Righteousness2:
Political EARTHQUAKE in South Africa:

For the first time since the fall of the apartheid regime in 1994, Nelson Mandela's ruling party (ANC) has lost its absolute majority in parliament, and will be forced to form a coalition with partners.

Just after Ramophosa and his ANC decided to Dine with the devil and carry Hatred for the Apple of GOD'S eye ( ISRAEL) to the next level


I will Bless those who bless you and Curse those who curse you.



SIN AND PUNISHMENT!

Stop talking nonsense, you will be so disgraced the moment you found out how ignorant and blind you have been for years.

Righteousness2:
One FACT i have come to understand in this Last of the Last days , is that Everything happening to and around ISRAEL is knowingly or unknowingly pushing ISRAEL to GOD ALMIGHTY Orginal plan and purpose for them.

The antisemitism and hate all over the World is Bringing them from all over the world Heavy numbers back to their GOD Given land just as was prophecied thousands of yrs ago in the bible.

The Perceived betrayal from Biden, the man presently in the White house is also pushing ISRAEL to GOD'S Orginal purpose for them which is to Depend solely on HIM and No one else.

Prophet Zechariah tells us GOD will gather ALL nations against Jerusalem

Prophet Joel tells us GOD will gather ALL the Nations to Judgement and will Deal with them based on their dealings with ISRAEL.

Listen! From Inception, ISRAEL is One man squad.
[/b]
They do not need the Help of any nation.
Na we ( Gentiles) Need their Help.
In relating with them, we Gentiles come into GOD'S BLESSINGS for the Earth.
That is the Covenant.
That is what the likes of America and nations of the Earth have Enjoyed.

Your tears, feelings, anger or lamentation does not move GOD. GOD is moved by HIS word not by your Feelings or tears. HE Respects HIS More than HIS Name.

Hate or Love ISRAEL, they are GOD ALMIGHTY Chosen Nation.
They are GOD ALMIGHTY Signet on the Earth.
They are the APPLE OF GOD'S EYE.
It is through them that GOD have dealings with the nations and inhabitants.

If you are angry , you go and fight or question GOD ALMIGHTY not me.

As For Biden, He has made a grave mistake, both morally and politically.
He is Bringing GOD'S Judgement on a Sinful Country.

[b]Today! Tomorrow! And Forever! I STAND WITH GOD'S LAND
I STAND WITH ISRAEL.

The more you talk is the more you make big fool of yourself. Who told you they are the real Israel, since the false state was created they have never stood alone but have always depended on America and Europe to survive till date.
The last retaliatory attack by Iran was a heavy blow if not the help of America and European army the false Israel would have been shattered.
Go and study to show yourself approved or remain in ignorance.

temmyyem:
Most West Africans with E1B1A haplogroup are descendants of the ancient Israelites, this is the reason we were enslaved and still being oppressed both in West Africa and diaspora.

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLcRucsbW9wkXj1zEbpBQi6ENrD7LFEN-k&si=7c6BC3W9274nIKLH

Many of our people are still sleeping 😌 that's the reason why all.manner of evil is going on everywhere because we are still in error practicing Christianity,Islam and transitional religion.

CameroonPepper:
Aboki politicians are fighting Tinubu back.
Expect a major explosion in a major Abuja location soon. These guys don't play around.

Aso Rock, CBN HQ, Eagle Square, Sheraton etc will be potential targets.

I see a good luck Jonathan treatment happening to tinubu, like you said they are planning to use insecurity to remove him. A major attack could be on the way in the major cities most especially Abuja.

nlfpmod:


https://www.google.com/amp/s/nairametrics.com/2024/01/05/nigerian-banks-fintechs-set-to-launch-cngn-stablecoin-on-february-27/%3famp=1

I pity my country, why do we have short memory? Why have we forgotten e-naira. What happened to it? Now we are talking of another scam that have failed already.

fergie001:


SaharaReporters

Resting in peace Aketi the brave..

post=127356113:
Update From NāijaCover. Com



Source: https://punchng.com/footballer-slumps-dies-during-training/

Nigeria is not ready to make progress yet so a team training section is going on without a medics and ambulance in this age and era, ordinary CRP procedure would have revived him. RIP 🙏🏾.

cucumbar:
so these fine fine girls na ghetto girls? me I've been to Soweto.

You're lucky because you didn't let them know you're Nigerian

socialmediaman:


Source: https://saharareporters.com/2023/11/08/g-7-countries-meet-japan-announce-support-israel-pause-humanitarian-aid-gaza

Unfortunately no more samurai in Japan anymore.

foleskay:

All these west African countries with their instability sef. Can't they learn from East Africans who hv seen steady development over the years? West Africa is the bane of Africa,including Nigeria. Very backward in everything, including d skin. Dem malians and Senegal have d darkest skins iv ever seen. You'd know this when yu see their players in EPL .

BTW,how many guinea do we have sef. Gunea Conakry,guinea Bissau,equatorial guinea and the real Guinea!
E no go better for person wey partition Africa in d 19th century oo.

My brother why must you bring skin color into your comment that's very bad pls don't do that again as an African.

lexylaw40:


https://dailypost.ng/2023/10/27/treat-all-gunshot-victims-without-police-report-igp-orders-health-workers/

Nice move

Holyfic:
My view is this the iron dome system was overwhelmed 3500 missiles in a day how many batteries are in Israel that's the highest sofar in their conflicts, secondly Israel was distracted gathering intelligence of their bigger enemy Iran bombing their targets in Syria meanwhile their backyard enemies has plan going on, the Jews just overlook their Palestine , never you loose guard

It was planned by people working to actualize new world order in the both sides Israel and Palestine, intelligence available to me showed that Israel actually withdraw troops from the southern border and deliberately allowed Hamas militants to gain access.infact the Southern border have the best security in the world which can detect both movement within kilometers to the fence both underground and in the air but Hamas simple walked close and destroyed the fence with explosives flow over it with gliders unchallenged. Even the military counter attack was very weak as planned because it was planned to be so.

The ultimate aim is WW3 which is already on the way watch out for what will come of this conflict because Iran and all major Islamic states will be involved as planned. then the christens, all will fight to exhaustion and then the shadow people will impose the new world order in the name of peace. It won't be an easy process but surly under way.

Be careful not to join them in taking any side just study your scripture and avoid religion totally.

Mrsoft3:
this people are really taking over the world, africa in their palms....you dont know what i am saying go read the chinese soup, its a book

Who is the author

OPPORTUNISTS VERSUS THE OBIDIENTS

By Emeka Ugwuonye, Esquire

Movement for peaceful change (MPC)

https://trendsdynamics..com/2022/07/opportunists-versus-obidients.html?m=1





This post was prompted by a need to respond to the recent interview Segun Awosanya, popularly known as Segalink, had with SEGUN ADEWOLE of the Punch Newspaper “on the cyber bullying and intolerant attitude displayed by members of the Peter Obi campaign.”



Segun Awosanya is the man who gained fame on social media a few years ago as the one fighting against the brutality of the Nigerian police, especially the SARS unit. He was seen as the pioneer of the movement against the SARS. He was a product of social media excitement by the Nigerian youths. He later lost the support of the youth and has recently been ridiculed on social media, each time he tries to reclaim his lost relevance. This time, he attempts so by attacking the supporters of Peter Obi. As seen in the interview, he is unhappy about his decline in fame and he is now attacking the process that produced him.



Throughout the breath and length of his interview with Segun Adewole, Mr. Awosanya, lamented the fact that he now being attacked by the same group of people whose cheers had catapulted him to relevance in the Nigeria social media. In the instance, his frustration is aimed at the segment of the vocal Nigerian youths who are cheering Peter Obi as their preferred presidential candidate. These youths are popularly called “the Obidients” There is no doubt that Obidients are vocal, aggressive and largely intolerant. But they really have no choice. They reflect the general anxiety in Nigeria that unless something was done differently, the clamor of the Nigerian youths would be scuttled yet again. Does that excuse the need for decorum? No! Does that justify the increasing intolerance of those who support Peter Obi? Certainly not. But it explains it. It makes it understandable. And people like Mr. Awosanya, Reno Omokri, Adeyanju or Poju Oyemade should not complain.



Indeed, Awosanya is the last person to complain about the mob tendencies of Nigerians on social media because he was one of the greatest beneficiaries of the unreasoning mob excitement. Awosanya presented himself as a superman who was genuinely fighting against police brutality and who was aiming at redressing the menace posed by the activities of the SARS unit of the Nigerian police. Many Nigerians believed him. The “unreasoning mob” cheered him on and he became an instant celebrity thereby. Then, Mr. Awosanya did not notice that much of the credit given to him was unjustified and unmerited. It was not an accurate measure of any tangible contribution he had made on the subject of redressing police brutality in Nigeria. Yes, there was a promise, but it was totally unfulfilled. None of those who cheered Awosanya understood that he was never really ready to take the bull by the horn. Instead, he was quite ready to appease the police system that he claimed to be challenging. Despite the glory and achievement he wanted to lay claim to, Awosanya was just riding on the euphoria of these same youths he castigates today.



