Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,236,421 members, 8,102,047 topics. Date: Wednesday, 12 March 2025 at 05:43 AM

Uche40's Posts

Nairaland Forum / Uche40's Profile / Uche40's Posts

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (of 5 pages)

Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 9:34pm On Nov 10, 2022
Namdio:


Firstly, Happy New Month!

Second, this is a clear case of people misinterpreting what God said, save for the last one (she is definitely mentally ill)

I don't think when God said leave all your belonging, he literally meant everything (and the two were pastors lol). They should have at least worn some clothes smh.

As for the truck driver, there had to have been a better way to get the woman to pull over. At least no one was harmed.

Happy new month. Been crazy busy lately.

1 Like

Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 7:09am On Nov 01, 2022
jasminer:


1. You don't want to judge Christianity by its own book of law, but you want to judge Christianity based on some philosophical trash written by only God knows who grin grin grin Double standards... I'll pass.

2. If we would continue having this discussion, I won't tolerate you calling my Holy Bible a fictional book, it's worse than you insulting my parents. I haven't insulted you at all in anyway... If you cannot do this, let this conversation end because I can't understand where the bile is coming from over something you claim doesn't exist

3. If I say my name is Timtim and Timtim means Gold, how can you argue with me because Timtim in your dictionary means beating?
I'm a Christian, and Christianity means Christ like. Religion is a system, I do not conform to nor belong to any christian system. My daily goal is to be more Christ like not to be more system like. That's all.

4. God is described as infinite. Humans are supposedly finite and have limited capacity to fully understand every aspect of his being.
I love your response on knowing the mind of God, most especially this emboldened part.
You agree man is limited and God is limitless, so how can man know everything in a limitless mind via man's limited mind?
Do you want to teach a day old child algebra or quadratic equation?
Will you teach a primary student quantum physics? You'll learn what you're capable of understanding. Even if God told you everything, you won't understand because man is limited but God is limitless.
All man needs to know about God is in the Bible and God sticks to what is written when dealing with man.

So once again, I know the mind of God, his mind is in the Bible.

5. I also love the verses you quoted to show various ways God speaks to man. They all agree with Numbers 12 vs 6-8:
6. And he said, Hear now my words: If there be a prophet among you, I the LORD will make myself known unto him in a vision, and will speak unto him in a dream.
7. My servant Moses is not so, who is faithful in all mine house.
8. With him will I speak mouth to mouth, even apparently, and not in dark speeches; and the similitude of the LORD shall he behold: wherefore then were ye not afraid to speak against my servant Moses?

Irrespective of whatever means God or God's angel speaks to you, one thing is certain, the message they give to you or the dreams or the visions cannot contradict the word of God in the Bible. If it's confusing or not clear and seems like it's contradicting the Bible, don't be in a haste to believe, first test the spirit to be sure they are of God. If the spirit is of God, pray for clarity and you'll get it.

6. Morals apart, the existence of this earth and everything in it is evidence that God exists.
Let's assume Big bang theory is true as thats pretty much the only scientific explanation of Earth's existence.

Big bang is the explosion of an immense energy and heat that gave birth to everything on earth and in space. What created the immense energy and heat before the beginning began? Some say Dark energy, some say Quantum uncertainty etc but there's a general consensus that something caused big bang and big bang caused everything else but logically thinking, it's impossible to have an infinite regress of cause and effects.

In simpler terms, it's impossible for something that caused what caused something to cause something to cause something that caused big bang to be the true SOURCE of all causes and effects because something must have caused the first something in the first place before that something existed.

Matter cannot be created nor destroyed same with energy, it can only be converted from one form to another so what was the first matter or energy that caused the dark energy to cause immense heat (up to 1trillion celcius degrees) to cause the explosion in the first place.

Before big bang, there was nothing, where did dark energy come from? Why hasn't another bang occured?

The only answer is that there MUST have been an UNCAUSED CAUSE which preceded every other thing. This UNCAUSED CAUSE is the true SOURCE of all form of matter, life and energy.

This source is who I refer to as God and everything that exists is proof that he caused everything to exist.

If I'm being honest, I've lost respect for you -- as well as interest in this discussion -- the moment I realized you were trying to insult my intelligence by 1) committing a Strawman Fallacy by reading into my statements to conjure up an absurd conclusion that I believe in spirits, 2) trying to convince me that a day old infant can realistically pose a threat to your safety (grin) and 3) thinking you could deceive me into thinking that war -- which is amply defined as armed conflicts between two different countries -- was the reason God caused the global flood. It seems to me like you are arguing in bad faith and I couldn't care less about this discussion at the moment. This doesn't feel like a conversation to me. It feels like someone trying to win an argument by any means necessary, no matter how underhanded or dishonest they can get. This discussion is played out and has become tiresome for now.

I'll be extremely busy for the next couple of days, so I won't be having the time or patience to type out long, detailed responses. If I do respond, my ripostes will be much shorter going forward. However, I WILL keep tabs on this thread though, to monitor further discussions, and might make time to revisit this particular post thoroughly in the future, which is why I've quoted it as a reminder.

In the meantime, please get a primer on the Philosophy of Religion. Thanks.

4 Likes

Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 1:22am On Nov 01, 2022
jasminer:
It's Christianity that's in the question here and so it must be discussed according to the words of the Bible and only according to the words of the Bible, not what anyone says.
You can't discuss Christianity and it's doctrines from the standpoint of an atheist and if that's what we're doing... Let me come and be going because the Gospel of salvation to them that perish is foolishness but to them that believe, it's the power of God unto salvation.

Sorry dear but you don't get to dictate the rules and policies of our conversation. We're not in a church auditorium where circlejerking and regurgitation of religious platitudes is the norm. We're in an internet chatroom where multiple individuals with various beliefs, worldviews and ideas are free to express their opinions about certain ideologies. For your information, there is something called the Philosophy of Religion (I know you claimed later on in this post that Christianity isn't a religion, but we'll be bursting that erroneous canard very shortly).

