kmcutez:


See what you have done with the power of authority you’ve been given. Last in everything, and to boot it all, a shithole country as your legacy.

AfonjaConehead:


Shut up and come closer and closer and closer lemme squeeze you a bit.

kmcutez:


Well, I am a God god. Don’t know about you.

Leverage2021:


Should a man rape a woman in the Muslim north and doesn't have 5women to witness, her testimony is rendered weak against one male culprit

AfonjaConehead:

@ prophetfire,she's actually right, don't let her use something you might not know get the undue craftry advantage

I'm sure she get big yansh that she uses as well craftily

AfonjaConehead:

@ prophetfire,she's actually right, don't let her use something you might not know get the undue craftry advantage

I'm sure she get big yansh that she uses as well craftily

kmcutez:


When it comes to oppression of women, I noticed that all the tribes will unite, especially the Yorubas and the Igbos. You guys should explore that avenue. Maybe, just maybe, you guys will finally achieve the unity you are looking for by banding together to oppress the woman.

kmcutez:


Sorry to disappoint you. I got big brains instead.

2mNaira:



No, you are wrong.

Genesis 2:20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.


The wonan is the man's helper or assistant not his equal.


Genesis 3:16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.


You rule over your surbodinate.

Ephesians 5:23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Ephesians 5:33 Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband.

People reverence their superior.


1 Corinthians 11:9 Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.


The scripture you quoted is talking about sex. It saying that neither the man nor the wonan has the right to deny the other of sex. Look at it in the Amplified version.

1 Corinthians 7:4-5
[4]For the wife does not have [exclusive] authority and control over her own body, but the husband [has his rights]; likewise also the husband does not have [exclusive] authority and control over his body, but the wife [has her rights].
[5]Do not refuse and deprive and defraud each other [of your due marital rights], except perhaps by mutual consent for a time, so that you may devote yourselves unhindered to prayer. But afterwards resume marital relations, lest Satan tempt you [to sin] through your lack of restraint of sexual desire. [Exod. 19:15.]


Modified:
See also 1 Cor. 11: 3,5 below.

1 Corinthians 11:3,5
[3]But I want you to know and realize that Christ is the Head of every man, the head of a woman is her husband, and the Head of Christ is God.
[5]And any woman who [publicly] prays or prophesies (teaches, refutes, reproves, admonishes, or comforts) when she is bareheaded dishonors her head (her husband); it is the same as [if her head were] shaved.

kmcutez:
Northern women should stop birthing them, let’s see who’s more superior. Let the men and their Allah find another way to bring them into this world.

kmcutez:


Tell me what you think the the woman’s eggs are. Your doctrine is so far off. Do you know the woman is the one that passes all of her mitochondrial DNA to her children, both male and female. The woman can make sperm from her bone marrow and the sperm will swim to fertilize the egg, hence why you hear of virgin or immaculate conception.

kmcutez:


If you also pass an electric current through the woman’s egg, the egg will start the process of cell division which eventually leads to a baby. No sperm needed. Can’t happen with the man’s sperm.

AdedoyinO:


I hope your know that the Genesis 3:16 that you quoted is actually a curse. A fallout of the sin of Adam and Eve and that was not God's original plan for them?

Moreso, all the scriptures you have quoted are majorly related to marriage and the home and so it applies only to a married man or woman in the confines of marriage, not in the workplace or society at large.

What about the unmarried men, whose head are they? Who should an unmarried woman submit to as her head?

When this issue of equal rights for women is being discussed, we are quick to lock it down on marriage relationship and the home mean while, what it seeks to address is more and equal civic rights for women.

It's only recently that Saudi Arabia allowed her women to start driving or even go to the stadium to watch games...how do these correlate to relationship between a man and his wife.
Many years ago, even in western countries women were not allowed to vote not to talk of being voted for but the situation is very different today.

Except you are going to give me a scripture that says clearly that the female gender is of less value than the male and so they cannot have equal rights.

kmcutez:


If you also pass an electric current through the woman’s egg, the egg will start the process of cell division which eventually leads to a baby. No sperm needed. Can’t happen with the man’s sperm.

newbornmacho:
Women are scum, and can never be equal to men.

