I'll tip Madrid for the trophy considering how far they have come. I have been observing for a while now that any defence that proved difficult for us have always somehow been easily penetrated by Madrid.
I just hope I am wrong this time.

Welcome Valverde!

You played under Johan Cruyff, we hope you'll help us regain our identity that has brought us so much joy and success.

We actually didn't end the season trophyless.

Goodbye Lucho, thank you for all the good, the bad and the ugly we got served under your watch. Good luck to you in your future endeavour.

Chelseafan1:


It's not very common with the Epl like it is with Laliga, go check the records, I think Chelsea broke or set a new record with ds 93 points, im not so sure. **modifed** Chelsea have won with 95 points in 2004/2005....its been long.

Pep was disappointing, Mou was, Spurs were Spurs.



Chelsea actually set a new record with the most number of wins in a season.. .. which is 30 wins outta 38

It doesn't always happen like this. You shouldn't judge with this

It doesn't always happen, but it happened already.
My point? If what happened had actually happened in La liga, would you be singing the same song? Your guess is as good as mine I am sure you got the drift!

Chelseafan1:


He never had it easy tho and u sef know.

He most likely wouldn't break a sweat to win the Laliga

How come Chelsea finished the league with 93 points and 7 points ahead of the second placed team while Madrid(who supposedly didn't break a sweat) won the league with same 93 points and just 3 points ahead of the second placed team?

Chelseafan1:


You have a point but then again, if we are being truthful to oursleves, we would agree that it's very easy for any coach to win trophies with than it is with any Epl team.

Barca has a rich history and always try to sign the best players from other leagues and club, same for Madrid too.

That's the point here sir. The emboldened would have been the words used on Conte as nobody would have praised him for the good job done.

Chelseafan1:


Lol, dt one na joke na.....thing is, it's always easy for any coach to succeed at Barca than say Chelsea, because of the quality of players in the team and of course Messi. But that doesn't still mean, credit shouldn't be given to the Coaches.

What has changed about the sextuple - winning Pep who couldn't win ordinary spoon with those kinda city players, is it that he has lost his coaching skills or he is now clueless.?

I am sure you would get the point I am trying to make.

The emboldened says it all. But often times, rather than giving credit, you guys tend to tow the other lane. Need I remind you that a certain Tata never won anything in Barca albeit having same Messi and co at his disposal? That's to tell you that it's not always as easy as you guys always want us to believe.

As per the sextuple winning coach, I don't need to tell you that he still remains the only coach to have done it in the history of football. If it's that easy as you guys always claim, every coach that coaches Barca should be boasting of such a feat every season.

Chelseafan1:
On a more serious note now Sebod, earlier Conte was losing that myself and some other fans wanted him out sef....we were swearing for him seriously until he say down, tweaked our formation to 3-4-3, that was what won us the league...


You have to give him props for that.

I have never discredited him for the good job done.
My point is this: if he had done all the tweaking of formation, and won the league for Barca, you guys would have made us believe he had it easy because of Messi and co, no competition in La Liga bla bla bla and not because he's good at tweaking formation. I could as well quote your post on Bayern thread claiming anybody would win with Messi

Chelseafan1:


[b]We were left dumbfounded he won it in his first attempt [/b]with players Pep and Mourinho think are useless.

The emboldened means he's a great coach. Wouldn't you have termed him fraud had he done that in Barca? Wouldn't you have also believed he's able to win it in Spain because anybody can win it in Barca and not because he's good?

Chelseafan1
You should know bro. Conte came to Chelsea and won the league in his first attempt in a supposedly tough league which makes him at least a very good coach. The question is, if he had won the league for Barca in his first attempt, wouldn't you guys have termed him a fraud as anybody could coach Barca and still win?

Chelseafan1:


Don't be surprised Moyes would come and win the treble or sextuple for them.

Congrats on your league victory bro. However, I have a simple question for you.
If Conte had come to Barca instead of Chelsea and wins the league in his first season as he did with Chelsea, would you have termed him a great/good coach?

SeekinAttention:



I thought they were looking for at the Chelshit thread earlier today

Just saw the mentions by those crazy dudes this night
Even Kesh, a staunch Shekpite at that time had given the league to city only for them to mess things up. Wetin man go do?

