Illusioneffect:

No plot holes whatsoever, yo the movie even has a 100% audience approval rating in rotten tomatoes after 10,000 ratings. They just called it a Qnon conspiracy - a movie about child sex trafficking 🤦🏽‍♂️, it was the same Rolling Stones that called the Netflix movie 'Cuties' a misunderstood movie, movie were 7 year old girls were touching themselves sexually 🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️

I've always known I can't depend on some major mainstream media outlets to report the truth when it comes to certain topics. Similar to how most critic's movie reviews can't always be trusted. When advancing an agenda, they ditch credibility. I've read enough reviews on Facebook and observed audience feedback to conclude that this is a quality film.

When I read the comments under that CNN video, I simply thought that everything seemed a little strange. The speaker in attendance makes the claim that the film uses excessively exaggerated statistics and feeds conspiracy theories. He explains to the anchor that they attempt to make child sex trafficking appear more widespread than it actually is. Isn't one child already too many, one might then ask.

Let's then explore the QAnon hoax. What do its adherents claim that is so absurd and unbelievable? It's just a theory that there is a sizable underground child trafficking ring, many elites are involved in it and that children are used for all sorts of things. Why won't so many people believe it after what happened with Jeffery Epstein? Remember they told us that Epstein was part of a larger child trafficking ring and many of his associates have not been apprehended.

I'm just happy that people are showing up to support the project; the box office results are fantastic. The protection of children is the issue here, not left wing or right wing. Parents with kids who aspire to be famous in Hollywood should keep a close eye on those kids. Promises are what pedophiles in high places use to lure kids.

pryme:


If you are the type that likes watching or listening to long Podcast you can watch this interview from Tim Pool with the man himself (Tim Ballard) and the Producer of the movie, hearing the story from him himself was just as good as it's gets, one of the interesting Part was they had to go to filming location with 30 ex Navy Seals because Jim Caveizel's wife will not allow her husband go near Colombia because of safety concerns, THEN SOME OF THE NAVY SEALS LEFT THE FILMING LOCATION TO BUST A TRAFFICKING RING.

I really recommend you watch this interview.

https://www.youtube.com/live/UK3NWozQXdY?feature=share

It's a little over 2hrs long

Thanks for the recommendation, will watch this later.

Pearl Harbor: 10/10
Genre: Biopics, Action, Drama

Damn!..... Pearl harbor was a massacre. The Japs really came prepared and they delivered premium vulwance. This was just too terrifying to watch, the horrors melted by the Japs in their planes against the US at Pearl harbor were just unspeakable.

The US striking Hiroshima and Nagasaki with nukes was simply overkill but it was clearly the Japs who drew first blood. Don't get it twisted, should the tables be turned, the Japs would have done worse, unleashed hell itself on US soil.

The dialogue, cinematography, character build up, music score, acting, vfx were all top notch, considering it was a 2001 movie. It's a perfect 10 for me.

🎥 Asteroid City (2023) = 5.9/10 ✔️

🎥 God Is A Bullet (2023) = 5/10

🎥 Warhorse One (2023) = 1.2/10 ❌

WriterNig:
🎥 Warhorse One (2023) = 1.2/10 ❌

😂🤣🤣 I l thought I warned everyone here about this movie. One of the worst movies, if not the worst (well I'm still waiting for the flash to confirm something) released this year so far ... Well it seems you have enough MB at your disposal.

oyaskii:
lol I have found out that the there's more thrill in filling up your HDD and hoarding than actually watching the files.
😃. Before i would download anything and hoard anything on site, but i now, I'm very selective of the titles i indulge in and download because of space, because i think 7 HDD is an overdrive already, but if i see a good deal like you, i go reason am 😅.

Exactly at the bolded 😃...

WriterNig:
🎥 Warhorse One (2023) = 1.2/10 ❌

It seems y'all watch anything

When I'm not getting paid to review, why would I be watching movies that I'll end up eating so low?

The few I did, I deeply regretted them...

That's why I'm very selective and my ratings are rarely less than 6.5/10

SOZINN:




I've always known I can't depend on some major mainstream media outlets to report the truth when it comes to certain topics. Similar to how most critic's movie reviews can't always be trusted. When advancing an agenda, they ditch credibility. I've read enough reviews on Facebook and observed audience feedback to conclude that this is a quality film.

When I read the comments under that CNN video, I simply thought that everything seemed a little strange. The speaker in attendance makes the claim that the film uses excessively exaggerated statistics and feeds conspiracy theories. He explains to the anchor that they attempt to make child sex trafficking appear more widespread than it actually is. Isn't one child already too many, one might then ask.

Let's then explore the QAnon hoax. What do its adherents claim that is so absurd and unbelievable? It's just a theory that there is a sizable underground child trafficking ring, many elites are involved in it and that children are used for all sorts of things. Why won't so many people believe it after what happened with Jeffery Epstein? Remember they told us that Epstein was part of a larger child trafficking ring and many of his associates have not been apprehended.