The evidence of Awosanya’s lack of impact as regards curtailing abuses by the SARS was shown in the fact that the SARS never stopped or reduced their activities as a result of Awosanya’s alleged advocacy. In 2018, the Nigerian police detained Emeka Ugwuonye, a lawyer, at their infamous abattoir detention center in Abuja. The reason the police detained Ugwuonye was simply because he had accused the police on social media of abusing the rights of Nigerians. After a weekend in police cell, Emeka Ugwuonye attempted to make a video documentary to expose the atrocities and extrajudicial killings committed by the Nigerian police in Abattoir, of which he was a witness. The police realized that if Emeka Ugwuonye was allowed to air his views, Nigerians would get a true picture of the atrocities being committed by the police. To silence Ugwuonye, Commissioner Bala Ciroma ordered that Emeka Ugwuonye be charged with a phantom murder and armed robbery, unbailable offences in Nigeria, and thus have him remanded in prison for an offense he could never have committed.



While Emeka Ugwuonye was in detention, messages were sent to Mr. Awosanya by those who believed that he would see the cause of Ugwuonye as worthy of support. But Mr. Awosanya actually praised the police for persecuting Ugwuonye. The only reason one could deduce from Mr. Awosanya’s indifference to Ugwuonye’s predicament was that he, Awosanya, was never serious in his fight against police brutality and he was not willing to do anything that could remotely offend the police high command. It was also possible that Mr. Awosanya did not want to share credit with anybody else in the fight against police brutality, and he perceived Ugwuonye as superior rival.



Also, when, as a result of the ineffectiveness of Awosanya’s advocacy, the Nigerian youths, who had supported him, decided to take matters into their hands, which led to the 2020 ENDSARS riots, the same Mr. Awosanya turned against the youths and supported the police authorities. He thus lost the support of the Nigerian youths. He found himself sinking into irrelevance, as those who once cheered him regained their reasoning ability and began to question his claims and his leadership.



It is clear from this interview that Mr. Awosanya is quite bitter about his decline in fame. What he sees as intolerance on the part of the Obidient youths is a continuation of their rejection of his hypocrisy. He failed to realize that every glory is fleeting. But attacking the youths for losing their support shows he lacks a good understanding of history and human nature, despite his pretentions of knowledge thereof. He is even at the point of justifying his credentials and qualifications to function as an advocate for justice and an influencer. Thus he compares his case with Bill Gates and the latter’s work on vaccines. What a fantastic analogy! That is how bad it is for Awosanya. Painting his opponents with tar does not help him either. I saw where he described Obidient youths as tribalists or “feminists” seeking same-sex marriage in Nigeria. That was the lowest Awosanya could go. First, he showed extraordinary ignorance. I challenge him to look up the meaning of the word “feminist” in any dictionary. He will be shocked to know he didn’t know the meaning of such common term.



Awosanya is a product of the social media bubble. He rode to fame on the crest of social media euphoria by youths who acted before they reasoned. And when those youths eventually engaged reason, they saw that Awosanya was just hot air, full of empty talks that intended to impress. And when the youths realized their mistake about him, they turned against him. His loss of fame or decline in relevance is part of a natural chain of events. A leader of the mob should not complain about mobs. He should just wait for the next round of the wave and then he can jump in for another opportunistic ride.
https://trendsdynamics..com/2022/07/opportunists-versus-obidients.html?m=1

ivolt:
You should have been embarrassed to copy and paste this nonsense.

You can't even get the heading correctly.
Even a kid knows that the war is between Russia Ukraine. NATO is not part of the war nor Ukraine a member of NATO.
Russia's cyber gang managers are obviously not recruiting the brightest.

I wouldn't bother with the rest of the thrash as I do not expect a below average student to understand the main issues.

If you have any atom of common sense you should have known that the war in Ukraine is a proxy war between NATO and Russia.

PRESENTING THE RUSSIAN-NATO WAR IN A WAY AN AVERAGE NIGERIAN STUDENT CAN UNDERSTAND IT
(By Emeka Ugwuonye, Esquire)

https://trendsdynamics..com/2022/03/presenting-russian-nato-war-in-way.html?m=1




To tell the story of the ongoing war in Eastern Europe, I have to use my personal experience as an angle of illustration. I am sure one will immediately wonder how the experience of a Nigerian man would help explain a war occurring at the opposite end of the world. But be patient with me and you will understand.

In 1987, I was a first year student of law in University of Benin. The first year was spent on non-law electives, to give the student a general knowledge of things through related courses in social sciences, arts and philosophy. One of the compulsory non-law courses we took was philosophy. That was how I met Professor Christos Theodoropoulos. He was a Greek man. He taught philosophy and jurisprudence in University of Ife, before he followed Professor Itse Sagay to Uniben to found the law faculty there. I liked Theodoropoulos immediately I met him. He was different from other professors. He said things I never heard before but which were already on my mind, though I was too scared to voice them out. For instance, Theodoropoulos shocked us in class one day when he said to us in the middle of a lecture: “Man made God in the image of man. As the image of man changed, the image of God also changed. This is why the primitive man had to have a primitive God, and a modern man has to have a modern God, who even has a family of father and son born out of wedlock”. This was crazy! But, I began to follow the man because I wanted to know more about his thoughts. I eventually became his protégé in Uniben.

The greatest impact Theodoropoulos had in my impressionable mind then was that he taught me dialectics (which continues to guide my analytic thoughts to date). He also turned me into a Marxist and a Communist as a student. That was a sufficient radicalization process any young man could undergo then.

From this exposure, I understood that the world was divided into two ideological blocs with distinct global positioning. The ideological blocs were capitalism and Communism and their distinct places on the face of the earth were America and Western Europe for capitalism and the Soviet Union on the eastern part of Europe for Communism. As a Marxist student, I identified with the way the Communists saw the world while I doubted the capitalist worldview. There was constant tension between the leaders of these two ideological blocs, which I learned had been there since after the Second World War. Despite the tensions, there was a balance. It was assumed that the two blocs were stalemated and were equal in strength such that none could swallow up the other. The anchor of the balance between the two blocs was the fact that each side had amassed sufficient nuclear bombs to be able to mutually destruct in the event of violent confrontation between the two. So, they vehemently opposed each other but without direct violent and physical confrontation. That was why that era was termed the Cold War, presumed to be the non-physical hostilities between the two sides. The capitalist countries, led by America, formed a military alliance for their joint security against the Soviet Union led by Russia, which formed their own military alliance called the Warsaw Pact to checkmate NATO.

By 1991, when I was leaving University of Benin and heading to the Nigerian Law School in Lagos, there was incredible turmoil going on in the world which seemed to alter the pre-existing stalemate between the two blocs. The changes were of both ideological and geopolitical dimensions. In geopolitical terms, the countries that came together to form the Soviet Union disintegrated, and each became independent. It was like peeling away of an onion. As each member of the Soviet Union went its way, it shrank the base that hosted the Communist world.

However, as the Soviet Union peeled away, NATO and the capitalist world remained intact and bourgeoning. So, in a way, you can view the changes that occurred in 1990/91 years as the collapse of the Soviet Union and Communism. So, capitalism defeated Communism. Russia, the dominant state in the Soviet Union, rapidly began to reform its economy along the model of American capitalism. Another part of the world that was Communist but not part of the Soviet Union was China. Though part of global communism, China was not in a state of cold war with NATO and the West, as the Soviet Union was. However, when it appeared that there was a defeat of global communism, China also began to reform its economy in the direction of capitalism.

By 1993, I was a graduate student at Harvard University. This was at the peak of market-oriented reforms of former Soviet countries and China. These reforms dominated academic discussions, research, and thoughts at Harvard University. For me, as a student, I was again involved in the same thoughts and subjects that had dominated my educational development in Uniben. But this time, it was more complex, more advanced, and occurring at Harvard, where the professors involved were actually the global leaders of thoughts on the subjects. For instance, while at Harvard, I took courses in economics, one of which was taught by Professor Jeffrey Sachs. I mentioned Sachs because he was officially one of the leading economists of the world that Russia had hired to guide it through reforms at the earliest stages. So, here I was, a student brought up with Communist thoughts, but now studying under a leading capitalist economist of the time. I was amazed as Jeffery Sachs proclaimed that, indeed, Carl Marx was right in predicting the withering of the state and that that had been realized by the collapse of the Soviet empire.