The useless vagina senator olujimi is a jobless idiot.

What a ridiculous useless bill

Spits ...women are scum

I appreciate those Northern senators for this

BigSarah:
Religious people will always want to practice the Anti people principles of their Religion ..

And shy away from the positivity of religion

kmcutez:


If you also pass an electric current through the woman’s egg, the egg will start the process of cell division which eventually leads to a baby. No sperm needed. Can’t happen with the man’s sperm.
Are you talking about the electricity invented by the MAN called Thomas Edison?
I dem call you fshBrn nah

kmcutez:


Tell me what you think the the woman’s eggs are. Your doctrine is so far off. Do you know the woman is the one that passes all of her mitochondrial DNA to her children, both male and female. The woman can make sperm from her bone marrow and the sperm will swim to fertilize the egg, hence why you hear of virgin or immaculate conception.

kmcutez:


The world would be a much safer place without men.

30naira:



Lollllll this is the most hilarious thing I have heard this year.

kmcutez:


The Black woman is your God. Her womb is the only portal connected to the heavenlies where souls can come through to be birthed into this world. Why do you think she is so oppressed? You only oppress those more superior to you.

Starzo:

You wouldn't even have a phone to be typing this nonsense without the inventions of men

kmcutez:


Yes. In the Human Reproductive Cloning Act 2001, the Government outlined their position against the controversial technology. Reproductive cloning uses somatic cell nuclear transfer to create animals that are genetically identical. It involves the transfer of a nucleus from a donor adult cell to an egg that has had its nucleus removed. The egg is then treated with either chemicals or electric current, and if it begins to divide normally, it is transferred into the uterus of the surrogate mother, where it will develop. A classic example of that process is Dolly the sheep.

Under the proposed new legislation, that process could be allowed to create human clones. Regulations could allow a nucleus to be removed from an adult cell from a woman with mitochondrial disease and to be placed in a donor egg with healthy mitochondria, and from there a clone could be produced. In such a case, it would not have the healthy mitochondrial DNA from the second woman. That procedure, which would not involve fertilisation and would remove the need for a man, was suggested some time ago in a report in the British Medical Journal as a potential way to treat mitochondrial disease. Under the Bill, the protection previously provided against this procedure by the 2001 Act would no longer be in place, as that Act is abolished by clause 3(6) and schedule 8.

kmcutez:


Yes. In the Human Reproductive Cloning Act 2001, the Government outlined their position against the controversial technology. Reproductive cloning uses somatic cell nuclear transfer to create animals that are genetically identical. It involves the transfer of a nucleus from a donor adult cell to an egg that has had its nucleus removed. The egg is then treated with either chemicals or electric current, and if it begins to divide normally, it is transferred into the uterus of the surrogate mother, where it will develop. A classic example of that process is Dolly the sheep.

Under the proposed new legislation, that process could be allowed to create human clones. Regulations could allow a nucleus to be removed from an adult cell from a woman with mitochondrial disease and to be placed in a donor egg with healthy mitochondria, and from there a clone could be produced. In such a case, it would not have the healthy mitochondrial DNA from the second woman. That procedure, which would not involve fertilisation and would remove the need for a man, was suggested some time ago in a report in the British Medical Journal as a potential way to treat mitochondrial disease. Under the Bill, the protection previously provided against this procedure by the 2001 Act would no longer be in place, as that Act is abolished by clause 3(6) and schedule 8.

Eggxactly just like oga serpent snake-and-apple told eve in that beautiful garden!!!
Will you be a good girl now and come close lemme press you a bit

kmcutez:


Tell me what you think the the woman’s eggs are. Your doctrine is so far off. Do you know the woman is the one that passes all of her mitochondrial DNA to her children, both male and female. The woman can make sperm from her bone marrow and the sperm will swim to fertilize the egg, hence why you hear of virgin or immaculate conception.

AfonjaConehead:

you are a mitochondrial element!!!!!