yungmin:


4 hazards related to what or where?

Related to work place sir.....

Uncle

U forgot spiritual hazard too

simplebb:


The right answer should be Physical, Chemical, Biological and Ergonomic Hazards. That's the four types of workplace hazards.... You only made mention of examples under this types.

It can equally be 5 if one factor Psychological hazard into it.

Click on this link for further read

https://www.occupationalhc.com/2016/06/workplace-hazards-4-common-types/

sexiestharam:
Hello everyone. Please I am asking for my brother who got 20k alert for lagos about a week ago. Please does alert mean they will be shortlisted? Because that's what I am seeing on the thread. Please clarify for me.

No one knows if those who received TF alert will be shortlisted or not. In the interest of your brother, don't inform him about this thread if you are not sure he can handle the pressure from the hypothesis generated here on a daily basis. While he awaits his APL you can continue to look out for the date people here will get theirs to make your confirmation. Trust me, it will be easier on him that way.

Honestly, if you are not on this thread, you are wrong. A house full of all spices!!
I really wish we all could make it to the tower.
Let's keep hope alive.
Let no one give you "BP"
Even if you have a link, pray and "dey your dey"
And if your only link is God, hold unto Him firmly.
Hold unto whatever you believe, lest you are shaken with " a big bang thoery".
On the last note, i would suggest you should keep your "info" to yourself if you are not ready to give the full detail of it or a proof of evidence beyond any reasonable doubt. Let us stop raising dusts unnecessarily.
[color=#006600][/color]

Cheers.

simplebb:


Related to work place sir.....

Hazards are broad! Even the hazards in construction sites are quite different depending on the activities. So, workplaces are different and the inherent hazards are different as well.

Gbyms:
If you are a seconded, will you be paid by Nnpc and Nlng together?

And NYSC join

pflourish:


No who knows if those who received TF alert will be shortlisted or not. In the interest of your brother, don't inform him about this thread if you are not sure he can handle the pressure from the hypothesis generated here on a daily basis. while he awaits his APL you can continue to look out for the date people here will get theirs to make your confirmation. Trust me, it will be easier on him that way.

Thank you.

How many people joined the alertees today?

Just checking sth

simplebb:


Related to work place sir.....

bros no forget my question o

I saw these recently, hence my confusion.

Truth is that it crossed my mind to say Chemical and Biological Hazards. But I guess those were Categories of Hazards.


If you search 'types of hazards', you'll see fire, cuts, burns etc ... listed.

I wasn't going for an HSE position.

yungmin:


4 hazards related to what or where?

Beeam:
Since this guy got alert last week, his blood has been hot ni sha!

B4 that, he was so much fun on here oh... Dropping hints that supported No APL for alertees...

Now, baba no just get joy again..... Inside life

I saw these recently, hence my confusion.

Truth is that it crossed my mind to say Chemical and Biological Hazards. But I guess those were Categories of Hazards.


If you search 'types of hazards', you'll see fire, cuts, burns etc ... listed.

I wasn't going for an HSE position.

Are you saying I scored zero for that question?

yungmin:


4 hazards related to what or where?

simplebb:


The right answer should be Physical, Chemical, Biological and Ergonomic Hazards. That's the four types of workplace hazards.... You only made mention of examples under this types.

It can equally be 5 if one factor Psychological hazard into it.

Click on this link for further read

https://www.occupationalhc.com/2016/06/workplace-hazards-4-common-types/

FLOW101:

I saw these recently, hence my confusion.

Truth is that it crossed my mind to say Chemical and Biological Hazards. But I guess those were Categories of Hazards.


If you search 'types of hazards', you'll see fire, cuts, burns etc ... listed.

I wasn't going for an HSE position.

Are you saying I scored zero for that question?

Bros why you dey lie if you want to argue pls do so with google.

Inception:


Nice one.

How would you have answered the use of Root Cause Analysis in the implementation of HSE?

A good question.

Root Cause Analysis (RCA) refers to the process by which the key underlying cause of an unwanted event (accident, incident) is identified, this is quite different from the immediate cause. RCA have the potential to prevent recurrence of an hazard as it tackles the hazard at its main source. This is indeed the main reason for implementing a Root Cause Analysis to look beyond the surface cause (can be management approach to overall safety in the organization, lack of quality HSE education, no/poor enforcement of HSE policies, workplace conditions not good enough etc.) Thus addressing the recommended actions from the RCA will help to eliminate recurrence of the specific failure and also other failures which had a common root as the one that occurred.

In practice, at times it is impossible to identify with 100 percent certainty, a single root cause of an event. In such circumstances, it is prudent to work with the most likely causes and mitigate the risk of recurrence by addressing all of the potential causes of the event.

