Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,209,825 members, 8,007,262 topics. Date: Tuesday, 19 November 2024 at 06:33 PM

Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism - Islam for Muslims (3) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Islam for Muslims / Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism (13887 Views)

Islam Doesn't Teach Terrorism, Clarification Of The Quoted Qur'an Verses / Why Muslims Should Never Have To Apologize For Terrorism - By Omar Alnatour / Wahhabism/Salafism, Terrorism, Takfiri Killings,Suicide Bombing And Saudi Arabia (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by abusurv(m): 8:05pm On Oct 28, 2016
In Nigeria the name for the Wahhabi is jamatulizalatulbidiawaikomatisunna popular known as izala .one of the people that introduce it cheik Abubakar gumi and has it headquarters in jos and another in Kaduna.
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by Empiree: 9:09pm On Oct 28, 2016
hamzeiy:

a simple question should require a simple answer .prove your points and if you cant ..you only need to say it instead of beatin around the bush. anyway i do believe what you said to a certain extent. the saudi royals can virtually do anything to stay in power. we can only pray for better leaders and rectify our affairs with Allah otherwise the struggle will continue
So if you know this, what else you want me to prove?. Dont you think you contradict yourself?
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by Empiree: 9:29pm On Oct 28, 2016
usmanktg2:
OP is blind to Islamic History. Wahhabism is the fundamental base of all terrorists attack since the advent of the 20th century.

The most peaceful Islam is the Traditional Sufism which came together with our Islam here in Nigeria prominently by Shaykh Uthman Bn Fodio (Qadiriyya) and Shaykh Umar Futi (Tijjaniyya)

Wahhabism got rid of the Spiritual dimension of Islam for selfish interest to denounce the Ottoman Caliphate, leaving Islam with nothing but mere theories.

Read up فتنة الوهابية and الصواعق الإلهية.
That's it. The bolded part was really my concern in the post. He condemned muslims from doing dhikr pre-fajr salat. I have this evidence in pro-ibn Wahab website. So he brought "protestant" version of Islam. However, I am not concern much about his link with terrorism. He is not alone on that.


Saudi and Israel are sisters This lecture was given in late 2001 in Sidney Australia

This should help brother BeansAndBread


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XcJXbaT7Cc

This confirms what i said earlier. And this should help you too mr hamzeiy

hamzeiy:

a simple question should require a simple answer .prove your points and if you cant ..you only need to say it instead of beatin around the bush. anyway i do believe what you said to a certain extent. the saudi royals can virtually do anything to stay in power. we can only pray for better leaders and rectify our affairs with Allah otherwise the struggle will continue


And listen to Qaddafi. He said The Britain created Saudi Arabia. I thought you people should know this. It is in the open. Why pretending or you simply do not know?

7 Likes

Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by Rafidi: 11:20pm On Oct 28, 2016
BeansAndBread:
Shias and hypocrisy:

#Thousands of Shias are in Syria killing innocent Muslims.

#Shias were the ones that first perpetrated suicide bombings

#You once supported the killing of millions of Muslims in Baghdad by the mongols

#You supported the killing of innocent Bahraini Sunnis.

Rubbish!!!!

stop lying Mr. BetaThing.

a Shia will NEVER attack or fight back against ANYONE because of the person's belief. whether you call Wahhabi terrorists in Syria "civilians" or whether you call naturalized Bahraini police officers "innocent Sunnis" or whether you call resistance to israeli occupation and "martyrdom operations"-which Palestinians Sunnis are also well known for- "suicide bombing" that is your problem.

the bottom-line for using force in the Holy Quran is spelled out clearly:

"Permission [to fight] has been given to those who are being fought, because they were wronged. And indeed, Allah is competent to give them victory. [They are] those who have been evicted from their homes without right - only because they say, "Our Lord is Allah." And were it not that Allah checks the people, some by means of others, there would have been demolished monasteries, churches, synagogues, and mosques in which the name of Allah is much mentioned. And Allah will surely support those who support Him. Indeed, Allah is Powerful and Exalted in Might." (22:39-40)

Allah (swt) did not give Muslims and the Prophet (s) the right to fight to convert people, or based on TAKFIRISM or because others commit "shirk" or because you do not like what they believe or how they practice. the use of force in Islam is for self defense only. the Shia are not pacifist and neither is the Holy Quran. do not mix up self-defense, or even collateral damage when innocent people perish unintentionally- as civilians from all communities are suffering in Syria- with TAKFIRI killings. and for your info, the army of Bashar al-Assad is majority Sunni soldiers. are Sunni soldiers killing Sunnis because they are Sunnis? you must be a joker!

once more, stop lying. even if you worship an idol, you should feel ashamed of yourself and the belief you adhere to that makes you keep repeating the same lies over and over in every thread. any ideology or belief that makes you to intentionally and un-repentantly lie in this manner should make you reflect and reconsider even if you do not fear Allah, because there is no sign you fear Allah.

you want Muslims to give cover to Wahhabi Takfiri killings. the answer, from both Shia and Sunnis, is a unanimous and unambiguous capital NO! Islam is a religion of peace and the world is getting to know as the days pass that the terrorism that so called Muslims perpetrated is WAHHABISM and NOT ISLAM!

