Miscellaneous:

hahahaha. . .i studied d question b4 answering o. . . .i'm still taking my stand.

But i'm really surprised dat me, explicit7 and eng tino are the only ones dat see it dis way. . . . Me jst dey laff una. . . Hahahaha

Asakel:
Head ov servants.

sylvalord:
chief-maid

Ken excel:

hahahahaha..A house wife.

Adex097:
CONFAM

exPLIcit7: They are trying to justify themselves by removing the word HEAVIER.

Swagalord18:
tino waz ryt .....don't drag him in2 ur folly

ugiee: ]
Med& surg...... Agg 68
U?

Swagalord18:
tino waz ryt .....don't drag him in2 ur folly

WELCOME Sire !

Miscellaneous:
sist good afternoon o. . .i didnt want to join the arguement but, then i thought ''miscellaneous u nor lyk physics ?''

WRONG Sire !

I had to quickly rush and quote ur post cos i think u are really confused and others might think u are right and no one has given a valid point

What is upthrust ? Upthrust is up-thrust. What is thrust ? Thrust is a force. . . So wat is an upthrust ? Upthrust is an upward force!

Now this is where I got Lost bro !
Cos Last Time I checked . Upthrust was the Force exerted on an Object when Partially / wholly Immersed in a LIQUID .

Or maybe Physics Advanced and Left me behind... Upthrust In air You gotta be kidding me

Now to say which is heavier, suspend the 1kg of sand and 1kg of iron from the same location on the earth and u'll see that the sand produces more upthrust than the iron. . . (hope u know that na)

U ain't simplifying nothing bro !
Enough of ur sophistries sire. You know....how u managed to arrive at another theory =>''UPTHRUST'' (which isn't even germane to what we're arguing on) Is really AMAZING ! More Diesel to ur elbow.
You're savvy...really savvy.
But that doesn't make u right

To simplify the whole thing, we say. . .weight= acc. due to gravity - upthrust i.e w=g-u (hope u agreed ?)

g= a downward force and
u= a upward force.

So, g in both sand and iron is same at that point but the upthrust differs and thereby, shows that iron is heavier than sand.

exPLIcit7: Mr Man dat Is enough of you...you don't try and defend yasef by insulting anoda person is it that u don't reason or wat...don't argue...JUST CONSIDER THE WORD "HEAVY" IN THAT QUESTION...AND TRY USE UR SENSE...

Sir-Tunechi:
Explicit Miscellaneous. I urge u guys 2 go back nd start readin ur ss1 physicsz cus ur pointz doesnt show u undastnd physics but only crammed 2 cary 1st in claz

La Cram ;La Pour ;La Forget

Doc_Miss: WELCOME Sire !




WRONG Sire !



Agreed !



Now this is where I got Lost bro !
Cos Last Time I checked . Upthrust was the Force exerted on an Object when Partially / wholly Immersed in a LIQUID . Puhahahaha...sis abeg don't confuse yasef...according to Achimedes Principle...when an object is partially or wholly Immersed in a fluid...IT EXPERIENCES AN UPTHRUST WHICH IS EQUAL TO THE WEIGHT OF THE FLUID...while are you saying upthrust is a force exerted on an object when partially Immersed...

Or maybe Physics Advanced and Left me behind... Upthrust In air You gotta be kidding me



U ain't simplifying nothing bro !
Enough of ur sophistries sire. You know....how u managed to arrive at another theory =>''UPTHRUST'' (which isn't even germane to what we're arguing on) Is really AMAZING ! More Diesel to ur elbow.
You're savvy...really savvy.
But that doesn't make u right




I wouldn't wanna drag this any further(to avoid stories that touch) cos it's obvious everyone thinks they're right...
So it's okay

Ken excel:




hmmmmm dats ur opinion i guess..and d fact dat u find it infuriatin or insultive dosen't change d fact dat its d clandastine.....besides self sciences student too dy show demselves were ever dy day...

Ken excel:




hmmmmm dats ur opinion i guess..and d fact dat u find it infuriatin or insultive dosen't change d fact dat its d clandastine.....besides self sciences student too dy show demselves were ever dy day...

Romanticboy1:


r u d adeyemi fola-sumfin on fb?

Doc_Miss: WELCOME Sire !




WRONG Sire !



Agreed !



Now this is where I got Lost bro !
Cos Last Time I checked . Upthrust was the Force exerted on an Object when Partially / wholly Immersed in a LIQUID .

Or maybe Physics Advanced and Left me behind... Upthrust In air You gotta be kidding me



U ain't simplifying nothing bro !
Enough of ur sophistries sire. You know....how u managed to arrive at another theory =>''UPTHRUST'' (which isn't even germane to what we're arguing on) Is really AMAZING ! More Diesel to ur elbow.
You're savvy...really savvy.
But that doesn't make u right




I wouldn't wanna drag this any further(to avoid stories that touch) cos it's obvious everyone thinks they're right...
So it's okay

exPLIcit7: puhahahahaha

Adex097:

LEMME PUT AN END TO THIS UNENDING ARGUMENT!!!

*from an Economist point of view*

IF 1KG of sand is NoT equal to 1kg of iron, then you're telling us (Economist) that $1.00 is not equal to #161.92 .
#Exchange-rate.




*dazall*

Signed by Adex
C•S•O

Adex097:

LEMME PUT AN END TO THIS UNENDING ARGUMENT!!!

*from an Economist point of view*

IF 1KG of sand is NoT equal to 1kg of iron, then you're telling us (Economist) that $1.00 is not equal to #161.92 .
#Exchange-rate.




*dazall*

Signed by Adex
C•S•O

This wan na tiff gan! Did u have to use money U shulda used one of those funky pictograms in essential economics