morpheus24:

Cheik deals with Egyptology at best and his arguments centered on the existenc of

morpheus24:

After Diops time, further genetic testing was done on many pharaonic mummies and they cluster with Africans on a PN2 clad, meaning they did have African ancestry with E3b1b being the most consistent Ydna haplogroup consistent North Africans, Ethiopians, Somali and Nile valley peoples but also had many West Asian DNA ancestry as well

morpheus24:
He argued that most of the Egyptian Pharoahs were black African and Melanin tests on some of the mummified Pharoahs proved this

morpheus24:

"ancestors" of all people presently populating the entire world today "originate" in Africa.

[s]This is different from saying Caribs came from Africa if you want to use simple deductive reasoning. [/s]

Amujale:


You are utterly and completely wrong, your fried brain is getting the better of you.

Cheikh Anta Diop wasn’t merely an Anthropologist, he held distinctions in multiple disciplines.

History never runs out of date, the reason it’s called history in the first place.

Amujale:


Tell us what your arguments are, quote your sources and their authors and let’s take it from there.

Amujale:

Since you have no argument but gibberish from being brain washed, you and your type go around attaching pan Africanist with Eurocentric views that have been found to be false and vile with regards to African History.

morpheus24:


[s]Please answer my other question O!, this running around ithe subject is exposing you as a nuisance.

Cheikh Anta Diops's contribution to this matter as you psoted is within the field of Anthropology i.e. the study of the origins of man.

He is not a scientist O

He makes no commentary of genetics o!


If you are looking for a black scientist that comments on these matters Keita who is an expat is who you should refer to .
[/s]

Amujale:


If you don’t understand my research then STFU instead of making yourself look the more stupid.

All your analysis of the above academics are completely and utterly wrong.

It isn’t hard to research.

But as all brain washed Eurocentric’s, they cannot research on African historians because your brain has been fried.

Maybe if you make the effort to read and study his works instead of peddling Eurocentric views that are false and vile.

Amujale:


That isn’t uncommon, since the Nile Valley ,West Asian and Europe civilisations have been in direct communication since around 800 B.C.E.

Amujale:

Moreover, DNA isn’t meant as the “be all and end all”. Eurocentric’s and other non
-African scientist use it to further their delusions, similar to the ones that you peddle.

Amujale:


The only academics that use DNA testing to further the African narrative are African academics and pro-African scholars and academics.

Amujale:

In the early 2000’s i wrote a whole thesis on DNA studies and how it can be used to “con” the general public. Years later, numerous sites pop out of the wood work, you only need to check the situation with sites similar to “ancestry.com”, these are mere guess works, nothing scientific about their methods.

morpheus24:


He is not a scientist O

He makes no commentary of genetics o!

Amujale:
If you don’t understand my research then STFU instead of making yourself look the more stupid.

All your analysis of the above academics are completely and utterly wrong.

It isn’t hard to research.

Amujale:


That isn’t uncommon, since the Nile Valley ,West Asian and Europe civilisations have been in direct communication since around 800 B.C.E.

Moreover, DNA isn’t meant as the “be all and end all”. Eurocentric’s and other non
-African scientist use it to further their delusions, similar to the ones that you peddle.

The only academics that use DNA testing to further the African narrative are African academics and pro-African scholars and academics.

In the early 2000’s i wrote a whole thesis on DNA studies and how it can be used to “con” the general public. Years later, numerous sites pop out of the wood work, you only need to check the situation with sites similar to “ancestry.com”, these are mere guess works, nothing scientific about their methods.

Amujale:


Stop quoting me, our discussion is a waste of time.

Amujale:

You claim Diop isn’t a scientist and makes no mention of genetics.

You are wrong as usual.

Amujale:

Go away, I don’t have time for liars and fakers
To ba fe ki Lakaye fi eje re we, then you will continue to quote me unnecessarily.

Oponu Ayirada

Se emi ni mo mo ba you ni?

You have shown to us all that you are a total waste of time, a disgrace to all the senses.

Amujale:


Tell us what your arguments are, quote your sources and their authors..

