On 4 June 1994, in one of many similar broadcasts on Radio-Te´le´vision
Libre des Mille Collines (RTLM), Kantano Habimana called for 100,000 young
men to be ‘‘recruited rapidly’’, who
should all stand up so that we will kill the Inkotanyi and exterminate them …
[T]he reason that we will exterminate them is that they belong to one ethnic
group. Look at the person’s height and his physical appearance. Just look at
his small nose and then break it.7
Incitement such as this spurred on the massacres which made up the
Rwandan genocide of 1994. Its effectiveness is evidenced in the testimony of a
former ge´nocidaire

In 1920, thirteen years before Hitler came to power in Germany, the so-called
Protocols of the Elders of Zion was published in Germany for the first time, amidst a
flurry of other anti-Semitic writings. They purportedly consisted of the minutes
of a fabricated meeting of Jewish elders in Berne in 1897, and contained allegations
of a Jewish conspiracy to rule the world and enslave Christians.1 Viciously
anti-Semitic, by 1933 they had gone through thirty-three editions.

They kept saying Tutsis were cockroaches. Because they had given up on them
we started working and killed them.

Inchoate crimes
The word ‘‘inchoate’’ denotes something that has ‘‘just begun’’ or is ‘‘under-
developed’’,9 ‘‘partially completed’’ or ‘‘imperfectly formed’’.10 Inchoate offences
are thus incomplete offences, which are deemed to have been committed despite
the fact that the substantive offence, that is, the offence whose commission they
were aiming at, is not completed and the intended harm is not realized. Black’s
Law Dictionary describes such an offence as ‘‘A step toward the commission of
another crime, the step in itself being serious enough to merit punishment’’.11 In
English common law there are three general inchoate offences: attempt, conspiracy
and incitement (or solicitation in US law). All of them may incur criminal liability
even though the crime they were intended to bring about does not materialize.12 In
the case of incitement, the crime is completed despite the fact that the person
incited fails to commit the act to which he or she has been incited


Incitement in international law
Nuremberg: Streicher, Fritzsche
Incitement to genocide first became a crime under international law when the
International Military Tribunal (IMT) at Nuremberg passed judgment on the
accused Julius Streicher and Hans Fritzsche in 1946. While the term ‘‘incitement
to genocide’’ was not yet known as such and the accused were instead charged with
crimes against humanity, this charge was based on acts which would today fall
within the definition of incitement to genocide. Both Streicher and Fritzsche were
furthermore charged with crimes against peace, and Fritzsche with war crimes.
Julius Streicher was the founder and editor of the anti-Semitic weekly
magazine Der Stu¨rmer, the aim of which, according to Streicher himself, was to
‘‘unite Germans and to awaken them against Jewish influence which might ruin
our noble culture’’.24 In its judgment, the IMT described how in leading articles
and letters, some of them written by Streicher himself, Jewish people were depicted
as ‘‘a parasite, an enemy, and an evil-doer, a disseminator of diseases’’ or ‘‘swarms
of locusts which must be exterminated completely’’.25 The Tribunal found that by
means of such hate propaganda, Streicher ‘‘incited the German people to active
persecution’’,26 as well as to ‘‘murder and extermination’’, acts which in the IMT’s
view represented a crime against humanity,27 of which Streicher was convicted and
was sentenced to death by hanging.

The above quotations were taken from Incitement in international criminal law by Wibke Kristin Timmermann. The essence of the quotations above is to draw attention to Nnamdi Kanu's activities as running foul of international law. And as a result Nnamdi Kanu can be treated as a war criminal.

It is wrong for Ndigbo to sit by and watch as Nnamdi Kanu and his criminal group, Ipob, tags all Nigerians as living in a zoo. Invariably all other Nigerians apart from Ndigbo are animals. Is it not animals that are kept in a zoo? Posterity will judge Indigbo on their silence while Ipob designate all Nigerians apart from Biafrans as animals living in a zoo.

We can all recall Ndigbo attack on rant hq when some Igbo people in the group were called senseless during argument. All Ndigbo rose up against rant hq.

