https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRWJcrRO0GM

Shaprara:


Absolutely right. That’s a result of liberal and far left policies. Last time anything good came out of California Ronald Reagan was governor.

Might have as well put Portland, Oregon on the list! It's Antifa central in that s***show of a city!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KO3ct4iCkfU

Here's a few interesting questions:

Who are SJWs in America?
Who are Soy-Boys?
What are the differences between the Transgender Community & Feminism?

OLAADEGBU:


Do you mean you never ever lied?

Yes! Also I'm not resorting to "Holier than you" tactics like an oppressive robot-like policeman!

OLAADEGBU:



Too much grammar, just answer the questions conscientiously.

To let you know bluntly, You are a gaslighting cretin who is easily offended by highly intelligent folk & Critical contextual evidence that absolutely counter the Anglo-Saxon Christianity which was perfectly designed by the Jesuits which you uphold!

Here's your answers:
- I did not lie, sexually bang another man's wife (looking at a woman with lust does not count as adultery whatsoever as that is a Jesuit created lie), steal from anybody at all, or covet anything that belongs to my neighbor(s)!

OLAADEGBU:


Then answer the follow-up questions in the videoclip.

Here's the fatal flaw to your questions: This is a guilt-trip video made with Jesuit gatekeeping influences!

OLAADEGBU:



Are you good?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCSUKIhjevo

Of course i'm a good person! This is nothing more than utilization of illogical fallacies to gatekeep people from Critical Thought & Contextual Analysis of how sex before marriage is never a sin & made up guilt-trip designed by the Vatican w/ the Jesuits!

* Prior to the 1800s AD period, AIDS/HIV never became common in the world & realistic, a very rare disease viral disease that stayed almost exlusively in Ancient South Africa!
* Ancient Israel w/ the realm of the Ancient Roman Empire never had any HIV infection incidents at all w/ no HPV incidents & no Hepatitis C incidents!

* Heterosexual Anal Sex can never be the quickest way to get AIDS as long as
- both heterosexual partners are not drug addicts including needle use
- The male partner never was a bisexual at all especially a load of anal creampies & anus expanding sessions by using only the joystick
- The anal sex session itself does not involve severe damage and/or bleeding of the anal cavity
- the female partner is not a tranny lover especially Ice-Cream'd around 20+ times by trannies
- Both partners' immune systems are in pristine condition
- (Bonus) Utilization of a condom

* For the submissive partner receiving the penial action with the internal seminal ejaculation of the HIV-infected partner per exposure --- 1/70 chance of infection
* For the submissive partner receiving the penial action without the internal seminal ejaculation of the HIV-infected partner per exposure --- 1/154 chance of infection
* Non-infected HIV person (or a complete healthy person in general) doing 500 sexual encounters without condom use (vaginal only, anal only & Vaginal w/ anal): 1/16000 or 0.0000625% (<<<<<<<<<
* Non-infected HIV person doing 500 sexual encounters with condom use (vaginal only, anal only & Vaginal w/ anal): 1/110000 or 0.00000909% (<<<<<<<


* The notable countries with the lowest HIV rates are Iran, Saudi Arabia, "Bosnia and Herzegovina", Lebanon, Australia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Sweden, Albania, and the Netherlands!
- Czech Republic has an HIV infection rate of 0.0335%
Hungary has an HIV infection rate of 0.0205%
* The notable countries with the highest HIV rates (Not from the Continent of Africa) are Jamaica - 1.70%, Guyana - 1.60%, Suriname - 1.40%, "Trinidad and Tobago" (from the Caribbean islands) - 1.20%, Thailand - 1.10%, Dominican Republic - 1.00%, Ukraine - 0.90%, Russia - 0.8% to 1.0, Papua New Guinea - 0.90%, Panama - 0.80%, Indonesia - 0.40%, and Mexico - 0.30%!
* The geographical section of Africa that has the highest HIV infection rates is Southern Africa especially Swaziland, South Africa, Botswana, Mozambique, and Zimbabwe!
-

* The USA has a HIV infection rate of 0.30% with 1,100,000 people living with HIV out of 321 Americans in the USA (recorded in 2015)
- The American South w/ Washington DC are the most afflicted regions of HIV Infection

