Stop asking of the evidence of the supernatural or/and God



It's useless.



When existence is defined as that which has neither a beginning nor an end nor a mind of its own,then there's no limit to what exists.



Hence....., the truth is also existence , the truth is also limitless, the truth is ever-occurring.


The truth is also mindless.



The truth is also reality Itself.



Does the meaning of an evidence nullify the statements I have made?




What else?

You know you can destroy an atheist with just 1 concrete proof right?

If there is no physical evidence of Jesus rising from the dead, then the burden of proof is on Christians to prove that he really rose from the dead.

Emilokoiyawon:
If there is no physical evidence of Jesus rising from the dead, then the burden of proof is on Christians to prove that he really rose from the dead.

If there's no evidence ...... adjectives are not required here, how can Christians prove this or that

HellVictorinho4:



If there's no evidence ...... adjectives are not required here, how can Christians prove this or that

When you say atheist do you mean people that don’t believe in god or your god?

falcon01:
You know you can destroy an atheist with just 1 concrete proof right?

It's not about that.






It's about what some atheists do in vain.



Waiting for a proof in whatever way


I can't find any reason to be asking you of what you can't provide



Messi can be paid by Madrid if he is a Madrid player



But Messi is never playing for Madrid ..... when Barca exists.

Maynman:


When you say atheist do you mean people that don’t believe in god or your god?

People that don't believe in any God.


Are you the one that gave me a Good?

Emilokoiyawon:
If there is no physical evidence of Jesus rising from the dead, then the burden of proof is on Christians to prove that he really rose from the dead.

Like you can bring the physical evidence of your great grandfather's, great grandfather!

Dtruthspeaker:


Like you can bring the physical evidence of your great grandfather's, great grandfather!

He never spoke as if the man is still alive

HellVictorinho4:




People that don't believe in any God.


Are you the one that gave me a Good?

So you don’t have problems with people that believe in ANY god? Stone, tree, Etc. but you have problem with people that don’t believe in ANY god?

HellVictorinho4:

He never spoke as if the man is still alive

So one can say he never had a great great great great great grandfather, therefore his great grandfather's great grandfather does not exist.

Dtruthspeaker:


So one can say he never had a great great great great great grandfather, therefore his great grandfather's great grandfather does not exist.

According to the definition of English...., you're wrong.



In English....,if he was alive,the evidence is not because of him proving it now by himself...so he doesn't have to prove being alive now to have ever existed......he only has to have existed either before or be existing now.

The proof of being alive before by him is also before.

It is not now.


It is past tense.


It is not required of him now.


It can be proven by someone else now.


We can't say Mr Bihhhhhhgggggggg was ever alive because he has not existed before neither is he existing now.


How did I know?



I know because I check the present for the possibility of such in the past and none shows up.


I also check for the possibility of such in the present and none still shows up.




So, you should now know that you can check for the possibility of something in the past in the present by checking for something that is either a result of its disintegration or a result of its transformation.


A disintegration is not a rearrangement of the components of a combination.
It's the splitting.


A transformation is a rearrangement of the components of a combination in which the components change their positions by moving across one another or each other.

HellVictorinho4:

According to the definition of English...., you're wrong.

In English....,if he was alive,the evidence is not because of now.....so he doesn't have to prove being alive now to have ever existed......he only has to have existed either before or be existing now.

Change of post! The issue is not if he is alive. The issue is he can not provide physical evidence of his great grandfather's great grandfather.

Dtruthspeaker:


Like you can bring the physical evidence of your great grandfather's, great grandfather!

I am an evidence of the existence of my ancestors. If my great grandfather did not exist, I will not be here.

Emilokoiyawon:


I am an evidence of the existence of my ancestors. If my great grandfather did not exist, I will not be here.

Same as ours!

We would not be here if Someone did not build us this House we call "world" and put us in it.

Emilokoiyawon:


I am an evidence of the existence of my ancestors. If my great grandfather did not exist, I will not be here.

Dtruthspeaker


This guy is right.


His ancestors were disintegrated or split while releasing the cells or whatever those things were ,I mean the things that combined to form him.


They were split or separated from the things they released.

HellVictorinho4:

Dtruthspeaker


This guy is right.


