OLAADEGBU:

Because I have noticed that you always creep out of the woodworks whenever topics relating to Obama or LGBT are raised.

thehomer:

So what is the relevance of my own sexual orientation? I'm not Obama neither do I have to be homosexual to understand that bigotry isn't right.

OLAADEGBU:

Your worldview and objections are based on ingannation.

OLAADEGBU:

As you can see, you have no evidence to back up your claim. All is based on the foundation of speculations and assumptions which you use as your presuppositions.

thehomer:

That is what happened to Jephthah's daughter on God's behalf.



If you understand English Language, then you shouldn't be finding anything I said confusing. What is the fallacy and where did I commit this fallacy?

Image123:
Already quoted your fallacy for ya since 6.01pm on April 25. Why are you still asking like an automaton?

Image123:
If i do something 'wrong' on your behalf which you didn't require, are you to take the blame? What exactly are you saying happened to Jeptha's daughter? i don't get this Mercy-Burning you're fallaciously on about.

Image123: ^
you avoided my questions?

Image123:
Already quoted your fallacy for ya since 6.01pm on April 25. Why are you still asking like an automaton?
If i do something 'wrong' on your behalf which you didn't require, are you to take the blame ? What exactly are you saying happened to Jeptha's daughter ? i don't get this Mercy-Burning you're fallaciously on about.

Image123: kindly re-answer the questions directly, thanks.

thehomer:

. . .

How is it irrelevant to point out that the mercy of your God includes burning innocent people as a sacrifice to himself?

Exactly what word or phrase don't you understand? You quoted my posts there so simply highlight the words or phrases that you find confusing.

thehomer:

The response of mine that you quoted answers this perfectly. Here it is again. Pay attention to what is in bold.

thehomer:

Once again, you reveal your moral decrepitude. You accused me of committing a fallacy yet you're unable to actually show me this fallacy.

thehomer:

The fact that your God gave Mary his rod is in your Bible.

You're the one making the claims yet has so far been able to provide evidence. You're the one making the speculations and assumptions since you're the one making the claim.

thehomer:

I'm sorry but you'll need a more reputable source than world net daily.

Image123:

Already quoted your fallacy for ya since 6.01pm on April 25. Why are you still asking like an automaton?
If i do something 'wrong' on your behalf which you didn't require, are you to take the blame? What exactly are you saying happened to Jeptha's daughter? i don't get this Mercy-Burning you're fallaciously on about.

How is it irrelevant to point out that the mercy of your God includes burning innocent people as a sacrifice to himself?

Exactly what word or phrase don't you understand? You quoted my posts there so simply highlight the words or phrases that you find confusing.

You never actually identified the fallacy you merely quoted my statements. What I'm asking you for is for you to present my statement and actually identify the fallacy you think it falls into.

OLAADEGBU:

Don't mind him, his job is to be equivocating, deliberately being ambiguous, beating around the bush and ending up being confused and flummoxed.

OLAADEGBU:

Your sophistry in the thread I opened below about Obama's unbiblical declaration where you were truculent when it comes to defending the indefensible.

https://www.nairaland.com/461202/obamas-unbiblical-declaration

OLAADEGBU:

And you don't see yourself as being nefarious?

OLAADEGBU:

Don't be contumacious. Where is the fact in the bolded sentence above?

OLAADEGBU:

You've started prevaricating now. You don't have to be perfidious.

Image123: @thehomer

i asked
1. If i do something 'wrong' on your behalf which you didn't require, are you to take the blame?
2. What exactly are you saying happened to Jeptha's daughter ?

You're insisting that your answer to this questions is


Are you sure you understand the question? Or you're being sophistic like Ola pointed out?

Image123:
Here are the questions again in larger font. Kindly answer them, it's actually possible for you to discuss ihope?
[size=15pt]1. If i(Image123) do something 'wrong' on your behalf which you(thehomer) didn't require/request, are you(thehomer) to take the blame?

Image123:
2. What exactly are you saying happened to Jeptha's daughter? i.e summarise in one or few sentences what your complaint is about Jeptha's daughter.[/size]

Image123:
i already did this, ihope you don't reply like an automaton yet again this time.
i talked of the class even. As your status requires, i guess you know what is called a classic ignoratio elenchi? If you don't please read up. That's one perfect class the fallacy pointed at. It is also a fallacy of irrelevant conclusion, an appeal to pity. And you're notorious for redherrings. To break it down further to your statement if by some misfortune, you still cannot locate it; The thread was on Obama and some 'evidence' on his gay sex scandal. And tpia sprays some 'May God have mercy on you' talk to which Ola rightly added that 'God have mercy on us all'. Then out of (satan knows where perhaps) nothing, you pulled out Jephthah's daughter and some (yet/presently) unclear inconclusive and incoherent sobs about her. You're diverting the issues on ground, introducing the appeal to pity.

thehomer:

What was indefensible? You're welcome to post your response for review.

thehomer:

Show me the fallacy o thesaurus digger.

thehomer:

Mary got pregnant with God's seed.

thehomer:

It isn't prevarication to point out that your source isn't reputable.

thehomer:

No, you're the one being confused and attempting to use sophistry to evade the acts of your God.

thehomer:

If I could have stopped you or gave you information that would have prevented you from doing that wrong thing, then I would bear some responsibility. When God is involved, he bears infinite responsibility.

thehomer:

Read the account about her. She was cooked as service to your God.

thehomer:

And here you shoot yourself in the foot, throat and eyes several times.

1. OLAADEGBU didn't present any actual evidence supporting his claim until I pushed him to and then he presented hearsay from an unreputable source.

2. My point with Jephthah's daughter is that God has shown that he doesn't have mercy on us. If he won't have mercy on an innocent person, why will he have mercy on you?

3. Unless you wish to claim that the Bible is a poor source of information about God, then you cannot claim that pointing out a failure of God to show mercy is an appeal to emotions.

Now will you stop shooting yourself in the head and address my points?

Image123:

Oh my brother, i just dey swim inside this your engrish oh. i need to re-say that i love the grammar being dissipated hia.

OLAADEGBU:

Obama's unbiblical declaration, of cause. Go back to that thread to see my review.