Philosophy of Religion is the branch of philosophy that is concerned with the philosophical study of religion, including arguments over the nature and existence of God, religious language, miracles, prayer, the problem of evil, and the relationship between religion and other value-systems such as science and ethics. It is often regarded as a part of Metaphysics, especially insofar as it is interested in understanding what it is for something to exist, although arguably it also touches on issues commonly dealt with in Epistemology, Ethics, Logic and the Philosophy of Language. It asks such questions as "Are there sound reasons to think that God does (or does not) exist?", "If there is a God, then what is he like?", "What, if anything, would give us good reason to believe that a miracle has occurred?", "What is the relationship between faith and reason?", "Does petitionary prayer make sense?" It does not ask "What is God?", as that would assume the existence of God, and that God has a knowable nature, which is more the territory of theology (which usually considers the existence of God as axiomatic, or self-evident, and merely seeks to justify or support religious claims).
https://www.philosophybasics.com/branch_philosophy_of_religion.html

So your insistence that Christianity CAN and MUST only be discussed in the context of Biblical understanding is disingenuous, or naive at best. The reality here -- which I can parse from your telling reluctance to view your beliefs from an objective and unbiased lens -- is that you afraid of having your beliefs called out to be baseless and unjustified. You can keep claiming otherwise till your face turns blue. You can keep finding solace in the written words of the Holy fictional novel of your choice, but I know deep down, THAT is your biggest fear.

jasminer:
1. Christianity isn't a religion, it's a way of life. Christian means Christ like.

That's cute. But it would do you a whole lot of good to come to the realization that "religion" and "way of life" are not mutually exclusive and, in fact, can be argued to be largely synonymous. As a religion, Christianity is an acknowledgement of a set of core beliefs and practices embedded in the Holy Bible. As a way of life, it is a relationship between Christians and God the Father, through faith in Jesus Christ the Son, expressed by the power of the Holy Spirit. However, let me start by addressing your claim that Christianity is not a religion.

Now, it is a common argument that religion is hard to define properly. Nevertheless, there are some characteristics -- which scholars mostly agree -- are peculiar to a set of practices and/or ideologies that qualify them to be called RELIGIONS. Having established this, please answer "True" or "False" to the following statements:

1) You believe in a supernatural being, or at least, a supernatural realm.

2) Your belief system distinguishes between sacredness and profanity.

3) There are ritual acts focused on sacredness in your belief (Holy Communion, Baptism, The Eucharist etc.).

4) Your belief system has a moral code.

5) Your belief system affirms experiences of spiritual and supernatural "feelings".

6) Your belief system includes prayer as one of its' central activities.

7) Your belief system has a worldview as a whole and the place of the individual therein.

cool Your belief system has a disciplined lifestyle based on the worldview of what your Holy text teaches.

9) Your belief system encourages "group gatherings" bound together by all of the above.

If you answered "True" to, at least, 6 out of the 9 statements listed up there, then my sister, your belief system IS A RELIGION. You can pull up scriptures from morning till night arguing otherwise, but you cannot reasonably deny that at the very least, your belief system has an overwhelming number of religious aspects attached to it.

jasminer:
2. I can tell the mind of God because it's written in the Bible... He made known His ways to Moses, His acts to the children of Israel. Psalm 103 vs 7

Actually, you're dead wrong.

You can NOT fully comprehend or understand the mind of God. You can have a PERSONAL knowledge of God, based on your SUBJECTIVE interpretation of scriptures -- which is what you meant here. People interprete scriptures differently, and that's why you have multiple denominations within Christianity, with slight variations of the Christian doctrine across these denominations. That's why you have people arguing over tithes. That's why you have people arguing over the doctrine of the Holy Trinity. It is precisely because you can NOT have a COMPLETE KNOWLEDGE of God's nature, his mind, his plans, his will and his objectives.

For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, declares the Lord. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts.
- Isaiah 55:8-9

Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways! "For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who has been his counselor?"
- Romans 11:33-34

Behold, these are but the outskirts of his ways, and how small a whisper do we hear of him! But the thunder of his power who can understand?
- Job 26:14

God is described as infinite. Humans are supposedly finite and have limited capacity to fully understand every aspect of his being. Some might argue that the concept of original sin perfectly explains this limitation of man. It is even asserted in the Bible that God keeps certain secrets hidden from mankind, and reveals only what he wishes mankind to know. So, the idea that you can get a complete grasp of God's thought process by merely reading the scriptures is wishful thinking.

The secret things belong to the Lord our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may follow all the words of this law.
- Deuteronomy 29:29

jasminer:
[b]So even if a million people come and say God said this, as long as it contradicts the Bible, they are all wrong.

Since you just came back from the moon, I'll clue you in: God himself routinely bypasses and/or outrightly contradicts his own commandments numerous times in the Old Testament just to favor his own people and punish the "sinners" and "evil doers". For instance, he commands not to kill, but he orders and orchestrates the killings and destruction of countless individuals and cities in the Old Testament. King David committed many acts of murder in the Old Testament. Samson did the same. They were instruments of God. Today they are considered to be heroes of the Bible. So your criteria is feeble and irrelevant.

jasminer:
And if you claim this is what Christianity is about, quote a scripture to back it up.

Request granted. I'll quote four.

We have different gifts, according to the grace given to each of us. If your gift is prophesying, then prophesy in accordance with your faith; if it is serving, then serve; if it is teaching, then teach; if it is to encourage, then give encouragement; if it is giving, then give generously; if it is to lead, do it diligently; if it is to show mercy, do it cheerfully
- Romans 12:6-8

But the Advocate, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you
- John 14:26

And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams
- Acts 2:17

Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not wanting to make her a public example, was minded to put her away secretly. But while he thought about these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take to you Mary your wife, for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit. And she will bring forth a Son, and you shall call His name JESUS, for He will save His people from their sins.
- Matthew 1:19-21

Christianity asserts that God desires to have a personal relationship with humans, and therefore he can speak to people through multiple means which include through dreams, thoughts, visions, the Holy Spirit, and even through other people. Reading the Bible is just one out of many means and it can be argued that it is often subject to misinterpretation.

jasminer:
You're only obligated to believe what the Bible says about God. Anything outside that is double standards.

This assumes that God can't speak to people through other means besides the Bible. Thankfully, we've already addressed this faulty assumption.

