Jahwinaboy:
Keep dreaming. Chelsea can hardly be the same ever since Abrahimovic left. Remember this day. No nonsense owner mentality is needed here once more

Chelsea are gradually getting over the Abramovic effect. They will build again with Pochettino.

BarrElChapo:
With sell on clause ooo... This Brighton are fools 🤣

And they would want to buy cheap from other clubs. Brighton need to be taught a lesson.

Why body dey pepper you? Na ur family get Chelsea FC?

Alpharey:


Is it your money? Did they ask you to lend them?

FreeSpirited:
Waste of money as usual for Chelsea, when theres fantastic option
Romeo Lavia is better and way way cheaper......
Kudus is a better and well rounded utility player........way way cheaper

Getting those two players willl cost Chelsea way less than 115 million pounds altogether......Lavia can do all the job of Caicedo even with grace...while Kudus is a fantastic dribbler, scorer, tackler, midfilder, winger all roll into one player.......
.
But this is Chelsea....they love spending like a prodigal son......Caicedo is good but....not better than Lavia and its stupid to buy him for 115million....is he even better than prime Kante?.....yet on the eve of winning EPL with Leicester, Chelsea got him at a very modest price of i think less than 40....So whats the justification for paying 115 for Caicedo? How much would we now sell machine like Rodri?

poor man sense; Kane was sold to Bayern for 100m pounds at the age of 30years!, This calcedo is young, has a premier league experience and can't you see how Enzo finished Liverpool midfield? Chelsea boards know the best for the club but it's normal to criticize the spending !

FreeSpirited:

in 2016,Apart from Pogba bought by juventus from manUtd at 89milliom (understandable cos coming from big team to big team), other good or promising players were bought within same range of 30-35million

john stone was 47million same year....considered hefty
Mane was 34, Kante 32, Mustafi....35 or so...

So why should Caicedo fall far far as an outlier price for this year...is he better than the epl winning Kante of 2016 whose price dint come as an outlier price?/.....Just accept Chelsea has been manipulated.....at most he he shouldnt be more than 70million even if we consider inflation

You're contradicting yourself Mr man. Just look at all the people you mentioned now, how much were they cost then? Compare to the present market value of players.

sirlop:

U dey mind that guy?
Arsenal spent over 100m on Rice and they hailed it as a smart move.spending 115m on Caiceido who is better than riceis not bad business. The present day transfer is highly inflated. They are pained that someone like Caicedo came to Chelsea

Exactly, they're really pained.

geoworldedu:

You're only planning for today and not for other years ahead. Caicedo is planning way ahead.

Okay! You're sure Chelsea is going to win the League or finish top 5? I hope so too

Chelsea be inflating price of players
That's how they signed mudryk 4 100m nd Enzo for 115 now they are paying close to €130m for a player with only one good Epl season under his belt.

FreeSpirited:
Waste of money as usual for Chelsea, when theres fantastic option
Romeo Lavia is better and way way cheaper......
Kudus is a better and well rounded utility player........way way cheaper

Getting those two players willl cost Chelsea way less than 115 million pounds altogether......Lavia can do all the job of Caicedo even with grace...while Kudus is a fantastic dribbler, scorer, tackler, midfilder, winger all roll into one player.......
.
But this is Chelsea....they love spending like a prodigal son......Caicedo is good but....not better than Lavia and its stupid to buy him for 115million....is he even better than prime Kante?.....yet on the eve of winning EPL with Leicester, Chelsea got him at a very modest price of i think less than 40....So whats the justification for paying 115 for Caicedo? How much would we now sell machine like Rodri?

Can you believe that Brighton got him for only 4m? Talk about making huge profit 😄

Mogajunior:
Chelsea are gradually getting over the Abramovic effect. They will build again with Pochettino.

I pray so. Time shall tell

iFESTAC680:


Okay! You're sure Chelsea is going to win the League or finish top 5? I hope so too

yes

Mogajunior:
Liverpool is not good? Cmon man. Chelsea are just in great shape currently.

no vex naa,, time will tell when the play all this teams i mentioned

Okechinwadike:
no vex naa,, time will tell when the play all this teams i mentioned

Okay then. Let's keep our fingers crossed.

dondodo:
FTC for first time

for where 😂

FreeSpirited:
Waste of money as usual for Chelsea, when theres fantastic option
Romeo Lavia is better and way way cheaper......
Kudus is a better and well rounded utility player........way way cheaper

Getting those two players willl cost Chelsea way less than 115 million pounds altogether......Lavia can do all the job of Caicedo even with grace...while Kudus is a fantastic dribbler, scorer, tackler, midfilder, winger all roll into one player.......
.
But this is Chelsea....they love spending like a prodigal son......Caicedo is good but....not better than Lavia and its stupid to buy him for 115million....is he even better than prime Kante?.....yet on the eve of winning EPL with Leicester, Chelsea got him at a very modest price of i think less than 40....So whats the justification for paying 115 for Caicedo? How much would we now sell machine like Rodri?

sorry bro,caicedo is overpriced yes but saying kudus and lavia is better is a joke

Gaabasky:
This Chelsea people sa. One hundred what for just above average player?. Causing problems for other teams in the market. How much Julian Mbappe will cost?

It is Juliet mbappe and not julian

Mogajunior:


[b]The price of Football players inflated dramatically in recent times. Most times these players don't even perform to expectation. [/b]But all the same, he is a good addition to the team.

Notwithstanding, Chelsea's game against Liverpool today was impressive. I see Pochettino bringing back the good old days.

