morpheus24:


So in other words, you don't know where to reference me to.

Amujale:


These are good questions that you find the answer to by studying Anthropology, Palentology, Biology, Morphology, Anatomical and Genetics sciences.

Its from the combination of the studies in these disciplines that help historians to identify with their timeline that outlines these same major world events.

Amujale:


We've had that discussion already follow the link here:


Cheers!



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mk9IqMz6IDs

Amujale:


Honestly you are loosing the plot, going to end our conversation here.

If you want the answer to your questions my advice is to study

Go and study a degree level in any of the disciplines i sighted earlier and get back to me with your findings.



More importantly, study World History according to African historians and academics.

morpheus24:


I asked you to simply direct me to what article dates human beings to 50 millon years ago and how did they come about that date.

morpheus24:


1. 55,000 time line for the emergence of Europeans/White Skin. This is confirmed by "European science" and is based off genetic studies of how old the gene that triggers skin pigmentation "SLC24A5" was dispersed and activated more so in Europe and Asia.

https://bigthink.com/philip-perry/the-genes-for-white-skin-didnt-develop-in-europe-upenn-study-finds

"Researchers collected genetic material from 1,570 Africans. They studied their genomes, examining 4 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in all. These are areas along the genome where a gene has been altered. From there, they identified the four key areas responsible for the variation in skin pigmentation. What surprised researchers most was that the gene SLC24A5—responsible for light skin, thought to have developed in Europe, is actually very common in Africa."

2. First black man 150,000 years ago. Also confirmed by "European science". Homo sapien sapien's emergence dated back to this time. Prior that the rest of the theory names other types of species of Humans that populated the earth. There is no confirmation that these other species of Humans were black and they all died out therefore all humans today are of one stock not multiple stocks of humans or hominids


3.Albino gene- The Albino gene is not triggered by the same gene that gives color pigmentation to humans. It is a lack thereof of Melanin, therefore it is not responsible for the color pigmentation in White people. "Melanin is an organic pigment that produces most of the colour seen in mammals. Depending on how it is created, melanin comes in two colour ranges, eumelanin (producing dark browns and blacks) and pheomelanin (producing light reddish tans and blondes)". Therefore White people have melanin but a different form of it


4. African contributions to science via and Egypt_ This is not in contention and studies on Khemetic science, the metu neter exposes how many egyptian elements are present in modern day history and knowledge
Isis or Asat and horus- Mary Jesus connection.

5. The oldest fossil found in Africa is not a Homo Sapien/black person or the first black person. She is an australopithecus, A type of archaic human that existed in Africa. Again Lucy was not a Homo Sapien, she does not share any genetic material that is common to all humans today any more so than a monkey sharing genetics with Humans today.


I did not hear anything about 50 million years for black people being around. All this guy is talking about is outdated. Please update your studies. These videos were made quite a long time ago and more information is actually present today that debunks and clarifies a lot of what he talks about.

This is no more than an afrocentric tilt to scientific information that was established in the 1990's.

I am about to watch the second video and critic it. if you wish to debate me please pick a specific subject matter from the video and we can go into detailed information.

morpheus24:


So you are assuming that I don't have rudimentary knowledge on each of the disciplines you listed.
.

morpheus24:


So you are assuming that I don't have rudimentary knowledge on each of the disciplines you.

Amujale:


And i direct you to go and check our previous discussion, there you will find sources of learned academics and historians i acredit to these historical facts e.g Cheikh Anta Diop, Ivan Van Sertima, Dr Ray Haggins, Paul Barton e.t.c

Assuming you are searching for more Eurocentric sources, then i cannot help you.

Good luck with your Eurocentric viewpoint on World History but i do NOT prescribe to that.

Cheers

Amujale:


That is due to the fact that you possesd a Eurocentric view of World History that is itself anti-African.

I put it to you that your viewpoint on Afican History is Eurocentric, warped and unfit for African purpose.

Theres no amount evidence one would provide your kind of warped anti-African mentality that could wash all the toxins to allow for common sense.

I leave you to wallow in your ignorance.

Amujale:


Obviously you do NOT.

Assuming you possess the knowledge that you claim, then you would be aware of the jargons and the timeline of the true chronology of the Ages used in the determination of World History.

Since you dont even know that according to your own Eurocentric ideology humans have been around for over 50 million years.

You are poorly read on World History.

Amujale:


According to the Paleoclimatic history of our world, the "Out of Africa" experience occurs during the period denoting the Wurum Inter-Stadio. It was said that the Phenoms got caught up in an Ice box.

They live within the ever so hospitable ice; an enviroment dominated by Icy conditions for over a milenia.

Once the Ice Age passed, many Africans turned into white Europeans and Asians (there are a combination of conditions that allows for such to happen); whilst a few retained their complextions throughout the entire period. Those that retained their African features are known to us as the 1%.

50% of World History occurs exclusively within the African continent.

No sensible academic anywhere in the world can deny the fact that every human on earth came as a result of Africa.