Jeffery Sachs' initial reform activities in Russia met some serious criticisms, mainly because he moved too fast. He reformed certain economic institutions far ahead of some critical legal institutions. For instance, he reformed state-owned enterprises and issued vouchers in lieu of shares to citizens, but without a company/business law to regulate the bundle of rights attached to shares or vouchers. As criticisms poured in, there was a serious debate as to whether shock therapy which Russian reforms characterized was as good as or better than the gradualist approach that China adopted. There was also a discussion as to whether democracy was a prerequisite to successful economic reform. In this particular regard, China was constantly compared with India, which, though with the history of communism was indeed the biggest reforming democracy in the world. Then, it seemed that Russia was too eager to become like America in terms of market reforms. On the other hand, China appeared slower in embracing America market forces. I was young, and I was involved in these debates going on at Harvard then, albeit initially, as a student.

A couple of years later, Jeffery Sachs was appointed the Director of Harvard Institute for International Development (HIID). Many erstwhile Marxist scholars in the University brought up again the old criticism they had for Jeffery Sachs – that he had no respect for rule of law, that he reformed the market ahead of rule of law and thereby could not protect the reformed Russian economy from corruption and the activities of the few powerful individuals who cornered the reformed economy, later to become known as the oligarchs. To deflect some of these criticisms, Jeffery Sachs recruited three lawyers to join him at HIID. The goal was for him to be able to show the world that he now understood the importance of the rule of law in economic reforms. Hence, he had three lawyers in his staff. The three lawyers were: (1) Jonathan Hay, an American, stationed in Russia to cover HIID activities in Russia, (2) Catherina Pistor, a German legal scholar, and (3) Emeka Ugwuonye, a Nigerian, stationed in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Our work was to help guide economic reforms in various countries where HIID was engaged for the purpose of ensuring that economic reform was progressing at a pace that embraced corresponding reforms in legal institutions.

How did those events lead to the moment we face today? Though Russia lost its empire and its glory at the end of the Cold War, it remained militarily powerful. However, Russia, in reforming as it did, became swallowed by the West/NATO in terms of the economic control of the world. Russia did not like this. Russians also believe that they, too, have a destiny to remain a superpower. The increasing gap between Russian military strength and its economic weakness was disturbing to Russia. On the other hand, NATO countries never believed that the Cold War was over. The West continued with a desire to impose every of its values on the rest of the world, including a super power and a proud country as Russia. Rather than maintain the geopolitical boundaries that existed during the Cold War, NATO began to expand by swallowing up countries that formerly allied wish Russia. The implication was that the Russian sphere of military influence (which it now describes as its security concerns) continued to shrink as that of NATO continued to expand.

Russia had hoped that NATO would not expand by shrinking its sphere of influence. It tried to counter it in many ways, including through nefarious interferences in elections in the NATO countries. It did not succeed. Clearly, America and NATO were seeking what has been described as the liberal hegemony, that is, the desire to impose their values of human rights and democracy across the world. Market-oriented reforms were achieved in Russia and to a great extent in China, but political reforms in terms of democracy and human rights have not quite been achieved to the satisfaction of the West. The idea of liberal hegemony sought to conform democratic institutions in Russia to those in America, as it has been done in the economic front. Russia resisted. American expansion through NATO threatened Russia. Clearly, Russia is not a leader in the world economy. It has lost any hope of that to American capitalism. And Russia did not want to lose its military might as it lost economic power.

Of all the former Soviet Union countries, Ukraine is the closest to Russia. They have shared commonalities throughout history. Admitting Ukraine into NATO would place NATO at the door steps of the heart of Russia. Russian Government understood that such would place it at significant disadvantage as a superpower, that it would lose much of its clout as a military power. Putin goes further to believe that the ultimate aim of NATO in getting that close to Russia was for NATO to eventually physically conquer Russia. Hence, Putin saw NATO expansion as an existential threat to Russia. Viewed in such a serious manner, Putin would go to war to stop it from happening.

Now, finally, it must have been shocking to observe the speed with which NATO crippled the Russian economy through sanctions. Why was that possible? That was because Russian economy was intricately integrated with Western economic institutions. Indeed, the effect of the sanctions must have convinced Putin of what would happen in any other area where Russia allows NATO to dominate it. Russia, through economic reforms occurring since 1990, has subordinated its economy to that of the West, and now the West has exercised the leverage and crippled Russian economy. Similarly, should Russia subordinate its security concerns to NATO, it will be a matter of time for NATO to leverage that to the point of neutering Russia permanently. Every hegemonic power ultimately gets expressed through military might. You saw that in Iraq, Libya, and nearly Syria. Russia knows what NATO could do to dislodge you if they could.

Time has gone by. Today is much different from 30 years ago. Propaganda and disinformation have always been weapons of war. But, Putin could not have prepared for the level of propaganda made possible by the social media today. He has been outgunned when it comes to propaganda and disinformation. As NATO powers ban Russian news agencies while at the same time dishing out exaggerations and untruth against Putin, he must realize that there was an aspect of this warfare he was not prepared for. And what do you think about the sanctions-based attack on the assets of Russian businessmen? Their only true sin was that they happened to be Russians. The claim that the oligarchs are friends of Putin makes no sense. The Russian businessmen who formed partnerships with their American and European colleagues must have been shocked at their victimization.

For me, I am still a student studying events as they manifest and unfold.

https://trendsdynamics..com/2022/03/presenting-russian-nato-war-in-way.html?m=1

THE PREDICAMENT YOU FACE WITH A DISTURBING PATERNITY DNA TEST.
(By Emeka Ugwuonye, Esquire)
Due process advocate (DPA)

https://trendsdynamics..com/2022/03/the-predicament-you-face-with.html?m=1
.
From our experience in DPA in the past few years, we have come to know based on statistical evidence available to us that nearly half the time, the child is not the biological child of the father. And in growing number of cases, the child is not the biological child of the mother either because children get switched in large hospitals with large maternity wards.

The most risky is the first child. It should be noted that in many cases, a lady never breaks up with her boyfriend until around the time of her wedding. Some take up to six months after their wedding before they finally ended their affairs with their boyfriends. This should not be a surprise to you in a country where there is usually a wide age gap between the man and his wife. Because of the economy and culture, the man is not able to save enough to marry early. He marries in his 40s and 50s. But he is marrying a lady in her early 20s who needs to marry immediately because of the economy that has no employment for her. For her, marriage is a substitute for employment. And she has to marry a rich man probably in his 50s. The implication is that the lady will leave her boyfriend in his 20s to marry the husband in his 50s. She will likely remain in the relationship with the boyfriend even as she gets married to the husband. The first child is usually the biological child of the boyfriend.
.
Paternity crisis could be a delicate and heart-wrenching experience for parents to face. DPA will continue to provide delicate, confidential, and highly professional services to families in such situations
.
What causes a high rate of negative DNA negatives includes:
.
(1) Infidelity in the marriage: Unfortunately, people focus on the mother's infidelity. That is true, but there is more to it. The mother did not get herself pregnant. In many cases of mother's infidelity, it was a married man who got her pregnant. A husband who is angry that his wife's child is not his biological child has actually sired many children with his side chicks (somebody else's wife) without it ever coming to light. Also, it may be the husband's infidelity that led the bored and abandoned wife into reciprocal or remedial infidelity. So, let's not be judgmental about these things.
.
(2) Rascality and fraud: Some women are simply too ignorant and reckless to assume that the truth would never come out or that it doesn't really make a difference who the biological father is. They assume that the man should be happy to father any kid he sees in his house. That is dumb. Most men want to sow their own seeds. They believe that they come back to life through their genes reproduced through their sperms. So, giving him the product of another man's genes is not the same thing. But, some ignorant women don't realize this. Or, they do, but somehow naively or fraudulently believe that the man will never find out.
.
(3) Ignorance of biology: Some women don't know their body circles. They misjudge. They assume that because they slept with their husband on the day they considered the peak of their ovulation, the husband must be the father and not the boyfriend she slept with two days earlier or later. Sperms have various ranges of potency. And sperms can live for 3 days in your body. A more potent sperm can push out your husband's relatively weaker sperm and fertilize your egg. The sperms struggle inside your body, and the most powerful among which can swim fastest is the one that breaks through.