Amujale:

In the early 2000’s i wrote a whole thesis on DNA studies and how it can be used to “con” the general public. Years later, numerous sites pop out of the wood work, you only need to check the situation with sites similar to “ancestry.com”, these are mere guess works, nothing scientific about their methods.

Amujale:


All black people are easily associated with Africa. In antiquity, all black people are African and are the only humans present in the world at the time.

The oldest human fossil is found in Africa, the oldest complete human fossils found outside Africa are that of a black Africans.

It’s simple logic that evades Eurocentrics.

“All Nigerian people are intelligent.

Olu is a Nigerian.

Therefore, to everyone else other than Eurocentric and their sympathisers, applying simple logic Olu is an intelligent person.”

Exploring the analysis of reputable African historians, academics and scholars, one is bound to reach similar conclusions.

Eurocentric’s view on African history is wrong, I can fully assure everyone reading these text that African historians are accurate in their determinations of our own history.

Amujale:
DNA isn’t an absolute science as such can be used to further a biased view on African history.

Amujale:

Genetical science, or DNA studies to be specific isn’t the “be all and end all”; and certainly cannot be used exclusively to determine history.

To determine World history, academics use a multiple of disciplines including the sciences.

Amujale:

In my post here, I have been able to prove beyond doubt that the Eurocentric view on African history is false and vile.

Amujale:

The only true African history is the ones determined by African(s) by default all other versions are false and invalid.

mysticwarrior:
Isn't it time you guys end this your prolonged war?
Everybody has left this tread for you guys, pls it is time for truce.

Amujale:

In the early 2000’s i wrote a whole thesis on DNA studies and how it can be used to “con” the general public. Years later, numerous sites pop out of the wood work, you only need to check the situation with sites similar to “ancestry.com”, these are mere guess works, nothing scientific about their methods.

Amujale:


All black people are easily associated with Africa. In antiquity, all black people are African and are the only humans present in the world at the time.

The oldest human fossil is found in Africa, the oldest complete human fossils found outside Africa are that of a black Africans.

It’s simple logic that evades Eurocentrics.

“All Nigerian people are intelligent.

Olu is a Nigerian.

Therefore, to everyone else other than Eurocentric and their sympathisers, applying simple logic Olu is an intelligent person.”

Exploring the analysis of reputable African historians, academics and scholars, one is bound to reach similar conclusions.

Eurocentric’s view on African history is wrong, I can fully assure everyone reading these text that African historians are accurate in their determinations of our own history.

Amujale:


Tell us what your arguments are, quote your sources and their authors..

morpheus24:



Point to any measurable phenomena that can be quoted to true absolute terms however 99.99999999% fact is a good enough measure for anything.


[s]All disciplines are put together to reconstruct history however there are certain disciplines that are "MORE ACCURATE" that others. Anthropology can hypothesize that a certain people lived in a certain area at a given period of time. Carbon dating/archealogy determines more definitively an estimate of the time frame they lived there. Genetic evidence gives a better definitive answer of who actually lived there. [/s]

morpheus24:

YouTube videos all day.
What is the proof you have provided, YouTube videos

morpheus24:

That's like saying if a Yoruba man claims that his version of Okro soup is the best tasting in the entire world and an Igbo man eats it and says no then the Igbo man is utterly and completely false in his assertion.

Amujale:


And finally you have shown to me and everyone else
that you are a dunce, liar, faker and bigot.

How has ethnicity got involved now.

mysticwarrior:
Isn't it time you guys end this your prolonged war?
Everybody has left this tread for you guys, pls it is time for truce.

Amujale:


I think morpheus24 is a braind dead trouble maker that cannot realise when he is wrong.

Check out his response.


Its evident that he has no argument, no sense, is avbigot that cannot read nor understand written text properly, has been proven to be partialy blind and is completely and utterly deaf.

Amujale:


Ask the dunce called morpheus24 to post his argument and relevant authors and their sources.

morpheus24:


It is evident that you cannot rebut any argument

Amujale:

You have no argument.

Disagreeing with pan Africanist isnt a real argument.

Show us your arguments, quote your sources and authors.