Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,163,367 members, 7,853,640 topics. Date: Friday, 07 June 2024 at 08:40 PM

Identity Fraud - Romance (7) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Romance / Identity Fraud (12342 Views)

Identity Of Viral Side Chick Embarrassed By A Married Woman At Ikeja City Mall / The Identity Of The Girl Who Engages 3 FUTO Students In Tramadol S*x Revealed / Lady Uses Sex To Trap Lover Wanted For Fraud (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) ... (12) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 9:43pm On Jan 03
There is significant historical evidence that the Moors, an Islamic empire of North African origin, ruled parts of the Iberian Peninsula during the period known as the Middle Ages. However, it is not accurate to say that the Moors ruled "all of Europe."

The extent of Moorish control over Europe varied over time and was limited to the Iberian Peninsula, with occasional raids and incursions into other parts of Europe. While the Moors did have some influence on culture, art, architecture, and philosophy in Europe, their reach was mainly limited to the Iberian Peninsula and the Mediterranean region.

The notion that the Moors ruled all of Europe is sometimes associated with a controversial and baseless theory known as "Atlantic theory" or the "Moors of America" theory, which argues that Africans were the primary builders of the major civilizations in the Americas and elsewhere. This theory is rejected by mainstream scholars and has been debunked by numerous studies.

In short, while the Moors did have a significant impact on certain parts of Europe, their rule was largely limited to the Iberian Peninsula, and the notion that they ruled all of Europe is not supported by historical evidence.



Pseudo Historians who don't care if they are correct in their beliefs as long as they have a belief. These dark skin black Supremacists even dispute biblical stories and have written themselves in as Egyptian and Hebrews. There's a serious misunderstanding of history, race and geography in these Freemasonry Moors of America who seem to think brown skin nobility like King James and King Louis are the results of Moors mixing with white women. Once I began to research for myself I found none it to be true and in some cases a complete sham.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 5:49pm On Jan 04
According to the Bible, Abraham is described as a Semite and a descendant of Shem, the son of Noah. In the book of Genesis, chapter 11, the Bible tells the story of the Tower of Babel and the confusion of languages: "Now the whole world had one language and a common speech. As peoples migrated from the east, they found a plain in the land of Shinar and settled there. They said to one another, 'Come, let us make bricks and bake them thoroughly.' They used brick instead of stone, and tar for mortar. And they said, 'Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be scattered over the face of the whole earth.' But the Lord came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men were building. And the Lord said, 'Behold, they are one people, and they have all one language, and this is only the beginning of what they will do. And nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible for them. Come, let us go down and there confuse their language, so that they may not understand one another's speech.'" (Genesis 11:1-7).

In terms of historical references, many scholars believe that Semitic people originated in the Fertile Crescent of the Near East and spoke the Proto-Semitic language, from which all modern Semitic languages are descended. Some of the earliest Semitic groups included the Akkadians, Babylonians, Assyrians, Arameans, and Phoenicians. The Semitic people are believed to have spread from the Fertile Crescent to North Africa, the Arabian Peninsula, and the Horn of Africa.

In terms of physical appearance, Semitic people are generally described as having light to medium-colored skin, thick and dark hair, and prominent noses. There is considerable variation within the Semitic people, however, and individuals can often be distinguished by their specific ethnic group or region of origin.

According to historical records and biblical teachings, the Semitic people included the Hebrews (who settled in Canaan and gave rise to the Israelites), the Moabites (descendants of Moab, the son of Lot), the Edomite (descendants of Esau), the Phoenicians (a maritime people who settled along the eastern shores of the Mediterranean Sea), the Arameans


Having light to medium colored skin this is consistent with ancient depictions and modern depictions of Semitic so it is what Abraham looked like. Abraham was brown and neither black nor white. And King Solomon is described as dark and comely it similar means that he was a dark brown color not black.


There is alot of fraud going on coming from not just whites pretending to be Semitic but also blacks pretending to be the historical Semitic people whom had light to medium colored skin which is brown. The phony white and blacks are committing this fraud together in a ditchotomous distraction to suppress the true identity of the Semitic people. It could very well be that they are satanists attacking God's truth.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 5:57pm On Jan 04
Here are the true Semitic people


The skin color of Semitic people varied depending on the specific ethnic group and geographical region. Some Semitic peoples, such as the Akkadians and Babylonians, were known to have lighter skin tones. Others, such as the Edomites and Moabites, were described as having darker skin tones, perhaps similar to what is now considered "brown" or "tan."

However, it is important to note that the physical appearance of Semitic peoples has varied over time and across different regions. In general, the Semitic people were characterized by a range of physical traits, including a prominent nose, thick and dark hair, and an oval-shaped face. Some scholars have suggested that the Semitic people may have originated in the Near East and later migrated to other regions, potentially carrying with them different physical features and genetic traits.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 6:02pm On Jan 04
There is no better description than the one given by the ancient Egyptians themselves who took pride in their jet black skin. Ham is the father of Egypt and the black race.


