wordcat:
Ajasco,

Papa Ajasco,

Mama Ajasco,

Boy Alinco,

Pa James,

Pa Jimoh

I don forget that lady name

Although I'm not a Red Pill adherent per se I still happen to be a movie buff. So based on my movie watching experience, I can recommend the following:

1) Disclosure (A movie about a married man falsely accused of s e x u a l harassment by his boss)

2) Derailed (A movie about a married man blackmailed for infidelity and his attempts at redemption results in shocking revelations)

3) The Last Seduction (If you want to see a practical illustration of simping/white knighting and the disastrous consequences that go with it, then this is the movie for you)

4) Basic Instinct (after watching this movie you are likely to become wary of beautiful and intelligent women)

5) Unfaithful (I haven't watched this myself but I've read about it and I feel you red pillers may find it useful. Its basically about a married woman's infidelity and how her husband on finding out, lets jealousy drive him towards k i l l i n g the man his wife has been seeing)

6) Gone Girl (Someone has already recommended this but I am listing it here again for added emphasis. This is one movie you don't wanna miss trust me)

7) The Girlfriend Experience (A story of an escort showing how she navigates between her career as a girlfriend-for-hire and her personal life)

8 Nocturnal Animals (Story of a woman who parts ways with her first husband, a struggling writer at the time, because she perceived him as “weak” and because he could not provide for her materially. From the woman's point of view, the movie tells of her first husband attempts of getting back at her for breaking his heart.)

9. To Die for (A story of an ambitious woman with a career in TV news who will stop at nothing to get what she wants even if it means having her newly-wed husband m u r d e r e d by a high school student who has a crush on her)

10. Vicky Cristina Barcelona (Tells the story of two women, one single and the other engaged, who go to spend a vacation with relatives in Spain and end up in a love triangle with a troubled poet)


Moral of these films:

- Woman are just as capable of being unfaithful in relationships as men. Never forget that.


- It does not matter how romantic or emotionally available you are when in a relationship with a woman (particularly a hypergamous one). If your money is not involved in the romance, then the Lord is your strength.


- Never in your life underestimate a woman by saying, “What can she do? All she will do is cry and nag and nothing will happen” They are not always as fragile, weak or clueless as they may seem. They are strong and are capable of messing you up on a very good day either directly or through the help of other men like yourself. As in e go shock you.


- Learn to control your manhood if you don't want to get into trouble. More especially when you're married to a wonderful woman with kids.


- Being chivalrous can cost you your life and make you susceptible to feminine manipulation if you are not careful. If you must be a woman's knight in shining armour, then endeavour to take your brain along with you on that journey.


- As a man, it is necessary to know when a woman or another man like yourself is attempting to use your masculinity to manipulate you. On no account should you as a man let your masculinity be used against you either by a man or by a woman. To hell with all that alpha male and real man shii. If you end up losing your life in the process of proving that you are a real man na wetin you gain kwanu? I will rather be a “fake man” and live long enough to see my children's children even up to the fourth generation than die before my time all in the name of being a “real man”. After all, as wise old Solomon puts it, a living dog is better than a dead lion.


- Learn to control your jealousy. Going ahead to do something stupid because another man is shagging your wife or girlfriend is not always worth it.

- LAST BULLET: Woman wey like you go like you and woman wey no like you no go like you even if your build skyscraper give am.

HAPPY SUNDAY FOLKS... AND A HAPPY NEW MONTH!!

KevinDein:
Nice list @Theakuko. Watched a good number on that list, will be watching "To die for" later in the day.

Starcrest1:
I see 5 women in the frog

sparog:
One reality show that has to come back is Gulder Ultimate search

Ijawwomaninoyo:

But something is written up there that the woman didn't attend his parents' funeral because he didn't pay bride price.
The return of bride price symbolizes a dissolution.

Ijawwomaninoyo:

No man of God is responsible for anybody's misfortune. It is clearly written up there that he didn't pay bride price, so they are not legally married and she has every right to get married to anybody.

Magnoliaa:


Great!