Congrats to Madrid!

Chelseafan1:


Shame no go ever let Sebod show for here.... E dey inside hin toilet like ds dey peep ds thread.

I dey my house, come and beat me

airmark:




I have sent IV to the president-general of ramuzaki's supporter's club, Mr. Rafiu ladipo Sebod. All the way from barcelona. They were in it together according to him.

You don craze finish I swear

Pep fall hand sha

senorova:


Why are you embarrassing your ancestors?

The guy is too slow!

hensben:
Yes football is not lawn tennis. Neymar should move to epl or hazard go to la Liga before they can be compared just like in the case of when cr7 was in epl you rarely see fans comparing him to Messi, or you think if cr7 remained in epl he will be effective the he is now.
You nor know ball sha so this things I am saying will be difficult for you to understand or maybe you chose to to form deaf ear, typical club fan behavior.
My advise to you is to be a football fan first before been a club fan, by doing that you will understand the game better and won't analyze sentimentally.

I love the way you adhered strictly to the advice. Just keep it up. No be me and you go dey argue untop Hazard-Neymar. I no get that kind time. Well done the real football fan!

agrovick:


Some of you just spit crap in the name of trolling, this is an excerpt from bleachers report

Pedro leaves Barca under a small cloud. Club secretary Robert Fernandez claimed on TV3 the player forced his own exit by handing in a transfer request, something Pedro rubbish

So pray tell what is your own definition of reject considering this is a player Barca were reluctant to let go.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2529333-pedro-transfer-news-latest-rumours-speculation-on-barcelona-star

Barcelona were initially reluctant to sell the 28-year-old, a feeling that was strengthened by Neymar’s recent illness with the mumps.
Pedro was considered the first point of backup for the Barcelona attack, but he made clear that he wanted more: a regular starting spot.

http://www.101greatgoals.com/blog/im-already-blue-pedro-tweets-thanks-to-barcelona-after-joining-chelsea/

sebod:
It's so funny how many Shekpites still don't know the meaning of the word 'reject'. They tend to take it personal whenever any of their players doing fine is called one.
The moment a player is deemed surplus to requirement by his club, and leaves to another club to ply his trade in search of a 1st team shirt he could not lay claim at the former club, he becomes a reject of the club. This does not necessary mean the players is not good
Alexis moving to Bayern does not make him an Arsenal reject as long as the club wishes he extends his contract as a sure starter. But a Barca reject as he was surplus to requirement at Barca not be cause he was not good but because he could not break into the starting line up.

Costa, Aguero, Falcao et all were never La Liga rejects unlike Pedro, Alexis, Di Maria and co who had to leave to avoid sitting on the bench.

Trust some Shekpites to still bite

Is it that you didn't read the post well before jumping at your keypad to type or you don't understand the word 'surplus to requirement'? Kindly read the post again carefully if you can see...Alexis moving to Bayern does not make him an Arsenal reject as long as the club wishes he extends his contract as a sure starter. But a Barca reject as he was surplus to requirement at Barca not be cause he was not good but because he could not break into the starting line up.
And then tell me if Pedro was a sure starter and the reason he chose to leave.

hensben:
Leave that guy make him dey foo.l himself. That's how they start their comment with insult thinking they want to make sense but ending up saying rubbish and becoming a troll.

if only you can point to the insult in that post...... I'll advise you stick to 'football is not lawn tennis, Neymar should come to Epl for you to rate him bla bla bla' if you can't summit a reasonable rebuttal.

It's so funny how many Shekpites still don't know the meaning of the word 'reject'. They tend to take it personal whenever any of their players doing fine is called one.
The moment a player is deemed surplus to requirement by his club, and leaves to another club to ply his trade in search of a 1st team shirt he could not lay claim at the former club, he becomes a reject of the club. This does not necessary mean the players is not good
Alexis moving to Bayern does not make him an Arsenal reject as long as the club wishes he extends his contract as a sure starter. But a Barca reject as he was surplus to requirement at Barca not be cause he was not good but because he could not break into the starting line up.

