Dawdy:

Your analogy is dumb. If I hadn't seen gun before and someone told me that gun killed. I had to believe him, because he told me based on the experience he might have had about the gun. Perhaps he used it himself or it was used in his presence. He didn't just assume that gun killed because he had dream that gun killed.

The reverse is the case here. They said "earth is rotating around the sun 67000 mph." though, they never saw earth rotation. just speculations. How come when we jump up on the moving earth we land on the same spot? The said if you threw something up inside the moving car, it wouldn't fall down far behind you. Is something moving straight compared to rotating object? We asked, "what makes earth rotate" they said gravity. They can't really explain how the so called force of gravity. They just assume it pulls everything down. And the only example they gave is that if you threw something up it would fall down. Why the so called gravity allowed me to throw something up in the first place? The same gravity can't pull smoke down. If the Sun's gravity is constantly pulling planets toward it, why hasn't the Earth been pulled into the Sun?

The law of gravity pull the to the earth to the sun can easily be broken whe a bird flies. They gave another excuse that gravity is the strongest and the weakest force. What make gravity strong and weak? Gravity remains unproven theory not fact at all. And if the gravity is removed in astronomy, what is left is zero.

sukkot:
hmmmmm some very mind bending scenario you have painted SirWere but i hate to bring the spoiler alert into the scenario. without the brain you are actually still a complete and wholesome entity because contrary to what has being thought to be conventional wisdom, the brain does not actually do anything but manifest the electrical impulses sent to it from your heart. the heart is the real brain and your brain is just like a computer monitor that manifests the impulses sent to it from the heart. so the brain is the computer monitor and the heart is the computer motherboard. so back to your scenario ? you without your brain does not negate who you are so you will be culpable in all the crimes committed in lagos so long as your heart was in your body when you committed the crimes .

donnffd:


I clearly understand, but you misinterpret me, I never said that the multiverse wasn't an hypothesis we shouldn't consider, I only said there is no way we can test it for now and that keeps it in the realm of pseudoscience. I also meant that if we do test the hypothesis and find out its true, then string theory must be true and then it poses a whole different question, where did string theory come from?, and finally when I concluded on we not understanding some things, I actually mean that, not because we should not strive to know but because our biology is probably not built to understand it. Look at chimps, the difference in DNA between our species is just 2%, but look at the gap, one can only understand rudimentary logic and the other General relativity.
What makes you think our brain has enough matter to understand some concepts the same way a chimp can't grasp quantum mechanics? Imagine a species with a DNA difference of 2% ahead of us, do you think we can grasp concepts those guys would?

LoJ:

Hello Fayahsoul,

I am not sure about the meaning of your sentence. Yes I have read the book form of the Grail message, and experienced the living form of the Grail message. It is a fact I have already stated in this forum many times. I however do not claim to be a "grail messenger" as I am member of no religious/spiritual body.

However, What I state, are my opinions and on the basis of my personal experiencing. The fact that something is written in one book or the other (whether Bible, Koran, or the Book form of the Grail message) does not prove the validity or otherwise of it. And Indeed, it is a mistake to stop at the letters of any book, including the one of Abdrushin.

I was led to Grail message via a spiritual experience. And A lot of people have experienced the Truth without ever reading any book, including the book form of the Grail message.

To sum up, I speak about things I have experienced. And Whatever I say, is my opinion and my experience. People should open their heart, use their intuition to seek the Truth and experience it also.

If on the other hand, your words were meant to be derogatory and pejorative, then I wish you strength and blessings.

Greetings.

LoJ:

Hello Fayahsoul,

I am not sure about the meaning of your sentence. Yes I have read the book form of the Grail message, and experienced the living form of the Grail message. It is a fact I have already stated in this forum many times. I however do not claim to be a "grail messenger" as I am member of no religious/spiritual body.

However, What I state, are my opinions and on the basis of my personal experiencing. The fact that something is written in one book or the other (whether Bible, Koran, or the Book form of the Grail message) does not prove the validity or otherwise of it. And Indeed, it is a mistake to stop at the letters of any book, including the one of Abdrushin.

I was led to Grail message via a spiritual experience. And A lot of people have experienced the Truth without ever reading any book, including the book form of the Grail message.

To sum up, I speak about things I have experienced. And Whatever I say, is my opinion and my experience. People should open their heart, use their intuition to seek the Truth and experience it also.

If on the other hand, your words were meant to be derogatory and pejorative, then I wish you strength and blessings.

Greetings.