4 Likes

Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by BeansAndBread(m): 12:10am On Oct 29, 2016
usmanktg2:


1. Can you please quote any 'Wahhabi Shaykh' thousand years back? That he called himself 'Wahhabi'

Can you quote anyone who adheres to the Manhaj of the Salaf calling himself a Wahabi? So why call Muslims Wahabi?

2. For your information, there is no existing Silsila or an authentic chain from Ibn Abdulwahab to Ibn Taymiyya

That doesn't change the fact that Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn Abdulwahab followed the Manhaj of the Salafs.

3. How can we go back to the roots of islam? by reading islamic books on our own? making our own taqlid?

By returning to the teachings of the Salafs and abandoning whatever the khalaf have innovated.

1. There is nothing like full blown Sufi. Islam/Sufism is not a political party.

You ought to be intelligent than this, when I mentioned full blown Soofee, I meant someone who performs tawaf round the Graves of Saint, those who shout "inyass" whenever evil befalls them, etc Lol! grin

2. Can you point Shaykh Usman bn Fodio teachers that is 'Wahhabi'? Is Shaykh Jubril Wahhabi?

I never said any of them is a Wahabi, some of his teachers benefitted from knowledge passed from Ibn Abdulwahab. Now read:

One of teachers was Jibreel ibn ‘Umar of the Tuareg tribe who had made Hajj and thus lived in Makkah for a while. In Madeenah, Jibreel Ibn ‘Umar studied with Muhammad Murtada az-Zabeedee (1145-1205 AH/ 1732-1791 CE) who was originally from India but had travelled to az-Zabeed in Yemen where he lived for a while and studied before going on to teach in Madeenah himself. One of az-Zabeedee’s teachers was Shaah Waliullaah ad-Dehlawee (1702 –1762 CE) of Delhi in India. Dan Fodio’s uncle who taught him hadeeth was Muhammad bin Raaj who had studied under Abu’l-Hasan as-Sindee also from India and a teacher of hadeeth in Madeenah. Abu’l-Hasan as-Sindee was a student of Muhammad Hayaat as-Sindee another great hadeeth scholar of India who was also teaching in Madeenah. One of Muhammad Hayaat as-Sindee’s students was Muhammad ibn Abdul-Wahhaab (raheemahumullaah). See a recent study conducted in Nigeria and written in Arabic entitled Asaaneed al-Faqeer ad-Da’eef al-Mutashaafee bi’l-Mushaffa’ Ahmad as-Shareef (Ms. University of Ibadan Library 82/137: Ibadan, Centre of Islamic Documentation (CAD)).

I hope you'll open your eyes to read!

3. It is obvious you are ignorant of Shaykh Usman. Come to the north, we will teach you his teachings.

When no be say I dey craze! You want to corrupt me koh? See this one o, as you can see I quoted him in my last post. Lemme give you another of his quotes:

If such a person is not aware of the Sunnah it is not permissible to follow him…He is simply a lunatic lost in his special state. (ibid. p.105 (Arabic text), p. 157 (Eng. Text)) Hisn ul-Afhaam min Juyoosh ilAwhaam

4. Shaykh Usman is a Qutb, spiritual pole in Qadiriyya.

As I said earlier, he wasn't a full blown Soofee. He had inclinations to salafiyyah and soofeeyyah, which is very similar to An nawawi. As for your statement that he's a "Qutb", I don't know what that means.

[s]1. Quoting him saying this does in no way justifies his stand.
2. What about his books solely based on Sufism like Tariq’l-Janna, Usuul’d-Deen, Tabshir’l-Umma, Usuul’l-Wilaayat also Silsilatul Qadiriyya?[/s]

3. All sufis are followers of Ahl Sunna wal Jummaa and the rightly guided Salafs.

Big lie, extremist Soofees like you are Semi-Shia. As popularly said by scholars; "Soofeeyyah is the gateway to Tashayyu"

4. There is hardly NO any Sufi Master that didn't wrote about the importance of Sunna and the Manhaj of Salaf. The Tijjaniyya Shaykh, Ibrahim Inyass wrote a whole book Raf'ul Malam amman rafa'a wa qabada iqtidaan bi Sayyidil Anaam, solely on following the Sunna.
Also Check the diwan Of Shaykh Ibrahim Niass, He wrote:

Abayna Siwat Tawhidil lazi, anil mustafa turwa wa an sahbihi turwa.

