Contact17:



errm isnt that what I just wrote except worded differently?

Modified- Check my previous post
The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “It is not permissible to shed the blood of a Muslim who bears witness that there is no god except Allaah and that I am His Messenger, except in one of three cases: a soul for a soul (i.e., in the case of murder); a married man who commits adultery; and one who leaves his religion and splits form the jamaa’ah (main group of Muslims).” (Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 6878; Muslim, 1676)

a
man who fought against Allah and His Apostle and deserted
Islam and became an apostate." There is a condition there. Clearly the person must have been a mole and have been leaking infomation to the enemies, this person will be killed even in western military rule.

Contact17:
There is only three instances where people should be killed
1) A person who murdered someone intentionally
2) An person who commits adultery
3) An apostate

liar..... Bukhari (83:37) - "Allah's Apostle never killed anyone except
in one of the following three situations: (1) A person who
killed somebody unjustly, was killed (in Qisas,) (2) a married
person who committed illegal sexual intercourse and (3) a
man who fought against Allah and His Apostle and deserted
Islam and became an apostate."

AminuRano87:
I like your courage to tell the truth. All other Muslims that said otherwise are hypocrites.
That's Islam new comers are welcomed but no one can leave it. Doesn't it look like a CULT?

some people believes hadith over Quran. May Allah show you the right path.

lexiconkabir:
Your Question will be answered by theses following points,


(1) This is the ruling of Allaah and His Messenger, as the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "Whoever changes his religion, kill him." (reported by al-Bukhaari, al-Fath, no. 3017).

(2) The one who has known the religion which Allaah revealed, entered it and practised it, then rejected it, despised it and left it, is a person who does not deserve to live on the earth of Allaah and eat from the provision of Allaah.

(3) By leaving Islaam, the apostate opens the way for everyone who wants to leave the faith, thus spreading apostasy and encouraging it.

(4) The apostate is not to be killed without warning. Even though his crime is so great, he is given a last chance, a respite of three days in which to repent. If he repents, he will be left alone; if he does not repent, then he will be killed.

(5) If the punishment for murder and espionage (also known as high treason) is death, then what should be the punishment for the one who disbelieves in the Lord of mankind and despises and rejects His religion? Is espionage or shedding blood worse than leaving the religion of the Lord of mankind and rejecting it?

(6) None of those who bleat about personal freedom and freedom of belief would put up with a neighbour’s child hitting their child or justify this as "personal freedom," so how can they justify leaving the true religion and rejecting the sharee’ah which Allaah revealed to teach mankind about His unity and bring justice and fairness to all?

ISIS member everywhere, May Almight Allah save us from wahabiyah and their beliefs.

and mutual tolerance. In Western countries, Sikh policemen and soldiers are allowed to wear their turbans
and beards, and this has not led to any Sikhization of Europe and America. Besides, why on earth would a
mere piece of clothing lead to mass conversions in any faith? How reasonable does that sound?
Apparently, Ogundiya’s alarmist approach to internal Muslim issues – which have absolutely nothing to
do with Christians or Christianity – is disturbing, to say the least. He is supposed to give responsible
leadership to the Osun State Christian community. But, what is he doing instead? It is even terribly
disappointing that he is asking the state governor to flout the ruling of the state high court, just to calm
his jumpy nerves. Perhaps, a sign of how out-of-line Ogundiya has become is his comical vow to appeal
the judgment, even though neither he nor his organization was a party in the case. Considering the utter
emptiness and rashness of his threats and actions, it seems considerably clear that he is only a
troublemaker. He has no interest in peaceful coexistence between Muslims and Christians in Osun State.
He wants to build a wall of hatred between the two faith communities and sow the seeds for a bleak
future for our noble state. But, is that really the teaching of Christ? “A man without self-control is like a
city broken into and left without walls,” says the Christian scripture. Such a man is indeed a threat to
humanity as a whole. Maybe, it is high time that the leaders of CAN started to deal with their Muslim
compatriots “with all humility and gentleness, with patience, bearing with one another in love” as their
holy book prescribes.

