Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,196,473 members, 7,961,467 topics. Date: Sunday, 29 September 2024 at 06:20 AM

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (347) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1026168 Views)

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President Trump / Photos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian. / @elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) ... (344) (345) (346) (347) (348) (349) (350) ... (668) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kabe1: 8:21am On Feb 22, 2018
tdayof:


His question wasn't dumb. They have SU-35, SU-33, SU-30,SU-27, SU-24, SU-25 ETC deployed there so of what use is their latest fighter over there if not for something more political than militarily?

Combat testing and evaluation of aircraft systems in a real life combat environment.

How dumb could you people be?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 8:38am On Feb 22, 2018
kabe1:

Combat testing and evaluation of aircraft systems in a real life combat environment.

How dumb could you people be?

You're the dumb one here. Quick to dish out insult without using the little sense left with you.

Is combat testing and evaluation of onboard systems only tested in real life combat environment? You want to drop bombs right? You can drop them anywhere. The bomb doesn't give a damn if it's ISIS or a plain ground as long as target is met.
The Chinese J-20 has been in service. Was it deployed to fight ISIS?


Who do you think you are on this thread? Even if anyone makes a foolish assumption, if you can't correct with the little sense you're left with, it's not hard you keep quiet.

7 Likes

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by upko1: 8:47am On Feb 22, 2018
tdayof:


You're the dumb one here. Quick to dish out insult without using the little sense left with you.

Is combat testing and evaluation of onboard systems only tested in real life combat environment? You want to drop bombs right? You can drop them anywhere. The bomb doesn't give a damn if it's ISIS or a plain ground as long as target is met.
The Chinese J-20 has been in service. Was it deployed to fight ISIS?


Who do you think you are on this thread? Even if anyone makes a foolish assumption, if you can't correct with the little sense you're left with, it's not hard you keep quiet.
Barman give am 1crate of coooold Heineken grin

2 Likes

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kabe1: 9:11am On Feb 22, 2018
tdayof:


You're the dumb one here. Quick to dish out insult without using the little sense left with you.

Is combat testing and evaluation of onboard systems only tested in real life combat environment? You want to drop bombs right? You can drop them anywhere. The bomb doesn't give a damn if it's ISIS or a plain ground as long as target is met.
The Chinese J-20 has been in service. Was it deployed to fight ISIS?


Who do you think you are on this thread? Even if anyone makes a foolish assumption, if you can't correct with the little sense you're left with, it's not hard you keep quiet.
You are hopeless idiotic, problem is, you don't know it.

Now, read that link dummy!

https://mobile.twitter.com/CombatAir/status/966544957581545472
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 9:14am On Feb 22, 2018
kabe1:

You are hopeless idiotic, problem is, you don't know it.

Now, read that link dummy!

https://mobile.twitter.com/CombatAir/status/966544957581545472


and how is this voided the fact that whatever testing being made in a combat area can be simulated in a real life situations.

You're a dufus.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kabe1: 9:14am On Feb 22, 2018
tdayof:



and how is this voided the fact that whatever testing being made in a combat area can be simulated in a real life situations.

You're a dufus.
Ignorance is bliss. Continue to wallow in it.

Faced with irrefutable evidence, you resort to mumbling like a buffoon.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:21am On Feb 22, 2018
nemesis4u:
Sara production version will sport winglets

For a second there, thought you were talking about the Denel SARA; one of the more stupid in a litany of bizarre decisions recently.

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:12am On Feb 22, 2018
tdayof:


I'm sure the Chinese are willing to spend much money. Why are they not invited grin

That's the million dollar question.

Guess after that the Russians will be expendable in the fighter market wink
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:14am On Feb 22, 2018
Frumentum:


For a second there, thought you were talking about the Denel SARA; one of the more stupid in a litany of bizarre decisions recently.

Damn shame , looks good and am sure it has the potential to enter markets in Africa and beyond

Budget cuts ?

Name is saras , I missed a s grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by newafricaken254: 12:23pm On Feb 22, 2018
tdayof:


Escort duties for younger aircrafts. Especially when they want to trespass lol. They've been doing so with the SU-35.
considering the increasing tension between assad forces and turkey over afrin,then the recent tension between russia and US.russia wants to flex its muscles
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 1:20pm On Feb 22, 2018
Frumentum:


For a second there, thought you were talking about the Denel SARA; one of the more stupid in a litany of bizarre decisions recently.

It has potential. Commercial aircraft market is readily available. I'm only concerned about the design as it looks like something for an executive purpose/personal use. If it's something like the Fokker 50/ dash 8 that accomodate large amount of passengers, airliners will find it as a very good choice here in Africa.