. The Bible refers to Egypt as "the land of Ham" in Psalm 78:51; 105:23, 27; 106:22; 1 Chronicles 4:40


There are no black Hebrews or a dark skin black Jesus. All black people on Earth descent from Ham only the light skin blacks are mixed and may have Semitic origin produced by Semitic men such as Tygrayans of Ethiopia who are oppressed there. Many Creole light skin black Americans whose ancestors came from European Franks, Celts and Spanish.


There is historical and biblical evidence that suggests that Semitic men did produce offspring with Hamitic women.

According to the biblical account, Noah's sons, who descended from Ham and Shem, were the ancestors of the different nations of the world. The Bible suggests that the people of Egypt and the people of Canaan descended from Ham and Shem. In addition, the biblical account suggests that Abraham's wife, Hagar, was an Egyptian woman, and that their son, Ishmael, was the ancestor of the Ishmaelites, who later became known as the nomadic Arabs.

This suggests that there was intermarriage between Semitic and Hamitic people in ancient times. Additionally, archaeological findings in the Middle East suggest that there were cross-cultural and cross-ethnic marriages and mixing between Semitic and Hamitic people.

Overall, the historical and biblical evidence suggests a complex and interconnected history of genetic and cultural exchange between Semitic and Hamitic people in the ancient Near East.


Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 3:37pm On Jan 05
The categorization of race in the United States as a black and white dichotomy is rooted in the history of slavery and the ideology of white supremacy. During the era of slavery in the United States, African Americans were considered property and were not considered to be fully human. They were often referred to as "black" as a way to distinguish them from the white population, which was considered superior.

Over time, this categorization of black and white became ingrained in the culture of the United States, and other races, such as Native Americans, Asians and Latinos, were often lumped together or excluded from the black-white dichotomy. The "one-drop rule" was a concept that arose during the era of Jim Crow and segregation, and it stated that anyone with even a single drop of African American blood was considered black. This rule effectively collapsed all other races into the black category and enforced a strict racial hierarchy in which whites were at the top and blacks were at the bottom.

The debate over whether Jesus was black or white is a complex issue that reflects the ongoing struggle for racial equality and the legacy of slavery in the United States. While it is true that Jesus was likely middle eastern and brown in color, the issue of race and the racial hierarchy that the United States has been built on is deeply complex and reflects a long history of oppression and inequality.



America has spread it's racism abroad and its race classification has affected even people in Kenya. The debate whether Jesus and Jews were black or white has pushed the conversation into such an intense stand off that people forget that Jesus was actually Middle Eastern and certainly had brown skin.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 4:15pm On Jan 05
When the Moors ruled the Iberian Peninsula there were already Jews living there who were Edomites. These are the Jews who didn't follow Christ as all those Jews called Judeans or Israelites went into Europe becoming the Celts, Gauls and Frankish tribes that practiced Christianity. These Edomite Jews remained in the old Judaism that King David and the Maccabees had forced upon the Edomite ancestors. After the fall of Jerusalem alot of these Edomite Jews relocated to the Iberian Peninsula where they remained until the Moors arrived from North Africa. Seeing that they didn't believe that Jesus was the Messiah and son of God these Jews faced no persecution by the Moors whilst the white Gothic Christians were taken as slaves. This motivated anyone from being a Christian so Blacks coming from Africa who didn't want to be Muslim soldiers converted to Judaism. And whites who didn't want to be Christian slaves to the Moors converted to Judaism. This is how there became black and white Jews who spoke Hebrew and practiced it's traditions. These blacks and whites are responsible for all the artwork such as the Russian Icons and the Reinassance Art that reflects Jews as black or white. But the true phenotype and color of the Edomites and Jews matched that of other Middle Easterners as did the early Celts, Gauls and Frankish tribes.



Here are the sephardic jews below:

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 4:56pm On Jan 05
We hurl truth at falsehood until we smash out its brains.

Here are authentic Jews of Edomite descent who looked just like Israelites because Edom and Israel were twins.

You can clearly their middle eastern phenotype and brown skin.

Cut out the lies!

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 8:07pm On Jan 05
When Herod realized that he had been outwitted by the Magi, he was furious, and he gave orders to kill all the boys in Bethlehem and its vicinity who were two years old and under, in accordance with the time he had learned from the Magi.



What you won't hear is that all the people in the story are Middle Eastern Semitic people. King Herod is an Edomite who was very rich so he paid the Roman officials overseeing Judea 5,000 lbs of gold to make him king of Judah. There had not been a king since the Jews went into captivity in Babylon. Even though the royal line continued King Herod wasn't apart of it. After becoming King, Herod ordered to kill all the Judeans inside the Pharisees and Sadducees societies and replaced them all with Edomites which were his own people. Then King Herod began killing baby boys two years and younger to prevent the rise of a true Judean who had royal blood to challenge his rule over Judah. Clear the confusion, it was the Edomites who crucified Jesus and not his family. They had the throne and rulership over Judah and planned to keep it.