Since your husband is cheating, I can't stop you from cheating back. But be wise about it.
.
(4) Deliberate and calculated decision at gene selection: A woman may deliberately not want her children to have the genes of her husband. Your husband may be a wealthy man through political corruption. But otherwise, you know your husband is unintelligent and uncompetitive. You want your children to benefit from your husband's wealth (which was why you married him in the first place). But you want your children to be of superior genetic stock. So, you deliberately get pregnant from your boyfriend who is super intelligent (PhD nuclear physics) while allowing your husband to train the kids as his. You have cleverly matched the wealth of your husband with the intellect of your boyfriend, thereby achieving an optimal factor selection. But, this is risky and dangerous because it is now so easy to perform paternity tests. Indeed, we expect that the next four generations of mobile phones (4 years from now) will have apps that can perform DNA and pregnancy tests on the spot.

For women, whoever your husband starts insisting on paternity test or if your husband suddenly declares that any of your children is not his biological child, unless you know for certain that he is not the biological father, the first thing you should do as the mother is to go and perform a DNA maternity test. This is to ensure that your biological child was not switched by mistake in the maternity ward. There have been situations where that happened, and the woman was falsely accused of adultery. It took many years before it was realized that it was a switch. Then, it was too late to save the marriage.

In any event, if you face a situation like this, the DPA Family Law Clinic is the best in Nigeria to assist you. Don't panic. Don't fight. Just come to us for the most assured professional service.

https://trendsdynamics..com/2022/03/the-predicament-you-face-with.html?m=1

Balkan:
Seriously!

Confirmed truth

LeoDeKing:
How come abiama didn't tell him not to visit Kenya?

Is he not a prophet that has been predicting events like the arrest of Abba Kyari?

>

HOW NNAMDI KANU WAS LOCATED AND KIDNAPPED IN KENYA: MY HUNCH.

(By Emeka Ugwuonye, Esquire)


https://trendsdynamics..com/2022/02/how-nnamdi-kanu-was-located-and.html?m=1

The British intelligence informally notified their Nigerian counterpart (NIA) that Nnamdi Kanu was in Nairobi, Kenya. NIA relayed the information to the DSS and the Presidency. The Presidency approved the operation to locate and bring Nnamdi to Nigeria, even if done by way of kidnapping. Of course, there are ramifications for this theory.





Once it was confirmed that Nnamdi was in Kenya, the plan was to track him in Kenya and bring him to Nigeria without going through a long and highly controversial extradition hearing. It was believed in Nigeria, and rightly so, that going through an extradition hearing in Kenya or Britain would play into the hands of IPOB and give them a significant platform such as a British or Kenyan court to make the case for Biafra and that would give them the attention of mainstream and international media. So, extradition must be avoided at all cost. Besides, such extradition hearing would take years, as Nnamdi Kanu would appeal the decisions to the highest court, if need be. Also, such lengthy and highly visible trial of the Biafran case would enable IPOB raise so much money and become even more powerful and recruit millions or more followers. That would be gold for Nnamdi Kanu. So, that left only rendition as the option for the Nigerian government. It was really devil's alternative for Nigerian government.



A further challenge was how to carry out the rendition operation successfully. The Nigerian agents knew through the British that Nnamdi was in Kenya. But the British agents did not want to provide further help because they feared that their Nigerian counterpart might bungle any plan they would have and the role of the British agents might become known and that could be a messy issue in Britain. So, they just passed on the information to the Nigerians but refused to try to help in tracking Nnamdi's actual location in Nairobi. Nnamdi was not really as private as he should be. He was not secretive enough in his movements within Kenya. So, he was sited and identified and even tracked to his house in Nairobi. But how do you catch him and remove him without raising attention? The Nigerians did not want a repeat of what happened when Nigerian Government under the same Head of State tried to rendition Umaru Diko.



Nigerians needed help from within Kenya intelligence. But the Kenyans were not as forthcoming as Nigeria wants them to be. The case of Abdullah Ocalan (the Kurdish rebel leader) was so fresh in the minds of the Kenyan intelligence. Note that in the Ocalan's case, there was a controversy over who actually captured Ocalan, in Kenya where he was hiding from the Turkish Government. The Kenyans claimed that it was Turkish agents that came in Kenya and captured Ocalan and took him away without the knowledge of the Kenyan authority (just as they are saying now in the case of Nnamdi Kanu). But Ocalan insisted it was Kenyan agents that arrested him and handed him over to the Turkish forces. Eventually, Turkey confirmed that it was indeed Kenyan agents that captured Ocalan. So, this time, Kenyan intelligence did not want to assist Nigerian government more directly in order to avoid a repeat of the embarrassment that came from the discovery that Kenyan agents were the ones that captured Ocalan.



However, it is believed that the Kenyan agents gave the contact of some private (non-state) actors that could assist Nigerian agents to actually capture Nnamdi Kanu. But there was still a big challenge. The only role the Kenyan agents would play was a passive one - to not do what the British agent did that stopped last minute the plane carrying Umaru Diko from taking off. The Kenyan intelligence agreed to ensure that the plane that would take Nnamdi Kanu out of Kenya would not pass through the normal security and clearance protocol. There will just be a blank where the plane and its manifest would have been documented.



Further challenge: How to carry out the extraction operation. That requires knowing in advance when and where Nnamdi would be alone. The Nigerian agents did not have such information and the Kenyan agents did not want to play such direct role. The only option for the Nigerian agents was to use an insider - a close associate of Nnamdi Kanu who would be able to reveal to them where Nnamdi Kanu would be alone or at least with just a couple of people.



The Nigerian agents had access to someone very very close to Nnamdi Kanu, who happened to be one of his lawyers. They asked him to help obtain the information they needed. The person was in regular touch with Nnamdi, because Nnamdi remained keenly interested in the cases of IPOB pending in courts. He was someone that Nnamdi would pick his call at anytime. The person knew in the evening of June 22 that Nnamdi was going to the airport to receive someone the next day. He knew that it was a personal friend coming to meet Nnamdi in Kenya. He guessed rightly that Nnamdi would make his trip to the airport private and discrete. He passed on that information to the Nigerian agents. They asked him to have a video call with Nnamdi around the time he would be leaving for the airport because they wanted to get Nnamdi's picture as he was dressed. The person had a video call with Nnamdi when he was about to leave for the airport. He captured the screen and forwarded to the Nigerian agents the picture of Nnamdi as he was dressed at that moment. That picture was then sent to the team set up since the night before to intercept Nnamdi. They were to intercept him on his way to the airport. But there was a mistake. They couldn't block his vehicle. Instead, they followed him all the way into the parking lot, where they accosted him and spirited him away.



Despite the successful capture of Nnamdi Kanu, it took about 6 days before the Nigerians could complete plans of bringing in a private jet and lifting Nnamdi from Kenya without intervention of the Kenyan airport authority. The capture of Nnamdi was so successful. The fact that they found him alone without anyone with him meant that they could keep him for upto six days for Nigerian agents to be ready with the extraction plan. Assuming that Nnamdi had people with him when captured, his capture might have attracted attention and if so, Kenyan authorities would have been forced to intervene and that would have aborted the extraction.



The Nigerian government would not like it to be known that a rendition (a highly controversial and unlawful act) was approved by the Presidency. Despite the apparent success of this rendition, it is still a potential source of embarrassment for Nigerian government. And that is why Nnamdi Kanu's lawyer are emphasizing the evil of rendition. Why would this government try again what they tried on Umaru Diko - to kidnap a suspect rather than go through the legitimate channel? The emphasis on rendition will expose ultimately the problems and embarrassment to the government. Why should a government act like a terrorist group to get at their opponent?

https://trendsdynamics..com/2022/02/how-nnamdi-kanu-was-located-and.html?m=1

GET READY FOR MY FORTHCOMING ANALYSIS OF THE CASES OF ABBA KYARI

(Emeka Ugwuonye, Esquire)



https://trendsdynamics..com/2022/02/get-ready-for-my-forthcoming-analysis.html?m=1

.

I shall be presenting an analysis of the legal predicament of DCP Abba Kyari. I intend to demonstrate that the crimes of Abba Kyari are actually the crimes of the Nigerian police as a whole. You must understand that it would have been impossible for Abba Kyari to rise so rapidly through the ranks despite the absence of any remarkable education or credentials unless he truly represented what the Nigerian police stood for. It would have been impossible for Abba Kyari to hold many sensitive and vital positions in the Nigerian police if he did not enjoy the blessings and active endorsement of his seniors. Abba Kyari headed SARS in Lagos, where it was known that thousands of suspects were tortured, executed, disappeared, or framed up for offenses they did not commit. It is impossible for the senior police officers not to have been aware of the bloody record of Abba Kyari as the head of SARS, Lagos. And to reward him, he was promoted to head the contrivance known ironically as the Intelligence Response Team (IRT). And naturally, IRT under Abba Kyari became the biggest killing machine in the Nigerian police force, far exceeding the record of atrocities for which SARS was unequaled.

.