If I'm being honest, I'm getting tired of this roundabout argument where you use bland sophistry and hermeneutics to protect your position. I'll cut to the chase here. I brought this up previously but you swiftly avoided it. Well, I've entertained your game of musical chairs long enough.

Your claim that God is the source or arbiter of moral values contains an unsupported assertion: GOD EXISTS. Please provide empirical evidence supporting this assertion.

2 Likes

Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 1:17am On Nov 01, 2022
jasminer:

Mathew 18 vs 18, Whatever you allow on earth will be allowed in heaven. Man started war, man reaped war. If God were to act on everything that doesn't please Him, would you as an atheist still be alive? Would there be any other religion apart from Christianity?

This response is a complete non-sequitur and has nothing to do with the post you replied to. Please sit back and read it again carefully. I've reposted it below. I'm sensing that you have difficulties following logical propositions. Your entire arguments on this thread seem to rely an awful lot on special pleading, begging the question and red herrings.

uche40:
This assumes that an omnipotent and omniscient deity who advocates peace, love, mercy and forgiveness, does not have the capacity to prevent conflict and fighting among neighboring countries. He also cannot think up other means to avert conflict and ensure peace and harmony between these countries, while still ensuring that his plan for man is fulfilled. You have not answered my question.

=================================

jasminer:
God has reserved one day when He will speak wether you asked Him to speak or not, that's called the day of judgement, until that day comes, you'll have to pray and fast for Him to speak to you or wait for your karma for whatever evil you commit.

Thought terminating cliché.

jasminer:
In the bible days, a old child of an enemy you killed poses a future threat to you and your children.

Maybe. But guess what? By then, he'd be an ADULT, and not a DAY OLD INFANT.
Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 1:16am On Nov 01, 2022
jasminer:


Genesis chapter 6 vs 5 - 8

5. And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
6. And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
7. And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.
8. But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD.

For the Bible to say that the wickedness of man was great, then it means that people did abominable things then.
A world where everyone was constantly thinking of evil things and carrying them out? Constantly trying to outdo each other's wickedness of the previous day?
If God didn't wipe out that world, do you think we'll even be talking about morality?

Such a world deserved to be wiped out by God.

This is a Red Herring Fallacy -- and if I might add -- a very careless bait and switch you tried to pull off thinking I wouldn't catch on quick. I guess it was only a matter of time before you decided to take this route of blatant dishonesty. Madam, let me refresh your memory:

uche40:
Are you positive that ALL instances of genocide and infanticide carried out by God in the Bible only occurred when God was provoked in an instance of war? A "Yes" or "No" will suffice.

jasminer:


You mean commanded by God. Yes

Following which I asked you to describe the prevailing war scenario which compelled God to wipe out more than half of the living organisms on the planet, and then you went on a ridiculous tangent, talking about the evil sins people committed. How does any of that describe a war scenario?

This recent action of yours leads me to question your true motive for discussing here. It's becoming quite clear to me that you're arguing only because you want to win an argument, not because you want to arrive at, or establish any facts. You are clouded by your Christian bias and will make any arguments to justify your position even if it involves wilful distortion of facts or cheating yourself out of a tough position by switching the argument. You haven't answered my question and you know it.

3 Likes

Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 1:14am On Nov 01, 2022
jasminer:

You said here that one group are certain, the other group isn't certain

And...?

I stated that I'm not certain if God exists or not, and that I withhold belief in God due to lack of evidence. How does that translate to me "believing that there could be spiritual activities" or whatever? If I don't believe God exists due to lack of evidence, is it far-fetched to realize that I also wouldn't believe in spiritual activities for the exact same reason?

cc: kingxsamz

3 Likes 1 Share

Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 12:28pm On Oct 31, 2022
jasminer:


Oga, you saw another atheist say that she believes there could be spiritual activities and the likes. What's your own inside it now?

I want to assume you weren't referring to me in this post but just in case you were, could you direct me to any statement I have made that has led you to draw this wild and preposterous conclusion?

cc: kingxsamz

1 Like 1 Share

Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 12:22pm On Oct 31, 2022
uche40:
Are you positive that ALL instances of genocide and infanticide carried out by God in the Bible only occurred when God was provoked in an instance of war? A "Yes" or "No" will suffice.

jasminer:


You mean commanded by God. Yes

Thanks for the affirmative response.

Now, I want you to elaborate on the prevailing war scenario that provoked God into perpetrating the mass extinction flooding event that led to the death of practically all living things in the world apart from the residents of Noah's Ark. One could argue that the word "genocide" doesn't even begin to come close to describing such a destructive act of gargantuan magnitudes.

To put things in their proper context, I've reposted my question above.

1 Like

Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 12:18pm On Oct 31, 2022
jasminer:


Humans started war, perfected the art of war not God.

And God permitted the conception of war since nothing on this earth happens without his foreknowledge. He even takes the liberty to support a particular side in these wars.

jasminer:

A country committed genocide against another country, God ordered that the favour be returned exactly the same way. God didn't start it but he made sure that they reaped what they started.

This assumes that an omnipotent and omniscient deity who advocates peace, love, mercy and forgiveness, does not have the capacity to prevent conflict and fighting among neighboring countries. He also cannot think up other means to avert conflict and ensure peace and harmony between these countries, while still ensuring that his plan for man is fulfilled. You have not answered my question.

Please consider the implications of certain arguments before you make them.

In the meantime, I will take your refusal to provide an answer to my initial question about the day old infant as an admission that there exists no instance where a day old infant can actually pose a direct threat to your life.

1 Like

Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 12:09pm On Oct 31, 2022
[Retracted]
Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 12:01pm On Oct 31, 2022
jasminer:
If Christianity is a game, there are rules to the game.

Well, Christianity isn't a game. It's a religion.

jasminer:

The fact that someone said God said this, does it automatically mean God said it?

God could have said it. How are you going to know? Can you read the mind of God? Can you understand his thought process perfectly enough to understand his plans, will and objectives at a certain point in time? You can't be 100% sure if they were or weren't commanded by God. I always hear Christians say "God knows the best" whenever something disastrous happens to them. Note that God is omniscient and omnipotent, and so no activity or event happens on this earth without his foreknowledge.

