The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Bulleye(m): 6:22pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
On 4 June 1994, in one of many similar broadcasts on Radio-Te´le´vision Libre des Mille Collines (RTLM), Kantano Habimana called for 100,000 young men to be ‘‘recruited rapidly’’, who should all stand up so that we will kill the Inkotanyi and exterminate them … [T]he reason that we will exterminate them is that they belong to one ethnic group. Look at the person’s height and his physical appearance. Just look at his small nose and then break it.7 Incitement such as this spurred on the massacres which made up the Rwandan genocide of 1994. Its effectiveness is evidenced in the testimony of a former ge´nocidaire
In 1920, thirteen years before Hitler came to power in Germany, the so-called Protocols of the Elders of Zion was published in Germany for the first time, amidst a flurry of other anti-Semitic writings. They purportedly consisted of the minutes of a fabricated meeting of Jewish elders in Berne in 1897, and contained allegations of a Jewish conspiracy to rule the world and enslave Christians.1 Viciously anti-Semitic, by 1933 they had gone through thirty-three editions.
They kept saying Tutsis were cockroaches. Because they had given up on them we started working and killed them.
Inchoate crimes The word ‘‘inchoate’’ denotes something that has ‘‘just begun’’ or is ‘‘under- developed’’,9 ‘‘partially completed’’ or ‘‘imperfectly formed’’.10 Inchoate offences are thus incomplete offences, which are deemed to have been committed despite the fact that the substantive offence, that is, the offence whose commission they were aiming at, is not completed and the intended harm is not realized. Black’s Law Dictionary describes such an offence as ‘‘A step toward the commission of another crime, the step in itself being serious enough to merit punishment’’.11 In English common law there are three general inchoate offences: attempt, conspiracy and incitement (or solicitation in US law). All of them may incur criminal liability even though the crime they were intended to bring about does not materialize.12 In the case of incitement, the crime is completed despite the fact that the person incited fails to commit the act to which he or she has been incited
Incitement in international law Nuremberg: Streicher, Fritzsche Incitement to genocide first became a crime under international law when the International Military Tribunal (IMT) at Nuremberg passed judgment on the accused Julius Streicher and Hans Fritzsche in 1946. While the term ‘‘incitement to genocide’’ was not yet known as such and the accused were instead charged with crimes against humanity, this charge was based on acts which would today fall within the definition of incitement to genocide. Both Streicher and Fritzsche were furthermore charged with crimes against peace, and Fritzsche with war crimes. Julius Streicher was the founder and editor of the anti-Semitic weekly magazine Der Stu¨rmer, the aim of which, according to Streicher himself, was to ‘‘unite Germans and to awaken them against Jewish influence which might ruin our noble culture’’.24 In its judgment, the IMT described how in leading articles and letters, some of them written by Streicher himself, Jewish people were depicted as ‘‘a parasite, an enemy, and an evil-doer, a disseminator of diseases’’ or ‘‘swarms of locusts which must be exterminated completely’’.25 The Tribunal found that by means of such hate propaganda, Streicher ‘‘incited the German people to active persecution’’,26 as well as to ‘‘murder and extermination’’, acts which in the IMT’s view represented a crime against humanity,27 of which Streicher was convicted and was sentenced to death by hanging.
The above quotations were taken from Incitement in international criminal law by Wibke Kristin Timmermann. The essence of the quotations above is to draw attention to Nnamdi Kanu's activities as running foul of international law. And as a result Nnamdi Kanu can be treated as a war criminal.
It is wrong for Ndigbo to sit by and watch as Nnamdi Kanu and his criminal group, Ipob, tags all Nigerians as living in a zoo. Invariably all other Nigerians apart from Ndigbo are animals. Is it not animals that are kept in a zoo? Posterity will judge Indigbo on their silence while Ipob designate all Nigerians apart from Biafrans as animals living in a zoo.
We can all recall Ndigbo attack on rant hq when some Igbo people in the group were called senseless during argument. All Ndigbo rose up against rant hq.
