Evidence has been released that contradicts what we have been told about the source and origins of religious legends and stories - including the Creation Account.

Brief summary of findings…

The stories about gods and God from the ancient Middle East, including Egypt, all came from the same non-divine source.

The story of Enki (as related by Sitchin) is not about an encounter with aliens.

Ancient Creation accounts all came from the same non-divine origin.

The Hebrew, Christian, and Muslim perceptions of GOD also came from this same source.

The story of Atlantis and the biblical story of Creation came from the same non-divine source.

Moses held in his hands this non-divine source - being one of the ‘tablets of stone’.

Babylonian and Mesopotamian accounts called this same stone the ‘tablet of destiny’.

Documented in the Old Testament, Ezekiel and Daniel’s “visions” came from this same non-divine source.

In Revelation (NT) John’s “visions” also came from the same non-divine source.

The story by Ezekiel about seeing “Wheels within Wheels” is not about seeing an alien spaceship.

In referring to “The Lamb (of God)” John was not referring to Jesus.

John documents being shown the source and origin of all these things.
He called it ‘A book with seven seals, written on the backside and the inside’.

Egyptian scribes also held this object. They depicted and called it the ‘RA-Disk’.

Hindu tradition documents this same object as ‘the Egg of Brahma’.

Biblical Gospel scholars note a missing document (called the “Q”) that was the original source for some of the New Testament stories.

Mormon prophet, Joseph Smith, documented holding ‘artefacts’, and a mid 1800s picture shows him holding the case which held a specific ‘seer stone’.

.
The ‘tablet of stone’ held by Moses, the Sumerian ‘tablet of destiny’, the Hindu ‘the Egg of Brahma’, John’s ‘book’, the Egyptian ‘ra-disk’, the ‘Q’, and Smith’s ‘seer stone’ all refer to the same non-divine object.

In 1998 the Australian researcher Ronald Pegg identified this non-divine object, conducted investigations, and subsequently found the basis for all the above religious subject matter not to be of a divine origin.

There is now proof revealing that there is no GOD, and that this religiously perceived GOD did not create the earth 6,000 years ago.

2 videos, an 10 Text Evaluation, a Case Study, 7 written News Reports, an Overview of Findings (and an E-Book report) - ALL present where various aspects of different religions and their sacred texts originated, and it is not from a divine source called GOD (or by what name people choose to use).

LINK: http://www.worldbreakingdiscoveries.com.au/index.html
.

@OP

People say Eddy_P is a man but findings suggest he is actually not human. His parents noticed he is actually non human. His siblings also noticed he is actually not human. When he went to school, the research done by the school authorities showed he is not human. Those who would have been his friends decided he is not human. Clinical observations point to the same conclusion that he is not human.

Somehow or other, he went abroad on holiday where he was observed to be not human and on the return flight, the pilot wondered how he got on board since he is not human.

Do you see how intelligent your post is - its as succint as the broken record above repeating rubbish. Could you go the entire hog and let us know what this non-divine source is rather than being a broken record.

nb commented “Could you go the entire hog and let us know what this non-divine source is rather than being a broken record.”

Visit the given link, and read and view it for yourself.
In that way I do not have to write more words (like a broken record).

What you call 'a broken record' is a brief summary of the various texts that contain the clues to answering the question.
It also serves as an indicator to the scope of the discoveries made.