sinizia:


I'm sorry lord OtemAtum; the giver of lives, fatterner of cows and fertilizer of crops; forgive my indiscretions, o cager of the old gods.

Tonight, you shall dine with the creamiest of oloshos Naija has to offer. Consider it my burnt offerings to you.

iamoyindamola:

The god is angry

airmark:

You guys need to start believing me o.
Raumdeuter please inform eruditor to honour his word.

Ibime:



I don't think there is any valuation methodology that will work, much less one that will not contravene IFRS guidelines.

Intangible assets can only be revalued with reference to an active market and players contracts are likely too unique to benchmark against an active market. That's why we will carry someone like Drinkwater at his asset value (should be around £16m now ignoring salary element) rather than write him off and declare a £16m loss this year. We'll just let amortisation naturally impair him slowly until the end of his contract.

Segedinho:


You have kolo finish kpatakpata.


How dare u think of desecrating otematum holy "gbola".

And for this:

Ye shall be caged in the most remote part of the earth.

Thy flesh shall be devoured by the most wicked earthlings.

Oh,thy mighty OtemAtum will have no mercy on thy wailings and "shalaye" for thou hath sinned in the eyes of Otematum.

For ye have no regards for his holy gbola.

PDPGuy:
Chelsea wants to buy Oblak for 100 million pounds, and are offering Kepa as part of the deal!
However, I’m not sure Simeone would accept such a massive downgrade in his goalkeeping department

Ibime:



Yes, they can set capitalisation benchmarks or in FFP case, profitability benchmarks but the accounts on which those benchmarks are aggregated are only subject to IFRS. Whereas it's easier for CBN to tie a bank to capitalisation metrics as those are usually focussed on current assets (usually Cash and <365 Receivables), profit is a more difficult metric to pin down especially in an industry like football whose profit figures are materially affected by disposal gains or losses and who have little short-term correlation between cashflow and profit. A football club could have £100m reduction in Cash and Receivables and still declare £200m profit in the same year. How do you pin that down?

Ibime:
Yes, they may charge a management fee within a Group Structure, or may apportion salaries across the different subs. Infact the management fee structure may allow them to sink overhead losses more safely in UAE than spread it around. How can UEFA regulate that?

Beyond overheads, you would be surprised to find they also put what you would consider traditional OPEX to parent and apportion later. I know of OPEX items for services my company provides to City that gets billed to Parent. It would be interesting to follow those OPEX down the line and see how they are apportioned between parent and subs.

eph12:
airmark where is your mcm running to here? What's he pointing at?

nipeks001:

You’re right

Jorginho is a systemic player- a misfit, but not a bad player. Jorginho would be a good fit for Man city where priority is moving the ball quickly. There’s a reason Guardiola preferred Busquet to Yaya Toure or Mascherano. There’s a reason Sarri is using Pjanic ahead of Matuidi or Jorginho ahead of Kante in a DM role. They play quick possession football and they favor players that can make quick accurate passes to play out from the back. While these kind of players make occasional tackles, their coaches know that Ball winning is not their strong point/priority in these teams and over looks it in favor of their passing ability. These kind of teams defend by keeping possession(the ball away from opposition) and TEAM press( Guardiola will bench Aguero for not pressing high before benching Rodri for being dribbled in a match), not by depending solely on Defensive players in the team. In Chelsea’s case, we are not so good at Team press, and that’s why players like Jorginho are exposed when we lose possession.

In all- Jorginho is not a bad player, but probably a bad misfit in this current team as what fans are demanding of him is not in his skill set. Play Pirlo in this current Chelsea system and he won’t get much joy

nipeks001:

You’re right

Jorginho is a systemic player- a misfit, but not a bad player. Jorginho would be a good fit for Man city where priority is moving the ball quickly. There’s a reason Guardiola preferred Busquet to Yaya Toure or Mascherano. There’s a reason Sarri is using Pjanic ahead of Matuidi or Jorginho ahead of Kante in a DM role. They play quick possession football and they favor players that can make quick accurate passes to play out from the back. While these kind of players make occasional tackles, their coaches know that Ball winning is not their strong point/priority in these teams and over looks it in favor of their passing ability. These kind of teams defend by keeping possession(the ball away from opposition) and TEAM press( Guardiola will bench Aguero for not pressing high before benching Rodri for being dribbled in a match), not by depending solely on Defensive players in the team. In Chelsea’s case, we are not so good at Team press, and that’s why players like Jorginho are exposed when we lose possession.

In all- Jorginho is not a bad player, but probably a bad misfit in this current team as what fans are demanding of him is not in his skill set. Play Pirlo in this current Chelsea system and he won’t get much joy

PDPGuy:
Chelsea wants to buy Oblak for 100 million pounds, and are offering Kepa as part of the deal!
However, I’m not sure Simeone would accept such a massive downgrade in his goalkeeping department

airmark:
''Liverpool will be presented with the Premier League Trophy after their match against Chelsea on Wednesday 22 July 2020''.

Na God's hand we dey now.

airmark:


Since this picture will lift you out of the great depression that Obafemi punched you into, i have liked and shared this post.

donjazet:


I saw this and was really happy. One can't just trust all these rumors sha. But at least it seems Lampard is ready to drop Kepa and that is the real joy here.

airmark:


Since this picture will lift you out of the great depression that Obafemi punched you into, i have liked and shared this post.

BlueRayDick:
"Jorginho is not a bad player, but.......but.....but..."

But kini

Nezzjnr:
Our bluuus let's accept the Fact

We can't beat Manu in the upcoming FA cup fixture

Let us focus on positive football abeg

You again?

donjazet:


Thank you very much. This is exactly my point. We Chelsea fans are just too quick to rubbish our players.
People think i just like unpopular opinions when in essence i am pointing out the truth. Jorginho is one of the best registas in the world right now.

The absurd thing about this is that since Lampard retired, Chelsea have not really been blessed with world class midfielders apart from maybe kante and we have one who is one of the best at what he does and we are so quick to rubbish him despite not having a better certified option. It's tiring.

donjazet:

E be like say you store all our player pictures for your phone.

Is there any player on this earth wey no get "but" or comma for him game?
Mention any perfect player wey you know.

izzou:

You again?

BlueRayDick:


Do u also "heart" Jorginho BackPassinho

eph12:

So even you don't know what's pursuing VVD there? Maybe rumdeuter will know sha

popizaino:



Repeating it won't make it true. Pls give up abeg.jorginho isn't what you're calling him and by the way I thought ibime warned you not to grow the word regista anyhow,pls for sanity sake don't use that word with jorginho abeg.

popizaino:
Mourinho and st James park .

Let see who him and his fans would blame this time again.