As Nnamdi Kanu is Calling all Nigerians except Indigbo as animals living in a zoo, what do Ndigbo think Nigerians should do to them for giving him support? |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Tranquillity360: 6:38pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Bulleye: On 4 June 1994, in one of many similar broadcasts on Radio-Te´le´vision Libre des Mille Collines (RTLM), Kantano Habimana called for 100,000 young men to be ‘‘recruited rapidly’’, who should all stand up so that we will kill the Inkotanyi and exterminate them … [T]he reason that we will exterminate them is that they belong to one ethnic group. Look at the person’s height and his physical appearance. Just look at his small nose and then break it.7 Incitement such as this spurred on the massacres which made up the Rwandan genocide of 1994. Its effectiveness is evidenced in the testimony of a former ge´nocidaire
In 1920, thirteen years before Hitler came to power in Germany, the so-called Protocols of the Elders of Zion was published in Germany for the first time, amidst a flurry of other anti-Semitic writings. They purportedly consisted of the minutes of a fabricated meeting of Jewish elders in Berne in 1897, and contained allegations of a Jewish conspiracy to rule the world and enslave Christians.1 Viciously anti-Semitic, by 1933 they had gone through thirty-three editions.
They kept saying Tutsis were cockroaches. Because they had given up on them we started working and killed them.
Inchoate crimes The word ‘‘inchoate’’ denotes something that has ‘‘just begun’’ or is ‘‘under- developed’’,9 ‘‘partially completed’’ or ‘‘imperfectly formed’’.10 Inchoate offences are thus incomplete offences, which are deemed to have been committed despite the fact that the substantive offence, that is, the offence whose commission they were aiming at, is not completed and the intended harm is not realized. Black’s Law Dictionary describes such an offence as ‘‘A step toward the commission of another crime, the step in itself being serious enough to merit punishment’’.11 In English common law there are three general inchoate offences: attempt, conspiracy and incitement (or solicitation in US law). All of them may incur criminal liability even though the crime they were intended to bring about does not materialize.12 In the case of incitement, the crime is completed despite the fact that the person incited fails to commit the act to which he or she has been incited
Incitement in international law Nuremberg: Streicher, Fritzsche Incitement to genocide first became a crime under international law when the International Military Tribunal (IMT) at Nuremberg passed judgment on the accused Julius Streicher and Hans Fritzsche in 1946. While the term ‘‘incitement to genocide’’ was not yet known as such and the accused were instead charged with crimes against humanity, this charge was based on acts which would today fall within the definition of incitement to genocide. Both Streicher and Fritzsche were furthermore charged with crimes against peace, and Fritzsche with war crimes. Julius Streicher was the founder and editor of the anti-Semitic weekly magazine Der Stu¨rmer, the aim of which, according to Streicher himself, was to ‘‘unite Germans and to awaken them against Jewish influence which might ruin our noble culture’’.24 In its judgment, the IMT described how in leading articles and letters, some of them written by Streicher himself, Jewish people were depicted as ‘‘a parasite, an enemy, and an evil-doer, a disseminator of diseases’’ or ‘‘swarms of locusts which must be exterminated completely’’.25 The Tribunal found that by means of such hate propaganda, Streicher ‘‘incited the German people to active persecution’’,26 as well as to ‘‘murder and extermination’’, acts which in the IMT’s view represented a crime against humanity,27 of which Streicher was convicted and was sentenced to death by hanging.
The above quotations were taken from Incitement in international criminal law by Wibke Kristin Timmermann. The essence of the quotations above is to draw attention to Nnamdi Kanu's activities as running foul of international law. And as a result Nnamdi Kanu can be treated as a war criminal.
It is wrong for Ndigbo to sit by and watch as Nnamdi Kanu and his criminal group, Ipob, tags all Nigerians as living in a zoo. Invariably all other Nigerians apart from Ndigbo are animals. Is it not animals that are kept in a zoo? Posterity will judge Indigbo on their silence while Ipob designate all Nigerians apart from Biafrans as animals living in a zoo.
We can all recall Ndigbo attack on rant hq when some Igbo people in the group were called senseless during argument. All Ndigbo rose up against rant hq.
As Nnamdi Kanu is Calling all Nigerians except Indigbo as animals living in a zoo, what do Ndigbo think Nigerians should do to them for giving him support?