Let me rephrase your question and throw it back at you: Do you think I'm obligated to believe anything you claim about your experience with God simply because you said it?

jasminer:
1. Rules of Christianity include the facts that God is righteous and an upholder of righteousness

What moral basis are you using to justify and/or presuppose God's righteousness? I can already guess that you'll point to your Bible, the works of Jesus Christ, or something that might even be unrelated to the Bible. However, it is at this juncture that I will gladly jolt your memory to the fact that by assuming God to be origin of morality, you have stripped yourself of ANY independent moral criterion you can use to classify Gods actions.

In light of this, if you choose to claim that God is good because it says so in the Bible, or because of Jesus or the present state of the world, then it means you already have a logically prior criterion that you use to assess what is good and what is bad, and this criterion is independent of God's existence. This will be a complete 180 degrees turn around from your initial position that God is the arbiter or source of moral values. In fact you would only end up proving the atheists' argument -- in a hilarious case of irony -- that morality and religion are independent of each other.

jasminer:
2. We should love our neighbours like we love ourselves and only do to our neighbours what we would like someone else to do to us

The capacity to understand another person's condition from their own perspective is not unique to religious ideologies. Evolutionary Psychology shows that empathy (which is the father of your conscience) helps to increase pro-social behavior. A united group is a stronger group, and a group can achieve higher levels of success in hunting, protection etc. and by implication, are well suited for breeding healthy offsprings than a bunch of isolated individuals. This is not speculation, but rather insight gained from hard, empirical research. Consider reading the full entry of the link below. I'll just post a small excerpt:

The mere sight of suffering, independently of love, would suffice to call up in us vivid recollections and associations. The explanation may lie in the fact that, with all animals, sympathy is directed solely towards the members of the same community, and therefore towards known, and more or less beloved members, but not to all the individuals of the same species. This fact is not more surprising than that the fears of many animals should be directed against special enemies. Species which are not social, such as lions and tigers, no doubt feel sympathy for the suffering of their own young, but not for that of any other animal. With mankind, selfishness, experience, and imitation, probably add, as Mr. Bain has shown, to the power of sympathy; for we are led by the hope of receiving good in return to perform acts of sympathetic kindness to others; and sympathy is much strengthened by habit. In however complex a manner this feeling may have originated, as it is one of high importance to all those animals which aid and defend one another, it will have been increased through natural selection; for those communities, which included the greatest number of the most sympathetic members, would flourish best, and rear the greatest number of offspring.
http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Darwin/Descent/descent4.htm

jasminer:
3. God's word never breaks. As a Christian I believe that we have day and night because God has commanded it, before day and night seize maybe there'll have to be an apocalypse. God said that there'll be floods but He also said that water will never destroy the world again. If His word fails, He seizes to be God. That's what He said. And that's what I am holding on to. In my not so many years, I can testify that His word has Never failed me.

I typically dismiss arguments appealing to anecdotes or personal testimonies because I have no empirical means of verying it, and there's always the probability that the subject misremembered the events s/he's accounting for, or is intentionally distorting the facts.

As to your claim that God never changes. Sure, he may never change. But you also believe he rules and reigns forever. He still communicates with his faithful servants today. He can use anybody and instruct them to do his bidding. God used Samson to terrorize the Philistines. From the viewpoint of the Philistines, Samson was an unhinged and unstable deviant. We all know how his story ended. You might make the claim that the Philistines were evil and committed numerous sins against God. But in Nigeria and the world at large, aren't we mostly living like godless people today, committing sins as described by the Bible? In light of this, what gives you the right to condemn people who commit seemingly unethical acts and insist that they were commanded by God to punish the evil doers? You're not the only person who claims to have a special relationship with God. What gives you the right to assume that God definitely didn't command them? We can only guess. We can't be certain that they were led by demonic spirits.

1) Search up on the Centennial Olympic Park Bombing of 1996. Eric Robert Rudolph carried out bombing attacks on two abortion clinics and a nightclub. He was inspired by God to bring judgement upon sinners and "baby killers". He wasn't a mass murderer, he was only carrying out God's instructions.

2) Benjamin Matthew Williams and James Tyler Williams murdered a gay couple in 1999. They were said to belong to a family of fundamental Christians.

3) The Army of God is an American Christian Terrorist organization who have instigated many acts of anti-abortion violence.

You don't have any right to condemn the aforementioned as misguided or evil because they are just a drop in an ocean of Christians who claim to receive divine instruction from the Lord. You cannot tell for certain that they were not inspired by the Holy Spirit. And you cannot discount their testimonies any more than I can discount yours.

jasminer:
4. God declared that what a man sows he'll reap. There's no changing or escaping it.

So? There are many variations of this platitude that are independent of belief in the Christian God.

jasminer:
5. We have the new testament because Jesus lived and died fulfilling the Old testament so anyone who believes in Jesus automatically has fulfilled the Old testament. This is because God saw that man can't follow laws because of our fall from grace. The only law in the new testament now is Love and if you fail this commandment, no heaven for you.

grin. Barely ten lines ago, you were affirming that God doesn't change his mind. Yet, he saw that man can't follow laws because we fell from grace (by sin), and decided to modify the law. Ignoring the fact that God clearly changed his mind here, why wasn't he aware that man wouldn't be able to follow his commandments in its pure, original form? I thought he was all-knowing. Lol.

Nevertheless, your claim here accidentally refutes the relevance of the Old Testament since you're suggesting that we couldn't follow those laws in the first place. Makes me wonder why the Old Testament was included in the Bible at all.

jasminer:
6. God is not partial, God is a father and creator to all humanity which is why His rain falls on me the Christian, you the atheist and even the religious fanatics.

Well, he seemed to favor the Israelites over all other tribes and nations in the Bible, bringing down empires for the benefit of his "chosen people".

I've ignored the remaining paragraphs because I've already addressed the arguments you make in some of them above. And I also want to be careful not to make this rejoinder too lengthy.

2 Likes 1 Share

Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 11:59am On Oct 31, 2022
Namdio:
...God doesn't impose His will on mankind...

Pharaoh called me some minutes ago. He says he knows a popular comedy club in Egypt. He needs you to perform as an entertainer.