The situation has been described as a “crisis” by mainstream news outlets, like The Punch, Vanguard and
Premium Times. The Osun State High Court had on June 3, 2016 given a judgment which recognizes and
upholds the constitutional rights of female Muslim students in the state to wear their hijabs at school,
during school hours. The court specifically cited section 38 of the 1999 constitution (as amended) as the
basis for its ruling. Hijab is a “fundamental right” of the female Muslim students under that section, said
the court. The said section grants “every person” in Nigeria the freedom to “manifest” their religion. That
obviously covers the use of the hijab by any Muslim citizen.
In the Islamic faith, the hijab is of exactly the same status as the five daily prayers. Both of them are
absolutely obligatory upon the matured Muslim girls and women. She must wear it wherever a male –
who is not from her immediate family – is present. To give a clearer idea of the status of the hijab, it is, to
the devout Muslim woman, more important than the turban is to the Sikh. Therefore, while it is easy to
find Muslim girls and women who do not like wearing the hijab (mostly due to their upbringing and
environment), there are indeed others who wish to carry out the command of their God by wearing it
anytime they are outside their homes. Under the Nigerian constitution, they have the “fundamental right”
to do that. It is indeed noteworthy that the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) have never denied this
either. They too concede that the hijab is a fundamental right of female Muslims. However, they simply
cannot let them exercise that constitutional right.
According to the leaders of CAN in Osun State, the hijab symbolizes the “Islamization” of the state. So,
their opposition to its use by female students is, in their view, a kickback against creepy conversion of the
“Christian” (?) State of Osun into an Islamic caliphate. On June 7, CAN even organized an “emergency”
meeting over the renewed hijab “threat.” Elisha Ogundiya, their local chairman, later issued a statement
declaring that the hijab is an Islamic propagation tool. CAN fear that as soon as Muslim students started
wearing their hijab at school, everyone in Osun State would somehow become Muslim, and then possibly
a caliph would emerge. These facts reveal that CAN see the hijab as an existential threat. So, they will
never stop opposing it, and may even go to very desperate lengths to stop Muslims from wearing it. This
necessarily puts them on an eternal collision course with the generally peaceful and law-abiding Muslim
majority of Osun State.
CAN threaten to direct Christian students in the state “to start wearing Christian garments and vestments
as part of their school uniform for the propagation of our own faith” if the governor decides to respect
the court’s pro-hijab ruling. The exact point of comparison between the hijab and the Christian garment
is, however, not mentioned. The hijab is compulsory for the female Muslim, in all places and at all times
– except only when she is with her immediately family. Is that the case with the “Christian” garments
(whatever that means)? When a female Muslim is prevented from wearing her hijab, she is thereby
automatically denied the right to perform one of her most fundamental religious obligations. Is it then
really the case that the “Christian garments” are obligatory upon female Christians in all places and at all
times (except in the presence of their immediate families) as well? Is it truly a religious obligation in
Christianity to adorn choir robes and other “Christian” vestments virtually everywhere they are?
It is obviously impossible to miss the intolerance and fanaticism of Christian leaders like Ogundiya, who
raise false alarms over non-issues and needlessly stoke up religious tensions between Christians and
Muslims. The world has moved beyond such kinds of religious rascality. This is the age of intellectualism

Messi is the best footballer ever, nobody is close. In football it is Messi and others

rita25:
mine is 90/70 I don't know if that is too low or just ok.

hypotension.... Too low

Seeing marriages crashing on a daily basis make me wonder if true love still exist. Maybe because I have seen too much of india movies, I still firmly believe in love but seeing love turning to hatred in many marriages make me fear marriage. Is something wrong with our generation? Or is it that marriage orientation is low?

Prince

Prince

malele:
Useless party. 2016 budget never gree una bring out na 2017 una dey think off

[color=#990000][/color]for your mind you have said something reasonable?! Please always read the article and think well before you comment