tuniski:


When a simple straightforward procedure becomes cumbersome, something is amiss!

agabusta:


You obviously lack comprehension skills. Go back and read the link you provided.

The WAEC official stated that the exam was jointly conducted by WAEC and Cambridge.

He then specifically said he cannot talk about the document of Cambridge, as he is not an official of Cambridge but can talk about that of WAEC.

He then listed out the result obtained by the president from WAEC records. It seems your reading did not see this part right?

omhor:
No one is ever expecting the Supreme Court to pronounce Atiku winner but the point I believe they want to score has been achieved. I have been in that court all through and for the first time I see Barr Wole Olanipekun SAN closing his case prematurely.

It is not for any reason beyond the fact that the key witnesses they produce rather than helping the matter threw spanner in the works. The old man that came to testify on certificate said the army never collected their papers, the WAEC/, Cambridge man said the certificate our President is holding is not from them. Abba Kyari was the funniest of the three when he said he brought picture of the graduating set of the president and under cross examination the question was asked " is there a different between picture and certificate"?
He answered yes. The question was asked again ' can a picture stand in the place of certificate' he said no. Simply making useless of his submission.

The main point here is that Nigeria Judiciary is on trial not Buhari VS Atiku again. In fact the certificate issue more than INEC server issue. At the end of the day it was discovered that no certificate was attached to Buhari's INEC form, even no qualification in the CV tendered in court, yet this is defended tooth and nail by our elites, even journalists.

The wise ones after the revelation, has kept quiet because it is better to be silent than stand for what you can't tell your child tomorrow.

Wole Olanipekun (SAN) practically has nothing to say again. INEC that conducted election did not call any witness to confirm that the election it conducted was credible. APC did not call any witness to argue that the election it won was credible. Only Buhari called witnesses who did more damage than good to his case.
So the matter has been settled.

Like I said, It is the judiciary that is on trial, not any other person. In the end the matter will be judged based on technicality which will now be the apex court overruling itself when it had earlier said matter should be on merit and not technicalities.

This issue is not about Buhari and Atiku, it is about the fabric of the nation. It is about building a credible and reliable judicial system..But again this is Nigeria where what our mouth is saying is contrary to what our mind believes.

Tunji Olanipekun
A judicial correspondent

agabusta:



The person that signed, signed as the Vice Chancellor of the University of Cambridge.

Has the renowned university denied the document and the person that signed?

erico2k2:

Just wait, they will deny it very soon, there is such thing as FOI bill here i n the UK, I can even write to ask for it right about now!

erico2k2:

@ agabusta come and read what your mate wrote and learn a thing or two from it instead of being a blind BAT!

agabusta:


The write-up is balderdash. Senior lawyers dont engage in overkill, when the objectives of their defence has already been achieved, thats for upcoming lawyers.

Stop listening to hearsay and confirm information yourself. The WAEC man gave each grade on the result obtained by the president in court.

Atiku lawyers were only trying to play funny by asking him questions on the Cambridge copy of the result, which he rightly countered them, that he can only talk about the WAEC results because he represents WAEC.

Kindly note that both bodies collaborated on the exams as at then, and both have the results and are empowered to issue a statement of result.

agabusta:



Why are you people so uni-directional? Why are u only waiting for them to deny it without even considering that the document may actually be genuine?

Pls go ahead and make the request. We'll appreciate that.

Also, ensure you create a thread on the response you get.

I remember in 2015, people like u also made lots of noise that Hausa was not being offered as at 1961 that they will get in touch with Cambridge. After Cambridge confirmed, they went dumb and started picking on other points.

erico2k2:

keep defending the defenceless.we all know this certificate is fake, you refused also to acknowledge the names on it, you overlooked that bit too. where you blind to that too?? Its is glaringly clear to the man on the street that this is a cooked up certificate and a very poor job at doing it cos a dunce did it!

agabusta:


The write-up is balderdash. Senior lawyers dont engage in overkill, when the objectives of their defence has already been achieved, thats for upcoming lawyers.