Indeed, as a matter of commonsense, whatever Abba Kyari is accused of doing now is simply the basic modus operandi of the Nigerian police. If Kyari was perceived by the police to have done anything wrong, he would not have become their best officer. And whatever the police may do today, make no mistake, Abby Kyari was the best of the Nigerian police by their horrible standards. And never you forget that the Nigerian police never caught Abba Kyari. In their book, he is a good man and the good officer. Abba Kyari got into trouble by the FBI standards, not by the standard of the Nigerian police. He again got into trouble by the standard of the NDLEA, not by the standard of the Nigeria police. And in each case, the Nigerian police tended to shield him. It took an open battle between the NDLEA and the police for Abba Kyari to be arrested for dealing in narcotics with chilling evidence against him. What does that tell you?

.

The Nigerian police, as a matter of common practice, will take money from a rich person and arrest and detain anyone the rich person wanted detained. That was exactly what Abba Kyari did for Hushpuppi. Also, maybe unknown to the average Nigerian, the desire of the rich person may be the death of his opponent. If he paid the police, the police would kill the person wanted dead. You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to know that if Abba Kyari could detain a person just because of 8 million Naira, he would kill a person for 16 million naira, and he must have done that again and again. He got caught. While on suspension awaiting extradition request, the police allowed him to retain command position in the same IRT he was supposedly suspended from. He was seen mingling with the top officers in the force, while on suspension. Indeed, he was untouchable. The reason is because, as far as the Nigerian police were concerned, Abba Kyari had done no wrong. While on suspension, the same Abba Kyari had the temerity to play a coordinating role in an international drug cartel. And the Nigerian police had no problem with that.

.

As horrible as the specific actions of Abba Kyari may be, Nigerians need to know that 90% of Nigerian police officers are like Abba Kyari. Their system endorses it. They are doing what Abba Kyari did, though they are not yet caught. That is how they live. As good as it may be that Abba Kyari is going down and traveling far to meet justice, the fact remains that nothing will change in the Nigerian police without a comprehensive reform of the force.

.

I will shed more light on this subject when I post my analysis. Try to read it. It was not easy for me when in 2018 I was forced to publicly describe the Nigerian police force as the biggest crime gang in Nigeria. I would hate to say that about any police force in the world, how much more the police force of my own dear country. For the audacity to condemn the Nigerian police, I was framed up for murder and armed robbery and a judicial system that is so indulgent toward the Nigerian police remanded me in prison for two years. It is a shame, indeed, that the EndSARS riot proved me right two years later, and Abba Kyari cases have again proved me right four years later.


https://trendsdynamics..com/2022/02/get-ready-for-my-forthcoming-analysis.html?m=1

SmartPolician:
Thanks, OP, for this insightful explanation.

Isn't it rather stupid that whereas the world is still trying to overcome coronavirus and the destructive effects it has left on us USA and Russia are more interested in flexing their military might?

Like one Nairalander once said, USA, Russia and China are the major problems of this world.

Their interest first before anything even if it means destroying the world. Kindly check my blog for other interesting and expository articles.

6 Reasons Why NATO and Russia Disagree

https://trendsdynamics..com/2022/02/6-reasons-why-nato-and-russia-disagree.html?m=1

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the Russian Federation have been at odds for many years. The tension between the two has been an ongoing issue since long before Russia annexed Crimea in 2014. There are a number of reasons for this disagreement, and some of them may seem trivial, while others may be more important to you than others. These are some of the main reasons why NATO and Russia disagree:

1. NATO is a Western military alliance made up of mostly European countries, while Russia is a non-aligned country that remains distrustful of western influence.

2. NATO is against Russian expansionism, which is out of fear that it will destabilize its bordering countries

3. NATO is complying with US demands to contain Russian influence in the Middle East

4. Russia sees NATO as an American tool used to spread democracy in Europe

5. The West sees Putin's regime as authoritarian and corrupt

6. Russia sees NATO as a threat to its sphere of interest


Western alliances and Russian non-alignment
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization is a military alliance, while Russia remains non-aligned. NATO was made up of mostly European countries, and many of those countries were members before the dissolution of the Soviet Union. After that, many former satellite states joined as well.

NATO is against Russian expansionism, which is out to destabilize its bordering countries. NATO sees Putin’s regime as authoritarian and corrupt, while Russia sees NATO as an American tool used to spread democracy in Europe. The West sees Putin’s regime as authoritarian and corrupt, while Russia sees NATO as a threat to its sphere of interest.


NATO's fear of Russia
NATO is against Russian expansionism, which is out of fear that it will destabilize its bordering countries. Russia has had many past conflicts with its neighboring countries like Turkey and Georgia. These conflicts have caused NATO to be very cautious about Russia's intentions in the region. This is one of the main reasons why NATO and Russia disagree.


NATO's role in the Middle East
Russia is not looking favorably on NATO's role in the Middle East. Russia's military intervention in Syria has been the direct response to what it perceives as NATO’s encroachment on its sphere of interest. The United States of America is also not looking favorably on these recent actions by Russia.

There are many reasons for this disagreement, but some of the most important ones include:

-NATO is a Western military alliance made up of mostly European countries, while Russia is a non-aligned country that remains distrustful of western influence

-NATO is against Russian expansionism, which is out of fear that it will destabilize its bordering countries

-NATO is complying with US demands to contain Russian influence in the Middle East

-Russia sees NATO as an American tool used to spread democracy in Europe

-The West sees Putin's regime as authoritarian and corrupt

-Russia sees NATO as a threat to its sphere of interest


Russia's view of the West

Russia has a negative view of the West, but it's less prominent than the West's view of Russia. The West sees Putin's regime as authoritarian and corrupt, while Russia views NATO as a threat to its sphere of interest.

Russia is not an ally of NATO, but it still wants to be recognized as a power in Europe. NATO doesn't want any one country to dominate Europe because that could cause chaos on the continent. NATO is complying with US demands to contain Russian influence in the Middle East, which is out of fear that it will destabilize its bordering countries like Ukraine and other Eastern European countries.


The West's view of Putin

The West sees Putin's regime as authoritarian and corrupt. They feel that the state media is a propaganda machine that has been used to enforce Putin's power. NATO feels that Russia has been trying to undermine the democratic ideals of the West by attempting to spread anti-western sentiment in Europe, as well as meddling in countries' affairs. For example, Russia has been supporting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his regime from waging war against his own people.


Conclusion

The disagreement between NATO and Russia has been going on for a long time. But what is NATO, and why do they disagree with Russia?

NATO is a military alliance of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, a group of countries from North America and Europe, based on the NATO-Russia Founding Act.

NATO's primary goal is to defend its members from any attack by Russia. In 2002, NATO had 16 members. In 2017, it had 28 members.

NATO has been increasing its presence in Eastern Europe, which is a reaction to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

In 2014, the U.S., Germany and other NATO countries started supplying weapons and transportation equipment to the Ukrainian army. NATO has also increased its military exercises and training in Eastern Europe.

NATO and Russia disagree because they have different views on the Middle East and the West. NATO believes that it is important to contain Russian influence in the region and to fight terrorism. Russia wants to dominate the region and to stop NATO from entering into their territory.

As the tensions between NATO and Russia continue to increase, it can be hard to know who is right and who is wrong.

The two sides clearly don't want the same things for the future of global political order.

neo25:
Hi all a friend of mine tells me he sees his wife always in dreams with another strange Man like she is married to him and he as the husband would stand by and watch them both like a stranger in that dream.

They both have been married for 10 years now but these dreams have been occurring at least every week since last years November 2021.
Can anyone please advise, both the Spiritual and Physical implications.

Thanks.

He should investigate his wife for infidelity, avoid seeing any pastor or visiting any spiritual place for now.

WHAT NIGERIANS WILL SOON KNOW ABOUT ABBA KYARI

https://trendsdynamics..com/2022/02/what-nigerians-will-soon-know-about.html?m=1
DPC Abba Kyari is probably responsible for extra-judicial executions of more than 2000 suspects arrested by him and his men both as head of SARS lagos and head of IRT. And he killed for his own personal enrichment. If he liked your house, your hotel, anything you have well enough, he would implicate you and frame you up with kidnapping and armed robbery allegations. He would arrest and kill you. And he would steal your property. He was probably the most deadly and most powerful killer in the history of exteajudicial killing in the Nigerian police force.

Abba Kyari can build a mountain out of nothing. During the time I was detained in Kuje prison, I studied a number important suspects and documented the interviews and studies carried out. Thank God I made my study and research available to relevant foreign agencies and international organizations. I studied the case of Wadume. Wadume is standing trial right now. How many of you know that Wadume was never charged with the offense of kidnapping? That was because he was never involved in any kidnapping or there was absolutely no evidence of kidnapping. You don't have to take my word. Just go to the court of Justice Binta Nyako of Abuja Federal High Court, and you will ask the Registrar of the court to give you a copy of Wadume's case file. You will be shocked to know that Wadume is standing trial only for one single charge for the offence of unlawful possession of firearm. And he will be easily acquitted of that charge.

