Mcslize:

ARE U ON 2GO? THEN LET ME HAVE UR USERNAME

Sir-Tunechi:
Tank u JESUS 4 allowing me nd my nairalandaz c diz new day.........gudmawnin peepz

Holyrule: no hope without maths and english in any course at all jor

Metaphycist: Wit a D7 in maths,u wil get cleard 4 courses art courses,law inclusive.

Holyrule: i see u all oooh...miss Ugiee i greet ooooh

ugiee:

Ah greet u 2 jawe... Hp u hd a 1dafl nyt rest

sigidporte:

"he spent six years in united but now united is his past, that he is at home and will retire there"

odizeey: Todays scripture;John 1v12- but as many as received him,to them gave he power to become the sons of GOD,even to them that believde on his name. Good morning ppl,ayam kay good morning,slim terry i forgive u,i owe u one hug for benin,no b homo hug o

Hw z homo hug like

MrRomantic1:


Hw z homo hug like

odizeey: u r in d best position to answer dat question

YDSF

odizeey: Todays scripture;John 1v12- but as many as received him,to them gave he power to become the sons of GOD,even to them that believde on his name. Good morning ppl,ayam kay good morning,slim terry i forgive u,i owe u one hug for benin,no b homo hug o

Sir-Tunechi:
Xori 4 bringin up diz 1kg issue but sum pple must have sense......in physicz mass iz directly proportional 2 weight xo equal masses has equal weight....secondly uptrust in air although itz a fluid iz too low to b recognisd in physics irrespective of the volume of solid..datz y wen doin calculationz on upthrust in physics dy wuld give u weight in air nd weight in fluid bcuz weight in air is taking as d standard weight nd nt considered as fluid(although we all knw itz a fluid)...xo weda air or vacuum 1kg of sand nd 1kg of iron re equaly heavy.... *datzall*

odizeey: Nobody is Suaver

_____ :

1. U said upthrust isnt considered in air ? Ah jst dey laff. . how do
aeroplanes fly ? What makes rocket to be propelled ?.

Adex097: @oliseh.com, your toothbrush be like....ehm....lemme just comment my reserve

Miscellaneous:

tunechi i av told evry1 times without number to drop that isshh so they wont block dis thread but u refused. . . . .we stopped arguing doesnt makes u or anyother right or mayb u think u knw physics more.
1. U said upthrust isnt considered in air ? Ah jst dey laff. . how do aeroplanes fly ? What makes rocket to be propelled ?
2. U said they will always consider both water and air during upthrust ? So aeroplane go enta water first shey ?
3. He even went as far by saying, w=g-u cant/doesnt exist in physics. . .ah jst dey laff. . .and e call himself engr student. . i was expecting to hear dat 4rm doc_miss but not 4rm an engr student. . .well i will show it u so dat u dont disgrace urself outside.

I told u science students dont read, read and read we read, think, think and if possible we think the picture of the experiment without carrying it out physical (that is why albert einstein is d most brilliant scientist)..And for the purpose of clarification, we are not disputing the fact that with just calculations 1kg of iron and 1kg of sand wouldnt be equally heavy. . . . U guys are saying both will av 9.82N(10N approx.) each. .but dats because u've only considered the downward force on the two objects due to gravity. Assuming that we're measuring the weight of objects somewhere on earth, we must also consider the effects of the earth's atmosphere, the upward force to be precise. Since air is a fluid, we must consider the effects of upthrust on these two objects:

Upthrust(u) = weight_of_displaced_fluid

i also noticed that u guys jst focused on w=mg because u only calculate and no experiment or thinking. But,

Weight, w = downforce_due_to_gravity - upthrust_from_fluid

therefore, w= mg -u but m=1. so, w=g-u. . .there are more complex ways to prove it but i think dat will only make u confuse d more. And we all knw dat upthrust in 1kg of iron and 1kg of sand differs but ''g'' in both remains the same so, how can they be equally heavy ? Dere will be a slight difference in heaviness, . . .i think 0.89 - 1.1.

Tunechi only resort to insult cos dats wat he can do best. . .i argue without insults cos we avnt seen each other b4 and we dont knw each other's temperaments . . .i knw u'll still disprove wat i said above cos there is somekind of a spell in ''w=mg'' and i guess dats because its not easy to change mentality & even if every1 says u guys are right, dat doesnt makes u right.

And to prove who reasons lyk an art student lyk u claimed, ask any of them and u would see whose reply they'll give. And for the record, dont think u knw more cos we are all learning. . . .am expecting ur insults cos dats ur duty.

Lest i forget, for d bolded text above, weight in air is taken as the standard weight we all knw dat but not during comparism cos shape of objects(iron and sand) is significant. . That is why a house and an aeroplane can have same mass but an aeroplane cos of its shape and concept of upthrust can fly!!!

Throwing away the concept of ''upthrust'' on planet earth is lyk saying there is nothing lyk ''matter.''

Enough said, i unfollow dis thread but i will come back wen dis dies down cos i sense dis will degenerate to something else. . .u neva can tell. Its not a foolish decision but a very wise one. . .if we happen to see in uniben, we can continue d arguement.