There's a thread on how Inyass was scrutinized, I hope you can take a look:

https://www.nairaland.com/3401996/sheikh-ibrahim-niasse

1. Please give me the chain. It doesnot exist. It is even ignorant to believe that it exists. Please bring it foward.

I've done that already!

2. Shaykh Usman bin Fodio wrote a whole book of his teachers, which i know you dont know about, There is NO shaykh that is not sufi.

Another big lie, just because we have Soofees here doesn't mean Islam can't exist without Soofism. Islam was independent of Soofism from the beginning, so will it at the end.

3. Shaykh Usman bin fodio NEVER went to Makkah. I now confirm you dont know anything about Him.
4. Which year did Uthman went to mecca? grin grin grin

Please read, read and read.


That's an honest mistake, I mistook him for Jubril Ibn Umar.
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by BeansAndBread(m): 12:19am On Oct 29, 2016
blantyre:

[s]Kai! Alhamdulillah for this insightful piece of yours. You have well spoken my mind and the minds of many peaceful and tolerant Muslims. Wahabists and salafists have destroyed the true essence of Islam. A brother up there was mentioning the need for one to read a certain book. Which book do I need that will portray a wahabist better than the actions of wahabists that we see daily in wanton killings, beheadings burning and utter lack of pity for the sufferings of children and the elderly. Countries that were once peaceful under sufism have suddenly turned to killing fields because knowingly or unknowingly they romanced the salafists clerics of Saudi Arabia eggs Pakistan. The fact that you ascribed a certain name to your ideology does not equate or translate to that ideology. Wahabism is a curse to Islam that why lately I am beginning to feel uncomfortable with the way those Nigerian wshabist called Izala are bringing wahabi clerics to this country [/s]
From this post of yours, it shows you didn't even care to read the op. This is why you all will never learn, I was once like you but I was open to learn.

I hated the concept of suicide bombing, I thought the Wahabists were the once that started but when I searched for scholars that condemned it, I discovered that they were Salafi Scholars. This made me to have a rethink and then I downloaded the book "Wahabi myth" which was written by Western convert. I really wish you can be sincere and just read, you'll be surprised.
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by BeansAndBread(m): 12:28am On Oct 29, 2016
blantyre:

Mr. Beans we are all Muslims here. Is very painful for you to be trying to deny an obvious truth. Wahabism is a cancer.

So returning the teachings of the Salafs is cancer, while beating yourselves, circumbulating the graves of men, etc is pure Islam? You guys never cease to amaze me!

For your information an Imam of kaaba, black man confirmed that ISIS got their inspiration from the teachings of wahabism. I will provide the link Inshaallah.

Don't bother, i've watched it. This Imam, Kalbani has been refuted already by salafi scholars distancing ISIS. I have loads of pdfs, books and videos which proves ISIS have nothing to salafiyyah.

And lately following the gruesome murder of that Jordanian pilot by ISIS some Muslim countries started removing all nooks by ibn taimiyya from their shelves and production of new ones stopped because everyone knows the kind of violence and intolerance that those books teach.

Lol, lemme clear you now. Do you know ISIS uses the word of Allaah and His apostle to justify their crimes? Are you now saying we should throw off all the Qur'an and book of hadith off the shelf just because some ignoramus misinterpret? By what you're saying, since ISIS uses the Qur'an and Hadith we should all become Toist because they're peaceful? grin

In countries like Algeria government even gives official support to sufi zawiyas as a way of de-rsdicalising people

Yet when Algeria descended into a civil war even with all the zawiyas. Rubbish!!!! I'm damn sure you didn't read the article, why can't you just take a chill pin and read!
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by Rafidi: 1:06am On Oct 29, 2016
BeansAndBread:
From this post of yours, it shows you didn't even care to read the op. This is why you all will never learn, I was once like you but I was open to learn.
I hated the concept of suicide bombing, I thought the Wahabists were the once that started but when I searched for scholars that condemned it, I discovered that they were Salafi Scholars. This made me to have a rethink and then I downloaded the book "Wahabi myth" which was written by Western convert. I really wish you can be sincere and just read, you'll be surprised.