LoJ:

Hello Fayahsoul,

I am not sure about the meaning of your sentence. Yes I have read the book form of the Grail message, and experienced the living form of the Grail message. It is a fact I have already stated in this forum many times. I however do not claim to be a "grail messenger" as I am member of no religious/spiritual body.

However, What I state, are my opinions and on the basis of my personal experiencing. The fact that something is written in one book or the other (whether Bible, Koran, or the Book form of the Grail message) does not prove the validity or otherwise of it. And Indeed, it is a mistake to stop at the letters of any book, including the one of Abdrushin.

I was led to Grail message via a spiritual experience. And A lot of people have experienced the Truth without ever reading any book, including the book form of the Grail message.

To sum up, I speak about things I have experienced. And Whatever I say, is my opinion and my experience. People should open their heart, use their intuition to seek the Truth and experience it also.

If on the other hand, your words were meant to be derogatory and pejorative, then I wish you strength and blessings.

Greetings.

micodon:


The Bible NEVER said that. People who do not understand the Bible think the 6 creative days are 6 literal days.

vivaciousvivi:

God bless you. I have been itching to comment on the time travel comments I saw here. Its completely abstract.

Dollyak:

There is a huge possibility for backward time travelling, at least from a mathematical point fo view-based on Einstein's theory of general relativity, which describes gravity as the warping of spacetime by energy and matter. An extremely powerful gravitational field, such as that produced by a spinning black hole, could in principle profoundly warp the fabric of existence so that spacetime bends back on itself. This would create a closed timelike curve, a loop that could be traversed to travel back in time.

mayskit4luv:
All I knw z dat equilibrium will b established someday....

rhizoidz:
Like a scientist I love being opposite, questioning the root of things and ideas before trying to get answers,

I'm going to relate the omnipotence paradox to a mathematical theory of the idea of the rotation of the moon around the earth.

Instances
1. X is omnipotent, which is defined as the ability to do all.
2. Can X create an entity(Y) which is too great for him to destroy?

Possibilities
1. Just like space and time would be opposite sides of the same entity, creation and destruction, life and death, infinity and zero are opposite sides of the same entity, the fact that for X to be omnipotent, he must be able to do Y and undo it at the same time,each of which makes the other impossible, which is supposed to be normal , one observation of mine is that whenever two equal sides if the same entity are imposed , they create a continuum, which both are present and at the same time none is present.

2. The factors that would confirm X's nature of being omnipotent is the ability of X 1. Be able to create Y which he should not be able to destroy then 2. Destroy Y, if he can do both, then he is omnipotent, isn't that so? He has to obey two forces of the same magnitude but different directions, now relate this to the rotation of the moon about the earth... The moon is subjected to obey the law of gravity and that of the first law, so did that mean a massive explosion? No an infinite loop of cycles, then if X's ability to create Y and then destroy it made him omnipotent, it might have also made him eternal, stuck in a loop of cycles...
Darn it!! I've just created another question!

Looking up to you peeps, can you help me sort this hypothesis, and put it in the right order.

SirWere:

Have you read Micheal Criction's "sphere"

RobinHez:
A new bbm group has been created for those interested in discussing science and technology. If you're interested please put down ur bbm pins so you get added to the group.

Geofavor:

Lol. See as you dey laugh me. We are still on the same page here, boss.
It seems you and the other guys misunderstood what I meant by "explosion" in that context. I didn't mean "blow up". No. I meant a "rampant increase".

If I'm correct, a singularity exploded (or expanded) over billions of years to form the universe -- says the theory.

Subsequently, living organism began to emerge. How? They formed themselves from the already existing matter. This, I am not comfortable with.




. Definitely I have a lot to learn. If this is so, shouldn't reproduction be made from raw matter then? I think abiogenesis is still a mere hypothesis.

johnydon22:


That is quite intriguing but still doesn't account to the fact no other person saw that particular event that only the kids saw.

If a flying machine suddenly appears in the sky close for people to see majority would see it not some selected few.

My position when it comes to U.F.O alien theories remains.

U.F.O means Unidentified flying Objects and as it name implies "Unidentified" means we have no idea what it is.

If you call it an alien space ship, it is no longer "Unidentified" since you already identified what it is.

Lenticular clouds are said to be the most causes of U.F.O sightings, that we don't know what a flying object is doesn't mean it is alien.

Until we get a clear picture of such claims, maybe the aliens stop landing in back yard of farmers and school children and start landing in airports.

till then there is no need to paint a picture based on such vague shadowy claims.