As Nnamdi Kanu is Calling all Nigerians except Indigbo as animals living in a zoo, what do Ndigbo think Nigerians should do to them for giving him support?

Bulleye:
On 4 June 1994, in one of many similar broadcasts on Radio-Te´le´vision
Libre des Mille Collines (RTLM), Kantano Habimana called for 100,000 young
men to be ‘‘recruited rapidly’’, who
should all stand up so that we will kill the Inkotanyi and exterminate them …
[T]he reason that we will exterminate them is that they belong to one ethnic
group. Look at the person’s height and his physical appearance. Just look at
his small nose and then break it.7
Incitement such as this spurred on the massacres which made up the
Rwandan genocide of 1994. Its effectiveness is evidenced in the testimony of a
former ge´nocidaire

In 1920, thirteen years before Hitler came to power in Germany, the so-called
Protocols of the Elders of Zion was published in Germany for the first time, amidst a
flurry of other anti-Semitic writings. They purportedly consisted of the minutes
of a fabricated meeting of Jewish elders in Berne in 1897, and contained allegations
of a Jewish conspiracy to rule the world and enslave Christians.1 Viciously
anti-Semitic, by 1933 they had gone through thirty-three editions.

They kept saying Tutsis were cockroaches. Because they had given up on them
we started working and killed them.

Inchoate crimes
The word ‘‘inchoate’’ denotes something that has ‘‘just begun’’ or is ‘‘under-
developed’’,9 ‘‘partially completed’’ or ‘‘imperfectly formed’’.10 Inchoate offences
are thus incomplete offences, which are deemed to have been committed despite
the fact that the substantive offence, that is, the offence whose commission they
were aiming at, is not completed and the intended harm is not realized. Black’s
Law Dictionary describes such an offence as ‘‘A step toward the commission of
another crime, the step in itself being serious enough to merit punishment’’.11 In
English common law there are three general inchoate offences: attempt, conspiracy
and incitement (or solicitation in US law). All of them may incur criminal liability
even though the crime they were intended to bring about does not materialize.12 In
the case of incitement, the crime is completed despite the fact that the person
incited fails to commit the act to which he or she has been incited


Incitement in international law
Nuremberg: Streicher, Fritzsche
Incitement to genocide first became a crime under international law when the
International Military Tribunal (IMT) at Nuremberg passed judgment on the
accused Julius Streicher and Hans Fritzsche in 1946. While the term ‘‘incitement
to genocide’’ was not yet known as such and the accused were instead charged with
crimes against humanity, this charge was based on acts which would today fall
within the definition of incitement to genocide. Both Streicher and Fritzsche were
furthermore charged with crimes against peace, and Fritzsche with war crimes.
Julius Streicher was the founder and editor of the anti-Semitic weekly
magazine Der Stu¨rmer, the aim of which, according to Streicher himself, was to
‘‘unite Germans and to awaken them against Jewish influence which might ruin
our noble culture’’.24 In its judgment, the IMT described how in leading articles
and letters, some of them written by Streicher himself, Jewish people were depicted
as ‘‘a parasite, an enemy, and an evil-doer, a disseminator of diseases’’ or ‘‘swarms
of locusts which must be exterminated completely’’.25 The Tribunal found that by
means of such hate propaganda, Streicher ‘‘incited the German people to active
persecution’’,26 as well as to ‘‘murder and extermination’’, acts which in the IMT’s
view represented a crime against humanity,27 of which Streicher was convicted and
was sentenced to death by hanging.

The above quotations were taken from Incitement in international criminal law by Wibke Kristin Timmermann. The essence of the quotations above is to draw attention to Nnamdi Kanu's activities as running foul of international law. And as a result Nnamdi Kanu can be treated as a war criminal.

It is wrong for Ndigbo to sit by and watch as Nnamdi Kanu and his criminal group, Ipob, tags all Nigerians as living in a zoo. Invariably all other Nigerians apart from Ndigbo are animals. Is it not animals that are kept in a zoo? Posterity will judge Indigbo on their silence while Ipob designate all Nigerians apart from Biafrans as animals living in a zoo.