This is all hypocrisy. The problem isn't the means of fighting but the target that matters and the purpose. That is why JIHAD and terrorism are worlds apart. If you like jump from the sky to fight or dive into the pacific. What makes it jihad (using force for self defense only) and not terror is if it is in self defense, if it's targets are combatants who are oppressive and if the killed is a wrongdoer who killed you. Not kill based on people's beliefs. There is no takfiri killing in Islam. It makes no sense for Wahhabi clerics to condemn what you call "suicide bombings" and condone takfiri killings. It lacks essence. The difference islamically between "suicide bombing" and "martyrdom operation" based on the verdict of both Sunni and Shia scholars is the target and purpose, and not the means of fighting. I've not for once heard of Wahhabi clerics condemning suicide bombings targeting innocent Iraqi Shia civilians. I've not heard of Wahhabi clerics calling for Shia-Sunni unity, when they know well these are the two wings of Islam. Without either, the religion cannot fly! They only rush to condemn what you call "suicide bombing" in its entirety and particularly in Palestine against occupation forces because poor palestinian Sunnis use this means to resist Israeli occupation. When Israel is the target, they rush to condemn it. They have problem with Muslims defending their lives, properties and land-because of the porous and desperate means used-but have no problem with takfiri killings targeting innocent Muslims for their beliefs and religious practices. Jihad is self defense and not terrorism regardless of the means used for self defense.
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by BeansAndBread(m): 10:19am On Oct 29, 2016
Rafidi:


[s]This is all hypocrisy. The problem isn't the means of fighting but the target that matters and the purpose. That is why JIHAD and terrorism are worlds apart. If you like jump from the sky to fight or dive into the pacific. What makes it jihad (using force for self defense only) and not terror is if it is in self defense, if it's targets are combatants who are oppressive and if the killed is a wrongdoer who killed you. Not kill based on people's beliefs. There is no takfiri killing in Islam. It makes no sense for Wahhabi clerics to condemn what you call "suicide bombings" and condone takfiri killings. It lacks essence. The difference islamically between "suicide bombing" and "martyrdom operation" based on the verdict of both Sunni and Shia scholars is the target and purpose, and not the means of fighting. I've not for once heard of Wahhabi clerics condemning suicide bombings targeting innocent Iraqi Shia civilians. I've not heard of Wahhabi clerics calling for Shia-Sunni unity, when they know well these are the two wings of Islam. Without either, the religion cannot fly! They only rush to condemn what you call "suicide bombing" in its entirety and particularly in Palestine against occupation forces because poor palestinian Sunnis use this means to resist Israeli occupation. When Israel is the target, they rush to condemn it. They have problem with Muslims defending their lives, properties and land-because of the porous and desperate means used-but have no problem with takfiri killings targeting innocent Muslims for their beliefs and religious practices. Jihad is self defense and not terrorism regardless of the means used for self defense.[/s]
Everyone, here's the real terrorist. He's defending suicide bombings by calling "martyrdom operations", the worst part is all those bashing don't see this.
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by Nobody: 10:32am On Oct 29, 2016
BeansAndBread:
Everyone, here's the real terrorist. He's defending suicide bombings by calling "martyrdom operations", the worst part is all those bashing don't see this.

Ofcoure they won't, shi'ism and sufism are two sides of the same coin.

1 Like

Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by usmanktg2(m): 11:39am On Oct 29, 2016
Can you quote anyone who adheres to the Manhaj of the Salaf calling himself a Wahabi? So why call Muslims Wahabi?
1.You are confusing yourself here, You said Wahhabism existed thousands years back, and you are now asking me?



That doesn't change the fact that Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn Abdulwahab followed the Manhaj of the Salafs.
1. Yes Sure, but how will i know that they follow the manhaj of the salafs? Because they made you to believe that?


By returning to the teachings of the Salafs and abandoning whatever the khalaf have innovated.
1. How will i return? just by reading there books?
2. Who will show me the way of the salaf? By myself?
3. You think nobody wants to follow the way of the salaf, only them?

You ought to be intelligent than this, when I mentioned full blown Soofee, I meant someone who performs tawaf round the Graves of Saint, those who shout "inyass" whenever evil befalls them, etc Lol! grin
1. You know nothing about the beliefs of DanFodio, For your information, Shaykh Usman use to perform Salatul Bagdadi before every war. Salatul Bagdadi is another chapter, why i know you will definitely call him Kafir.
2. Read Lamma Balagtu, Shaykh Usman performs many tawassul of Shaykh Abdulqadir Jilani.

I know you are ignorant of all these things. And Wallahi, You have never read or seen all these his books that am quoting.