Ojukwu that didn't call you animals in zoo,what did your nigeria give him? Uwazurike that never called you animals in zoo,what did your nigeria give him? To me Your nigeria is zoo. 5 Likes |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Bulleye(m): 6:40pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Tranquillity360: Ojukwu that didn't call you animals in zoo,what did your nigeria give him?
Uwazurike that never called you animals in zoo,what did your nigeria give him? Why the zoo? |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Tranquillity360: 6:43pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Bulleye:
Why the zoo? Because most of you Nigerians behave like animal. |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Bulleye(m): 6:44pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Tranquillity360: Because most of you Nigerians behave like animal. And Biafrans are what? |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Tranquillity360: 6:44pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Bulleye:
Why the zoo? Because most of you Nigerians behave like animal.
But you didn't answer the question i ask up there. |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Yujin(m): 8:04pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Bulleye: On 4 June 1994, in one of many similar broadcasts on Radio-Te´le´vision Libre des Mille Collines (RTLM), Kantano Habimana called for 100,000 young men to be ‘‘recruited rapidly’’, who should all stand up so that we will kill the Inkotanyi and exterminate them … [T]he reason that we will exterminate them is that they belong to one ethnic group. Look at the person’s height and his physical appearance. Just look at his small nose and then break it.7 Incitement such as this spurred on the massacres which made up the Rwandan genocide of 1994. Its effectiveness is evidenced in the testimony of a former ge´nocidaire
In 1920, thirteen years before Hitler came to power in Germany, the so-called Protocols of the Elders of Zion was published in Germany for the first time, amidst a flurry of other anti-Semitic writings. They purportedly consisted of the minutes of a fabricated meeting of Jewish elders in Berne in 1897, and contained allegations of a Jewish conspiracy to rule the world and enslave Christians.1 Viciously anti-Semitic, by 1933 they had gone through thirty-three editions.
They kept saying Tutsis were cockroaches. Because they had given up on them we started working and killed them.
Inchoate crimes The word ‘‘inchoate’’ denotes something that has ‘‘just begun’’ or is ‘‘under- developed’’,9 ‘‘partially completed’’ or ‘‘imperfectly formed’’.10 Inchoate offences are thus incomplete offences, which are deemed to have been committed despite the fact that the substantive offence, that is, the offence whose commission they were aiming at, is not completed and the intended harm is not realized. Black’s Law Dictionary describes such an offence as ‘‘A step toward the commission of another crime, the step in itself being serious enough to merit punishment’’.11 In English common law there are three general inchoate offences: attempt, conspiracy and incitement (or solicitation in US law). All of them may incur criminal liability even though the crime they were intended to bring about does not materialize.12 In the case of incitement, the crime is completed despite the fact that the person incited fails to commit the act to which he or she has been incited
Incitement in international law Nuremberg: Streicher, Fritzsche Incitement to genocide first became a crime under international law when the International Military Tribunal (IMT) at Nuremberg passed judgment on the accused Julius Streicher and Hans Fritzsche in 1946. While the term ‘‘incitement to genocide’’ was not yet known as such and the accused were instead charged with crimes against humanity, this charge was based on acts which would today fall within the definition of incitement to genocide. Both Streicher and Fritzsche were furthermore charged with crimes against peace, and Fritzsche with war crimes. Julius Streicher was the founder and editor of the anti-Semitic weekly magazine Der Stu¨rmer, the aim of which, according to Streicher himself, was to ‘‘unite Germans and to awaken them against Jewish influence which might ruin our noble culture’’.24 In its judgment, the IMT described how in leading articles and letters, some of them written by Streicher himself, Jewish people were depicted as ‘‘a parasite, an enemy, and an evil-doer, a disseminator of diseases’’ or ‘‘swarms of locusts which must be exterminated completely’’.25 The Tribunal found that by means of such hate propaganda, Streicher ‘‘incited the German people to active persecution’’,26 as well as to ‘‘murder and extermination’’, acts which in the IMT’s view represented a crime against humanity,27 of which Streicher was convicted and was sentenced to death by hanging.
