Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,207,421 members, 7,998,962 topics. Date: Sunday, 10 November 2024 at 01:05 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Education / First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. (91528 Views)
I Lost My First Bank Atm Card How Do I Block It, Via Text Or Online / SAT Change Of Subject Question Some American Students Could Not Solve / See This Equation That Leads To Merry Xmas (pix) (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) ... (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) ... (23) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by Kutunban: 10:39pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
3+3*3-3+3=0 If you got 12 its wrong because Multiplying 3*3 is a wrong step to solving equation above What affects +3 must affect -3 So putting (3*3) ain't good Which is obviously wrong So for duded with 12 calculators and mathematical apps ain't good for you. |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by Datanet: 10:41pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
if our educational system is wrong. then you are definately part of failures. the answer is 6. ask your younger ones in ss3 to solve it for you. you should weep for yourself. quote author=petikal post=36825119]I weep for our academic system... actually, no, our academic system is better than this! I weep for the ignorant ones blindly insisting that they are right to something this simple. It's laughable to say Google can't do BODMAS when you have no idea the brains behind the search engine called "Google". These folks employ the brightest researchers in their field to solve the most complex/abstract problems, and BODMAS is the minutest of those. If you're going to use BODMAS, apply it properly, and don't negate other mathematical rules. -A+A is ALWAYS zero. Applying brackets doesn't change that. The answer here is 12.[/quote] 1 Like |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by Datanet: 10:44pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
you are not mathematically inclined too. the answer is 6. ask your younger ones at home quote author=Tubexsms post=36824463]The Answer is 12. Most guys are not mathematically incline. If it was about money almost everybody will get it correct. Even pMB did not pass mathematics [/quote] 1 Like |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by Kutunban: 10:45pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
Datanet: So when multiplying 3 by +3 it doesn't affect -3 is that what you are implying? Read more on quadratics it will help you. |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by otemanuduno: 10:45pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
Datanet:YOUR TEACHER DID NOT TEACH YOU IN SCHOOL THAT YOU SHOULD NEVER LEAVE THE MINUS SIGN OUT WHILE CALCULATING? YOU SAID 12-3+3=12-6? CHAI! NA WA FOR YOU O. DO YOU REMEMBER THE SET THEORY? WE USE TO HAVE SOMETHING LIKE 12-x+x+10-x=universal set. why didnt u get 12-2x+10-x=22-3x at the left hand side? I tot u normly say -x cancels +x and then get 22-x as ur left side part of the equation. so tel me why ur -3 didnt cancl +3 in 12-3+3 you got? 2 Likes |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by otemanuduno: 10:52pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
Kutunban:Pls simplify this equation for me; x+3x-3+x where x=3. Pls collect all the like terms collectable before insertin d valu of x into the equation. |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by Kutunban: 10:52pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
otemanuduno: You are one of the smartest I can see here 2 Likes |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by hollowpot15684(m): 10:52pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
abumeinben: this is why u keep failing.... look at how he is saying it like he is so sure of himself the ansa is 6. 1 Like |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by dagr8(m): 10:52pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
Kutunban:hoping to engage you in a meaningful discussion If you are told to calculate the expression 24 + 6 / 3 * 5 * 2^3 - 9, what will be your answer? |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by petikal(m): 10:54pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
Datanet: So, by YOUR 3rd rule: 3 + 9 - 3 + 3 => 3+9 and 3+3?? Don't you see the mistake there? How did -3+3 become 3+3? Again, when students make silly mistakes like this, they're to blame, not the academic system. 1 Like |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by Datanet: 10:54pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
the answer is still 6 minus sign is only impacted in a multiplication scenario. like -3 * 3 = - 9 how when applying bodmas you only work with numbers next to the sign in question. hope this helps. quote author=otemanuduno post=36826385] YOUR TEACHER DID NOT TEACH YOU IN SCHOOL THAT YOU SHOULD NEVER LEAVE THE MINUS SIGN OUT WHILE CALCULATING? YOU SAID 12-3+3=12-6? CHAI! NA WA FOR YOU O. DO YOU REMEMBER THE SET THEORY? WE USE TO HAVE SOMETHING LIKE 12-x+x+10-x=universal set. why didnt u get 12-2x+10-x=22-3x at the left hand side? I tot u normly say -x cancels +x and then get 22-x as ur left side part of the equation. so tel me why ur -3 didnt cancl +3 in 12-3+3 you got? [/quote] 1 Like |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by JummyIR: 10:55pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
I beg wots d ans op? Cos mine is 6 bodmas levels. |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by Datanet: 10:57pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
yes. it does not affect the minus sign because the multiplication sign is between the 3 * 3. and multiplication comes first before addition and subtraction. hope this helps quote author=Kutunban post=36826374] So when multiplying 3 by +3 it doesn't affect -3 is that what you are implying? Read more on quadratics it will help you.[/quote] 1 Like |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by bollify(m): 10:58pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
Kutunban: Very wrong sir.... PEMDAS OR BODMAS the answer is the same. Your solution is like saying x + x^2 - x = (x+x)*(x-x) do you now see that the bracket you introduced altered the original equation? The answer is 12 sir, sit down and look at it properly. God bless us 2 Likes |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by otemanuduno: 10:59pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
Datanet:HELPS ONLY THOSE WHO WANTS TO FAIL |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by Kutunban: 11:01pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
Datanet: SMH |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by petikal(m): 11:02pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