I never said any of them is a Wahabi, some of his teachers benefitted from knowledge passed from Ibn Abdulwahab. Now read:

One of teachers was Jibreel ibn ‘Umar of the Tuareg tribe who had made Hajj and thus lived in Makkah for a while. In Madeenah, Jibreel Ibn ‘Umar studied with Muhammad Murtada az-Zabeedee (1145-1205 AH/ 1732-1791 CE) who was originally from India but had travelled to az-Zabeed in Yemen where he lived for a while and studied before going on to teach in Madeenah himself. One of az-Zabeedee’s teachers was Shaah Waliullaah ad-Dehlawee (1702 –1762 CE) of Delhi in India. Dan Fodio’s uncle who taught him hadeeth was Muhammad bin Raaj who had studied under Abu’l-Hasan as-Sindee also from India and a teacher of hadeeth in Madeenah. Abu’l-Hasan as-Sindee was a student of Muhammad Hayaat as-Sindee another great hadeeth scholar of India who was also teaching in Madeenah. One of Muhammad Hayaat as-Sindee’s students was Muhammad ibn Abdul-Wahhaab (raheemahumullaah). See a recent study conducted in Nigeria and written in Arabic entitled Asaaneed al-Faqeer ad-Da’eef al-Mutashaafee bi’l-Mushaffa’ Ahmad as-Shareef (Ms. University of Ibadan Library 82/137: Ibadan, Centre of Islamic Documentation (CAD)).

I hope you'll open your eyes to read!

1. You clearly refuted yourself here.
2. Please show me how he benifitted from Ibn AbdulWahab here?
3. You have problem of English comprehension, Read what you just copy and pasted.
When no be say I dey craze! You want to corrupt me koh? See this one o, as you can see I quoted him in my last post. Lemme give you another of his quotes:

If such a person is not aware of the Sunnah it is not permissible to follow him…He is simply a lunatic lost in his special state. (ibid. p.105 (Arabic text), p. 157 (Eng. Text)) Hisn ul-Afhaam min Juyoosh ilAwhaam


1. Keep copying and pasting, All Sufi Shaykhs are followers of Ahl Sunna.

2. Let me quite Shaykh Ibrahim Niass also:
Wal qasdu Ahya Sunnatul Amin, wa tariqil qauma lil qurun

As I said earlier, he wasn't a full blown Soofee. He had inclinations to salafiyyah and soofeeyyah, which is very similar to An nawawi. As for your statement that he's a "Qutb", I don't know what that means.


1. You still cannot link him to Wahhabism.
2. You still cannot unlink him from Qadiriyya.

Big lie, extremist Soofees like you are Semi-Shia. As popularly said by scholars; "Soofeeyyah is the gateway to Tashayyu"



There's a thread on how Inyass was scrutinized, I hope you can take a look:

https://www.nairaland.com/3401996/sheikh-ibrahim-niasse

1. Empty and hollow thread devoid of intellectual discussions.
2. I have read almost all of Shaykh Niass's books.
3. You can quote him here anywhere from his 75 and above books.

I've done that already!



Another big lie, just because we have Soofees here doesn't mean Islam can't exist without Soofism. Islam was independent of Soofism from the beginning, so will it at the end.
Read your books, dont copy and paste.


That's an honest mistake, I mistook him for Jubril Ibn Umar.

1. It is not a mistake, You are ignorant of that, that is why. You dont know before i told you, you google searched and found what i told you is true.
2. Please, How many of Shaykh Usman books have you read cover to cover, Please be sincere.

1 Like

Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 3:14pm On Oct 29, 2016
Demmzy15:
I think this is a front page worthy material, it clears alot of misconceptions.
Thank God u said misconception! The reality is there for all to see that Wahabbism is the root cause of terrorism among muslims. Their fanatical form of sunna is alien to other sunnis prior to Abdulwahabb's limelight and even after his demise. Saudi has been the major financier of ISIS.
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 3:18pm On Oct 29, 2016
usmanktg2:
OP is blind to Islamic History. Wahhabism is the fundamental base of all terrorists attack since the advent of the 20th century.

The most peaceful Islam is the Traditional Sufism which came together with our Islam here in Nigeria prominently by Shaykh Uthman Bn Fodio (Qadiriyya) and Shaykh Umar Futi (Tijjaniyya)

Wahhabism got rid of the Spiritual dimension of Islam for selfish interest to denounce the Ottoman Caliphate, leaving Islam with nothing but mere theories.

Read up فتنة الوهابية and الصواعق الإلهية.
Thank u my brother! The paid writer has done his work and I believe already paid by the OIL SHEIKH for burnishing their tattered image
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 3:20pm On Oct 29, 2016
HAH:

If you want to have a clear view about the history of wahabism and it spread read below, personally I see them as genesis of Terrorism in islam


Wahhabism (Arabic: الوهابية‎‎, al-Wahhābiya(h)) or Wahhabi mission[1] (/wəˈhɑːbi, wɑː-/;[2] Arabic: الدعوة الوهابية‎‎, ad-Da'wa al-Wahhābiya(h) ) is a religious movement or branch of Sunni Islam.[3][4][5][6] It has been variously described as "ultraconservative",[7] "austere",[3] "fundamentalist",[8] or "puritan(ical)"[9][10] and as an Islamic "tore "pure monotheistic worship" (tawhid) by scholars and advocates,[11] and as a distortion of Islam by its opponents.[3][12] The term Wahhabi(ism) is often used polemically and adherents commonly reject its use, preferring to be called Salafi or muwahhid.[13][14][15] The movement emphasises the principle of tawhid[16] (the "uniqueness" and "unity" of God).[17] Its principal influences include Ahmad ibn Hanbal (780–855) and Ibn Taymiyyah (1263–1328).[18]