You?

lefulefu:
did u say she already has three kids for c ronaldo?
then she really tried maintaining her figure this way
some ladies just one kid and they will just blow up everywhere
some dont even wait to have kids before they explode
probably she does cardio and watches what she eats
Anyway it would have been odd for someone like Ronaldo who is a fitness buff to have a woman that is completely out of shape

I've seen a childless couple with the husband being muscular and all but the wife is just plus size and all (I don't wanna say fat )

IamPlato:
yes There Is A Second Part Coming Next Year

Magnoliaa:

Hey dear, how have you been?

Slawormir:
Damnnnnn niggarrr
Isoright

I just dey pity Barcelona

If them repeat wetin them play against Napoli last week then i can bet my balls they are going out today
Suarez was acting like actor instead of him to be serious
Falling and rolling on the floor for every little touch
Greizmann is no where to be found....
They better be serious or lewandowski will score them every minute
I shock when that guy score five goals within nine minutes
Muller own even worse.....you nor go see am for inside field but the next thing you go hear from commentator na

Goal! Goal! Thomas muller

ThawneXS:
Barcelona is winning this one

3-1

lanreHeda:
pls how can assault be non physical ?.......explain this pls

O really? Thanks

Magnoliaa:



Yeah. They do undergo a surgical procedure.

Everywoman is a great book on gynecology. The best I've read on it. It explains a lot, veryy informative.

Magnoliaa:


The part at red. I've had a strong feeling about that being so. Judging from some of her threads and comments. I think she'll come around to accepting that, soon.

I totally agree with you.

If she wasn't a feminist (as she claims to be) I would have overlooked that comment she made on the presumption that she is probably a traditionalist. But what irks me is that this same "feminist" who is supposed to be fighting against gender-based stereotypes for women is now the same person expressing that same gender-based stereotypes as it concerns men. So what then makes her a feminist?

She sees a man as a pu**y for deciding to keep his home clean with a broom. I mean I seriously don't get it. How does a man taking up a broom to sweep his house and keep his surroundings clean suddenly translate to him being a pu**y? I mean how? Or is she trying to say that sweeping is meant for only those who actually have pu**ies as in women?

The Lord is her strength shaa. I pray she realises the error of her ways in time.

CHEERS

HolyTrinity:


Smiles. You tried to deviate from the theme of our discourse which is on FEMINISM. Are we talking outside the subject matter? How come you successfully draw in misogynists and religious leaders into this despite your being right about what you said? What gives you the impression that I can say the same about these group of people you mentioned. And what 'same' are you even talking about. Supporting male superiority? Do you feel I'm advocating male superiority? I understand your attempt to go off the point. But be coherent and intelligible with your replies and avoid unnecessary comparisons and verbose statements. Let's stick to the issue and thrash things out logically and realistically.

I gave a simple analogy showing how actions/acts determines the intent of the actor, but you interpreted it in a way to suit your narratives. Shocking you had to use that statement and relate it to things outside what we're saying. Hope you know your talking outside the facts changes nothing! At least, you agree that people have this natural tendency to twist things to suit themselves.

At the second bolded, who is disputing that fact with you? You wanna enjoy privileges? Be worth it and go ahead! It's a free world you know.

At the third bold, No, that's not what I'm saying. Okay?! Thank you.

At the fourth bold, No need apologising! Suit yourself. You're good, so feel good.

At bolded no.5, What conclusions do you think I have drawn? I appreciate your advice though. Thanks.

I want to ask you. Are men complaining about being hurt by traditional gender roles? And what sense is in it to have left it to females to help them champion. See the broader picture mister and stop trying to base reality on theory. Whose benefit is the greater good of feminism. I think the best way to have courted men into buying such feministic ideal (male feminist) would have been to feign inclusiveness with a subtle claim to masculine welfarism.

Lemme quote again that statement you gave from Wikipedia. It says;
''...some Feminists...argue for the inclusion of men's liberation within its aims, because they believe that men are also harmed by traditional gender roles''.
I just want to understand. Why fight for men when they can more than enough fight for themselves? I smell a subtle way of disguising the real intent of feminism. Or could it be that they realize the importance of male support in fighting for their erroneous cause? Should all men blatantly kick against feminism will the ideology stay this long? After all, it is from men they demand equal rights. Try and be logical and reason things quantitatively. The ideal lost it's credence and value the moment it sought gender equality in public and private life without taking into consideration the variation in inputs by both gender.