We can all recall Ndigbo attack on rant hq when some Igbo people in the group were called senseless during argument. All Ndigbo rose up against rant hq.

As Nnamdi Kanu is Calling all Nigerians except Indigbo as animals living in a zoo, what do Ndigbo think Nigerians should do to them for giving him support?

Ojukwu that didn't call you animals in zoo,what did your nigeria give him?

Uwazurike that never called you animals in zoo,what did your nigeria give him?





To me


Your nigeria is zoo.

Tranquillity360:
Ojukwu that didn't call you animals in zoo,what did your nigeria give him?

Uwazurike that never called you animals in zoo,what did your nigeria give him?

Why the zoo?

Bulleye:
Why the zoo?

Because most of you Nigerians behave like animal.

Tranquillity360:
Because most of you Nigerians behave like animal.

And Biafrans are what?

Bulleye:
Why the zoo?

Because most of you Nigerians behave like animal.

But you didn't answer the question i ask up there.

Bulleye:
On 4 June 1994, in one of many similar broadcasts on Radio-Te´le´vision
Libre des Mille Collines (RTLM), Kantano Habimana called for 100,000 young
men to be ‘‘recruited rapidly’’, who
should all stand up so that we will kill the Inkotanyi and exterminate them …
[T]he reason that we will exterminate them is that they belong to one ethnic
group. Look at the person’s height and his physical appearance. Just look at
his small nose and then break it.7
Incitement such as this spurred on the massacres which made up the
Rwandan genocide of 1994. Its effectiveness is evidenced in the testimony of a
former ge´nocidaire

In 1920, thirteen years before Hitler came to power in Germany, the so-called
Protocols of the Elders of Zion was published in Germany for the first time, amidst a
flurry of other anti-Semitic writings. They purportedly consisted of the minutes
of a fabricated meeting of Jewish elders in Berne in 1897, and contained allegations
of a Jewish conspiracy to rule the world and enslave Christians.1 Viciously
anti-Semitic, by 1933 they had gone through thirty-three editions.

They kept saying Tutsis were cockroaches. Because they had given up on them
we started working and killed them.

Inchoate crimes
The word ‘‘inchoate’’ denotes something that has ‘‘just begun’’ or is ‘‘under-
developed’’,9 ‘‘partially completed’’ or ‘‘imperfectly formed’’.10 Inchoate offences
are thus incomplete offences, which are deemed to have been committed despite
the fact that the substantive offence, that is, the offence whose commission they
were aiming at, is not completed and the intended harm is not realized. Black’s
Law Dictionary describes such an offence as ‘‘A step toward the commission of
another crime, the step in itself being serious enough to merit punishment’’.11 In
English common law there are three general inchoate offences: attempt, conspiracy
and incitement (or solicitation in US law). All of them may incur criminal liability
even though the crime they were intended to bring about does not materialize.12 In
the case of incitement, the crime is completed despite the fact that the person
incited fails to commit the act to which he or she has been incited


Incitement in international law
Nuremberg: Streicher, Fritzsche
Incitement to genocide first became a crime under international law when the
International Military Tribunal (IMT) at Nuremberg passed judgment on the
accused Julius Streicher and Hans Fritzsche in 1946. While the term ‘‘incitement
to genocide’’ was not yet known as such and the accused were instead charged with
crimes against humanity, this charge was based on acts which would today fall
within the definition of incitement to genocide. Both Streicher and Fritzsche were
furthermore charged with crimes against peace, and Fritzsche with war crimes.
Julius Streicher was the founder and editor of the anti-Semitic weekly
magazine Der Stu¨rmer, the aim of which, according to Streicher himself, was to
‘‘unite Germans and to awaken them against Jewish influence which might ruin
our noble culture’’.24 In its judgment, the IMT described how in leading articles
and letters, some of them written by Streicher himself, Jewish people were depicted
as ‘‘a parasite, an enemy, and an evil-doer, a disseminator of diseases’’ or ‘‘swarms
of locusts which must be exterminated completely’’.25 The Tribunal found that by
means of such hate propaganda, Streicher ‘‘incited the German people to active
persecution’’,26 as well as to ‘‘murder and extermination’’, acts which in the IMT’s
view represented a crime against humanity,27 of which Streicher was convicted and
was sentenced to death by hanging.