Wahhabism is named after an eighteenth-century preacher and scholar, Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab (1703–1792).[19] He started a revivalist movement in the remote, sparsely populated region of Najd,[20] advocating a purging of practices such as the popular "cult of saints", and shrine and tomb visitation, widespread among Muslims, but which he considered idolatry (shirk), impurities and innovations in Islam (Bid'ah).[5][17] Eventually he formed a pact with a local leader Muhammad bin Saud offering political obedience and promising that protection and propagation of the Wahhabi movement mean "power and glory" and rule of "lands and men."[21]

The alliance between followers of ibn Abd al-Wahhab and Muhammad bin Saud's successors (the House of Saud) proved to be a durable one. The House of Saud continued to maintain its politico-religious alliance with the Wahhabi sect through the waxing and waning of its own political fortunes over the next 150 years, through to its eventual proclamation of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 1932, and then afterwards, on into modern times. Today Ibn Abd Al-Wahhab's teachings are the official, state-sponsored form of Sunni Islam[3][22] in Saudi Arabia.[23] With the help of funding from Saudi petroleum exports[24] (and other factors[25]), the movement underwent "explosive growth" beginning in the 1970s and now has worldwide influence.[3]

The "boundaries" of Wahhabism have been called "difficult to pinpoint",[26] but in contemporary usage, the terms Wahhabi and Salafi are often used interchangeably, and they are considered to be movements with different roots that have merged since the 1960s.[27][28][29] However, Wahhabism has also been called "a particular orientation within Salafism",[30] or an ultra-conservative, Saudi brand of Salafism.[31][32] Estimates of the number of adherents to Wahhabism vary, with one source (Mehrdad Izady) giving a figure of fewer than 5 million Wahhabis in the Persian Gulf region (compared to 28.5 million Sunnis and 89 million Shia).[23][33]

Many Sunni and Shia Muslims disagree with the Wahhabi movement, and a widely circulated conspiracy theory holds it to have been a product of British secret service efforts for causing the demise of the Ottoman empire.[34] Ulema, including Al-Azhar ma, including Al-Azhar scholars, regularly denounce Wahhabism in terms such as "Satanic faith".[34] Wahhabism has been accused of being "a source of global terrorism",[35][36] inspiring the ideology of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL),[37] and for causing disunity in Muslim communities by labelling Muslims who disagreed with the Wahhabi definition of monotheism as apostates[38] (takfir) and justifying their killing.[39][40][41] It has also been criticized for the destruction of historic mazaars, mausoleums, and other Muslim and non-Muslim buildings and artifacts.






Wahabbism is the great threat muslims r facing today!
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 3:28pm On Oct 29, 2016
Ahmadabd:
you are a joker
Like seriously! So u expect us to follow a complete aberration called Wahabbism? I thought u could do better than this, but I now know better. The fact remains every wahabbist has a terroristical tendency! This group has tattrerd muslims image world wide
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 3:30pm On Oct 29, 2016
HAH:
I can see the Wahabist on this thread are seriously trying to distance their sect with terrorism.

Ask anyone, ISIS, Alqaeda, Alshabab, Boko Haram etc are all wahabist.

So any adherent to wahabism is a potential terrorist.

Beware of them
Dont mind them, they think they r smarter thab others. Who is financing ISIS?
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 3:35pm On Oct 29, 2016
HAH:


My brother I fear Allah, and I love islam but pain is the bad name wahabist|salafist have brought this lovely religion through their terrorist activities, sadly non Muslim cannot distinguish us.

If the way the wahabis are professing islam is the way usman bin fodio followed it won't have spread to our land.
Yes ooo. These r people that claim to be holier than thou! yet utterly corrupt likw others but profess to be onlly true muslim group. Killing a fellow muslim by wahabbist is the easier than anything else.
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 3:40pm On Oct 29, 2016
lexiconkabir:


The people you call wahhabis do they call themselves wahhabis?

And who is a wahhabi?
Forget about the name! by their fruit u shall know. Doea bearing Muhammad makes one a true muslim? Likewise connically coining names that literally look virtuous to deceive unsuspecting muslims won't save u. Almighty Allah is after the content of ur work with genuine intention

1 Like

Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 3:40pm On Oct 29, 2016
HAH:


My brother I fear Allah, and I love islam but pain is the bad name wahabist|salafist have brought this lovely religion through their terrorist activities, sadly non Muslim cannot distinguish us.