So, why do most Nigerians believe that Wadume is a notorious kidnapper? Because Abba Kyari engineered that and manipulated the press to repeat that lie so many times that it became the truth.

Have you wondered why those soldiers who killed three police officers in the Wadume incident were never charged, but were instead promoted? That was because the story Abba Kyari told the world in that case was false. The soldiers acted properly within the law in shooting those policemen in mufti whom they believed were kidnappers after they refused three times to stop at military checkpoint.

The five men who kidnapped the wife of the Central Bank Governor were executed by Abba Kyari and his men after parading them, but after Abba Kyari and his men had taken from them the 100 million they were paid as ransom. Abba Kyari and his men tracked the men and could have arrested them before they were paid the ransom, but he preferred to wait until immediately after they received the ransom before arresting them. You can guess why. And they were killed not because Bba Kyari hated kidnappers, but because he needed to cover up the fact that he and his men cornered the ransom money. But the story did not end there. Four other men who never met or saw the wife of the Central Bank Governor are still in Kuje Prison standing trial for kidnapping the woman. They will all be acquitted because there is no evidence against them. They are just Abba Kyari's victims.

Do not believe half of what Abba Kyari told you about Evans. In fact, if you knew Abba Kyari well, you would believe Evans ten times before you can believe Abba Kyari.

Nigerians will one day know the truth about Abba Kyari, and the country will shake. If you recalled, when Abba Kyari was implicated last year in the Hushouppi case and he was suspended, I predicted that without the cover his position in the police gave him, Abba Kyari was like a baby standing on the beach without any clothes on. I was right. More truth is coming out about this mass murderer in the Nigerian police force.

Now, where are those bloggers Abba Kyari paid and used to cover up mass murder? They must be hiding now.

By DPA

https://trendsdynamics..com/2022/02/what-nigerians-will-soon-know-about.html?m=1

NNAMDI KANU’S LAWYER, IFEANYI EJIOFOR, IS DEEPLY ENTANGLED: HOW IT WILL LIKELY END

(By Emeka Ugwuonye, Esquire)

(Due process advocate)

10th Feb 2022


https://trendsdynamics..com/2022/02/nnamdi-kanus-lawyer-ifeanyi-ejiofor-is.html?m=1

Let us start from what we know for a certain, and from there we get to what we believe and can analyze. I want the reader to understand my process of presentation. We start from the certain truth and continue to the analytical truth, and from there to hypothesis and conjectural truth. It is easy to understand my writing and my presentation.



A certain truth is truth that does not depend on what I think or what you think. It is there for any person with eyes to see. Analytic truth is truth that you get to if you use your mind and connect certain truths. A certain truth requires the use of one of the five senses (seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, and feeling by touching). An analytic truth, on the other hand, requires the use of the 6th sense, which is analytic sense. For instance: “2 + 2” (certain truth) “= 4” (analytic truth). You have 2 and 2, which is a certain truth. But what about “= 4”? “2 + 2” is certain truth. You can see the two numbers with your eyes. But you can’t see “=4” with your eyes. It is when you analyze the certain truth “2 + 2” that you will arrive at the other truth (the analytic truth), “=4”. So, “= 4” is analytic truth. So, in understanding the situation with Nnamdi Kanu case and Barrister Ejiofor’s legal problems, we have to combine the certain truth and get to the analytic truth.



CERTAIN TRUTH:

(1) “On the 28th of May, 2008, Barrister Ejiofor obtained the sum of N5,600,000 from one Mr. Ikechukwu Okpala under a false pretense”. He defrauded the man. He forged Power of Attorney and Deed of Assignment. Then he tried to use the forged document to steal somebody’s land. Finally, when he was caught, he tried to pay back the money, but he did that fraudulently too, by issuing a dud cheque. These acts exposed Ejiofor to legal jeopardy, which means that he knew in his conscience that he might be caught and if caught, he would be prosecuted, and if prosecuted, he would probably go to prison for up to 15 years. (This is certain truth because it is contained in the Charge pending against Ejiofor in FCT High Court No. 3, Maitama, Abuja).



(2) As a reasonable person would expect, the above actions of Ejiofor were reported to EFCC in 2015. In other words, for 7 years, Ejiofor failed to give Mr. Ikechukwu Okpala back his money (because Ejiofor already “ate” the money and did not have money to pay back). The EFCC arrested Ejiofor, obtained damaging and implicating statements from Ejiofor). And in 2016, the EFCC filed five-counts criminal indictment against Ejiofor. And from that moment, Ejiofor was standing trial for fraud and forgery, with very damaging evidence and admissions from him. (This is a certain truth too).



(3) In the same 2016, Nnamdi Kanu, who was arrested in October of 2015, engaged the services of Ejiofor, not knowing that Ejiofor was facing criminal charges and that Ejiofor had made damaging and self-implicating admissions to the EFCC and was actually begging EFCC for a plea bargain. Also, Ejiofor failed to inform either Nnamdi Kanu or anyone close to him that he (Ejiofor) was at the mercy of the same Nigerian Government and that he might not be able to fight the Government in any case involving treasonable or terrorism charges. (This is also a certain truth).



(4) Between 2016 and present, Ejiofor acted as Nnamdi Kanu’s lawyer and as lawyer for IPOB in very sensitive cases where he ought to be fighting the Nigerian government and seeking to hold the government to the tenets of the constitution. In his capacity as Nnamdi Kanu’s lawyer, Ejiofor ought to be able to challenge the government without any appearance of fear or favor. (This is also a certain fact, based on our knowledge of the role of a defense lawyer in criminal cases – He fights the government, more so in politically sensitive trials like trials for treason and terrorism).



(5) We also know as a fact that with IPOB proscribed, Ejiofor actually became the only visible representative of IPOB in Nigeria. Nobody else actually could publicly speak for IPOB without risking an arrest since IPOB was proscribed. So, for four years, the only person that could formally answer for IPOB was Ejiofor. He was indeed their operational head. He went beyond the bounds of lawyer’s professional responsibility. It would have been so easy for DSS to indict him for the same offenses he was supposed to be defending IPOB members against. (This is a also a statement of fact).



ANALYTIC TRUTH:

(1) With the criminal case where Ejiofor was already begging for plea bargain, he could not be free and independent enough to challenge the government on anything serious. You cannot fight against a government you are at its mercy. There is a clear conflict between the interest of Ejiofor (which is to please the government and get a plea bargain for himself) and the interest of Nnamdi Kanu in his criminal defense (which is to challenge the government and defeat the government in court). In normal scenario, this is how a plea bargain discussion goes: Ejiofor would ask the EFCC to give him a plea bargain on favorable terms. The EFCC would ask him: “And what do we get from you in return”? It is possible that Ejiofor would say: “I can help you get Nnamdi Kanu and destroy IPOB”. It is reasonable to know that Ejiofor would rather cooperate with the Government of Nigeria than to fight the Government. (It is analytically sound to believe, therefore, that Ejiofor did what every rational person in his circumstance would do, which was to try everything he could to please and appease the Government of Nigeria and to offer the Government anything he could, including to offer the Government the head of Nnamdi Kanu on a wooden plate).



(2) To present this in a dramatic and easy to understand fashion: The government will squeeze Ejiofor balls and Ejiofor will try to squeeze Nnamdi Kanu’s balls. You don’t get a plea bargain free of charge. You must give something to the government in order to get something in return. What does Ejiofor offer the government for the bargain he is expecting from them?



(3) It is also analytically true that the intelligence used by the Nigerian Government in dealing with Nnamdi Kanu and IPOB involved insider information. It is analytically true that the Nigerian secret service would not have known by themselves the details of Nnamdi Kanu’s movement from UK to Kenya and his movement within Nairobi unless someone gave them help. In fact, after Nnamdi Kanu was brought into Nigeria on June 29, 2021, the Nigerian Attorney General reported that it was as a result of collaborative efforts of partners. He made it clear that they did not do it alone. Who then did they work with? Kenyan Government initially denied any knowledge of the operation. Also, Nnamdi Kanu never revealed publicly that he was in Nairobi. That was information tightly known within the inner circle of IPOB. Who then among IPOB leaders would have a reason to cooperate with the Nigerian Government with such a high prized asset like the arrest of the leader of IPOB?