The above quotations were taken from Incitement in international criminal law by Wibke Kristin Timmermann. The essence of the quotations above is to draw attention to Nnamdi Kanu's activities as running foul of international law. And as a result Nnamdi Kanu can be treated as a war criminal.

It is wrong for Ndigbo to sit by and watch as Nnamdi Kanu and his criminal group, Ipob, tags all Nigerians as living in a zoo. Invariably all other Nigerians apart from Ndigbo are animals. Is it not animals that are kept in a zoo? Posterity will judge Indigbo on their silence while Ipob designate all Nigerians apart from Biafrans as animals living in a zoo.

We can all recall Ndigbo attack on rant hq when some Igbo people in the group were called senseless during argument. All Ndigbo rose up against rant hq.

As Nnamdi Kanu is Calling all Nigerians except Indigbo as animals living in a zoo, what do Ndigbo think Nigerians should do to them for giving him support?

You can do whatever you can to 'indigbo'. Meanwhile, what should be done to fulanis who have killed thousands of Nigerians? If you don't answer this question, may sango kill you.

Yujin:

You can do whatever you can to 'indigbo'. Meanwhile, what should be done to fulanis who have killed thousands of Nigerians? If you don't answer this question, may sango kill you.

Two wrongs...

Bulleye

There is no hate speech or crime agaisnt humanity that is worst than this.

Ojiofor:
Bulleye

There is no hate speech or crime agaisnt humanity that is worst than this.

Ipob started propagation of Igbo hate agenda. Other ethnic nationalities warned that Indigbo should call Nnamdi Kanu to order but they refused. Others are now fighting back.

Bulleye:
On 4 June 1994, in one of many similar broadcasts on Radio-Te´le´vision
Libre des Mille Collines (RTLM), Kantano Habimana called for 100,000 young
men to be ‘‘recruited rapidly’’, who
should all stand up so that we will kill the Inkotanyi and exterminate them …
[T]he reason that we will exterminate them is that they belong to one ethnic
group. Look at the person’s height and his physical appearance. Just look at
his small nose and then break it.7
Incitement such as this spurred on the massacres which made up the
Rwandan genocide of 1994. Its effectiveness is evidenced in the testimony of a
former ge´nocidaire

In 1920, thirteen years before Hitler came to power in Germany, the so-called
Protocols of the Elders of Zion was published in Germany for the first time, amidst a
flurry of other anti-Semitic writings. They purportedly consisted of the minutes
of a fabricated meeting of Jewish elders in Berne in 1897, and contained allegations
of a Jewish conspiracy to rule the world and enslave Christians.1 Viciously
anti-Semitic, by 1933 they had gone through thirty-three editions.

They kept saying Tutsis were cockroaches. Because they had given up on them
we started working and killed them.

Inchoate crimes
The word ‘‘inchoate’’ denotes something that has ‘‘just begun’’ or is ‘‘under-
developed’’,9 ‘‘partially completed’’ or ‘‘imperfectly formed’’.10 Inchoate offences
are thus incomplete offences, which are deemed to have been committed despite
the fact that the substantive offence, that is, the offence whose commission they
were aiming at, is not completed and the intended harm is not realized. Black’s
Law Dictionary describes such an offence as ‘‘A step toward the commission of
another crime, the step in itself being serious enough to merit punishment’’.11 In
English common law there are three general inchoate offences: attempt, conspiracy
and incitement (or solicitation in US law). All of them may incur criminal liability
even though the crime they were intended to bring about does not materialize.12 In
the case of incitement, the crime is completed despite the fact that the person
incited fails to commit the act to which he or she has been incited


