olusola400:
how can u be comparing mane with hazard bro wise up than the difference is clear

chucs:
Will u keep kwuiet!!!!

hardbite:
Lool
It's obvious Eden is the best player in England because he's always the yardstick to measure success.

This was how man u fans compared him to depay, martial, rashford even lingard

Now it's sadio mane

Well, he'll keep performing consistently, and we all know how the players I mentioned above have fared

Mcking11:




Lol. Typical Nigerians. They don't argue with facts. Pouring emotions here and there. Show us analytically how hazard is better? Is that too much?

It is even more laughable to say Hazard is consistent where the season Leceister won league he scored ordinary 4 goals in the entire season.

You don't know what's consistent. LOL

MJBOLT:

the annoying thing is that they compare him to messi and ronaldo when he's not on neymar level

oluplus:
And where was your Neymar, when he was tearing Brazil apart in the world cup quarter final. Harzard was everywhere while Neymar faded to thin air. Hatred is not good for your B.P bro.

Mcking11:




Lol. Typical Nigerians. They don't argue with facts. Pouring emotions here and there. Show us analytically how hazard is better? Is that too much?

It is even more laughable to say Hazard is consistent where the season Leceister won league he scored ordinary 4 goals in the entire season.

You don't know what's consistent. LOL

Saintsquare:
this thread must not die abeg �

Mcking11:
Fortnightly, I pointed out that Sadio Mane had in past three seasons outperformed Eden Hazard of Chelsea but most people disagree with me. Because we come from a country where football facts and stats are presented with emotions, sentiment and over-flogged vitriols.

Hazard must have won trophies more than Sadio Mane but not better off in the field of play.

Whichever way, I still stand on the bedrock of stats which has proven that Senegalese Mane is better than Hazard for the past three seasons. In this setting, I have every right to conclude that Mane is better than Hazard in whatever happens on the pitch. This stems from the fact that the duo play the same position.


Let us use facts/stats as I always do to establish my assertion.
Since Mane came to Liverpool – that is since past three
seasons ( Excluding this current season)

GOALS/SHOTS:
Hazard made 101 appearances scoring 32 goals and shots of 184 and averaging a goal every 239 minutes.

Sadio Mane made 93 appearances scoring 34 goals and
shots of 213 and averaging a goal every 208 minutes
along the way.

Mane Leading Here.


BIG CHANCES CREATED:

Mane buries Hazard here too. Hazard had played 4,534 passes and Sadio total of 2,946. Even lesser? However, in
terms of creating BIG CHANCES, Liverpool’s man has
created 22 while Hazard 15.


To Read More: https://www.naijxclusive.com/sadio-mane-better-than-eden-hazard-stats/

Frankaka8:
Mane is better than Hazard. Both hav speed and skill... but Mane gets the nod cos he scores higher than Hazard... that mad skill of mane against Neymer is fatality. i just open mouth for seconds

airmark:


I hope you have closed your mouth now after two matches involving the two, within a week.

omar22:
Mane is a Striker
Hazard is a playmaker

I believe you know the difference?

iphanyi10:
it is very obvious the op is a very staunch Liverpool fan or a Chelsea hater.

cos' am still left bewildered and bemused at the basis for comparison.

one thing about stats is that they tend to tilt towards a team performing better, so if after a good season it's very likely you will have a good stats.

you cannot, i repeat Cannot in anyway compare mane with hazard, even jurgen klop will be livid and this absurdity.

if u hate a club say it, there is no crime in that but don't argue like someone who knows nothing about football.

I leave you with this question, you are asked to buy either of hazard or mane to your team who
will it be? be very sincere.