I need not say anything again. My friend, here's a little research for you. Go anywhere to anything relating to feminism and read comprehensively about their real agendas and aims. Don't just come selecting a few as it best help your arguments. Go find out entirely about the feminist ideology and tell me what you find. Pay particular attention to statements/quotes made by disguised feminists such as Mary Sanger, Hillary Clinton and cos. Then I'll show you a statement by Florence Nightingale (a Christian WWII nurse).

It seems the whites, the diehard campaigners of feminism, is where most Africans draw out rigid inspirations from. A truth is not truth when it's 99.99% right and 0.001% false.

At the last bold, I'm not referring only to the name, I'm also speaking with respect to the ideology. From a contextual perspective. The ideal is WRONG. Take it or leave it. When you successfully figure out what fuels feminism, you'll understand why it's inappropriate and something to kick against.

Moreover, names, tags are identities and somehow they influences destiny. Anyone can choose whatever name he feels like. That's their choice.

As a hint of note, You mentioned Jesus. Great of you to. But do you know Jesus had 12 disciples and there was no woman? I hope you won't allude that to His misperception of females. After all, He created them. Think critically about this before pulling out an argument out of this folks. I feel someone might find it controversial too.

HolyTrinity:



Brilliant input. But pls did you critically analyse my initial response? If you did indeed, then I think you missed my point.

Now, you can't separate an actor from his act. They go together. The act defines the activity of the actor. The act portrays the actor. This act may be influenced by any factor and the application depends on the discretion, intention, vision and radicality of the actor. When an act is not properly defined, things as abuse, misinterpretation, confusion or even deviation is inevitable.

Back to what you said. Yes agreed that some, if not the insignificantly few feminists (as you want me to term them, the 'reasonable/responsible' or the 'true' feminists), champion for equal male/female rights justly. Ok. But are you of the opinion that absolute equality in terms of outcomes, responsibilities, inputs/contributions involving the public and private life is possible between a male and a female?

I'm speaking strictly from this point. Overall equality.

As much as I appreciate societal inclusion, elevation, recognition and empowerment of women, Anyone with this ideal of total and exclusive equality is bereft of apt and sound reasoning. Such a one is an insolent scourge to the sensibilities.

No one must misconstrue absolute inclusiveness with absolute equality. Such error is an aberration to the orderly existence and coexistence of the male and female species.

And Sire, leave wikipedia out of this issue. Let's be realistic. I'm not basing my judgement on NL feminists. Who cares about anyone towing the wrong path order than to set him/her strait. So, leave all that nonessential assumptions.

Where you said feminists are not fighting for equal rights for women alone is as untrue as the tales of Lai Mohammed. What do you mean? Pls don't get it twisted. Who then are they fighting for? Fighting for less privileged men and themselves so they all can be equal with superior men? Again I say, don't get it twisted. This group want equality with men, as men, for themselves. Simple. And in a jointly proportional equal level on all grounds.

There may be feminists who simply want inclusion, responsibility and respect. Let them drop the feminist tag. They don't have to follow the feminist train to achieve their goals. Are there not people campaigning for girl child education? How about those advocating against domestic violence against women and female trafficking? Do they need feministic sermons to fight against these vices? Are men not in support of their efforts? So, what are we saying?

Lastly, no one is superior. No one is inferior. But let everybody be willing to accept their place and positional level in the scheme of nature/things. I don't need explaining again on why responsibilities cannot be same for both gender since I've done that already from previous replies.

Cheers.

HolyTrinity:


Smiles. Considering what you said, I checked up feminism and I found this;

A social theory or political movement which argues that legal and social restrictions on women must be removed in order to bring about EQUALITY of both sexes in ALL ASPECTS of public and private life.

So, any other thing for me to check up and have a better understanding of based on what have been documented down?!

I gave my view strictly on what I've found out feminism to be. Not what I've read about it alone, or heard about it. I mean experiential study. My inferences and statements are clearly a juxtaposition of inductive and deductive claims which are objectively evaluated.

I may not know the intent behind your claim above. I hope you'll make me understand.

Experience is the best teacher, but Observation is the best experience.
Thank you.