Incitement in international law
Nuremberg: Streicher, Fritzsche
Incitement to genocide first became a crime under international law when the
International Military Tribunal (IMT) at Nuremberg passed judgment on the
accused Julius Streicher and Hans Fritzsche in 1946. While the term ‘‘incitement
to genocide’’ was not yet known as such and the accused were instead charged with
crimes against humanity, this charge was based on acts which would today fall
within the definition of incitement to genocide. Both Streicher and Fritzsche were
furthermore charged with crimes against peace, and Fritzsche with war crimes.
Julius Streicher was the founder and editor of the anti-Semitic weekly
magazine Der Stu¨rmer, the aim of which, according to Streicher himself, was to
‘‘unite Germans and to awaken them against Jewish influence which might ruin
our noble culture’’.24 In its judgment, the IMT described how in leading articles
and letters, some of them written by Streicher himself, Jewish people were depicted
as ‘‘a parasite, an enemy, and an evil-doer, a disseminator of diseases’’ or ‘‘swarms
of locusts which must be exterminated completely’’.25 The Tribunal found that by
means of such hate propaganda, Streicher ‘‘incited the German people to active
persecution’’,26 as well as to ‘‘murder and extermination’’, acts which in the IMT’s
view represented a crime against humanity,27 of which Streicher was convicted and
was sentenced to death by hanging.

The above quotations were taken from Incitement in international criminal law by Wibke Kristin Timmermann. The essence of the quotations above is to draw attention to Nnamdi Kanu's activities as running foul of international law. And as a result Nnamdi Kanu can be treated as a war criminal.

It is wrong for Ndigbo to sit by and watch as Nnamdi Kanu and his criminal group, Ipob, tags all Nigerians as living in a zoo. Invariably all other Nigerians apart from Ndigbo are animals. Is it not animals that are kept in a zoo? Posterity will judge Indigbo on their silence while Ipob designate all Nigerians apart from Biafrans as animals living in a zoo.

We can all recall Ndigbo attack on rant hq when some Igbo people in the group were called senseless during argument. All Ndigbo rose up against rant hq.

As Nnamdi Kanu is Calling all Nigerians except Indigbo as animals living in a zoo, what do Ndigbo think Nigerians should do to them for giving him support?

Here we go typical Nigerian always looking at the symptoms and never the sickness

The question should be what made kanu to hate Nigeria this much , is it justified ? What is he asking for ?

Most of u here say hatred for igbos started after he coup ..but there are records or Igbo kllings before 1960 even

The likes of awolowo hated igbos to the extent he removed alafin for being friends with zik in 1955

Forget the massager focus on the massage ...nigeria is not one , we can't be on let's sperate and go our way ...that's all ...there won't be kanu to insult u again

Igbochief001:

Here we go typical Nigerian always looking at the symptoms and never the sickness

The question should be what made kanu to hate Nigeria this much , is it justified ? What is he asking for ?

Most of u here say hatred for igbos started after he coup ..but there are records or Igbo kllings before 1960 even

The likes of awolowo hated igbos to the extent he removed alafin for being friends with zik in 1955

Forget the massager focus on the massage ...nigeria is not one , we can't be on let's sperate and go our way ...that's all ...there won't be kanu to insult u again

Ok no problem. Biafra should know Oduduwa land is for Yoruba and relate accordingly.

Bulleye:

Ipob started propagation of Igbo hate agenda. Other ethnic nationalities warned that Indigbo should call Nnamdi Kanu to order but they refused. Others are now fighting back.

Crime is crime nor matter who started first.

Ojiofor:


Crime is crime nor matter who started first.

How do we stop it now that every ethnic nationality is standing up to Ipob? It was only Ipob before but now nobody knows how many have risen up to challenge Ipob and defend themselves.

Op is a boko and killer headsman supporter. Notice how he dodged the question on fulani herdsman and boko. He even tried to justify their actions

Bulleye:

Ok no problem. Biafra should know Oduduwa land is for Yoruba and relate accordingly.

Untill u have oduduwa then u can talk ..for now shut up and face the fulsnis killing out people

Igbochief001:

Untill u have oduduwa then u can talk ..for now shut up and face the fulsnis killing out people

For peace to reign inform Ipob to steer clear of Oduduwa territory and her citizens.