Jonah asked for your number. He said he wants to have a word with you.

The Ephesians asked about you. They want to know if you're still serving the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

[I apologize if the sarcasm rubbed you off the wrong way, but hopefully you got the message]

2 Likes

Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 11:44am On Oct 31, 2022
Namdio:


None of the links are working.

I realized that as well. I'm not sure why.

Most of the stories are said to be accounts from a book titled: God Made Me Do It: True Stories of the Worst Advice the Lord Has Ever Given His Followers

I tried searching for a .pdf format for the book but it seems it's not available online. You can research more on it if you're interested.

edit: Ok. I think I was able to find some of the news articles online. Try the links below

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1993/08/20/20-naked-people-emerge-after-auto-strikes-tree/b36f7f9f-ab19-4c22-b975-79a402c9b438/

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/wbna28005693

https://edition.cnn.com/2004/LAW/03/29/children.slain/index.html

I couldn't get the last one.
Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 1:11am On Oct 31, 2022
jasminer:


Please quote the other scenarios so I get a clearer understanding of where you're coming from. I mean provide the exact place in the Bible God commanded such

I'm sorry but you seem to have gotten your logic backwards. Let me refresh your memory on how this discussion evolved. I could have included links but I don't want to trigger the anti-spam bot, so I'll just give a summary of our correspondence using bullet points.

• kingxsamz asked you if genocide, infanticide, incest, slavery and rape were wrong.

• You affirmed that these acts were wrong.

• I pointed out the fact that some of these acts seemed to be endorsed by God at certain moments in the Bible.

• You then re-affirmed that killing people is an offense, except this time you suggested that it wasn't morally wrong if it took place in the context of a war. In light of my previous response about some acts in Bible appearing to resemble genocide and infanticide, this statement implies the hidden assertion that if genocide and infanticide was truly committed by God in the Bible, then it must have happened by him being provoked in an instance of war.

I haven't made any positive claims that other scenarios exist where genocide and infanticide are endorsed by the Christian God. You are the one who implicitly restricted genocide and infanticide to war scenarios. That's why I need you to confirm -- for the sake of clarity: Are you positive that ALL instances of genocide and infanticide carried out by God in the Bible only occurred when God was provoked in an instance of war? A "Yes" or "No" will suffice.
Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 12:59am On Oct 31, 2022
jasminer:


Firstly, I've watch documentaries on children who were rescued from terrorist camps. It took some two years to gain any form of normalcy. I saluted the courage of one particular mother where even her own society turned their backs on her and her son but she didn't give up till she found an equally determined children behavioral therapist and they both after about 2yrs restored some normalcy to the child.
Before his rehabilitation, the boy loved to kill and destroy anything he could. Cut off head of toys, strangle pets and watch them die with rapt attention, capture little creatures and slice them open, destroy the toys of other kids, beat up smaller kids, throw stones at vehicles, rejected the name his parents named him and insisted they call him what the terrorists used to call him, hated cartoons, screamed at adults and hit or bite them if they try to correct him. No respect, no fear, even urinated on his mother for scolding him. So, as a military decision maker, if you have two hundred thousand children like this, what do you do?

Then the issue of the new Borns, can they survive without their mothers? Who is going to breastfeed ten thousand day old children at the war front? Who will bathe them? Change their diapers?

Is leaving them alive and orphaned your idea of justice? Vultures and wild animals will eat them up either way.

Do you spare their mothers who are actively involved in their husband's terrorism by their own freewill? Who even raised their husbands to be terrorists if not the mothers of the husbands?

Some things are easy to say than doing it. I've never seen American soldiers bring back orphaned children, does that mean no child was in the terrorist camps ?
As noble as it sounds, you may not even be able to carry back your weak friend who is still alive talkless of a random child as innocent as it is.

That's even apart from the high risk that those children will grow to harbor resentment for the Israelites even if the Israelites save them. Afterall didn't Pharaoh's daughter save Moses? Didn't Moses grow up to side his own people and even killed an Egyptian?

It's easy to write noble stories but if you are not a military personnel, you haven't been in a war, you didn't even live in the times we're talking about, it's easy to misjudge

You've veered off on an absurd tangent my dear. Recall that my question to you was "what possible threat could a day old infant pose to your life?" I haven't seen you demonstrate any such threats yet. When neighboring villages, towns or countries that are at conflict start attacks on each other, infants below 1 year old are most likely to become casualties of war and far from remotely being active participants in it, so your reference to war as an example of infants being a threat to your safety is skewed and misleading. Plus, I already told you that I agree with you on the ethics of killings in war being a messy subject where it's hard to establish which murders are morally permissible or not, so your perambulations here are largely unnecessary.

The first paragraph in this dizzying riposte in particular is quite amusing as well. Correct me if I'm wrong but your entire rejoinder seems to be making the argument that innocent children and parents should be spared the misery of being alive to deal with all sorts of pain, suffering and PTSD that results from devastating war incidents -- insisting that there isn't any other option for them. In your first paragraph, you brought up an example of a young boy who was apparently dealing with mental trauma from war-related crimes which led to him exhibiting anti-social behaviors. Curiously, you shot yourself in the foot in that same paragraph when you affirmed that he was eventually rehabilitated. This seems to deflate your argument that "mercy-killing" of these infants is the only option.

Meanwhile, since the issue of war seems to interest you so much that you bring it up every five seconds, I'd really like you to explain to me why an omniscient, omnipotent and omnibenevolent deity relies on wars and petty violence to impose his will on mankind:

uche40:

What does your God really stand to gain from engaging in pissing contents with nations who defy him or go against his "divine" will? Why is he so bloodlusted and obsessed with wars in the Old Testament? If indiscriminate killing in any conflict or war scenario is to be justified, at least two conditions have to be met. The killings have to prevent calamities worse than it will cause. And, as a means of prevention, it has to be the last resort. Killing random people or infants should not be considered until ANY and ALL alternative means have been tried -- and have failed.

As the all-powerful, all-knowing deity of peace and love that your God is, is it so inconceivable for him to design a perfect blend of diplomacy and continuous examination to deal with any and all possible threats? Is war and violence the only means he can devise? Then why is he called all-knowing and all-powerful? Why is he called all-good (omnibenevolent)?