(4) There are multiple indicators that Nigerian Government could have been working with Ifeanyi Ejiofor. There are indications that Ejiofor was being handled by deep intelligence operators within the Nigerian secret services. Let me suggest some of the indicators:



(a) In December of 2019, Ejiofor was declared wanted by the Nigeria police for the events that lead to the killing of two police officers in Anambra State. The whole world knew that the police declared Ejiofor wanted. But what happened after that? Was Ejiofor ever arrested? Have you ever seen a situation where the police would go to the press and declare a person wanted for killing two senior police officers, and then never follow up? That sounds like some internal intervention. Somebody powerful must have sent a message to the police to say: “We need Ejiofor. He is useful to us. Don’t touch him yet. But gather the evidence you have on the murder case and let’s use it as additional pressure point on him”. Otherwise, please explain to me why Ejiofor would be declared wanted by the police for the death of two police officers and nothing was ever heard about it.



(b) Once IPOB became proscribed, all its activities became illegal under Nigerian law. Yes, Ejiofor is a lawyer and could be said to be acting as a lawyer. But it was clear that Ejiofor was not only a lawyer to IPOB. He was their spokesman. He was in touch not only with Nnamdi Kanu, but other leaders of IPOB. He was receiving money from them. Indeed, IPOB made it possible for Ejiofor to buy new cars, buy new suits, and even build a house. In 2015, Ejiofor was too poor to refund the money of Mr. Ikechukwu Okpala, even when faced with the prospects of arrest and prosecution for fraud. Yet, today the same Ejiofor managed to finance a chieftaincy tittle for himself. He even saw himself able to challenge Emeka Offor and publicly call Emeka Offor an idiot. That was the same Emeka Offor that paid his school fees. So, Ejiofor was not just a lawyer for IPOB. He has been their de facto leader. He used IPOB assets under his command. He would mobilize IPOB youths and use them as body guards to intimidate his village people, which led to the annoyance of Emeka Offor and the involvement of the Nigerian police. Ejiofor also used other tactical and operational assets of IPOB at will. For instance, Ejiofor knew the secret behind the name “Emma Powerful”. He knew that that was only an Alias which many people wrongly believed was a human being in the office of spokesperson for IPOB. Emma Powerful is an alias sold to the world as a real human being. Any of the inner circle of IPOB could make a statement and pass it off as a statement from IPOB spokesperson, Emma Powerful. If you doubt this, tell me who is Emma Powerful. We know others. We know Simon Okpa. We know which country he lives in. He is vocal and active. But do you know Emma Powerful? Have you even seen Emma Powerful? Where does he live? What does he look like? Emma Powerful is just an alias and Ejiofor used that name as he pleased. The fact is that the DSS and NIA operatives know this and that has been part of the scheme. Otherwise, they would have arrested Ejiofor for being an active operator of IPOB.



(c) If you remember well, in early 2020, Rambo of DPA revealed that there were signs that the Nigerian intelligence were actively operating within the IPOB ranks. If you think, you will remember when Rambo argued that IPOB was captured and that an element of its leadership were already under the control of the Nigerian intelligence. Many of you did not understand Rambo. At that time, it was not clear the intelligence handle within the top ranks of IPOB. Now, it is clearer. We now know that a key IPOB figure (its lawyer) has always been at the mercy of the Nigerian intelligence. This is an analytic truth.



(d) While still not able to do anything about the first time Ejiofor was declared wanted, the same Ejiofor got involved in yet another violence in his compound that resulted in what he described as an armed attack or assassination attempt, and it led to the killing of his PA. Ejiofor blamed it on the Nigerian police and claimed it was because he was the lawyer for IPOB. Yet, no arrests, no prosecution. Ejiofor was not even invited by the police to explain what happened in his compound. Why? How could all that be happening? As a former intelligence analyst myself, I could tell immediately that this was not normal.



(f) If you are implicated in killing two police officers (senior officers), you know that the Nigerian police will not let you go free. When a Deputy Police Commissioner was gunned down (probably by fellow officers) during the Shiite protest in Abuja, scores of Shiite members were arrested and dumped in prison. They are still facing murder trial. How come that the two officers were killed by what the police suggested were Ejiofor boys and Ejiofor is a free man, not even questioned?



NNAMDI KANU WILL HAVE DIFFICULTY DROPPING EJIOFOR AS HIS LAWYER:

Ejiofor knows a lot about IPOB operations. Apart from knowing things like the secret of the name, Emma Powerful, he also knows the donors and sponsors of IPOB. He is in a position to blackmail Nnamdi Kanu, if Nnamdi Kanu tries to fire him. Also, Ejiofor cannot withdraw from the case by himself because he will become totally useless to the Nigerian Government and they will have no further reason to give him a plea bargain. That is the dilemma Nnamdi Kanu faces with Ejiofor.



CONJECTURAL TRUTH:

Based on all the above, I can safely draw the conclusion that there is more to Ejiofor than meets the eyes. He is probably part of a delicate secret intelligence operation on the poor puns of IPOB, as well as on their leadership.



I believe that at the right time, the same intelligence scheme will intervene either to dismiss all pending criminal charges against Ejiofor, as part of the deal. Or, they may betray him and go ahead and trial him with the powerful evidence they have against him. This should be a lesson to many. They joined what they did not understand and cannot understand. And many of them have paid the utmost price. And in any intricate secret intelligence operation, there are many circles called “operational cells”. Nnamdi Kanu did not know a lot of what his trusted inter circles were doing. Just as Nnamdi Kanu has said he did not know about sit-at-home, he might not have known about the things Ejiofor was doing behind him. Nnamdi said he did not order the sit-at-homes. In the same way, he did not say those things Ejiofor tells people he said each time he visits him in detention. I just pity many.



CONCLUSION:

The above scenario shows the predicament Nnamdi Kanu and his new lawyers face. With Ejiofor as part of their team, they have an uphill task. Ejiofor’s new mission may now be to undermine and frustrate the new legal team.

https://trendsdynamics..com/2022/02/nnamdi-kanus-lawyer-ifeanyi-ejiofor-is.html?m=1

NOTE: Now that I may be revealing secret intelligence operation of certain individuals around IPOB and the restoration of Biafra movement and the trial of Nnamdi Kanu, I may have annoyed some people within these intelligence operations. I am sure they would not like any revelations I may have made. I hope they would not be so offended as to want to silence me.

onetimesurvey:
wow it's going to be a long holiday.
so I just cashed out from surveyng. I posted before but people took it for granted, I followed every instructions. yes it's your fault if you have internet and still broke, click on link in my signature and register, start earning money instantly, site is user friendly... just complete surveys and start cashing out
thank me later

Your survey stuff sounds too good to be true, how come the videos and comments in YouTube are 6months old without update?
Can you pls show evidence of payment if this is genuine.

NNAMDI KANU’S VICTORY IN COURT TODAY: THE LAST OF MY PREDICTIONS ALSO CAME THROUGH
(By Emeka Ugwuonye, Esquire)

https://trendsdynamics..com/2022/01/nnamdi-kanus-victory-in-court-today.html?m=1

It might have come to you as a surprise, but not to me. My analysis showed me clearly, many months ago, that Nnamdi Kanu’s best legal approach was to hammer on the specific acts of Nigerian government that violated his rights – including the invasion of his mome in 2017 by the Nigerian military and the rendition from Kenya. That was the counter-game that his lawyers could play. Anything else was just chasing after the government in government’s own game.

Interestingly, one of Nnamdi Kanu’s lawyers, Barrister Aloy Ejimakor, was reasoning in the same direction as I was, even though without any communication with me. As a seasoned international lawyer, Ejimakor understood that to take the legal battle outside the pre-planned strategy of Nigerian Government, he had to focus on the violations of the rights of Nnamdi, rather than just trying to defend the criminals charges. That was exactly what he did with the fundamental rights application he filed in Abia State High Court.

Before the Nigerian Government lawyers realized the masterplan, Ejimakor was miles ahead. And today, he scored the first and the biggest legal victory to be won by Nnamdi Kanu in his entire ordeal with the Nigerian Government. I predicted, and it came to pass, that the Court would declare Nnamdi’s rendition unlawful and illegal, and that the court would award damages. The court did award damages in billions. That was brilliant on the part of Barrister Ejimakor.

What happened today in Abia High Court shows again that if you follow the wrong strategy, you can spend years without winning much. In all these years that Ifeanyi Ejiofor has been following the wrong strategy, what has he won? He won the verbal and propaganda war among the members of IPOB. But real victory has constantly eluded him. However, with a brilliant strategy, Aloy Ejimakor won a tangible victory today, both in terms of substantive legal positioning and by way of humongous damage award. The difference between Ejimakor and the rest is clear. Those of you following my predictions would admit that I have been very clear on this and I said it would happen this way. It is now for Nnamdi Kanu and his family to know which lawyer delivers tangible results and which lawyer delivers noise and confusion.