* Brazil (of South America) in 2017 had an HIV infection rate of 0.60% to 0.65%
- Most of the 0.60% HIV infection rate in Brazil happens within the Southeastern quadrant (Rio Grande do Sul, São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro)
- Almost 1 million people in Brazil are living with HIV (Ages 15 - 49)!
- Factors that contribute to Brazil's HIV infection: Severe Air Pollution, Severe Water pollution, The Goiania Accident in the Brazilian state of Goias, Poor Liver Health, Severe Alcohol Abuse, Severe Drug Abuse (especially with Cocaine, Meth & GHB), Poor Digestive Tract Health, and trisexual lifestyles (Mostly men)



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV/AIDS
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_HIV/AIDS#Spread_to_the_Western_Hemisphere
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_HIV/AIDS_adult_prevalence_rate
https://www.avert.org/professionals/hiv-around-world/western-central-europe-north-america/usa
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/geographicdistribution.html
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/ataglance.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV/AIDS_in_Brazil
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/russian-hiv-cases-reach-record-high-of-over-a-million-a6828816.html
https://aidsvu.org/state/california/
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/002204269702700109?journalCode=joda
https://www.elitedaily.com/news/world/countries-us-states-highest-std-rates/964727

OLAADEGBU:


Atheists' love their sin is unprecedented.

Modern Christians just don't understand that their anti-sex philosophies come from the works of Stoicism, Neo-Platoism, Marcionism, The Cybele Cult, the teachings of Clement [of Alexandria], and Hermetic teachings!

http://thedperson1..com/2016/04/the-early-christians-were-extremely.html

MrBrownJay1:


Yet Abraham, King David, King Solomon and many other had countless of biatches, baby mamas, mistresses, yet were never viewed as sinners by your holy book...?!

Bro, get a brain, so long as the lady is unmarried, a man can have as many biatches/baby mamas/ mistresses/ concubines as he possibly desire....

You are clearly more intelligent than most sex-negative Christians within the Nairaland forum on Religion, Romance & Sexuality!

* Ancient Israel always has legalized Polygamy, Non-cultic non-pagan Prostitution & Concubinage within their land when they reigned supreme
* God/YHWH/"The Lord" never desired for Mankind to be sexually neurotic sheep-like creatures that can easily fall off a cliff!
* Sexual intercourse itself never makes a man & woman "Married"!
* Not even Jesus/NT Messiah (when analyzing the New Testament in Koine Greek rather than in Anglo-Saxon English) wanted Mankind to be sexually neurotic sheep-like creatures that can easily fall off a cliff!
* Paul the Apostle is not greater than God/YHWH/"The Lord". Abraham, Issac, Jacob, Israel, Moses, Aaron, Samson, Caleb, Joshua, King David, King Solomon, Elijah, Enoch, Ezekiel, and even Jesus/NT Messiah with Mary Magdelene & his 12 dispcles
* The Letters of Paul does not constitute the complete architect of the sexual morals that God/YHWH/Jehovah/"The Lord" set up
* The Jesuits made up almost all of the anti-sex doctrines preached by the Christian masses including the "Premartial sex = sin" teachings & "Abstinence till marriage" doctrine
*Today's Porn w/ fapping to it does not even equal to fornication!

OLAADEGBU:


All this argument just for the love of sexual sins?

No it isn't!

This argument is purely for the pursuit of critical analysis, truth & extremely tangible evidence rather than the pursuit of silly emotionalism, sheep drolly & illogical fallacies seen throughout most of Christedom!

OLAADEGBU:


You need to get born again, you need an afterlife.

Fornication is not premartial sex at all as you were led to believe by the christian masses!
Fornication NOT equal prostitution.

http://inkaboutit4u.com/fornication-is-not-premarital-sex.html
http://inkaboutit4u.com/fornication-definition-expose-wrong-definition.html
http://inkaboutit4u.com/fornication-defined-by-paul-sides.html
http://inkaboutit4u.com/what-fornication-is-not-what-adultery-is-not.html
http://inkaboutit4u.com/pornography-what-it-is-and-what-it-is-not.html

Fornication is actually cultic pagan fertility god worship by utilizing sex! (Numbers Chapter 25 verse 1 - 9 w/ Deuteronomy 23:17 - 18, Leviticus 21:1 - 15 & 1 Corinthians Chapter 10)

The modern definition of Fornication was created by the Catholic Church & The Jesuits!