I'm just happy that people are showing up to support the project; the box office results are fantastic. The protection of children is the issue here, not left wing or right wing. Parents with kids who aspire to be famous in Hollywood should keep a close eye on those kids. Promises are what pedophiles in high places use to lure kids.

You should listen to the Tucker Carlson and Tate's interview, it's just so amazing.
I once saw myself as a Democrat/Liberal but after the covid incident and the war in Ukraine stuff I just found myself listening to both ends of the spectrum to get a firm view on things - both Fox and CNN and I realised how blinded by the mass media I was. If you want to get a firm view on politics and moral don't just listen to one side of the story, listen to CNN, Candace Owens, Don Lemon, The blabber VP of the United States, Shapiro, The Daily Wire and the rest just to know where your morals stand 🤷‍♂️

I predict 750m - 950m at the end of its run

Guardians of the Galaxy: Vol 3

Now this is a movie. It has more heart than the first two installments, darker, less humour and plenty poignant moments. Lightening struck the same place three times. Quite a rarity.

Highly recommended.

The week is upon us..ladies and gents 🥹😌

oyaskii:
The week is upon us..ladies and gents 🥹😌

I'll be there no matter what

Ishilove:
Guardians of the Galaxy: Vol 3

Now this is a movie. It has more heart than the first two installments, less humour and plenty poignant moments. Lightening struck the same place three times. Quite a rarity.

Highly recommended.

While this one had less humour compared to the previous two, I had more laugh here surprisingly. The jokes landed perfectly.

BlackManta:


I'll be there no matter what

You know Ball!

BlackManta:


I'll be there no matter what

You beat me to that second pic....


I've been saying since that based on the pedigree of the director the movie ain't going to be the full campy shït some are expecting.

°°°

oyaskii:
You know Ball!

Y'all know the goal.... Barbenheimer supremacy. 🙌🙌

😶

nani667:
°°°

this looks AI generated

oyaskii:
The week is upon us..ladies and gents 🥹😌

Nah I pass, Oppenheimer for me

The Most Toxic Fanbases online according to statistics

How are Rihanna fans more toxic than Call of Duty fans?

How are death note fans more toxic than AOT and FMA fans

Marvel and DC fanbase dey so low on the list at all sef

Ishilove:
Guardians of the Galaxy: Vol 3

Now this is a movie. It has more heart than the first two installments, less humour and plenty poignant moments. Lightening struck the same place three times. Quite a rarity.

Highly recommended.

Correct.. Added to my list

Nickshrapnel:
While this one had less humour compared to the previous two, I had more laugh here surprisingly. The jokes landed perfectly.

I think the first installment was the funniest. That's where we learn Drax is very literal. "Nothing goes over my head. My reflexes are too sharp" is a line that is forever burned in my brain 😁😁😁. That is also one of the problems I have with the movie. It's like the writers forgot Drax doesn't know what metaphors are (reads literal meanings to every single statement) and made him to seem stupid/dumb.

For me, the star of the movie is the actor who played the mad scientist villain, High Evolutionary. The guy is an excellent actor. He was so good that I had to Google him and wasn't surprised to find out he began his career in British theatre. He made his character so...larger than life for lack of better words. The High Evolutionary is seeking to create a Utopic world because he himself is so fundamentally flawed and doesn't realise it. He is sadistic, psychotic and has absolutely no redeeming quality. The actor brought this character to life and you find yourself totally arrested once he opens his mouth to speak.

Chukwudi Iwuji is the star of the movie, in my opinion.

Baddestguyp:
I predict 750m - 950m at the end of its run

Lol, don't get ahead of yourself....

This is never getting close to $1bn or even $900mn sef. It's safest bet is around $700-750mn.
It has mad competition this summer with Barbie and Oppenheimer. And Barbie is overperforming that theatres can't keep up with demand and adding more screens to it.

It had great opening overseas but it's US domestic opening is an underperformance. Hitting just $80mn in a 5-day opening weekend is weak. Especially when you consider all the IMAX and PLF screens it's hoarding. Industry projected $90mn.

Good worldwide gross tho.... It'd have great legs I presume, as is normal for the MI franchise.

The Flash came early... Probably due to UK's digital release today, it ought to have been tomorrow as per USA digital release.

majesticguy:
The Flash came early... Probably due to UK's digital release today, it ought to tomorrow as per USA digital release.

guess is that they would have fixed the CGI for digital release...

Baddestguyp:
guess is that they would have fixed the CGI for digital release...

The CGI is not why the movie failed, so why will they further waste money on a pipe dream? They just wanna release it digitally and closed the chapter as quickly as possible has they have already written this off as a monumental loss.

Pirates of the terrible high seas, we feast early 😂