Going forward, what does today’s victory mean for Nnamdi Kanu’s case? It means a lot. A foundation has been laid for future victories. Let’s consider the following points:

(1) The finding by the court that the military invasion of Nnamdi Kanu’s house in 2017 was illegal now strengths Nnamdi’ argument that he did not jump bail, that he only escaped from a military assault. In so far as the court has determined that the military presence in his compound was illegal, it is now valid to say that his escape from Nigeria was justified. And if Nnamdi Kanu’s escape has been determined to be justified, then he did not jump bail. And if he did not jump bail, he deserves another bail now. That is the power of today’s judgment. Thanks to Aloy Ejimakor’s strategy and dilligence.

(2) Today’s judgment actually found the Nigerian Government to have been unjust, wrong, immoral, and acting unlawfully in its treatment of Nnamdi Kanu. That is a very powerful moral booster for Nnamdi Kanu, his cause and his supporters. They can now point at the judgment as their evidence that the Government has not been honest in its dealings. The judgment is actually a floodlight in a dark tunnel. It could be a rallying point for a group that has been so thoroughly decimated over the years. It will help them regroup and to raise funds. Can you imagine what it means for the Nigerian Army and the Federal of Government of Nigeria to apologize to Nnamdi Kanu, which means apologizing to the Igbos, to Biafrans. That is a very big one.

(3) Also, today’s victory will strengthen the diplomatic and political options toward resolution. Indeed, today’s judgment can be used to strengthen the move by Ohaneze. The judgment placed a stinking mud on the face of President Buhari. It weakens his position and robs his argument of all merits. And an intervener like Ohaneze can go back to the President and resubmit the political option. And this time, they will be doing the President a favor, not just saving Nnamdi Kanu. The President now needs help. He needs help to remove the mud on the face of his administration. And diplomatically, international community looking at today’s judgment are now in position to pressure Nigerian Government to obey the orders of the High Court. When the courts of your country has found you to be in violation of the law, the government cannot go on pretending to be justified in its pursuit of Nnamdi Kanu. Indeed, today’s judgment tends to turn the prosecution of Nnamdi Kanu into a blatant persecution. I cannot believe that the Nigerian government lawyers allowed themselves to lose the case in Abia High Court.

(4) Finally, today’s victory will feature in almost every defense Nnamdi Kanu would have to the criminal charges against him. Rather than the criminal the charges wanted to make of him, today’s judgment tends to make him a hero and makes him look like a man defending himself against a vicious government that violated his rights.

It is all to the brilliance of Aloy Ejimakor. Today’s judgment was a great achievement and I am happy to say that I predicted it just as it turned out.

Even though Nigerian Government will appeal against this judgment, it is too late. Nnamdi Kanu is now entitled to an apology from the same Attorney General that called him a criminal.

https://trendsdynamics..com/2022/01/nnamdi-kanus-victory-in-court-today.html?m=1

NNAMDI KANU CASE: THE CURRENT STATE OF THINGS.
(By Emeka Ugwuonye, Esquire)

https://trendsdynamics..com/2022/01/nnamdi-kanu-case-current-state-of-things.html?m=1

Today is yet another sit-at-home in the Eastern parts of Nigeria. In fact, I hurriedly left Enugu this weekend just to avoid being caught up in the puzzling situation on the ground. The situation is puzzling because though the sit-at-home was initiated in support of Nnamdi Kanu’s cause, it continued even after Nnamdi Kanu and his group had relentlessly tried to stop it. In other words, Nnamdi Kanu and IPOB are really not in control of the sit-at-home. I left Enugu in haste because I could get stuck.

Having escaped to a corner of Nigeria where I could move around on Mondays and the rest of the weak, I chose to stop and appreciate the weighty events of the week by presenting to you my assessment and predictions on the case of Nnamdi Kanu. So, let me start by asking: Where are we on the case?

President Buhari has rejected the plea for unconditional release of Nnamdi Kanu. He has taken the obviously expected position to put him through trial with the predictable outcome. Any hope that Nnamdi Kanu would be out of detention before the end of this Administration has been dashed. So, the focus is now squarely on what happens in the courts, no longer on what the Igbo politicians, Ohaneze, men of God and the rest would do. Those have failed and attention should be focused on the lawyers and the courts.

As I have repeatedly predicted, the motion to grant Nnamdi Kanu bail will fail. He will not be granted bail this week. The application to transfer him to Kuje Correctional center will also fail. He will be ordered to remain in the custody of DSS. This means that the complete isolation of Nnamdi Kanu from his followers will continue. And also, the application challenging the jurisdiction of the court will fail. The court will rule that it has jurisdiction to try Nnamdi Kanu irrespective of how he was brought back from Kenya. So, the three applications that Nnamdi Kanu’s “lead lawyer” has been hammering upon since June, 2021 will all fail, throwing the defense team back to square 1.

However, there will likely be some light in the turned for Nnamdi Kanu this week. For the first time, there could be a judgment that will favor him. It is the case of Fundamental Rights Enforcement filed by Barrister Ejimakor in Abia State, seeking to enforce the rights of Nnamdi Kanu. In this application, Barrister Ejimakor makes what is actually the most sensible legal move so far. Looking at the whole chain of events since last year, the most basic legal question has been on how Nnamdi Kanu was brought into Nigeria from Kenya. That is the rendition question. So much can be made to rest on that question. So, to some extent, that question is a foundational one in that so much may rest on the answer to that question.

Ejimakor brilliantly understands the importance of the rendition question. The question is: Did Nigerian government bring Nnamdi Kanu into Nigeria in accordance with the law or did Nigerian government violate the law and the rights of Nnamdi Kanu in the process of bringing him into Nigeria? Almost every intelligent lawyer or jurist will tell you that Nigerian Government acted illegally and violated the rights of Nnamdi Kanu in order to bring him into Nigeria. I believe that the High Court will on the 19th of this month, Thursday of this week, answer that question. And I am confident that if the Court is ready with its judgment on the 19th, the judgment will be that Nigerian Government violated the law and violated the rights of Nnamdi Kanu. I cannot imagine any standard of legal analysis that would declare lawful the manner in which Nigerian government brought Nnamdi Kanu into Nigeria last June.

The beauty of such judgment is not just that the court gives victory to Nnamdi on such cardinal question. Rather, the beauty of such judgment lies in its strategic implications. Because so much depends on that question, once it is answered in favor of Nnamdi Kanu, it opens the door to other more immediate questions, such as whether it is right for Nigerian Government to continue in what has been declared illegal. In other words,: If you agree that he was brought into Nigeria in an unlawful manner, how can Nigeria government be allowed to reap the benefit of an illegality? A poisoned tree can only produce poisoned fruits. If you violate the law to get Nnamdi Kanu to Nigeria, it means that anything done based on his presence in Nigeria is a continuation of an illegality. That is a strong argument to make in his favor.

How far will the Court in Abia State go in favor of Nnamdi Kanu on Thursday? I don’t want to raise your hopes unduly. But I believe that the court will declare the rendition illegal. I believe that the court will award monetary damages against the Nigerian Government in favor of Nnamdi Kanu. Certainly, the Nigerian Government will not pay any such damages, but it shifts the moral burden in favor of Nnamdi Kanu and against the Government, and this is a heavy burden for the government to bear. Any judgment faulting Nigerian Government is gold to Nnamdi Kanu and IPOB. So, to the extent that such a judgment will come is a victory to Kanu and a brilliant success for Barrister Ejimakor.

Indeed, one would wonder why this application was not make a priority all this while. This ought to have been the primary moves made by the defense team. If they had focused on this procedure since June, they would have significantly dented the work of the Government on the case.

Again, there are many reasons why a court may not render judgment on the day it was supposed to do so. But whenever the court gives judgment in the application filed by Barrister Ejimakor, it will be a victory for Nnamdi Kanu. And once any victory comes, it has the tendency to alter the entire direction of the case.

https://trendsdynamics..com/2022/01/nnamdi-kanu-case-current-state-of-things.html?m=1

gidgiddy:


I dont believe that the British authorities were making any moves against Kanu. I think that Nnamdi Kanu had to go to Kenya for some reason, and when the Kenyan authorities realised he was in their domain, they worked with Nigeria to kidnap and bring him back

Im no lawyer but I think that the charges against Kanu are baseless. They charges are mainly about what he said on his radio station which isnt even registered in Nigeria. Seems rather funny to be trying a man, in Nigeria, for what he said on a radio station in London

Before he left Britain he already have case in the court of which would have resulted in his conviction, even a layman knows it was the British that tiped the Nigerian authority on his way about, it's a simple logic.