OLAADEGBU:


It was Thomas Jefferson who said: "The precepts of philosophy and of the Hebrew code, laid hold of actions only. [Jesus] pushed His scrutinies into the heart of man, erected His tribunal in the region of his thoughts and purified the waters at the fountainhead."

Can you tell me what sexual sin that does not involve lust?

Exodus Chapter 20 - Deuteronomy 31:26 was 3200+ years before Thomas Jefferson (3rd President of the USA) was born & within those scriptures, there are no instance of sexual lust itself being evil! King David's many wives never made him evil until he coveted Bathsheba who was married to another man! Bathsheba was never a single woman when King David "lusted" for her!

Exodus Chapter 20 - Deuteronomy 31:26 is the complete architect of the sexual morals that God/YHWH/Jehovah/"The Lord" set up which was 3200+ years before the USA was born & 1600 years before the start of the Ancient Roman Empire!

I suggest you study on the Chronological background on Ancient Israel, Ancient Neo-Babylon, The timeframe between Abraham to Moses, Ancient Persia & Ancient Greece before drawing up hazy conclusions about "sexual sin" that has more flawed gloryholes than walls of a dilapidated building!

Doesn't take Rocket Science or Calculus 4 to figure things out!

Let ask serious critical thinking questions before we put on our emotions-only caps & wail like infantized children:


1. Is "Sexual lusting towards unmarried women" even mentioned in the 10 Commandments (Exodus Chapter 20)?
2. What are the specific sexual sins that Exodus Chapter 20 - Deuteronomy 31:26 listed? (Leviticus Chapter 15, Numbers 5:11-31, Leviticus 19:29 & Deuteronomy 22:13 - 21 are excluded)
3. Have the English language existed prior to 5th Century AD?
4. Did Paul of Tarsus was with the 12 Disciples prior to Jesus's death?
5. How big was Ancient Israel in 10th Century BCE?

* Prostitution (Today's Prostitution/ordinary prostitution) in general is not a sin! God/YHWH/The Most High of Israel, within the entire Old Testament, never ban & never eternally hated ordinary prostitution as he showed complete apathy towards it as he was only concerning the stability of the children of Israel especially in the BCE era when he placed "limits" on the practice of ordinary prostitution (Leviticus Chapter 15, Numbers 5:11-31, Leviticus 19:29, Leviticus Chapter 20 & Deuteronomy 23:17 - 18 w/ Deuteronomy 23:1 - 6)
- God/YHWH/The Most High of Israel (In the wholeness of the entire Old Testament) never wanted all of mankind to be sexually neurotic monogamous-only people at all as Biology itself & History 101 tells you the case!
- Nowhere in the Ten Commandments (Exodus Chapter 20) even states ordinary prostitution as as a transgression whatsoever or even mentions a tittle about it.
- Nowhere in the Old Testament states a "universal ban" against ordinary prostitution!
- A prostitute was a “rented” sex partner, A married women was a “bought and paid in full” sex partner and you had to pay the daily upkeep.. That was the only major different as far a sex partner goes.

* By the advent of the NT Messiah described in the New Testamentw/ the Law of Moses being decommissioned (including The Levite Priesthood), declaring Prostitution (Today's Prostitution/ordinary prostitution) in general as "a sin" is 100% irrelevant & 100% faulty!
- Leviticus Chapter 15, Numbers 5:11-31, Leviticus 19:29, Leviticus Chapter 20 (some of it) & Deuteronomy 23:17 - 18 w/ Deuteronomy 23:1 - 6 all vitally were set-up for the sanctity of the Levitical Priesthood!
- Paul of Tarsus never went against ordinary prostitution at all in 1 Corinthians Chapter 5 - 10, Acts Chapter 15 & Acts Chapter 21! Only Scared Prostitution/Idolatrous Prostitution (Numbers Chapter 25) as it was still relevant in Ancient Rome/The Roman Empire & Roman-controlled Greece!
- Google map "Corinth" & "Thessaloniki"!