Root cause Analysis would help implementation of HSE as it serves as a proactive, preventive and effective means to address an hazard from occurring again. Simply put, one has an idea of the root cause of an hazard and can put in place corrective plans to forestall such from future occurrences.

FLOW101:

I saw these recently, hence my confusion.

Truth is that it crossed my mind to say Chemical and Biological Hazards. But I guess those were Categories of Hazards.


If you search 'types of hazards', you'll see fire, cuts, burns etc ... listed.

I wasn't going for an HSE position.

Are you saying I scored zero for that question?

Hope they were not shaking their heads in approval of your response?

FLOW101:

I saw these recently, hence my confusion.

Truth is that it crossed my mind to say Chemical and Biological Hazards. But I guess those were Categories of Hazards.


If you search 'types of hazards', you'll see fire, cuts, burns etc ... listed.

I wasn't going for an HSE position.

Are you saying I scored zero for that question?

I want to believe that the panel would have corrected you if that's not what they expected you to say..


And bro, let's your interview performance be thing of the past and focus on receiving your APL. No one performed absolutely 100%, even some you think performed excellently well when narrating their experience only sounded like that because they are writing it, *they have time to think before writing*.....it wasn't that easy in the room.

Don't be sad because of one question, Just be hopeful and prayerful.. Good luck

No.

My panel was emotionless throughout. Calm and without emotions.

Inception:


Hope they were not shaking their heads in approval of your response?

Abdulaaleem:


I want to believe that the panel would have corrected you if that's not what they expected you to say..


And bro, let's your interview performance be thing of the past and focus on receiving your APL. No one performed absolutely 100%, even some you think performed excellently well when narrating their experience only sounded like that because they are writing it, *they have time to think before writing*.....it wasn't that easy in the room.

Don't be sad because of one question, Just be hopeful and prayerful.. Good luck

U have spoken well indeed. Whilst it's okay to find out if your responses to questions where adequate, try not to dwell on it.

yungmin:


Hazards are broad! Even the hazards in construction sites are quite different depending on the activities. So, workplaces are different and the inherent hazards are different as well.

That's quite true.

These broad examples have been classified into types which was highlighted up there. For example in construction sites, hazards most noticeable are physical hazards (slip, fall from heights etc.)...generally, one have physical, chemical, biological, ergonomic and psychological (this one comes in form of burnout, stress at work, low pay etc) . The type of workplace will determine the most prevalent of this type of hazard.

If one is to list four, just go with physical, chemical, ergonomic and biological....

simplebb:


A good question.

Root Cause Analysis (RCA) refers to the process by which the key underlying cause of an unwanted event (accident, incident) is identified, this is quite different from the immediate cause. RCA have the potential to prevent recurrence of an hazard as it tackles the hazard at its main source. This is indeed the main reason for implementing a Root Cause Analysis to look beyond the surface cause (can be management approach to overall safety in the organization, lack of quality HSE education, no/poor enforcement of HSE policies, workplace conditions not good enough etc.) Thus addressing the recommended actions from the RCA will help to eliminate recurrence of the specific failure and also other failures which had a common root as the one that occurred.

In practice, at times it is impossible to identify with 100 percent certainty, a single root cause of an event. In such circumstances, it is prudent to work with the most likely causes and mitigate the risk of recurrence by addressing all of the potential causes of the event.

Root cause Analysis would help implementation of HSE as it serves as a proactive, preventive and effective means to address an hazard from occurring again. Simply put, one has an idea of the root cause of an hazard and can put in place corrective plans to forestall such from future occurrences.

Thanks a lot for your response.

This question was put forward to me by the Chief panelist.

I sensed that it was a situational question, so i identified an incident (Lifting a prefabrication for a major project , in which there was a pad-eye failure:a near miss) which required an investigative team (myself included). The inquiry then investigated the incident by identifying all possible causes that would have lead to that event , in which these possible causes were eliminated one by one (due to the evidence available) until the 'root cause' of the padeye failure was identified: Improper/nonexistent NDT/NDE prior to the lifting operation. I also went further to say that what lead to it not being a fatality or a serious loss was due to the redundancy built into the lifting design (which was recommended by the investigative team in the event this happens again in the future) and the need to ensure that proper NDT was to be perforemed for future lifts ..




Of course this never happened, but men, i simply had to improvise in that split second....I have since been worried about this answer. How do you see it?

So AYAM Terhemba has remembered local men and women today again....
That's ok....

Seems you guys applied for HSE positions?

Inception:


Thanks a lot for your response.

This question was put forward to me by the Chief panelist.