Bulleye:

For peace to reign inform Ipob to steer clear of Oduduwa territory and her citizens.

Buy back ur land na

Igbochief001:

Buy back ur land na

He who owns the slave...

Bulleye:

He who owns the slave...

.....owns d land!

richie240:

.....owns d land!

No be my mouth talk am o!

Bulleye:

No be my mouth talk am o!

Neither mine.
#words_of_the_ancients!

Bulleye:

He who owns the slave...

in other words we igbos own both the slaves and their lands.....afinjaz can only wail...

Justice35:
in other words we igbos own both the slaves and their lands.....afinjaz can only wail...

Japan is for Japanese
Korea is for Koreans
England is for English
Wales is for Welsh
Scotland is for Scott
Germany is for Germans
Italy is for Italians
Spain is for Spaniard
Russia is for Russians
Biafra is for Ndigbo
Oduduwa is for?

Bulleye:

Japan is for Japanese
Korea is for Koreans
England is for English
Wales is for Welsh
Scotland is for Scott
Germany is for Germans
Italy is for Italians
Spain is for Spaniard
Russia is for Russians
Biafra is for Ndigbo
Oduduwa is for?

oduduwa or whatever only comprised Oyo,ekiti,ondo,Ogun,and osun as for Lagos we own it,and Ilorin I don't want to talk about it, you can go with your odudu whatever with the five state I listed,don't even dream of Lagos because we own it now.

Justice35:
oduduwa or whatever only comprised Oyo,ekiti,ondo,Ogun,and osun as for Lagos we own it,and Ilorin I don't want to talk about it, you can go with your odudu whatever with the five state I listed,don't even dream of Lagos because we own it now.

Nsuka is about to fall... Igala will soon take over. Continue dreaming over Lagos

Tranquillity360:
Because most of you Nigerians behave like animal.

Since you are in the zoo or a product of the zoo, what animal are you; bamboo, crocodile, orangutan? Just asking o and you can also tell us what Kanu is too because he's a product of the zoo

Justice35:
oduduwa or whatever only comprised Oyo,ekiti,ondo,Ogun,and osun as for Lagos we own it,and Ilorin I don't want to talk about it, you can go with your odudu whatever with the five state I listed,don't even dream of Lagos because we own it now.

When you get your Biafra and become foreigners in Nigeria, all laws applicable to foreigners would become applicable to you which include forfeiture of all private properties, land etc.

So rush up to get Biafra and be ready to get to Biafra to get your passport and visa before coming into Nigeria, all your privileges as Nigerians today would be stripped up immediately

Area4Area:
When you get your Biafra and become foreigners in Nigeria, all laws applicable to foreigners would become applicable to you which include forfeiture of all private properties, land etc.

So rush up to get Biafra and be ready to get to Biafra to get your passport and visa before coming into Nigeria, all your privileges as Nigerians today would be stripped up immediately

Na just one tap we go off south west would be in darkness if una try rubbish

Bulleye:
On 4 June 1994, in [s]one of many similar broadcasts on Radio-Te´le´vision
Libre des Mille Collines (RTLM), Kantano Habimana called for 100,000 young
men to be ‘‘recruited rapidly’’, who
should all stand up so that we will kill the Inkotanyi and exterminate them …
[T]he reason that we will exterminate them is that they belong to one ethnic
group. Look at the person’s height and his physical appearance. Just look at
his small nose and then break it.7
Incitement such as this spurred on the massacres which made up the
Rwandan genocide of 1994. Its effectiveness is evidenced in the testimony of a
former ge´nocidaire

In 1920, thirteen years before Hitler came to power in Germany, the so-called
Protocols of the Elders of Zion was published in Germany for the first time, amidst a
flurry of other anti-Semitic writings. They purportedly consisted of the minutes
of a fabricated meeting of Jewish elders in Berne in 1897, and contained allegations
of a Jewish conspiracy to rule the world and enslave Christians.1 Viciously
anti-Semitic, by 1933 they had gone through thirty-three editions.