http://inkaboutit4u.com/?p=Fornication_Correct_Definition__All_Fornication_Verses
http://inkaboutit4u.com/bible-concordance-strongs-worthless-libchrist.html
http://inkaboutit4u.com/fornication-is-not-premarital-sex.html
http://inkaboutit4u.com/about-myself-contact-info.html

Lust Or Covet LibChrist Liberated Christians
PO Box 55045, Phoenix Az 85078-5045

Promoting Intimacy and Other-Centered Sexuality

COPYRIGHTED 1997-2002 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - MAY BE REPRINTED OR QUOTED FROM ONLY IF CREDIT IS GIVEN LIBERATED CHRISTIANS, MAILING ADDRESS IS SHOWN AND WE ARE SENT A COPY OF PUBLICATION.

LUST Or Covet

Math 5:27-28: An interpretation of this passage is that if you look at the Greek verb (lust more properly translated covet or desire), is the same word used in the Septuagint's translation of the 10th Commandment (not covet). In this case, Matthew has Jesus saying that covetousness, the desire to deprive another of his property, is the essence of adultery. Jesus was then reaffirming a quite traditional understanding of what is wrong with adultery.

The Greek word here is, of course, epithumia, which also means "covet" and is the word used by the translators of the Septuagint to translate the Hebrew, chamad, in Ex. 21:17 "Thou shalt not COVET ." It is not coincidence, by the way, that "neighbor's wife" is included with the other PROPERTY listed in this text...like neighbors ox etc...

In this case, Jesus was asserting that adultery does not consist primarily of sexual union of two people, at least one of which is married, but it consists rather in the intention, accomplished or not, to take what belongs to another. The purpose of the verse is to show no one is free of sin, but the nature of sin lies in impurity of the heart (taking from another man his wife) rather than the physical act itself. This is different from consensual nonmonogamy. Its like the Rabbi said at the swing club, "I don't want to own your wife, just borrow her!" Now, lets look at how porneia is used here,

The natural desire for sexual variety or the enjoyment of looking at a beautiful body has absolutely nothing to do with "lust" as most assume it to mean. Lust is only wrong if it is the selfish desire to take something from another. Lust is wrong if it is about greed and self satisfaction at the expense of another. But there is nothing whatsoever wrong with mutually desired loving intimacy and enjoying sexual variety or pornography for that matter.

In biblical times man could have as many wives and concubines (breeders) as they wished once the man was age 12 and the women age 13, and adultery was only a sin for a married women. It was never a sin for a married man as long as the other women was not married (owned by another man). There was nothing wrong with "common" prostitutes which are often mentioned with no negative inference. Only the idolatry of the Temple prostitutes who were via sex worshipping the fertility gods was a sin, not prostitutes or their customers.

Biblically lust was not nearly such a bad word as those that use it against sexuality seem to think. In the original Greek the word translated "lust" was used several other times for things NOT considered wrong: Jesus "lusted" to be with his disciples. The word is the same as that some use to make lust to be a sin. Did Jesus sin? No, but He lusted. Strong desire for something is not a sin.

Another interpretation of the famous "lust" passage is that Jesus was taking the law in which the scribes and Pharisees believed that they were so authoritative on and pressing that law (using adultery as an example) to its ultimate conclusion, the intent of the heart.

Jesus was not interested in making a new law for us to follow. After all, he came to fulfill the law in himself through atonement, to bring back to God those of us who will come. The ONLY commandment he gave was LOVE, love of God with all that is within us and love of others as we should love ourselves.

Jesus was pressing the law to its ultimate conclusion to show how damning impossible a task its proposed adherents set for themselves in their inherent inability to follow the law. Other NT verses come right out and say that the law condemns, and that salvation is to be found elsewhere. The law does not save. Jesus' graphic illustration of sin by saying that the lustful should first cut out their eyes to enter heaven is not meant literally because the heart is the real core. Jesus is being sarcastic with the dogged enemies of the truth that were the Pharisees and Sadducees who sought to keep their status quo intact.