The above quotations were taken from Incitement in international criminal law by Wibke Kristin Timmermann. The essence of the quotations above is to draw attention to Nnamdi Kanu's activities as running foul of international law. And as a result Nnamdi Kanu can be treated as a war criminal.
It is wrong for Ndigbo to sit by and watch as Nnamdi Kanu and his criminal group, Ipob, tags all Nigerians as living in a zoo. Invariably all other Nigerians apart from Ndigbo are animals. Is it not animals that are kept in a zoo? Posterity will judge Indigbo on their silence while Ipob designate all Nigerians apart from Biafrans as animals living in a zoo.
We can all recall Ndigbo attack on rant hq when some Igbo people in the group were called senseless during argument. All Ndigbo rose up against rant hq.
As Nnamdi Kanu is Calling all Nigerians except Indigbo as animals living in a zoo, what do Ndigbo think Nigerians should do to them for giving him support?
You can do whatever you can to 'indigbo'. Meanwhile, what should be done to fulanis who have killed thousands of Nigerians? If you don't answer this question, may sango kill you. |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Bulleye(m): 8:25pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Yujin:
You can do whatever you can to 'indigbo'. Meanwhile, what should be done to fulanis who have killed thousands of Nigerians? If you don't answer this question, may sango kill you. Two wrongs... |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Ojiofor: 8:28pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Bulleye
There is no hate speech or crime agaisnt humanity that is worst than this. |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Bulleye(m): 8:33pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Ojiofor: Bulleye
There is no hate speech or crime agaisnt humanity that is worst than this.
Ipob started propagation of Igbo hate agenda. Other ethnic nationalities warned that Indigbo should call Nnamdi Kanu to order but they refused. Others are now fighting back. 3 Likes |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Nobody: 8:35pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Bulleye: On 4 June 1994, in one of many similar broadcasts on Radio-Te´le´vision Libre des Mille Collines (RTLM), Kantano Habimana called for 100,000 young men to be ‘‘recruited rapidly’’, who should all stand up so that we will kill the Inkotanyi and exterminate them … [T]he reason that we will exterminate them is that they belong to one ethnic group. Look at the person’s height and his physical appearance. Just look at his small nose and then break it.7 Incitement such as this spurred on the massacres which made up the Rwandan genocide of 1994. Its effectiveness is evidenced in the testimony of a former ge´nocidaire
In 1920, thirteen years before Hitler came to power in Germany, the so-called Protocols of the Elders of Zion was published in Germany for the first time, amidst a flurry of other anti-Semitic writings. They purportedly consisted of the minutes of a fabricated meeting of Jewish elders in Berne in 1897, and contained allegations of a Jewish conspiracy to rule the world and enslave Christians.1 Viciously anti-Semitic, by 1933 they had gone through thirty-three editions.
They kept saying Tutsis were cockroaches. Because they had given up on them we started working and killed them.
Inchoate crimes The word ‘‘inchoate’’ denotes something that has ‘‘just begun’’ or is ‘‘under- developed’’,9 ‘‘partially completed’’ or ‘‘imperfectly formed’’.10 Inchoate offences are thus incomplete offences, which are deemed to have been committed despite the fact that the substantive offence, that is, the offence whose commission they were aiming at, is not completed and the intended harm is not realized. Black’s Law Dictionary describes such an offence as ‘‘A step toward the commission of another crime, the step in itself being serious enough to merit punishment’’.11 In English common law there are three general inchoate offences: attempt, conspiracy and incitement (or solicitation in US law). All of them may incur criminal liability even though the crime they were intended to bring about does not materialize.12 In the case of incitement, the crime is completed despite the fact that the person incited fails to commit the act to which he or she has been incited
Incitement in international law Nuremberg: Streicher, Fritzsche Incitement to genocide first became a crime under international law when the International Military Tribunal (IMT) at Nuremberg passed judgment on the accused Julius Streicher and Hans Fritzsche in 1946. While the term ‘‘incitement to genocide’’ was not yet known as such and the accused were instead charged with crimes against humanity, this charge was based on acts which would today fall within the definition of incitement to genocide. Both Streicher and Fritzsche were furthermore charged with crimes against peace, and Fritzsche with war crimes. Julius Streicher was the founder and editor of the anti-Semitic weekly magazine Der Stu¨rmer, the aim of which, according to Streicher himself, was to ‘‘unite Germans and to awaken them against Jewish influence which might ruin our noble culture’’.24 In its judgment, the IMT described how in leading articles and letters, some of them written by Streicher himself, Jewish people were depicted as ‘‘a parasite, an enemy, and an evil-doer, a disseminator of diseases’’ or ‘‘swarms of locusts which must be exterminated completely’’.25 The Tribunal found that by means of such hate propaganda, Streicher ‘‘incited the German people to active persecution’’,26 as well as to ‘‘murder and extermination’’, acts which in the IMT’s view represented a crime against humanity,27 of which Streicher was convicted and was sentenced to death by hanging.
