Wen we go pop champagne semid

Voters shame on you haba 63 out of all of u on phone section too bad.
Congo semi just2nice better luck next time cos i voted for u.
So what is the price or just announcement like Npl

Just wana say a big Thanks to all that voted 4 dragnet
. . .and congrats to Semid4lyf & d politicians. . .lol

Wey dis Semid sef.
Guy, come nd complete my payment 4a job welldone.
U knw nah.

puskin:

Semid.
We did it.
Congratz.
Anymore RIGGING Jobs, just say holla-hòvìtò.

Rigging? I hope you have proof of this alleged rigging cos I have instructed my Lawyer, Mr Isongrata (S.A.N) to file with immediate effect & alacrity a suite against you for defamation of character particularly when Local and Foreign observers have declared the election to be free and fair. We shall meet in Court.

@ topic
We have all witnessed many electoral abracadabra in this 'online' country so I remain skeptical and circumspect until I am presented with my Certificate of Return. Until then I refuse to comment or answer any of the questions been thrown at me by the press and paparazzi.

Semid baba!!!!!!!! O lenu pa. Nothing do you. Congrats bro. You sure deserve it

Semid.
All dat one nah grammar.
Complete my kùdì.

Semid,congrats on your emergence as the phone dude of NL phone section.The poll says it all.

4peace:

Voters shame on you haba 63 out of all of u on phone section too bad.
Congo semi just2nice better luck next time cos i voted for u.
So what is the price or just announcement like Npl

I truly appreciate your vote,mehn.

And for those who voted for me,I really appreciate your vote and I will continue to contribute my quota to make this section tick and a fountain of knowledge for phone fanatics.

I didn't see my post on the poll. What could be the reason for this?

dragnet:

Just wana say a big Thanks to all that voted 4 dragnet
. . .and congrats to Semid4lyf & d politicians. . .lol

just2nice:

Semid,congrats on your emergence as the phone dude of NL phone section.The poll says it all.I truly appreciate your vote,mehn.

Thanks!!!! Victory Acceptance speech coming soon.

insongrata:

I didn't see my post on the poll. What could be the reason for this?

Post it again. I hope you have filed the suite I instructed you to file on my behalf against Puskin for defamation of character?

Congrats to you semid and everybody else, I believe you all have tried during the course of this year. And that doesn't leave out any single one of you that have participated in this section actively. Keep it up.
I also voted for semid though I don't know why. [B]It seems na only 'go' the guy hear, he no hear 'come'.[/B]

congrats,semid4lyfe

Orikenny, what it does? Long time

semid4lyfe:

Post it again. I hope you have filed the suite I instructed you to file on my behalf against Puskin for defamation of character?

This thread will soon transmogrify into court room.is the other parties ready for this suite?

nellaluv:

*yawn*

my dear why are u yawning?u hv not congratulate the winner yet o

@all: We have come to the conclusion of the epoc poll that has indeed, and of a fact, produced the undisputable winner of ThReAd'S BiGgEsT dUdE for 2009. Although insinuating allegation(s) of non substantiated rigging is begining to crop up against my esteemed client (semid4)lyfe, as being purported by one ex candidate **ski* et all. In any case, we are congruently and articulately in painstaking duty to ensure that our well deserted victory is not scorched in any form of derision 'circumspecto pactoberus dentusi'. We will defend this victory to the heights of flavuranus. The matter is nonetheless up to the insinuanta to present facts and I, as the able, well reckoned-with SAN, will defend with my utmost alacrity. The call is for stralls now.

@all: We have come to the conclusion of the epoc poll that has indeed, and of a fact, produced the undisputable winner of ThReAd'S BiGgEsT dUdE for 2009. Although insinuating allegation(s) of non substantiated rigging is begining to crop up against my esteemed client (semid4lyfe), as being purported by one ex candidate **ski* et all. In any case, we are congruently and articulately in painstaking duty to ensure that our well deserved victory is not scorched in any form of derision 'circumspecto pactoberus dentusi'. We will defend this victory to the heights of flavuranus. The matter is nonetheless up to the insinuanta to present facts and I, as the able, well reckoned-with SAN, will defend with my utmost alacrity. The call is for stralls now. Let the case begin now.