I sensed that it was a situational question, so i identified an incident (Lifting a prefabrication for a major project , in which there was a pad-eye failure:a near miss) which required an investigative team (myself included). The inquiry then investigated the incident by identifying all possible causes that would have lead to that event , in which these possible causes were eliminated one by one (due to the evidence available) until the 'root cause' of the padeye failure was identified: Improper/nonexistent NDT/NDE prior to the lifting operation. I also went further to say that what lead to it not being a fatality or a serious loss was due to the redundancy built into the lifting design (which was recommended by the investigative team in the event this happens again in the future) and the need to ensure that proper NDT was to be perforemed for future lifts ..




Of course this never happened, but men, i simply had to improvise in that split second....I have since been worried about this answer. How do you see it?

tejiri4:



Bros why you dey lie if you want to argue pls do so with google.

Lie about what

FLOW101:

I saw these recently, hence my confusion.


Are you saying I scored zero for that question?

You can't score zero ,at least 7/10 for that your response.

Heard someone sent him a Linkedin message requesting not to be paid Tfare by him.....

Inception:


Thanks a lot for your response.

This question was put forward to me by the Chief panelist.

I sensed that it was a situational question, so i identified an incident (Lifting a prefabrication for a major project , in which there was a pad-eye failure:a near miss) which required an investigative team (myself included). The inquiry then investigated the incident by identifying all possible causes that would have lead to that event , in which these possible causes were eliminated one by one (due to the evidence available) until the 'root cause' of the padeye failure was identified: Improper/nonexistent NDT/NDE prior to the lifting operation. I also went further to say that what lead to it not being a fatality or a serious loss was due to the redundancy built into the lifting design (which was recommended by the investigative team in the event this happens again in the future) and the need to ensure that proper NDT was to be perforemed for future lifts ..



Las las, e go be that larride guy

Of course this never happened, but men, i simply had to improvise in that split second....I have since been worried about this answer. How do you see it?

Inception:


Thanks a lot for your response.

This question was put forward to me by the Chief panelist.

I sensed that it was a situational question, so i identified an incident (Lifting a prefabrication for a major project , in which there was a pad-eye failure:a near miss) which required an investigative team (myself included). The inquiry then investigated the incident by identifying all possible causes that would have lead to that event , in which these possible causes were eliminated one by one (due to the evidence available) until the 'root cause' of the padeye failure was identified: Improper/nonexistent NDT/NDE prior to the lifting operation. I also went further to say that what lead to it not being a fatality or a serious loss was due to the redundancy built into the lifting design (which was recommended by the investigative team in the event this happens again in the future) and the need to ensure that proper NDT was to be perforemed for future lifts ..




Of course this never happened, but men, i simply had to improvise in that split second....I have since been worried about this answer. How do you see it?

Make sense

Inception:


Thanks a lot for your response.

This question was put forward to me by the Chief panelist.

I sensed that it was a situational question, so i identified an incident (Lifting a prefabrication for a major project , in which there was a pad-eye failure:a near miss) which required an investigative team (myself included). The inquiry then investigated the incident by identifying all possible causes that would have lead to that event , in which these possible causes were eliminated one by one (due to the evidence available) until the 'root cause' of the padeye failure was identified: Improper/nonexistent NDT/NDE prior to the lifting operation. I also went further to say that what lead to it not being a fatality or a serious loss was due to the redundancy built into the lifting design (which was recommended by the investigative team in the event this happens again in the future) and the need to ensure that proper NDT was to be perforemed for future lifts ..




Of course this never happened, but men, i simply had to improvise in that split second....I have since been worried about this answer. How do you see it?

Local man couldn't see anything as it could av been formed here too....
Local man is only on lookout for APL
But you tried bro

So,

1. Tfare list is with finance, they are the ones processing payment. No real reason why payment is being done in batches. However, everyone ll get paid eventuarry.

2. Selection has been completed by HR and list is with the management board for approval.

3. August remains the timeline.

I didn't state anything different from what most people already know. I only called someone in corporate HR to confirm a thing or two...Good day Ladies and Gents.

FLOW101:
No.

My panel was emotionless throughout. Calm and without emotions.

Same as mine.. No joy

As a safety officer i don't think he is fully correct , slippery floor should be more appropriate, excessive noise, poor lighting , dust , poor ventilation etc... Hazard is simply anything or object that has the potential to cause harm.

MRtristan:



Yes, you got them right, may be you should have added one more.

FLOW101:
No.

My panel was emotionless throughout. Calm and without emotions.

Sorry, are you related to flowwolf09?

Gianluigizona:
So,

1. Tfare list is with finance, they are the ones processing payment. No real reason why payment is being done in batches. However, everyone ll get paid eventuarry.

2. Selection has been completed by HR and list is with the management board for approval.

3. August remains the timeline.

I didn't state anything different from what most people already know. I only called someone in corporate HR to confirm a thing or two...Good day Ladies and Gents.

They shouldn't prolong this process. Men are ready to answer the national call to serve this country.

It will end in praise.