The above quotations were taken from Incitement in international criminal law by Wibke Kristin Timmermann. The essence of the quotations above is to draw attention to Nnamdi Kanu's activities as running foul of international law. And as a result Nnamdi Kanu can be treated as a war criminal.
It is wrong for Ndigbo to sit by and watch as Nnamdi Kanu and his criminal group, Ipob, tags all Nigerians as living in a zoo. Invariably all other Nigerians apart from Ndigbo are animals. Is it not animals that are kept in a zoo? Posterity will judge Indigbo on their silence while Ipob designate all Nigerians apart from Biafrans as animals living in a zoo.
We can all recall Ndigbo attack on rant hq when some Igbo people in the group were called senseless during argument. All Ndigbo rose up against rant hq.
As Nnamdi Kanu is Calling all Nigerians except Indigbo as animals living in a zoo, what do Ndigbo think Nigerians should do to them for giving him support?
Here we go typical Nigerian always looking at the symptoms and never the sickness The question should be what made kanu to hate Nigeria this much , is it justified ? What is he asking for ? Most of u here say hatred for igbos started after he coup ..but there are records or Igbo kllings before 1960 even The likes of awolowo hated igbos to the extent he removed alafin for being friends with zik in 1955 Forget the massager focus on the massage ...nigeria is not one , we can't be on let's sperate and go our way ...that's all ...there won't be kanu to insult u again 1 Like |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Bulleye(m): 8:39pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Igbochief001:
Here we go typical Nigerian always looking at the symptoms and never the sickness
The question should be what made kanu to hate Nigeria this much , is it justified ? What is he asking for ?
Most of u here say hatred for igbos started after he coup ..but there are records or Igbo kllings before 1960 even
The likes of awolowo hated igbos to the extent he removed alafin for being friends with zik in 1955
Forget the massager focus on the massage ...nigeria is not one , we can't be on let's sperate and go our way ...that's all ...there won't be kanu to insult u again Ok no problem. Biafra should know Oduduwa land is for Yoruba and relate accordingly. 1 Like |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Ojiofor: 8:43pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Bulleye:
Ipob started propagation of Igbo hate agenda. Other ethnic nationalities warned that Indigbo should call Nnamdi Kanu to order but they refused. Others are now fighting back. Crime is crime nor matter who started first. |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Bulleye(m): 8:48pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Ojiofor:
Crime is crime nor matter who started first. How do we stop it now that every ethnic nationality is standing up to Ipob? It was only Ipob before but now nobody knows how many have risen up to challenge Ipob and defend themselves. |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by History555: 9:09pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Op is a boko and killer headsman supporter. Notice how he dodged the question on fulani herdsman and boko. He even tried to justify their actions |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Nobody: 9:12pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Bulleye:
Ok no problem. Biafra should know Oduduwa land is for Yoruba and relate accordingly. Untill u have oduduwa then u can talk ..for now shut up and face the fulsnis killing out people |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Bulleye(m): 9:39pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Igbochief001:
Untill u have oduduwa then u can talk ..for now shut up and face the fulsnis killing out people For peace to reign inform Ipob to steer clear of Oduduwa territory and her citizens. 1 Like |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Nobody: 9:42pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Bulleye:
For peace to reign inform Ipob to steer clear of Oduduwa territory and her citizens. Buy back ur land na |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Bulleye(m): 9:44pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
|
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by richie240: 9:48pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Bulleye:
He who owns the slave... .....owns d land! |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Bulleye(m): 9:50pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
richie240:
.....owns d land! No be my mouth talk am o! |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by richie240: 9:57pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Bulleye:
No be my mouth talk am o! Neither mine. #words_of_the_ancients! |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Justice35: 10:15pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Bulleye:
He who owns the slave... in other words we igbos own both the slaves and their lands.....afinjaz can only wail... |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Bulleye(m): 10:20pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Justice35: in other words we igbos own both the slaves and their lands.....afinjaz can only wail... Japan is for Japanese Korea is for Koreans England is for English Wales is for Welsh Scotland is for Scott Germany is for Germans Italy is for Italians Spain is for Spaniard Russia is for Russians Biafra is for Ndigbo Oduduwa is for? |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Justice35: 10:30pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Bulleye:
Japan is for Japanese Korea is for Koreans England is for English Wales is for Welsh Scotland is for Scott Germany is for Germans Italy is for Italians Spain is for Spaniard Russia is for Russians Biafra is for Ndigbo Oduduwa is for? oduduwa or whatever only comprised Oyo,ekiti,ondo,Ogun,and osun as for Lagos we own it,and Ilorin I don't want to talk about it, you can go with your odudu whatever with the five state I listed,don't even dream of Lagos because we own it now. |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Bulleye(m): 10:37pm On Jun 28, 2020 |
Justice35: oduduwa or whatever only comprised Oyo,ekiti,ondo,Ogun,and osun as for Lagos we own it,and Ilorin I don't want to talk about it, you can go with your odudu whatever with the five state I listed,don't even dream of Lagos because we own it now. Nsuka is about to fall... Igala will soon take over. Continue dreaming over Lagos 2 Likes |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Area4Area: 1:32am On Jun 29, 2020 |
Tranquillity360: Because most of you Nigerians behave like animal. Since you are in the zoo or a product of the zoo, what animal are you; bamboo, crocodile, orangutan? Just asking o and you can also tell us what Kanu is too because he's a product of the zoo |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Area4Area: 1:44am On Jun 29, 2020 |
Justice35: oduduwa or whatever only comprised Oyo,ekiti,ondo,Ogun,and osun as for Lagos we own it,and Ilorin I don't want to talk about it, you can go with your odudu whatever with the five state I listed,don't even dream of Lagos because we own it now. When you get your Biafra and become foreigners in Nigeria, all laws applicable to foreigners would become applicable to you which include forfeiture of all private properties, land etc. So rush up to get Biafra and be ready to get to Biafra to get your passport and visa before coming into Nigeria, all your privileges as Nigerians today would be stripped up immediately 1 Like |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Nobody: 1:47am On Jun 29, 2020 |
Area4Area: When you get your Biafra and become foreigners in Nigeria, all laws applicable to foreigners would become applicable to you which include forfeiture of all private properties, land etc.
So rush up to get Biafra and be ready to get to Biafra to get your passport and visa before coming into Nigeria, all your privileges as Nigerians today would be stripped up immediately Na just one tap we go off south west would be in darkness if una try rubbish |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by nairalandankrah: 1:50am On Jun 29, 2020 |
Bulleye: On 4 June 1994, in [s]one of many similar broadcasts on Radio-Te´le´vision Libre des Mille Collines (RTLM), Kantano Habimana called for 100,000 young men to be ‘‘recruited rapidly’’, who should all stand up so that we will kill the Inkotanyi and exterminate them … [T]he reason that we will exterminate them is that they belong to one ethnic group. Look at the person’s height and his physical appearance. Just look at his small nose and then break it.7 Incitement such as this spurred on the massacres which made up the Rwandan genocide of 1994. Its effectiveness is evidenced in the testimony of a former ge´nocidaire
In 1920, thirteen years before Hitler came to power in Germany, the so-called Protocols of the Elders of Zion was published in Germany for the first time, amidst a flurry of other anti-Semitic writings. They purportedly consisted of the minutes of a fabricated meeting of Jewish elders in Berne in 1897, and contained allegations of a Jewish conspiracy to rule the world and enslave Christians.1 Viciously anti-Semitic, by 1933 they had gone through thirty-three editions.