If the way the wahabis are professing islam is the way usman bin fodio followed it won't have spread to our land.
Yes ooo. These r people that claim to be holier than thou! yet utterly corrupt likw others but profess to be onlly true muslim group. Killing a fellow muslim by wahabbist is the easier than anything else.
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 3:42pm On Oct 29, 2016
lexiconkabir:


So you know these, then why call them wahhabists?

Did Muhammad ibn Abdulwahhab bring any new methodology other than the methodology of the salafs? Or are you going to call some people Albanist because he followed the salafs?
the killings of thousands of muslins in taif,Madina and others was the way of who?
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 3:56pm On Oct 29, 2016
lexiconkabir:
Whoever calls to tawheed is tagged a wahhabist! Smh
Hmm bravo! So calling to Tawheed started with Abdulwahab? Ain't we had great scholars who preached tawheed b4 him? why were they not abhored by other muslims like every one does when Abdulwahabb name is mention? Whether u believe it or not British created Saudi and its sister country called Israel This British r ready to use what ever means to get what they want. Tha aim of creating the Wahabbiyah govt was to decimate the might id Othoman empire, knowing fully well that whoever control the The sacred towns of Mecca and Madina has influence over other muslims; if not for Mecca and Madina who gonna mention saudi ma self?

7 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by Nobody: 4:25pm On Oct 29, 2016
President99:
Hmm bravo! So calling to Tawheed started with Abdulwahab? Ain't we had great scholars who preached tawheed b4 him? why were they not abhored by other muslims like every one does when Abdulwahabb name is mention? Whether u believe it or not British created Saudi and its sister country called Israel This British r ready to use what ever means to get what they want. Tha aim of creating the Wahabbiyah govt was to decimate the might id Othoman empire, knowing fully well that whoever control the The sacred towns of Mecca and Madina has influence over other muslims; if not for Mecca and Madina who gonna mention saudi ma self?

if you don't understand my post, don't quote me.

1 Like

Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by Empiree: 5:59pm On Oct 29, 2016
The thing is this, I am not the type that go around screaming "Wahabi/salafi" and i hate to contribute in this type of thread bcus of non-muslims especially. However, what i noticed about this bashing of wahabi/salafi in this thread is that, pro wahabi brothers here brought this bashing upon themselves. I dont think any of you should take it personal at all.

I have no schism against the man named Ibn Abdual Wahab (may Allah forgive his shortcomings). I believe he was muslim but he did not understand some stuff in islam that he condemned. Also, claim that he revived or emphasized "tawheed" is baseless. They want to use this to castigate other Muslims. Weren't Muslims before him?. He condemned whatever he did not understand as shirk or bid'a which we see today.

As for brothers who vehemently defend him, you brought this bashing on yourselves for the fact that you portrayed pro-wahabi scholars as "only" authentic Muslims as if there are no Muslims outside of Arabia. This is very wrong. If other Muslims outside of Arabia were mushrik, how come you people are Muslims today in Nigeria?. Were your forefathers mushrikun for bringing you up as Muslims?. You had no idea who Ibn Abdual wahab was when you were young. You only got to know him recently. The same thing Jabata did when he called his father mushrik. Yet, he benefited from his Sufi father.

Anyways, problems that I have with these brothers is they do not blink twice before bashing non wahabi scholars and call them all sort of names "Alhu bida and mushrikun". Example is a thread opened recently about Sheikh Ibrahim Niyas(ra). Approach of cons are not sunnatic at all. They judged the man base on picture. They talked nonsense and attributed it to him without evidence other than to say "go and read xyz book. And you are the same people who campaigned against insulting past Ulama.

Bottomline is, you brought this bashing on yourselves and on Ibn AbdualWahab. And my understanding is, he retracted somef his misunderstanding before he died. For instance, he retracted his belief on Tazkiyah. This is something attributed to Sufis. Why would he condemn what Allah enjoined?. Tazkiyah has to do with Dhikr but this man called Ibn AbduWahab go against it. I cant consider someone like that a mujadid. His wrong concept is what is affecting his pros today. They condemn dhikr as well, at least in congregation. I see that online and offline. But when Eld comes or Juma'h, all of a sudden they start talking about doing dhikr which means they are "part time" or "protestant" muslims.

And yes, he and his successors have ties with the British like Ibn Saud who took bribe from the British but he called it "jizya". Even his people back then questioned him about this. The 5k pounds he took monthly from White man was for him to disobeyed a specific order of Allah in the Qur'an.
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by Demmzy15(m): 8:45pm On Oct 29, 2016
President99:
Thank God u said misconception! The reality is there for all to see that Wahabbism is the root cause of terrorism among muslims. Their fanatical form of sunna is alien to other sunnis prior to Abdulwahabb's limelight and even after his demise. Saudi has been the major financier of ISIS.
Why is that you guys are like this? You didn't even care to read the article which is very dishonest of you.