Even in the books of the Old Testament, it is proven time after time that your God's constant attacks and subjugation of the enemies of the Israelites are mostly ineffectual. His defeat of these nations only seems to contribute to temporary safety and long-term enmity between these nations and his chosen people since these nations will only view the Israelites' victory as a humiliation to be avenged.

1 Like

Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 12:46am On Oct 31, 2022
jasminer:


Genesis chapter 2 vs 5-6
... : for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground.
But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground.

I've read the full chapter in its entirety and the only thing I can infer from this passage you've cited is that up until the creation of Adam -- which I think is the main focus of Genesis 2 -- rain had not yet fallen. The passage seems to be describing the status quo PRIOR to Adam's creation. It says nothing about the atmospheric conditions existing between Adam's creation and the Flood of Genesis. So I think it's a bit of a stretch to extend this phenomenon to the period where Noah built his ark.

However, the part (which I emboldened) about mist going up from the earth strangely resembles the Water Cycle phenomenon.

The water cycle describes how water evaporates from the surface of the earth, rises into the atmosphere, cools and condenses into rain or snow in clouds, and falls again to the surface as precipitation. The water falling on land collects in rivers and lakes, soil, and porous layers of rock, and much of it flows back into the oceans, where it will once more evaporate. The cycling of water in and out of the atmosphere is a significant aspect of the weather patterns on Earth.
https://gpm.nasa.gov/education/water-cycle

That's a bit weird, but then again it's just speculation.
Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 12:36am On Oct 31, 2022
jasminer:


I am a Christian and will answer this question as a Christian.

It's right because God said it's right. He's wiser and knows more than me so I can never understand all the factors he considered before arriving at His conclusion. But if I'm confused, I'll pray and He'll help me to understand why He made that decision.

That's the difference between a theist and an atheist. Where there's confusion between logic and trusting God blindly, the Theist trusts God blindly while the atheist waits for logical convincing logic.

I've suffered terrible things, but today, I'm grateful to God for everything I suffered. Each blow taught me lessons my parents didn't teach me because they loved and sheltered me too much. Initially it was a cross but now it's a crown. This is after 20+yrs. I achieved something very big months ago something I first attempted about 12yrs ago and while discussing with my sister, she asked me if I was sad about the delay and sad experiences, I told her that if I had the power to go back in time, I'll willingly face each problem again. Some problems stripped me of fake friends, some problems made long time secret enemies reveal themselves, some taught me bluntness of life and the human nature, some taught me practical business, some taught me marketing, some taught me forgiveness and patience and it's made me who I am today which I am grateful for. For example, someone tried to marry me but the plan was to kill me after our wedding because of what I was pursuing, only after it supposedly fail did the person mock my failure and tell me that that was what attracted them to me. Lol. I later found out that the person knows people that can make a senator disappear shocked . Let me stop here for privacy reasons.
So why won't I trust Him blindly at my next crossroad?

Back to your question, God is the originator of morals, through the ancient times, the moral people were always those who served and obeyed his word. Before He began to speak to man, who would have taught man right from wrong? Nobody.
Go through the bible, God taught men to wash their clothes, wash their bodies, shave their hair or oil their hair, to not eat blood, to dig the ground before they defecate and cover it up, he taught men to cook food, to be kind to their animals, to be kind to strangers, to respect elders, to give to the poor and to Him, to be moderate in everything. He taught the laws for people who commit a crime and what to do for someone who mistakenly committed a crime. He even introduced the first polygraph test (the Urim Thurim) and what to do when the Urim Thurim is not there.

Everything you call humanity or morals has been written in the bible thousands of years ago.

Let me shock you a bit, ancient Britain was a pile of dirt, they didn't bathe or have sewage systems, the Europeans were appalled at the stench from the British when they first arrived Britain grin grin grin, Britain was pagan then. The missionaries then began to teach them Christianity, Islam etc and hygiene.

I see. So you consider to be good, any act that God tells you is good? That's interesting.

Given that you are Christian -- at least, in the traditional sense -- you already believe that God exists. And his existence is not just in the writings of the scriptures. He exists and will continue to exist for eternity. So it stands to reason that God keeps issuing commands and instructions to his people. If God insists that you kill your parents tomorrow, you'd have to do it. And don't tell me "God can't ask me to do such a thing" because you have no existing independent moral basis to assess and/or decide what God can or can not command you to do. You really have no right to condemn anybody on anything. If someone you've never met before raped your sister tomorrow, how can you tell for a fact that it wasn't God who commanded that rapist? You have lost ALL rights to make moral judgements. Your morality rests solely on whatever God desires. All things are permitted including sleeping with animals, killing of babies, stealing money from people etc. It all depends on God's plan, his will and his objectives at that point in time.

Let me also add that I found it a bit comical how you presented "blind trust" as a virtue or something that seemingly gives you an advantage over the atheists. I know you are one of those Christians who think they're close to God and have a special relationship with him. You talk to him and he responds to you, right? Here are some examples below of individuals who "trusted God blindly". Please note that you have stripped yourself of every moral right to condemn them or claim that they did not receive commandments from God.

May 2008 in Wisconsin...God told me if i prayed hard enough she would come back to life...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,354849,00.html

August 1993 in Texas, 20 naked people emerge from a car that struck a tree
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-961214.html

San Antoni, TX...God tells man to ram another vehicle at 100mph
http://www.metro.co.uk/weird/428252-god-told-man-to-ram-vehicle-at-100mph

March 2004, Texas...God told me to kill my 3 sons...
http://articles.cnn.com/2004-03-29/justice/children.slain_1_deanna-laney-insanity-defense-luke-laney?_s=PM:LAW

There's many more where that came from but anyhoo, that's by the way. I think we've ignored the elephant in the room for long enough now. It's time we finally addressed it. Your assertion that God is the originator of morals contains an unsupported claim: GOD EXISTS. Please support this claim with objective and empirical evidence. Give it your best shot. Don't be scared.
Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 11:12am On Oct 30, 2022
jasminer:


I said humans killing unprovoked is bad.
I never said that God taking the life He gave someone is bad.
It belongs to Him afterall.