They kept saying Tutsis were cockroaches. Because they had given up on them we started working and killed them.
Inchoate crimes The word ‘‘inchoate’’ denotes something that has ‘‘just begun’’ or is ‘‘under- developed’’,9 ‘‘partially completed’’ or ‘‘imperfectly formed’’.10 Inchoate offences are thus incomplete offences, which are deemed to have been committed despite the fact that the substantive offence, that is, the offence whose commission they were aiming at, is not completed and the intended harm is not realized. Black’s Law Dictionary describes such an offence as ‘‘A step toward the commission of another crime, the step in itself being serious enough to merit punishment’’.11 In English common law there are three general inchoate offences: attempt, conspiracy and incitement (or solicitation in US law). All of them may incur criminal liability even though the crime they were intended to bring about does not materialize.12 In the case of incitement, the crime is completed despite the fact that the person incited fails to commit the act to which he or she has been incited
Incitement in international law Nuremberg: Streicher, Fritzsche Incitement to genocide first became a crime under international law when the International Military Tribunal (IMT) at Nuremberg passed judgment on the accused Julius Streicher and Hans Fritzsche in 1946. While the term ‘‘incitement to genocide’’ was not yet known as such and the accused were instead charged with crimes against humanity, this charge was based on acts which would today fall within the definition of incitement to genocide. Both Streicher and Fritzsche were furthermore charged with crimes against peace, and Fritzsche with war crimes. Julius Streicher was the founder and editor of the anti-Semitic weekly magazine Der Stu¨rmer, the aim of which, according to Streicher himself, was to ‘‘unite Germans and to awaken them against Jewish influence which might ruin our noble culture’’.24 In its judgment, the IMT described how in leading articles and letters, some of them written by Streicher himself, Jewish people were depicted as ‘‘a parasite, an enemy, and an evil-doer, a disseminator of diseases’’ or ‘‘swarms of locusts which must be exterminated completely’’.25 The Tribunal found that by means of such hate propaganda, Streicher ‘‘incited the German people to active persecution’’,26 as well as to ‘‘murder and extermination’’, acts which in the IMT’s view represented a crime against humanity,27 of which Streicher was convicted and was sentenced to death by hanging.
The above quotations were taken from Incitement in international criminal law by Wibke Kristin Timmermann. The essence of the quotations above is to draw attention to Nnamdi Kanu's activities as running foul of international law. And as a result Nnamdi Kanu can be treated as a war criminal.
It is wrong for Ndigbo to sit by and watch as Nnamdi Kanu and his criminal group, Ipob, tags all Nigerians as living in a zoo. Invariably all other Nigerians apart from Ndigbo are animals. Is it not animals that are kept in a zoo? Posterity will judge Indigbo on their silence while Ipob designate all Nigerians apart from Biafrans as animals living in a zoo.
We can all recall Ndigbo attack on rant hq when some Igbo people in the group were called senseless during argument. All Ndigbo rose up against rant hq.
As Nnamdi Kanu is Calling all Nigerians except Indigbo as animals living in a zoo, what do Ndigbo think Nigerians should do to them for giving him support?[/s]
Why do you like writing rubbish |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Area4Area: 2:04am On Jun 29, 2020 |
Igbochief001:
Na just one tap we go off south west would be in darkness if una try rubbish This one no be online boasting, get your Biafra fast and you'd need a visa and passport before you can step into Nigeria, lose all those lands and houses all over Nigeria you boast with. Then Igbos go know say khaki no be leather |
Re: The Zoo: Ipob Crime Against Humanity by Nobody: 2:26am On Jun 29, 2020 |
Area4Area: This one no be online boasting, get your Biafra fast and you'd need a visa and passport before you can step into Nigeria, lose all those lands and houses all over Nigeria you boast with. Then Igbos go know say khaki no be leather We dash u the houses ...those are nothing ...max 10 years we done get them back .... We are igbos we don't die we multiple Visa into Nigeria ? Not oduduwa republic ? ...lol why are u scared of being independent ? Oh I get u would fight and kill your self |