Stop listening to hearsay and confirm information yourself. The WAEC man gave each grade on the result obtained by the president in court.

Atiku lawyers were only trying to play funny by asking him questions on the Cambridge copy of the result, which he rightly countered them, that he can only talk about the WAEC results because he represents WAEC.

Kindly note that both bodies collaborated on the exams as at then, and both have the results and are empowered to issue a statement of result.

NFFGG:
This is shameful. Pls let's read

Buhari Doesn’t Have Certificate And So What?

Lanre Adewole of Nigerian Tribune Wrote

By the president’s admission, listing none in his CV and not claiming any before the Tribunal vetting his re-election, it is now settled that Muhammadu Buhari, 21st century CEO of the largest black race, has no constituted (this thing again) authorisation to claim completion of any academic endeavour, though there are no doubts he ventured. With the dubious Nigerian justice system, those “glittering Cambridge assessments” his alter-ego and Chief of Staff, Abba Kyari, boasted of before the Abuja Tribunal, could end up being passed for the president as the constitutionally-required proof of being educated enough to lead the nation. Under Justice Zainab Bulkachuwa watch-ship of the Court of Appeal, serving as the Tribunal, anything goes. And where the appeal would go from Zainab’s court, technicalities, riding planes and grammatical faux pas, reign supreme. Who did we offend sef?

Read more https://tribuneonlineng.com/231615/

VULCAN:
Is this the certificate that Buhari hasn't been able to provide for 4 and a half years?

The one that made him go to court with 30 SANS

HarunaWest:

what is written there is Mohamed Buhari not Muhammadu Buhari....My dad is Agematez with Buhari, they schooled same time, his name is still intact no difference. This was the same thing that Evans ewerem was thrown out for...But you all won't see this cos ur blindfolded by loyalty to the president instead of loyalty to the nation.
Just remember that in future,you all will regret your actions today.

tuniski:


VC is only an office not a person! And the standard procedure is for the occupier of that office to write his/her name under the signature.
Reason being that different persons will be VC at different times.

The defense didn't bring anybody from cambridge to confirm or deny it. Aside that it is inconsistent with WAEC's version.

agabusta:


You work in Cambridge University for you to know their peculiar correspondence procedure right?

So after bringing a statement of result from an institution, you have to collect another letter from such institution confirming that the document emanates from them? Does that even make sense to you? The onus rest on the person disputing the document to prove.

So you are saying Buhari, President of Nigeria forged a letter from Cambridge University. According to you the University never wrote that letter right?

Which subjects are inconsistent with the WAEC version? Post both documents, let us see.

tuniski:


You think because it is cambridge their style will exclude VC's name on an official document he allegedly signed. And where do you think the format used in Nigeria and international standard emanated from, Daura?

There are 6 and 8 subjects. Stop dragging obvious inconsistencies. Those who know have gone silent.
If you tender a CTC from an institution duly signed and endorsed, and their is disputation, then the issuer will be required to confirm such.

Why do you think the Deputy registrar of WAEC was brought to testify? He was to confirmed both the WAEC and Cambridge documents but, seeing obvious discrepancies suddenly disown Cambridge's.

And don't ask me why he was to confirm Cambridge's.

agabusta:



You are no longer writing Cambridge? You have passed your judgment already?

Which one are u guys on sef? The statement of result is fake in its entirety and did not come from Cambridge?

Or the statement is an authentic result from Cambridge but there is contradiction in the name.

agabusta:


You work in Cambridge University for you to know their peculiar correspondence procedure right?

So after bringing a statement of result from an institution, you have to collect another letter from such institution confirming that the document emanates from them? Does that even make sense to you? The onus rest on the person disputing the document to prove.

So you are saying Buhari, President of Nigeria forged a letter from Cambridge University. According to you the University never wrote that letter right?