Could also serve as something good for the military. The issue about military procurements is that it isn't stable.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 1:22pm On Feb 22, 2018
Rustom 2 successfully completed 10 design validations flights from ATR. It is almost in the process of reaching highest altitude range as well as endurance. Work is also in progress to enhance the capacity of its engine to enhance its payload capacity.

2 Likes

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 1:27pm On Feb 22, 2018
newafricaken254:
considering the increasing tension between assad forces and turkey over afrin,then the recent tension between russia and US.russia wants to flex its muscles
Exactly. It's more than just testing aircraft capabilities and performance.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 1:28pm On Feb 22, 2018
Frumentum:


For a second there, thought you were talking about the Denel SARA; one of the more stupid in a litany of bizarre decisions recently.

Any picture from a different angle?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by newafricaken254: 2:12pm On Feb 22, 2018
China Z-20 helicopter

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:50pm On Feb 22, 2018
newafricaken254:
China Z-20 helicopter

Lolzz isn't that the Blackhawk

Blackhawk down grin

Can't imagine the chagrin of the Americans, actually they deserve it, they played their hand too much inorder to counter USSR and now have their asses on fire grin

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:52pm On Feb 22, 2018
Kestrel inching close to production, but army don't have any specific requirements for wheeled APC except for un duties

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by newafricaken254: 3:36pm On Feb 22, 2018
nemesis4u:


Lolzz isn't that the Blackhawk

Blackhawk down grin

Can't imagine the chagrin of the Americans, actually they deserve it, they played their hand too much inorder to counter USSR and now have their asses on fire grin
the future is tiltrotor

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:40pm On Feb 22, 2018
newafricaken254:
the future is tiltrotor

Future is the ability to convert imagination into reality. grin

2 Likes

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:42pm On Feb 22, 2018
It seems drdo has converted lakshya pilotless target drone into PGM carrying drone.
It must be for tech validation , otherwise not sure of its utility.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by newafricaken254: 6:19pm On Feb 22, 2018
KZ-11 solid launch vehicle 3rd-stage engine, diameter 2.2m, the shell is made of carbon fiber.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 7:03pm On Feb 22, 2018
newafricaken254:
China Z-20 helicopter

Bidexiii is there any application for this in Nigeria?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:14pm On Feb 22, 2018
It seems Akash mk1/S1 will be exported, it is in advance stages of negotiations.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:47pm On Feb 22, 2018
Endurance mode user trial of drdo Land-based Prototype (LBP) for Air Independent Propulsion (AIP) System for submarines for a period of 14 days was successfully completed at Naval Materials Research Laboratory (NMRL), Ambernath, on 2 December 2017.

The AIP, developed by Naval Materials Research Laboratory (NMRL) is a 250 kW Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cell (PAFC) based system, that allows up to 14 days of underwater endurance for a submarine running solely on power supplied by this system.

NMRL’s AIP system incorporates a set of innovations that make it a rather contemporary system. For one, NMRL’s AIP package has an onboard hydrogen generation plant, which produces hydrogen ‘in situ’ that too without any combusion, unlike many other AIP configurations where hydrogen for a mission has to be carried on board in tanks.

PAFC has much longer service life than any other commercially viable FC type and has much better tolerance to impurities in the reactants used even when compared to polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEMFC). But, PAFC operating temperatures are usually higher in comparison to PEMFC and overall power to weight ratio is lower.

The PAFC is designed such that series/parallel stacks can be used for power generation levels of up to 500 kw, this modularity of NMRL’s AIP solution enable it to be used in submarines other than the Scorpene as well. This also naturally increases the survivability of the system, since even if one of the modules fails, the control system for the PAFC stacks can reconfigure the remaining operational units to continue to supply power output, albeit at a reduced quantum.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by patches689: 7:18am On Feb 23, 2018
newafricaken254:
China Z-20 helicopter

They arent even pretending anymore... sad!

2 Likes

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:49am On Feb 23, 2018
Ola grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:50am On Feb 23, 2018
DRDO Mobile integrated network terminal

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:51am On Feb 23, 2018
DRDO 15m bridging system

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:53am On Feb 23, 2018
DRDO radio trunk system mk2

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:55am On Feb 23, 2018
Drdo integrated communications electronic warfare system

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:56am On Feb 23, 2018
DRDO Mobile integrated network terminal

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:57am On Feb 23, 2018
Rolta bms

(1) (2) (3) ... (344) (345) (346) (347) (348) (349) (350) ... (668) (Reply)

American Politics Thread - 2024 Elections — Biden’s Presidency! / Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . / Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa?

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 43
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.