His ancestors were disintegrated or split while releasing the cells or whatever those things were ,I mean the things that combined to form him.


They were split or separated from the things they released.

Cells I can't see and don't need to see, but it sufficient that I have seen how men are "made" through what we call sex from other men already made.

Dtruthspeaker:


Same as ours!

We would not be here if Someone did not build us this House we call "world" and put us in it.

This is not evidence of Jesus rising from the dead. Try again.

Emilokoiyawon:


This is not evidence of Jesus rising from the dead. Try again.

The Name Christ-yarnity, is evidence of All that is Christ's!

It surely will not exist if Christ Jesus did not come die and resurrect.

And I am His Evidence.

Dtruthspeaker:


Like you can bring the physical evidence of your great grandfather's, great grandfather!

Oga we know they existed. We have evidence of their existence. They reproduced. Some left behind personal effects. Some took pictures. We can trace back our family tree.

Now bring your own evidence.

Dtruthspeaker:


The Name Christ-yarnity, is evidence of All that is Christ's!

It surely will not exist if Christ Jesus did not come die and resurrect.

And I am His Evidence.

“Christ” is a title not a person.

Maynman:


“Christ” is a title not a person.

Titles belong to Persons.

naijapips02:


Oga we know they existed. We have evidence of their existence. They reproduced. Some left behind personal effects. Some took pictures. We can trace back our family tree.

Now bring your own evidence.

We have our Bible, we have the people with Him and we have the people who were associated with the people with Him (church), then you have me, His great great great.... somewhere in Nigeria.

Exactly like your family tree.

Dtruthspeaker:


Titles belong to Persons.

Yes it is not a person. they belong and used by persons as you said.

Dtruthspeaker:


The Name Christ-yarnity, is evidence of All that is Christ's!

It surely will not exist if Christ Jesus did not come die and resurrect.

And I am His Evidence.

That's not true. The name of someone is not evidence that the person died and came back to life. And you (as a person) are not evidence of Jesus rising from the dead.

Maynman:


Yes it is not a person. they belong to persons as you said.

When attached to a Person, it becomes a Person which is why we say "President say..., Principal say.... Christ Say...!"

Dtruthspeaker:


When attached to a Person, it becomes a Person which is why we say "President say..., Principal say.... Christ Say...!"

And we have many past and present presidents? They come and go but the title remain, yes?

Dtruthspeaker:


We have our Bible, we have the people with Him and we have the people who were associated with the people with Him (church), then you have me, His great great great.... somewhere in Nigeria.

Exactly like your family tree.

I have genealogical proof of my great grand father. I can proof he existed and he was related to me by gene analysis. I have actual physical proof of him. What's the genealogy of your god?

Emilokoiyawon:

That's not true. The name of something is not evidence of it's existence. And you (as a person) are not evidence of Jesus rising from the dead.

Same can be said about you but I do not need Tu Quoque.

You stood as evidence of your great grandfather how then can you prohibit me from standing as evidence of Christ, My Friend! (And I wish He was my father but it is known that He sired no children, so the best I can be is "Next Friend" (Law))

Dtruthspeaker:


Same can be said about you but I do not need Tu Quoque.

You stood as evidence of your great grandfather how then can you prohibit me from standing as evidence of Christ, My Friend! (And I wish He was my father but it is known that He sired no children, so the best I can be is "Next Friend" (Law))

The name of someone is not evidence that the person died and came back to life. And you (as a person) are not evidence of Jesus rising from the dead. Try again.

naijapips02:

I have genealogical proof of my great grand father. I can proof he existed and he was related to me by gene analysis. I have actual physical proof of him. What's the genealogy of your god?

"Genealogy Proof" which converts to "Testimony Proof" for genes can not speak!

I have done better than you, I have "testimony Proof" and physical proof just like you

Dtruthspeaker:


"Genealogy Proof" which converts to "Testimony Proof" for genes can not speak!

I have done better than you, I have "testimony Proof" and physical proof just like you

Not testimonial. Our genes are related. He gave birth to a human. He built a house. There's a straight from him to me. What proof do you have of your god? You mean he f**ked and gave birth? And we have his lineage to this day?