Which subjects are inconsistent with the WAEC version? Post both documents, let us see.

agabusta:



This is a legal matter. The WAEC official is right to state that he can only speak for WAEC and not Cambridge. Let the court subpoenaed Cambridge officials to speak for themselves.

The documents are pasted below for you. Which discrepancies are you talking about?

For your information, WAEC does not list subjects that are failed (F9) on their certificate. That is the reason he was registered for 8 subjects but the attestation is only showing 6. He got grade 9 in maths and one other subject according to the statement of result from the school broadsheet.

tuniski:

It is a legal matter and where exam was jointly conducted anyone of the party can confirm a document that emanated from their joint effort.

By the way, what you posted aint what is at the tribunal.

agabusta:


PLEASE show us what was at the tribunal.

"the necessity of proof lies with the person who lays charges."

tuniski:


Show the seal of exhibit on it as marked by the PEPT.

agabusta:


PLEASE show us what was at the tribunal.

"the necessity of proof lies with the person who lays charges."

Xda59:

Thanks a lot for this invaluable information.

erico2k2:

And in this reply you managed to miss the bit where one cert says he sat for 8 subjects and another said 6 subjects is this not an apisode of being a blind BAT
I follow the political sceene from here 24/7 and well informed thank you very much.

seunmsg:


Can you post the other certificate that showed that Buhari sat for 8 papers. I just want to check something.

seunmsg:


Can you post the other certificate that showed that Buhari sat for 8 papers? I just want to check something.

tuniski:

You guys are just hooked on apc propaganda. The result you are celebrating isn't what was submitted at the PEPT.


That submitted was 'CTC' by Abba kyari that showed 8 subjects as the raw data and was denied by WAEC deputy registrar.

erico2k2:

Bro no need to post cert, it clearly states that in the report, it was this discrepancy the WAEC witness noticed that he cut short his evidence re Cambridge certificate, He is not amongst the stupid politicians. He got a rep to protect! how can one person have two certs, one says diff nos of subjects and both bear diff names?

seunmsg:



Sometimes, I wonder if some of you actually wrote the same WAEC that some of us wrote. If you sit for 8 papers and score F9 in two subjects and P/D8 and above in the other 6 subjects, your certificate will reflect only six subject while your statement of result issued by your school and the WAEC master sheet would reflect the entire 8 subjects.

In the case of Buhari, it is very obvious the original certificate is lost. So, I don’t know the certificate you are talking about that showed 8 papers. WAEC issued an attestation of result to the president last year showing only 6 subjects. Cambridge also issued a certifying statement of result this year showing the same 6 subjects and same grades as shown in that of WAEC. So, where exactly is the discrepancy that you’re taking about? Please back up your claim by posting a copy of any Buhari certificate either from WAEC or Cambridge showing 8 subjects.

seunmsg:



Sometimes, I wonder if some of you actually wrote the same WAEC that some of us wrote. If you sit for 8 papers and score F9 in two subjects and P/D8 and above in the other 6 subjects, your certificate will reflect only six subject while your statement of result issued by your school and the WAEC master sheet would reflect the entire 8 subjects.

In the case of Buhari, it is very obvious the original certificate is lost. So, I don’t know the certificate you are talking about that showed 8 papers. WAEC issued an attestation of result to the president last year showing only 6 subjects. Cambridge also issued a certifying statement of result this year showing the same 6 subjects and same grades as shown in that of WAEC. So, where exactly is the discrepancy that you’re taking about? Please back up your claim by posting a copy of any Buhari certificate either from WAEC or Cambridge showing 8 subjects.

agabusta:



This is a legal matter. The WAEC official is right to state that he can only speak for WAEC and not Cambridge. Let the court subpoenaed Cambridge officials to speak for themselves.

The documents are pasted below for you. Which discrepancies are you talking about?

For your information, WAEC does not list subjects that are failed (F9) on their certificate. That is the reason he was registered for 8 subjects but the attestation is only showing 6. He got grade 9 in maths and one other subject according to the statement of result from the school broadsheet.