Datanet:Please stop the silliness, the (-) came after the multiplication, and is a property of the value 3. Hence, the computation (-3)+3 is zero. 1 Like |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by Datanet: 11:02pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
bodmas requires that you treat addition before subtraction. so for a scenario of 3 + 9 - 3 + 3 only select numbers next to addition sign and ignore others. so to make it clearly using parentheses it would be (3 + 9) - (3 + 3) those are the numbers closest to the addition sign before you ca then treat subtraction hope this helps quote author=petikal post=36826697] So, by YOUR 3rd rule: 3 + 9 - 3 + 3 => 3+9 and 3+3?? Don't you see the mistake there? How did -3+3 become 3+3? Again, when students make silly mistakes like this, they're to blame, not the academic system.[/quote] |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by Decapo: 11:04pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
Sleekydee: were you not thought bodmas in school? |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by Kutunban: 11:04pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
bollify: Now that's a beautiful observation, I really appreciate but The answer is still 3 3+3*3-3+3=0 (3+3)*(3-3)+3=0 (9-9)+(9-9)+3=0 0+0+3=3 |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by INDUSTRIALFAN(m): 11:07pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
Kutunban:18 |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by dagr8(m): 11:08pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
@datanet Even though A for addition is in PEMDAS/BODMAS before S for subtraction, these two operations also have the same priority. You look for these last two operations from left to right and complete them in that order. I think we should all have a heart to learn... It just hurts me seeing people doing something wrong and are bent on it 1 Like |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by Datanet: 11:08pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
the computation - 3 + 3 = 0 is correct only if this is the only equation we have however the equation is 3 + 9 - 3 + 3 you must therefore apply BODMAS hence. addition takes priority after you hav initially done 3 * 3. hope this helps petikal: 1 Like |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by Philadelphia: 11:12pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
For those still doubting, I applied BODMAS and got 12, I applied real life scenarios and got 12. Ok, if you can't do any of the 2 I mentioned above, then ask google And if you're lazy to ask google, well I've helped you and below is the screenshot of google's answer. But if you're still not convinced, then you need to go and plead with the witches in your village to stop dancing shakiti bobo around your head 2 Likes 1 Share
|
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by petikal(m): 11:13pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
Datanet: No. Respectfully, your application of parenthesis is incorrect. Have you done quadratic equations before? What happens when you remove brackets following a negative sign? The (+-) signs that were inside change. -(3+3) is equal to -1(3+3), which is equal to -3-3. The signs change. Don't apply BODMAS while negating other mathematical rules. And please stop saying "hope this helps". I've taught university level Calculus; this is very elementary and the argument is silly. 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by Datanet: 11:13pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
good point. DAGR8 i missed out on the left tto right rule. you are right.. at this point. 3 + 9 - 3 + 3. the left to right rule should apply. ao the correct answer is 12. dagr8: 2 Likes |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by harsysky(m): 11:18pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
Datanet: Let's for a second forget about BODMAS. I'm not about to lecture you; I just want you to reason with me. The question is (3+3*3-3+3)? Every number there with either + or - can move around but the exemption is (+3*3) . One can't move the +3 from its coleague *3 , they have formed a bond ( I think that's even why mathematicians brought the idea of BODMAS but if we all understand how NUMBERS work, we don't need BODMAS) that can't be broken easily. So, what u do is since (+3*3) have formed a bond, you tackle it first which equates to (+9). Now, You have removed the only sign (*) that is a problem to both - and + . You can now move them around as u wish i.e 3+9-3+3 or 3-3+9+3 or 9-3+3+3 or -3+3+3+9 . All must give 12. Reason with me that's all I ask. 3 Likes |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by Datanet: 11:21pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
yes. thats correct. once you treat the 3 * 3. every other one can be moved around. you are right. its 12. quote author=harsysky post=36827380] Let's for a second forget about BODMAS. I'm not about to lecture you; I just want you to reason with me. The question is (3+3*3-3+3)? Every number there with either + or - can move around but the exemption is (+3*3) . One can't move the +3 from its coleague *3 , they have formed a bond ( I think that's even why mathematicians brought the idea of BODMAS but if we all understand how NUMBERS work, we don't need BODMAS) that can't be broken easily. So, what u do is since (+3*3) have formed a bond, you tackle it first which equates to (+9). Now, You have removed the only sign (*) that is a problem to both - and + . You can now move them around as u wish i.e 3+9-3+3 or 3-3+9+3 or 9-3+3+3 or -3+3+3+9 . All must give 12. Reason with me that's all I ask.[/quote] 1 Like |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by Kazrem(m): 11:24pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
12 is the answer. |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by harsysky(m): 11:24pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
Datanet: Thanks Man for reasoning with me. 1 Like |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by abumeinben(m): 11:27pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
hollowpot15684: Bro...look at the question again. No bracket. Maybe u should try a calculator, type the values as they are and lets see what u get |
Re: First Bank Simple Equation That 87% Could Not Solve. by coolviv: 11:35pm On Aug 10, 2015 |
BODMAS.... multiplication first, addition second, then subtraction last. The answer is 6. |
(1) (2) (3) ... (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) ... (23) (Reply)
Some Nigerian National Honours And Their Meanings / Teacher Exposes Her Legs In Front Of Primary School Pupils (Photos) / Chrisland School Accused Of Covering Up Rape Of 10-Year Old Female Student
Viewing this topic: 1 guest(s)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 64 |