Totally agreed

Actually in football, 27 is the beginning of prime.

maxwell530:
Romeo Lavia is still overpriced at 50m
if you are a brilliant football analyst like you want to be, you would've understood the kind of profile Caicedo is and how DMFs are the hottest prospects out there right now and younger ones at that.Tchoameni was bought for 100m almost 2 years ago, Declan Rice with 1 year remaining on his contract was purchased at 105m, Bellingham 100m,Enzo at 100m. Young defensive Midfielders don't come cheap nowadays, the pros outweigh the cons. Imagine signing a 21 year old with 6 years contract,dude will be 27 after his contract runs out, a 27 year old player is considered to still be in his prime. Having a Midfield trio of 21 year olds offers you atleast 6 to 8 years of stability without looking to the market for another top players in that department. This is the exact thing Madrid is trying to do by bringing in Tchoameni, Bellingham and Camavinga to replace the deadly trio of Modric casemiro Kroos. With this plan, Madrid Midfield will be sorted out for another 7-10 years of stability.

Congratulations to Chelsea. But the guy would be a flop for robing Liverpool the guy.

FreeSpirited:
Waste of money as usual for Chelsea, when theres fantastic option
Romeo Lavia is better and way way cheaper......
Kudus is a better and well rounded utility player........way way cheaper

Getting those two players willl cost Chelsea way less than 115 million pounds altogether......Lavia can do all the job of Caicedo even with grace...while Kudus is a fantastic dribbler, scorer, tackler, midfilder, winger all roll into one player.......
.
But this is Chelsea....they love spending like a prodigal son......Caicedo is good but....not better than Lavia and its stupid to buy him for 115million....is he even better than prime Kante?.....yet on the eve of winning EPL with Leicester, Chelsea got him at a very modest price of i think less than 40....So whats the justification for paying 115 for Caicedo? How much would we now sell machine like Rodri?

is kudus a defensive midfielder ??

ken6488:
We own Liverpool

bitch, it was a draw ...


Thanks to Taylor for not giving that penalty ..


You get Moises, we get lavia and andre ...

Algold:



Thanks... Liverpool complicated the deal for Chelsea...
Liverpool outbid Chelsea at 110 at that point Brighton accepted the offer but Moises Caicedo rejected Liverpool and choose Chelsea. So loyalty is key, I don't care the amount he was bought. The boy is loyal and ready to help the team.


We are also getting Lavia.. so stay tune, don't touch that dial

like hell you guys are ...


lavia wants Liverpool just as caicedo wanted Chelsea

Silentgroper:


like hell you guys are ...


lavia wants Liverpool just as caicedo wanted Chelsea

That was before Liverpool went ahead to bid for caicedo @ 110m.
lavia feels betrayed and fears sadio Mane's situation

Silentgroper:


bitch, it was a draw ...


Thanks to Taylor for not giving that penalty ..


You get Moises, we get lavia and andre ...

Thanks to Taylor for not giving that penalty on the Push on chiwel in the box 18

That game was ref fairly

FreeSpirited:
Waste of money as usual for Chelsea, when theres fantastic option
Romeo Lavia is better and way way cheaper......
Kudus is a better and well rounded utility player........way way cheaper

Getting those two players willl cost Chelsea way less than 115 million pounds altogether......Lavia can do all the job of Caicedo even with grace...while Kudus is a fantastic dribbler, scorer, tackler, midfilder, winger all roll into one player.......
.
But this is Chelsea....they love spending like a prodigal son......Caicedo is good but....not better than Lavia and its stupid to buy him for 115million....is he even better than prime Kante?.....yet on the eve of winning EPL with Leicester, Chelsea got him at a very modest price of i think less than 40....So whats the justification for paying 115 for Caicedo? How much would we now sell machine like Rodri?

You're comparing Kante price of that time and now. Even price of garri has gone up drastically since then.

Frankmorgan:

It is Juliet mbappe and not julian

Thanks anyway. I didn't even checked. It was auto word. Kylian

Confirmed: Romeo lavia decides to join Chelsea football club * Fabrizio Romano

Silentgroper:


like hell you guys are ...


lavia wants Liverpool just as caicedo wanted Chelsea

I can smell Liverpool tears filling Atlantic ocean. The good thing about Caicedo is that he uses both legs effectively far better than Rice

Latest news, Liverpool have started again, they have outbidded Chelsea again at 60million pounds... Una dey find trouble

Algold:

I can smell Liverpool tears filling Atlantic ocean. The good thing about Caicedo is that he uses both legs effectively far better than Rice

Latest news, Liverpool have started again, they have outbidded Chelsea again at 60million pounds... Una dey find trouble

It doesn't matter anymore, because lavia informed the saints, he only wants Chelsea.
Chelsea can close the deal for 55m

Omobude244:

Liverpool was never going to sign Caicedo for 110m
chelsea started the war by trying to outbid Liverpool for Lavia
it was all a calculated plan to make sure chelsea leaves Lavia alone.
very smart move

now their plan has worked. they can now pay 50m for Lavia.

Lavia wont go to chelsea again now that they have Caicedo and FFP is still staring at chelsea face

Oga Chief Planner and Club Owner...

Smell the coffee!

Omobude244:

Liverpool was never going to sign Caicedo for 110m
chelsea started the war by trying to outbid Liverpool for Lavia
it was all a calculated plan to make sure chelsea leaves Lavia alone.
very smart move

now their plan has worked. they can now pay 50m for Lavia.

Lavia wont go to chelsea again now that they have Caicedo and FFP is still staring at chelsea face

I pity people wey dey take una serious.

freemanq:
Why body dey pepper you? Na ur family get Chelsea FC?

Na you body dey pepper actually on top how person decided to spend im money. Check am now