1. You say saudi funds ISIS, but ISIS has suicide bombed suicide mosques filled with military men.

2. According to ISIS, Saudi rulers and scholars are apostates.

3. Saudi Arabia has missionaries in Indian for more than 40years and today, we have almost none of Indian Muslims in ISIS or any extremist groups.

Why can't you all think?

1 Like

Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by Demmzy15(m): 8:47pm On Oct 29, 2016
President99:
Dont mind them, they think they r smarter thab others. Who is financing ISIS?
Assad and those who patronize their stolen oil.
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 9:09pm On Oct 29, 2016
lexiconkabir:


if you don't understand my post, don't quote me.
Brother, ur post was attempt to dignify Wahhabbism , which is an aberration to the whole sunna practice! U said "Whoever calls to tawheed is tagged a
wahhabist! Smh" this is a veiled statement brother and is an insult to the sensibility of other muslims scholars. What u insinuate here is that is only Abdulwahabb that practices true Tawheed or what? Greater preachers had existed before him and were not detested by other muslims, they never issued fatwa justifying killing of muslims who had different takes from theirs. Young man what were the reasons for killings of muslims in Hijaz, Mecca, Madina and taif during the formative years of Wahabbist govt?

5 Likes

Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by Nobody: 9:13pm On Oct 29, 2016
President99:
Brother, ur post was attempt to dignify Wahhabbism , which is an aberration to the whole sunna practice! U said "Whoever calls to tawheed is tagged a
wahhabist! Smh" this is a veiled statement brother and is an insult to the sensibility of other muslims scholars. What u insinuate here is that is only Abdulwahabb that practices true Tawheed or what? Greater preachers had existed before him and were not detested by other muslims, they never issued fatwa justifying killing of muslims who had different takes from theirs. Young man what were the reasons for killings of muslims in Hijaz, Mecca, Madina and taif during the formative years of Wahabbist govt?

you don't understand my post, again don't quote me if you don't! i dont have time for all these now, i have more pressing issues at hand!!
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 9:26pm On Oct 29, 2016
Demmzy15:
Why is that you guys are like this? You didn't even care to read the article which is very dishonest of you.

1. You say saudi funds ISIS, but ISIS has suicide bombed suicide mosques filled with military men.

2. According to ISIS, Saudi rulers and scholars are apostates.

3. Saudi Arabia has missionaries in Indian for more than 40years and today, we have almost none of Indian Muslims in ISIS or any extremist groups.

Why can't you all think?
U can likewise deny the role of British in the creation of Saudi and Israel but one thing is certain, U can fool all, all the time brother. So u r not aware of international conspiracy and u want discuss the most ruthless terrorism group issue on earth? So even the leaked USA's classified documents by julian assange has not cleated ur doubt?? Saudi n Qatar r d financiers according to hilary clinton leaked emails

4 Likes

Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 9:32pm On Oct 29, 2016
Demmzy15:
Assad and those who patronize their stolen oil.
their stolen oil got me lol
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 9:35pm On Oct 29, 2016
lexiconkabir:


you don't understand my post, again don't quote me if you don't! i dont have time for all these now, i have more pressing issues at hand!!
U v got nothing to send to defend this munderous group called Wahabbism, so u resorted to the above mantra!. Wahabbism is synonym with terrorism!!!
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by Nobody: 10:00pm On Oct 29, 2016
President99:
U v got nothing to send to defend this munderous group called Wahabbism, so u resorted to the above mantra!. Wahabbism is synonym with terrorism!!!

see, whatever i don't have time for this.
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 10:46pm On Oct 29, 2016
lexiconkabir:


see, whatever i don't have time for this.
Jst for one-paid writer to come up with a statement that indians ain't terrorists despite Sauduli financial help for them and that became ur reference point. Who has independently verified this? Okay here r them, though ISIS is opinion they r not fighters, some of indian recruits got beheaded for reasons best known to their Sheikhs! 7 Indian firms among those in Islamic State
supply chain: EU ...
indianexpress.com/.../7- indian-firms...
15 missing Indian Muslims feared to have joined
ISIS - ARA News
aranews.net/.../15-missing- indian-muslim...
ISIS does not consider Indians good fighter -
Times of India
m.timesofindia.com/.../ ISIS ... Indian...
How many Indian youths have joined ISIS? -
Quora
https://www​.quora.com/How-many- India ...
Hpoe this clear ur doubt that writer was just hallucinating that Indians r not terrorists even Wahabbist influence on them.

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (Reply)

Family Planning/Population Control: An Islamic Perspective (For/Against?) / Is The One Who Dies Of The Coronavirus Disease A Martyr? / What Is The Difference?

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 137
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.