Costa, Aguero, Falcao et all were never La Liga rejects unlike Pedro, Alexis, Di Maria and co who had to leave to avoid sitting on the bench.

Trust some Shekpites to still bite

CDM....DMF....

Nihilist is such a crazy dude I have this feelings he's a staunch Messi fan in disguise

pelvicky:
everybody seems to forget about Laurent Blanc.



Still preferable than all the names mentioned since.

what do you think dmcdad, sebod, coded01

I am really admiring this Juve coach for the way he sets up his team.
Blanc can also do a very good job with us if given the opportunity.

eyoniggar:


Bro, Madead wont won back to back. Truth be told, Simeone and his boys should allow team B play the 2nd leg.

Their team B might even do better.

foladj:


Everybody has their days.
Same way madrid didnt take their chances against barca.

This is a fare excuse, better than the solid defence/better keeper one.

foladj:


Yeah, against a berra keeper and solid defence

Does it really matter?
I don't think a solid defence and a better keeper was enough reason to blow up chances.
Let's see how the defence/keeper fare against Madrid.

foladj:

Dem jus dash am 2 "one on one" with keeper yesterday

The same way Suarez, Iniesta, Messi et all got the chances to score but blew them.

eyoniggar:



Calm down, you'll see how the season will end, you'll almost laugh till your teeth starts dropping off.

Forget ATM, very useless team, maybe they are tired, maybe not, all I know is, you cant allow a team that took two SURE CL trophys from you and then allow them get 3 past you in a semi. They should never find themselves into this stage of the UCL next season. But whats up with christina and his offside position these days? That first goal shouldnt have counted if the lines man have raised his flag.

Eyoniggar baba!
I don't see Juve stopping Madrid honestly. As compact as Juve were against us, we still got some very decent scoring chances only to be blown away by our players who chose to be profligate in front of goal in both legs. Madrid in the other hand have a way of utilising their slim chances coupled with the fact that they are often backed up with luck and poor ref decisions.

Madrid also have a very strong bench who can win them matches on a good day, another reason I feel they might also win the league. I am still hunted by the fact that we messed up our chances of at least winning the league.

All in all, I hope I laugh till me teeth almost drop off come the season end as you have opined.

As per CR7, I think he should be rather applauded for always positioning himself strategically and his ability to convert the chances when presented at him. ATM/Simeone should be blamed for their shambolic display last night rather than the ref.

Forget about Juve, just hand the UCL trophy to Madrid now.

I don't ever want to hear about Simeone being a top coach anymore. He's just a normal average coach.

hamzeiy:

so make the man wait untill the cheat of a wofe decides to walk away?.. thats a spineless advice pls

One of the responsibilities of a man is to defend his home against external aggression. He should fight for the survival of his marriage. And if after he's done all he could to make the woman see why the children don't deserve a broken home by changing her ways and insists on walking away, he then can be absolved of any guilt whatsoever. Never forget he made the first mistake of marrying her!

adam500hr:


I was a mere 27 yr old man with little or no change when we met. I was ok, but not to the point of having a woman rate me as rich or having then. Dont get it twisted, every woman get their own, na just the level of their ways different. What happened to me can happen to anybody, this is not tales by moonlight, na tales od day light.

What happened to you can happen to anybody, agreed. It's obvious you married her out of pity in order to avoid shame. That's the first mistake made. You can't afford to make another by allowing your family scatter, do all you can to salvage your home. Talk to her and pray to God. It's your responsibility as the head to raise a godly home.
No child deserves a broken home.

adam500hr:
Was not blind, met within 3 wks, got pregnant, told my parents i cant marry her cos i dont know her well, sbut they said in order to avoid shame for her family cos her pops was a pastor and that i woudnt want the same fate to become of my own daughter, that i'll just have to marry her. Thats where the story of my life began.

You actually slept with a stranger probably just to ease off, she in turn fell in love with your money and thought it would always be business as usual. And when what got her attracted to you seems no longer forthcoming, she's got to sort herself out.

You are already married, try and do whatever you could to save your marriage, bearing in mind you are the architect of whatever happens. You can't afford to make another mistake of having a broken home unless she decides to walk away.