Subzero047:
Zaidu Sanusi's stats

TheGoodJoe:


Zaidu Sanusi annoyed me with his repeated violent plays against Foden. He would have injured the Young Man for no reason.

I found that really displeasing.

kingphilip:
I'm sure he would have pleased you if Foden had ridden him to get a brace yesterday

TheGoodJoe:


Zaidu Sanusi annoyed me with his repeated violent plays against Foden. He would have injured the Young Man for no reason.

I found that really displeasing.

TheGoodJoe:


Zaidu Sanusi annoyed me with his repeated violent plays against Foden. He would have injured the Young Man for no reason.

I found that really displeasing.

TheGoodJoe:


There is a difference in committing fouls and being violent to injure a player.

What Zaidu Sanusi did repeatedly was sinister and malicious.

I did not say don't foul but don't be violent while doing it.

TheGoodJoe:


Zaidu Sanusi annoyed me with his repeated violent plays against Foden. He would have injured the Young Man for no reason.

I found that really displeasing.

kingphilip:
how many yellow cards or repeated warnings did he get for committing the 'so violent a foul' or the referee was so blinded he didn't notice?

chuks404:
calm down master . PEP tried mahrez against him no show, now foden nothing came out. It shows you how this guy has improved. Just give it to him.I believe he must have done that to instil fear in foden. Its part of the game.

elunico:


Well, the young man don't care about how you feel. He needed to get the job done, he wasn't ready to give Foden any space.

TheGoodJoe:

Zaidu Sanusi played very well. That is not what I am talking about. He defended well. I think he had a brilliant goal line interception of Sterling's shot which the commentator praised his reading of the place Sterling was to shoot to.

My problem was violent plays that were unnecessary.

TheGoodJoe:


Zaidu Sanusi annoyed me with his repeated violent plays against Foden. He would have injured the Young Man for no reason.

I found that really displeasing.

TheGoodJoe:

Zaidu Sanusi played very well. That is not what I am talking about. He defended well. I think he had a brilliant goal line interception of Sterling's shot which the commentator praised his reading of the place Sterling was to shoot to.

My problem was violent plays that were unnecessary.

chuks404:
. Anyway i see your point.

do4luv14:




Hmmm you surprised me with those your comments on Sanusi and Foden

going rough here and there, while performing your duty is part of the Game, the main purpose is to discourage ya attack for coming at you, at will, and the drag his confident level down,



or you want him to go easy on Foden, to give Foden more confidence to come at him right?


You should be glad, Foden keep his cool, cos, if he dont, and lash out at Sanusi, he could get a red, and city might had loss that game

TheGoodJoe:

Zaidu Sanusi played very well. That is not what I am talking about. He defended well. I think he had a brilliant goal line interception of Sterling's shot which the commentator praised his reading of the place Sterling was to shoot to.

My problem was violent plays that were unnecessary.

Icon4s:


Not that we have no Midfielders, Rohr prioritizes invitation of defenders over midfielders. What do you call an 18 man squad that will have 10 defenders ( 6CBs, 2RBs and 2LBs). Some other teams build their Team around the midfield. We build ours around the defense because even going forward we are lean up-front.

What is Rohr doing with this large number of CBs:
Leon Balogun
William Troost-Ekong
Chidozie Awaziem
Kenneth Omeruo
Semi Ajayi
Kelvin Akpoguma

6! And yet he doesn't know his best pairing option.

And he will still invite Zaidu Sanusi, Collins, Ebuehi and Aina as Full backs.
Yet he will still be playing a CB as RB!

It appears Rohr doesn't have the balls to drop some of these defenders.

We don't need more than 6 defenders, at most 7 to prosecute an AFCON qualifying game. The other spots in the team should be used to invite midfielders and forwards.

TheGoodJoe:


Zaidu Sanusi annoyed me with his repeated violent plays against Foden. He would have injured the Young Man for no reason.

I found that really displeasing.

mostob:
Sorry bro...that is what we call 'Rugged' .

TheGoodJoe:


There is a difference in committing fouls and being violent to injure a player.

What Zaidu Sanusi did repeatedly was sinister and malicious.

I did not say don't foul but don't be violent while doing it.

mostob:
https://www.nairaland.com/6291767/kanu-wife-react-after-peter


Osaze nor do well for this one. Not everything should be posted on social media. He should have at least respect Kanu,

Maybe na fake account sha

TheGoodJoe:


A player does not need to be violent to make an effective foul, especially when it was unnecessary. Actually Zaidu Sanusi was lucky not to get booked. Marega got booked and was taking off by the manager.

Zaidu Sanusi can make an excellent defender without violent tackles.

jihday:
'NFF should sack Rohr' but they can't even pay the players wages. Modified : Collin Udoh also confirmed it but he said the players aren't willing to talk about it

jihday:
Not fake account, I believe Osaze dey sniff cocaine. Although I've always known him to be loud mouthed.

do4luv14:


You dont get it do you?

There is a difference between violence and rough playing,
if we go by your word, then Foden should had leave the pitch with a broken leg or serious injury


so there is nothing to talk there

jihday:
And he didn't get a yellow card? No vex but I'll prefer to believe the referee

TheGoodJoe:


Just say you did not watch it.

TheGoodJoe:


What you are saying that as long as there is no injury to the player, then the move is not malicious.

Look at the picture below. That was a malicious tackle by Puncheon, which he actually planned to injure De Bruyne but De Bruyne completed the match without injury.

Are you saying because De Bruyne did not injure, the tackle by Puncheon was not malicious?