They kept saying Tutsis were cockroaches. Because they had given up on them
we started working and killed them.

Inchoate crimes
The word ‘‘inchoate’’ denotes something that has ‘‘just begun’’ or is ‘‘under-
developed’’,9 ‘‘partially completed’’ or ‘‘imperfectly formed’’.10 Inchoate offences
are thus incomplete offences, which are deemed to have been committed despite
the fact that the substantive offence, that is, the offence whose commission they
were aiming at, is not completed and the intended harm is not realized. Black’s
Law Dictionary describes such an offence as ‘‘A step toward the commission of
another crime, the step in itself being serious enough to merit punishment’’.11 In
English common law there are three general inchoate offences: attempt, conspiracy
and incitement (or solicitation in US law). All of them may incur criminal liability
even though the crime they were intended to bring about does not materialize.12 In
the case of incitement, the crime is completed despite the fact that the person
incited fails to commit the act to which he or she has been incited


Incitement in international law
Nuremberg: Streicher, Fritzsche
Incitement to genocide first became a crime under international law when the
International Military Tribunal (IMT) at Nuremberg passed judgment on the
accused Julius Streicher and Hans Fritzsche in 1946. While the term ‘‘incitement
to genocide’’ was not yet known as such and the accused were instead charged with
crimes against humanity, this charge was based on acts which would today fall
within the definition of incitement to genocide. Both Streicher and Fritzsche were
furthermore charged with crimes against peace, and Fritzsche with war crimes.
Julius Streicher was the founder and editor of the anti-Semitic weekly
magazine Der Stu¨rmer, the aim of which, according to Streicher himself, was to
‘‘unite Germans and to awaken them against Jewish influence which might ruin
our noble culture’’.24 In its judgment, the IMT described how in leading articles
and letters, some of them written by Streicher himself, Jewish people were depicted
as ‘‘a parasite, an enemy, and an evil-doer, a disseminator of diseases’’ or ‘‘swarms
of locusts which must be exterminated completely’’.25 The Tribunal found that by
means of such hate propaganda, Streicher ‘‘incited the German people to active
persecution’’,26 as well as to ‘‘murder and extermination’’, acts which in the IMT’s
view represented a crime against humanity,27 of which Streicher was convicted and
was sentenced to death by hanging.

The above quotations were taken from Incitement in international criminal law by Wibke Kristin Timmermann. The essence of the quotations above is to draw attention to Nnamdi Kanu's activities as running foul of international law. And as a result Nnamdi Kanu can be treated as a war criminal.

It is wrong for Ndigbo to sit by and watch as Nnamdi Kanu and his criminal group, Ipob, tags all Nigerians as living in a zoo. Invariably all other Nigerians apart from Ndigbo are animals. Is it not animals that are kept in a zoo? Posterity will judge Indigbo on their silence while Ipob designate all Nigerians apart from Biafrans as animals living in a zoo.

We can all recall Ndigbo attack on rant hq when some Igbo people in the group were called senseless during argument. All Ndigbo rose up against rant hq.

As Nnamdi Kanu is Calling all Nigerians except Indigbo as animals living in a zoo, what do Ndigbo think Nigerians should do to them for giving him support?[/s]

Why do you like writing rubbish

Igbochief001:

Na just one tap we go off south west would be in darkness if una try rubbish

This one no be online boasting, get your Biafra fast and you'd need a visa and passport before you can step into Nigeria, lose all those lands and houses all over Nigeria you boast with. Then Igbos go know say khaki no be leather

Area4Area:
This one no be online boasting, get your Biafra fast and you'd need a visa and passport before you can step into Nigeria, lose all those lands and houses all over Nigeria you boast with. Then Igbos go know say khaki no be leather

We dash u the houses ...those are nothing ...max 10 years we done get them back ....

We are igbos we don't die we multiple

Visa into Nigeria ? Not oduduwa republic ? ...lol why are u scared of being independent ? Oh I get u would fight and kill your self