From the content of your posts on this thread, it's clear to me that you consider the Christian God to be the source or arbiter of moral values. Ignoring the fact that morality is easily explained by evolutionary psychology, let us assume you are correct for the sake of argument. Unfortunately, by assuming that anything God orders is good or right, you have unwittingly admitted that God's morality cannot be objective and/or universal.

Euthyphro's Dilemma encapsulates this problem perfectly and it has yet to be answered satisfactorily: Is an act right because God says it's so, or does God say it's so because it's right? If it is right just because God says so, then morality is subject to his whim and has no real grounding except "might makes right". In other words, if tomorrow he declares that rape is good, does it actually become moral in any objective sense. On the other hand, if God commands it because it is right, then he is just a "middle man" and does not determine what is moral.

2 Likes

Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 9:55am On Oct 30, 2022
jasminer:


Yup, before the floods of Noah, there wasn't even rain talkless of flood.

Please provide citations supporting this claim.
Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 9:29am On Oct 30, 2022
jasminer:


The children being born in Boko Haram, iswap or even ISIS terrorist camps, do you think they pose a threat to humanity?

This is a non-answer, but I'll attempt a rejoinder to your argument in this post.

Obviously they don't as they're not actively taking part in the activities of the Boko Haram, ISWAP or ISIS terrorist groups. The individuals who pose a direct threat to your safety in this situation you've reconstructed are the actual terrorists themselves, and not the infants. So you haven't really answered my question.

Furthermore, I know you may think that killing infants in the instance you presented is totally unavoidable, but I want you to sit back and think carefully. Is it REALLY unavoidable? Is it really possible that you have exhausted ALL available options of ensuring that there isn't any needless collateral damage? Isn't indiscriminate killing somewhat tactless and indicative of lack of empathy? Like I stated earlier: If indiscriminate killing in any conflict or war scenario is to be justified, at least two conditions have to be met. The killings have to prevent calamities worse than it will cause. And, as a means of prevention, it has to be the last resort. Killing random people or infants should not be considered until all alternative means have been tried -- and have failed.

Soldiers are obligated to target those who have the capacity to inflict harm. Beings lacking this capacity e.g day old infants, are not military objectives. It could also be argued that based off their non-participance in terrorism crimes, the infants did not consent to their deaths, therefore their death was immoral. Consent is an important factor here because that is what we use to distinguish murder from suicide, sex and rape, theft and (consensual) economic transactions.

2 Likes

Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 9:20am On Oct 30, 2022
jasminer:


Unprovoked, outside a war scenario, killing anyone is a big offense and the punishment for it is death. But the things that happen in war can't be judged as the things that happen in a civilian court.
That's why the military has it's own court because if soldiers were to be tried in a civilian court, Omo, na firing squad grin grin

All is fair in war my dear, a soldier will never be making this argument because they know how decisions are made.

Let me give you an example, imagine you're driving a trailer which has "failed brake". In front of you is traffic, to your left is a bike with a woman and two babies, to your left is a coaster bus of 28 young men going to only God knows where. You must hit something and whoever you hit has only 1% chance of survival. Who will you hit?

Either you act or not, at least 4 will die but it could be up to 30+ depending on your choice. It's up to you to limit the casualties to the nearest minimum.

You have tacitly made the claim that ALL instances of genocide and infanticide ordered by God in the Bible were only carried out during war scenarios. Can you confirm this as positive? I want you to think very carefully before you answer this question. Recall that you already condemned the acts of genocide and infanticide as morally wrong.

It is true that the ethics of killing in war is muddy waters. I mostly agree with you there. Nevertheless, why war?

What does your God really stand to gain from engaging in pissing contents with nations who defy him or go against his "divine" will? Why is he so bloodlusted and obsessed with wars in the Old Testament? If indiscriminate killing in any conflict or war scenario is to be justified, at least two conditions have to be met. The killings have to prevent calamities worse than it will cause. And, as a means of prevention, it has to be the last resort. Killing random people or infants should not be considered until ANY and ALL alternative means have been tried -- and have failed.

As the all-powerful, all-knowing deity of peace and love that your God is, is it so inconceivable for him to design a perfect blend of diplomacy and continuous examination to deal with any and all possible threats? Is war and violence the only means he can devise? Then why is he called all-knowing and all-powerful? Why is he called all-good (omnibenevolent)?

Even in the books of the Old Testament, it is proven time after time that your God's constant attacks and subjugation of the enemies of the Israelites are mostly ineffectual. His defeat of these nations only seems to contribute to temporary safety and long-term enmity between these nations and his chosen people since these nations will only view the Israelites' victory as a humiliation to be avenged.

2 Likes

Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 9:06am On Oct 30, 2022
jasminer:


Interesting... Thanks for your insight

Always a pleasure.

jasminer:
I've heard another opinion that there's no God...

I'd like to point out here that there's a difference between Gnostic Atheism and Agnostic Atheism. The position you describe here is held by Gnostic Atheists who posit that God or gods certainly do NOT exist. Agnostic Atheists on the other hand are not certain if God exists or not. They just don't believe because they've not come across any evidence for God. For the avoidance of doubt, I happen to fall into the latter camp.

jasminer:
and hence all animals evolved from the same source with humans and apes evolving from the same ancestors.

Yes, I think this is asserted in the Theory of Evolution.

jasminer:
They further said that humans are simply smarter and have a better body frame and advanced communication senses which gave us adventage over all animals.

It's just a matter of perspective if you ask me. Other species have their own evolved characteristics and to them, those characteristics give them adventage (sic) over us. Did you know that there are more bacteria alive in a single human than there are humans existing on this planet? Look at what the Corona Virus did to us in 2020. What about the Ebola Virus? Malaria? Then we can talk about dogs and cats who appear to be far more sensitive to their environment than any human being can possibly hope to be. The only thing we as humans can pride ourselves in is our evolved intuition and abstract thinking that has allowed us to seemingly dominate the planet as we know it now.

jasminer:
They argue that such it's possible for a human to genuinely love an animal and be loved by that animal and if that animal is willing to spend the rest of their life with a human, then the human could wed them. embarassed embarassed

Yes it is very possible. And as far as I can tell, there exists no reasonable moral argument to suggest the immorality of such a phenomenon, particularly if mutual feelings of love exist between the human and the animal.

jasminer:
But what happens when an animal itself like a chimpanzee touches a woman sexually or an animal like a dog who has been exposed to sexual acts before attempts to ride a woman. In such a case, the animal made the first move, in such a case, it can't be rape can it?

