dragnet:


The $100 guy owns it, the seller simply sold to the highest bidder, if he had 3 different numbers for them then I believe he'd have sent the sms to the $100 number, and he said "as discussed", who discussed $100 ? the $100 guy !

dragnet:


The $100 guy owns it, the seller simply sold to the highest bidder, if he had 3 different numbers for them then I believe he'd have sent the sms to the $100 number, and he said "as discussed", who discussed $100 ? the $100 guy !

Idboyostic:
seller said has discussed after getting to lionlee but he replied the other guy and the 100$ guy wasn't the first who sent lionlee the link.....

Whoever sent the link first owns the deal....you should put this into consideration

dragnet:


"whoever sents the link owns it" can't apply in this case because pricing has broken the tie and the seller chose to sell to the highest bidder, are you telling me that if the seller agreed with another buyer for $500 and goes to deliver it to the $500, he'll accept $75 from lionlee or the $75 buyer would automatically increase to $500?

dragnet:


"whoever sents the link owns it" can't apply in this case because pricing has broken the tie and the seller chose to sell to the highest bidder, are you telling me that if the seller agreed with another buyer for $500 and goes to deliver it to the $500, he'll accept $75 from lionlee or the $75 buyer would automatically increase to $500?

Idboyostic:
All am saying is Lionlee owes the 1st set of clients a feedback before agreeing to the new bid.

He should have consulted them maybe they are willing to pay for the extra or not before anything.

Or you telling me lionlee doesn't owe them that?

sirlop:



Supported. The highest bidder got the attention of the seller. So, he owns it. Price here is the primary factor that made the deal possible. Considering whoever that sent link first is pure injustice. The $100 sealed the deal

Idboyostic:
All am saying is Lionlee owes the 1st set of clients a feedback before agreeing to the new bid.

He should have consulted them maybe they are willing to pay for the extra or not before anything.

Or you telling me lionlee doesn't owe them that?

And your 75$ to 500$ analysis is not just it....do you know the financial strength of the other clients?

You can't jump into conclusion that they won't be able to pay the 500$......you can only determine that when you reach out to them

Idboyostic:
All am saying is Lionlee owes the 1st set of clients a feedback before agreeing to the new bid.

He should have consulted them maybe they are willing to pay for the extra or not before anything.

Or you telling me lionlee doesn't owe them that?

And your 75$ to 500$ analysis is not just it....do you know the financial strength of the other clients?

You can't jump into conclusion that they won't be able to pay the 500$......you can only determine that when you reach out to them

dragnet:


it would be hard to apply that, if they all just placed orders with different prices, then it would've been binding on lionlee to go for the first person that supplied the link but in this case, it was the seller that made the move and broke the tie with these "I am on my way to deliver the laptop for $100 as discussed", which implies that he had decided to deal with the $100 especially since they're assumed to be separate individuals.

dragnet:


"I am on my way to deliver the laptop for $100 as discussed",

dragnet:


"I am on my way to deliver the laptop for $100 as discussed",

Idboyostic:
I just weak with your analysis Bro.....

So, whoever sent the link first does not have a say? Did lionlee reach out to the person? Was it the 100$ guy messages that was replied.

So, you saying lionlee doesn't owe you any explanation because someone out bidder you.

I just weak bro

sirlop:


Sending a link first is not a guarantee u own the deal. This is an open platform for crying out loud. Seller chooses to sell to the highest bidder. In this case, the $100 guy got the attention of the seller. So he owns the deal

Idboyostic:
this is not the true context.....go read it and come back to tell me what you just wrote.

It says seller replied Rackiticbarca sms saying on my way to deliver the laptop as discussed for 100$ not what you wrote up there

dragnet:

lionlee doesn't really, it is the seller that's meant to inform the buyers that have made lower offers, so if they can increase their bid, he can sell to them.

Idboyostic:
you saw the bolded text.....that is where I need you to hit on

dragnet:

as discussed for $100,
Now answer, who and who discussed $100 ?

dragnet:

your bolded is wrong, I copied out the sentence from lionlee's post, do a check.

frinx:


Free 5 IMEI check.
***1 per person.

Offer ends 12 midnight.

lionlee216:
Frinx gave me a deal of laptop, after which Rakiticbarca also sent me the same deal but with a different phone number but i didn't know it is the same laptop due to different numbers.. both were letgo

Now, A guy I am sharing my offerup account with also chatted with this seller on offerup and concluded on the laptop price for $100.. So the Seller now replied Rakiticbarca's sms saying I am on my way to deliver the laptop for $100 as discussed. Rakiticbarca negotiated $80 while frinx negotiated $70/$75.

So I got the laptop for $100 excluding pickup and shipping..

Abeg who is the rightful owner of the laptop??

lionlee216:
Frinx gave me a deal of laptop, after which Rakiticbarca also sent me the same deal but with a different phone number but i didn't know it is the same laptop due to different numbers.. both were letgo

Now, A guy I am sharing my offerup account with also chatted with this seller on offerup and concluded on the laptop price for $100.. So the Seller now replied Rakiticbarca's sms saying I am on my way to deliver the laptop for $100 as discussed. Rakiticbarca negotiated $80 while frinx negotiated $70/$75.

So I got the laptop for $100 excluding pickup and shipping..

Abeg who is the rightful owner of the laptop??

lionlee216:


It seems you are not getting me.

The Seller didn't respond to them both(frinx and Rackiticbarca offers. both negotiation were done on letgo) but he responded after the guy has chatted him up on offerup and negotiated $100 with him and said he will start coming. the moment he heard "95th and Ashland", He assumed he was talking to the same person and he now texted saying "I am on my way based on the $100 we discussed"


If 100$ wasnt discussed, he wouldnt have responded to my SMS. when he arrived, he said I hope You have the 100$ with you

Also he was making updates on offerup saying "i will be there" "I'm 19 mins away" etc

That was what happened..

dragnet:


Idboyostic, read the bold.

frinx:

Free 5 IMEI check. ***1 per person.
Offer ends 12 midnight.

Idboyostic:


@dragnet, read the first statement.....na wetn you first write for station na em go hold oo....not edited copy

dragnet:

check the IMEI of ur iPhone and post result here, that's my request.

dragnet:

check the IMEI of ur iPhone and post result here, that's my request.