Every ethnic group present in the world today are as a result of Africans and their rich history.

African people are the first people God created, and through them came all other ethnicities

These are substantiated with Anthropolpgy, Archeaology, Geology and World history; they all corroborate with the "Out Of Africa" phenomenon that occured thousands upon thousands of years ago.

Theres so much now known about African history than ever before, thanks to the enthusiasm of great African historians, scholars and academics.

We know the specific periods when every ethnic group moved out of Africa. For instance, by using low-tech scientific apparatus are able to determine when the current stock of Asians and Australasians left the continent and their state of mind at the time.

Amujale:

[s]According to the Paleoclimatic history of our world, the "Out of Africa" experience occurs during the period denoting the Wurum Inter-Stadio. It was said that the Phenoms got caught up in an Ice box.[/s]

Amujale:


[s]Once the Ice Age passed, many Africans turned into white Europeans and Asians (there are a combination of conditions that allows for such to happen); whilst a few retained their complextions throughout the entire period. Those that retained their African features are known to us as the 1%.[/s]

Amujale:


No sensible academic anywhere in the world can deny the fact that every human on earth came as a result of Africa.

Amujale:


[s]Every ethnic group present in the world today are as a result of Africans and their rich history[/s]

morpheus24:


Complete gibberish with no contextualization.

Anthropological studies and archaelogical studies "European mans" science all mention this.



No context, just gibberish again. Explain to us the process of their transformation from African to European?


This is not in denial, however an African who left Africa and became something else Andaman islander, Fijian, Eskimo, Ainu, European, Asian is no longer an African.

Phenotype is not Genotype.
Every human on this earth today are a result of the Homo Sapien sapien species who left Africa and those that stayed in Africa as well.

All these groups of people both outside and inside of Africa all experienced multiple adaptations and mutations. They changed both phenotypically and genotypically as well . Therefore we are all progenitors of these Homo sapiens. Everyone is Africa. duh!

Amujale:


You are a complete dunce. The third time you will bring your warped underdtanding to the forum, you are a dunce, scrounger of other peoples concepts.

You are a disgrace to all the senses.

In the course of our discussions you have shown to be untrustorthy and unreliable.

Amujale:
Answer me these questions morpheus24

Can you read properly?

Can you understand what you read properly?


What is it that you assume i am trying to articulate in my post?

Amujale:

[flash=250,250]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMg-79AzbI4[/flash]

Amujale:
Answer me these questions morpheus24

Can you read properly?

Can you understand what you read properly?


What is it that you assume i am trying to articulate in my post?

morpheus24:


Maybe you can't understand it but if you need clarification we can delve deeper into it.

All your posts are claiming Eurocentrism but at the same time using science in the same manner as those you accuse, skewing data and scientific information to bolster a certain narrative. Data is Data and must be viewed as objectively as possible so we get the truth of matters.

Anything else is Scientific heresy be it Eurocentrism or Afrocentrism.

Amujale:
According to Louis Farakhan and W.E.B Duboi, the quickest way to make all ends meet, is to encourage and strengthen bonds of solidarity between all Africans worldwide.

Africa first.

Africa first.

Lets all continue to put Africa at the forefront of our thinking, Africa is our cup of tea.

Amujale:
According to Genetics studies, the earliest fossils appear in Africa during the Paleocene geological epoch over 50 millon years ago.

Amujale:
I dont have time for fakers as morpheus24.
You are such a sorry case.
You really are morpheus24

Amujale:
Most of the things i talk against on the forum is engulf in you morpheus24.

You are untrustworthy, you lie, you steal and and you cheat.

Thus to expose you completely and tterly for the bogus personality that you are.


Everything that i am strongly against is manifest morpheus24.

Why?

morpheus25 lies point blank and cannot read properly.

All my post have sources insert. If it isnt a book and the sources, then it would ptobably be a video with the sources clearly visible to the reader.

I hardly use Eurocentric sources, although i have been knowm to quote Martin Bernal as most of his writings are seen as pro African literature.

And yet, he keeps asking for sources, you are the worst typr of student anyone could ever have.

An ingrate and a faker that would like to take the credit for the next guys efforts.

Amujale:

morpheus24 steals

You steal other peoples ideas and arguments and try to use to scam your way around the forum.

You have used my own material a few times already.

Not cool.

It isnt your fault though


I gave you my audience, you can jog along and go and spam another thread. Take what you jave learnt and use it wisely.


And you morpheaus24 are a cheat.

In the same way that you steal other peoples ideas snd concepts, you write as if they are your own, no reference to the original posters.

Amujale:
Both Louis Farakhan and W.E.B Duboi are pan Africanist.

During those days in the U.S Louis Farakhan is a breathe of fresh ideas and exceptionalism. I am not interested in his message about Islam, however their main message is of African progressiveness.

Africa first by all means neccessary.

morpheus24:


I am Pan Africanist myself but I will never compromise the "truth" so I can pursue an agenda. It makes me no different from my opponents.

This is true progress.