Humans can become victims of assault by animals. If the assault is sexual in nature and the human doesn't give consent, then technically it is rape.

1 Like

Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 10:49pm On Oct 29, 2022
jasminer:


Lol, Yes or no can't answer your question if that's what you're waiting for because that would be generalization and one size can't fit all. I myself will kill a child if I feel my life is threatened and my actions can be or condemned or justified depending on the scenario.

Unprovoked, it's wrong to kill any human regardless of their age.

In war, whoever needs to die for the safety of your country and people should be killed without thinking twice even if it's a day old child.

God never asked anyone to rape any woman, the punishment for rape is death. If you have no proof of otherwise, don't repeat this question again because this is the second time I'm answering it.

What possible threat could a day old infant pose to your life? I need common, plausible examples. Thanks.
Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 10:21pm On Oct 29, 2022
kingxsamz:

Now please answer me, quickly.
Is genocide, infanticide, incest, slavery and rape wrong?
I need direct answers. Thank you.

jasminer:
Yes they are wrong.

It's curious that you affirm that genocide, infanticide and slavery are wrong given that the Bible seems to support these acts. Could this be an implicit condemnation of morality in the Bible?
Romance / Re: My Experience As An Atheist In The Dating World. by uche40(f): 9:59pm On Oct 29, 2022
jasminer:


Yes they are wrong.

Buy you however haven't told me why beastiality is wrong since we're all animals according to atheists.

I'm sorry jasminer, but you've been thoroughly misled by theist propaganda. Atheism has no relationship with biology. The single unifying idea among atheists is that there exists no evidence for the existence of God or gods. What you have done is commit the Fallacy of Composition by assuming that ALL atheists believe that humans are animals because a select few probably do. Lack of belief in God has no connection to taxonomy, so your question is misguided at best.

That being said, I'll still bite. Note that I'm speaking for myself here and not kingxsamz. To give you some context, I believe morality is an individualistic concept and so I don't think bestiality is objectively immoral -- in fact I couldn't care less if you decided to walk out right now and hump your neighbor's goat. Ultimately it comes down to how you perceive it subjectively. I personally feel it's disgusting and bizarre, and could lead to people acquiring awful diseases. The only argument I could make asserting the immorality of bestiality is that animals possibly lack the ability to give consent, so sex with animals can be considered non-consensual, which is the very definition of rape. And we all know rape is wrong because it is an infringement and/or violation on others' free will and right to make their own informed decisions.
TV/Movies / Re: What Series Are You Watching Now? Part 2 by uche40(f): 3:37pm On Oct 29, 2022
House of Cards (2013-2018)

"A Congressman works with his equally conniving wife to exact revenge on the people who betrayed him".

Watched the first season many years back and I'm just starting to watch the others. Say what you want about Kevin Spacey. Dude is hella entertaining grin

1 Like

Religion / Re: How Tolerant Is God? by uche40(f): 3:30pm On Oct 29, 2022
Namdio:


Why Roland?

lol

cheesy

3 Likes

Religion / Re: How Tolerant Is God? by uche40(f): 2:17pm On Oct 29, 2022
MaxInDHouse:

Alright, i don't know what you mean by "Roland" my profile name is "MaxInDHouse"

Enjoy your weekend! smiley

Whatever, Roland.

4 Likes

Religion / Re: How Tolerant Is God? by uche40(f): 2:14pm On Oct 29, 2022
MaxInDHouse:


If you have nothing to add now that i've proved my worth as one of Jesus' true disciples and not misinformed Churchgoers! wink

Ok, Roland.

4 Likes

Religion / Re: How Tolerant Is God? by uche40(f): 1:45pm On Oct 29, 2022
MaxInDHouse:


Not much for the moment i only wish to help you know the real meaning of that group name "CHRISTIANS" that's why i quoted the founder (CHRIST) for you to compare what is happening around you before you refer to unbelievers as my "fellow Christians" smiley

Ok. Are you done now?

2 Likes

Religion / Re: How Tolerant Is God? by uche40(f): 1:41pm On Oct 29, 2022
MaxInDHouse:

You don't even know the real meaning of that group name "CHRISTIANS"

Well you need more enlightenment!

People who goes out to make noise in the streets disturbing the peaceful atmosphere are not followers of Christ! Matthew 12:19

People who support politics to pick up arms and start killing their neighbours including their own fellow believers are not followers of Christ! Mark 12:31 compare to John 13:34-35

People who welcome contradicting teachings and conflicting doctrines are not followers of Christ! John 17:22 compare to 1Corinthians 1:10

Now go back and figure out who are the true followers of Jesus the man called CHRIST because it's from that title the group name CHRISTIANS was derived! Act 11:26

Thanks for your time! wink

We were never arguing about who real Christians were or weren't. I have only pointed out that Christianity is riddled with contradictory beliefs which you yourself haven't refuted. So this post is a non-sequitur.

Anything else you want to add, hmm?

4 Likes

Religion / Re: How Tolerant Is God? by uche40(f): 1:28pm On Oct 29, 2022
MaxInDHouse:


The highlighted is exactly what i've been trying to tell you, my God is responsible for what is written in the Bible but please don't quote Him and adding your own meaning simply because you don't want to see reasons with him.

I speak with the greatest honesty and sincerity that's why i never turned to rage like your so called mainstream believers {1Peter 3:15} Jesus taught us to be wise and harmless! Matthew 10:16

So it's you who needs to be honest, respectful and calm whenever you meet people who has a different view of what you thought you've figured out! wink

Argue with your fellow Christians who claim that God is all-powerful and all-knowing. This argument is worn out and I have no desire to go back and forth on it anymore.

So again, thanks for your time.

3 Likes

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (of 5 pages)

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2025 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 236
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.