Congrat semi

insongrata:

@all: We have come to the conclusion of the epoc poll that has indeed, and of a fact, produced the undisputable winner of ThReAd'S BiGgEsT dUdE for 2009. Although insinuating allegation(s) of non substantiated rigging is begining to crop up against my esteemed client (semid4lyfe), as being purported by one ex candidate **ski* et all. In any case, we are congruently and articulately in painstaking duty to ensure that our well deserved victory is not scorched in any form of derision 'circumspecto pactoberus dentusi'. We will defend this victory to the heights of flavuranus. The matter is nonetheless up to the insinuanta to present facts and I, as the able, well reckoned-with SAN, will defend with my utmost alacrity. The call is for stralls now. Let the case begin now.

Semid told/instructed u in clear terms to file a suite and u are here beating about the bush/confusing urself. U better prepare ur writ of summons

semid4lyfe:

I hope you have filed the suite I instructed you to file on my behalf against Puskin for defamation of character?

Take this into cognizance b4 filing for a suite of dafamation against Puskin:

Dafamation of character is a catchall term that includes accusations of slander (spoken derogatory comments) or libel (written derogatory comments). Because defamation of character requires a showing of harm and because many defenses can be raised to a defamation claim, defamation of character can be difficult to prove. The following tips show the elements necessary to prove defamation of character.

1.Show that there was a false statement made about you. Generally, to prove defamation of character, you must show that someone made a statement of fact about you and that statement was untrue and not privileged.

2. Establish that the statement was relayed to a third party. It isn't enough that the untrue statement was said, it must also have been conveyed or published to others and understood to be about you. Public figures seeking to prove defamation of character must also show that the false statement was made with actual malice.


3. Put on evidence showing that the statement caused you harm. To prove defamation of character, you must show that the statement exposed you to hatred, ridicule, contempt, or caused injury to you in your occupation.

Congrats to Semid the winner whom i voted for as well as others on the list who are my very good friends,

The reason why most NL phone section members didn't vote during the polls was because each individual decided to vote for themselves as we all deserve a mention too, abi we no try? me personally visit only phone section and technology market and you say i no try too,


@MOD

what's the reward for being the phone section dude of the year?

I'll like to suggest that you tell Semid to start a thread and make the thread a sticky thread for some months or the whole of next year, till another winner comes up.

semid4lyfe:

I hope you have filed the suite I instructed you to file on my behalf against Puskin for defamation of character?

This is for ur own digestion:

Dafamation of character is a catchall term that includes accusations of slander (spoken derogatory comments) or libel (written derogatory comments). Because defamation of character requires a showing of harm and because many defenses can be raised to a defamation claim, defamation of character can be difficult to prove. The following tips show the elements necessary to prove defamation of character.

1.Show that there was a false statement made about you. Generally, to prove defamation of character, you must show that someone made a statement of fact about you and that statement was untrue and not privileged.

2. Establish that the statement was relayed to a third party. It isn't enough that the untrue statement was said, it must also have been conveyed or published to others and understood to be about you. Public figures seeking to prove defamation of character must also show that the false statement was made with actual malice.


3. Put on evidence showing that the statement caused you harm. To prove defamation of character, you must show that the statement exposed you to hatred, ridicule, contempt, or caused injury to you in your occupation.

@insongrata. as a so-called S.A.N avoid the use of such balderdash like this one: circumspecto pactoberus dentusi

@honsule: We are not that in a hurry to spend our strength, money and time with a matter we are confident we have under control. Besides, this kit-kat will also provide the needed time to garnere more substance from purported assertions from the insinuant. We are being tactful as well.

@semid, No shaking at all. We have the victory already.

initialize:

The reason why most NL phone section members didn't vote during the polls was because each individual decided to vote for themselves as we all deserve a mention too, abi we no try? me personally visit only phone section and technology market and you say i no try too,


@MOD

what's the reward for being the phone section dude of the year?

You've spoken!

A dupe mi o so obo nu-un, . . . . Congrats semid. . I believed i am very correct with the name. So how do we celebrate it?

@tunnex my bros, you enter well jare. The celebration starts as soon as we are done with the litigations. And that's quite soon.

*seating on the fence and chewing my kulikuli*

Semid. tell insongrata 2file dat suit very well. . .but b4 he obtains any injunction 4rm d court(s) against me, just complete d final instalment of ur payment plan 2settle ur debt 2me[b](puskin)[/b].