Some pictures depicting King Herod as a brown skin Middle Eastern man. This is the truth.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 8:18pm On Jan 05
The first known account of the idea that one of the three magi who visited baby Jesus in the nativity story might have been black appears in the 15th century. In his book "The Nativity: The History of the Origin of Christianity," the French historian Jean Le Fevre notes that there was a "legend that the wise men came to the birthplace of the Son of God, one of them being a black king, and bringing with them the gifts of gold, spices and incense." This claim was repeated by several historians in the early 16th century, including Giambattista Vico, who speculated that the magi were from the Kingdom of Kush, which was located in what is now northern Sudan.

While there are many accounts of this legend, it is difficult to say for certain where it originated or how it developed. Some historians have suggested that it may be linked to a desire to emphasize the universality of the message of Jesus and the Christian faith, by suggesting that it was not just a religion for one particular race or group of people. Others have suggested that it may have been a way to challenge the racial hierarchy that was established in the Western world during the age of colonialism and slavery. Regardless of its origins, this idea has remained a point of debate and discussion for many years.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 8:34pm On Jan 05
The magi were a group of wise religious figures who are believed to have come from Persia or what is now Iran in the Middle East. They were skilled practitioners of the Zoroastrian religion, which is one of the world's oldest religions, and based on the teachings of the prophet Zoroaster.

The magi played an important role in the Persian Empire, and were considered to be skilled astrologers and scientists. They were also known for their knowledge of religious rituals, and were often called upon to interpret royal omens and make forecasts for the future.

In the Christian tradition, the magi are said to have visited the baby Jesus when he was born, bringing gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh, and to have recognized him as the promised Messiah. The story of the magi is recorded in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke in the New Testament, where they are described as wise men from the East who followed a star to find the newborn King of the Jews.

After the Islamic conquerors swept through the Middle East in the 7th century, the traditions of the magi were preserved in the Islamic world, and they became known as the "three kings" or "three wise men" in many Muslim cultures. In the modern era, the story of the magi has continued to be celebrated in many countries, particularly in the West and in parts of the Middle East.

Overall, the magi, and their role in the story of the birth of Jesus, have been an important part of religious traditions and beliefs in the Middle East and beyond for centuries, and their legacy continues to influence cultures and religions around the world.


All the people in story of Jesus' birth had Semitic Middle Eastern phenotype and brown skin color. None of them were black or white. This is something that developed later on as more races of people embraced the Gospel.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 10:08pm On Jan 05
All the early Frankish Kings were Benjimans and they had Middle Eastern phenotype and brown skin clearly seen in portraits. Even Grand Master Hughes De Payens founder of Knights Templar had Middle Eastern phenotype and brown skin.


Were the Franks the same group as todays French? No. The Franks were a germanic nation, that spoke a germanic language and that were an ethnicity of rulers, that was not the same as the majority of the population, just like it's not because Han Chinese were ruled by Mandchu they turned into Mandchu.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 9:40am On Jan 06
Genesis 11:10-32 NKJV
This is the genealogy of Shem: Shem was one hundred years old, and begot Arphaxad two years after the flood. After he begot Arphaxad, Shem lived five hundred years, and begot sons and daughters. Arphaxad lived thirty-five years, and begot Salah. After he begot Salah, Arphaxad lived four hundred and three years, and begot sons and daughters. Salah lived thirty years, and begot Eber. After he begot Eber, Salah lived four hundred and three years, and begot sons and daughters. Eber lived thirty-four years, and begot Peleg. After he begot Peleg, Eber lived four hundred and thirty years, and begot sons and daughters. Peleg lived thirty years, and begot Reu. After he begot Reu, Peleg lived two hundred and nine years, and begot sons and daughters. Reu lived thirty-two years, and begot Serug. After he begot Serug, Reu lived two hundred and seven years, and begot sons and daughters. Serug lived thirty years, and begot Nahor. After he begot Nahor, Serug lived two hundred years, and begot sons and daughters. Nahor lived twenty-nine years, and begot Terah. After he begot Terah, Nahor lived one hundred and nineteen years, and begot sons and daughters. Now Terah lived seventy years, and begot Abram, Nahor, and Haran. This is the genealogy of Terah: Terah begot Abram, Nahor, and Haran. Haran begot Lot. And Haran died before his father Terah in his native land, in Ur of the Chaldeans. Then Abram and Nahor took wives: the name of Abram’s wife was Sarai, and the name of Nahor’s wife, Milcah, the daughter of Haran the father of Milcah and the father of Iscah. But Sarai was barren; she had no child. And Terah took his son Abram and his grandson Lot, the son of Haran, and his daughter-in-law Sarai, his son Abram’s wife, and they went out with them from Ur of the Chaldeans to go to the land of Canaan; and they came to Haran and dwelt there. So the days of Terah were two hundred and five years, and Terah died in Haran.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 3:59pm On Jan 06
There is evidence to suggest that the King of Khazaria, Bulan, played a significant role in converting his kingdom to Judaism. The Jewish Encyclopedia describes this process in detail.

According to the Jewish Encyclopedia, Bulan was the ruler of the Khazar kingdom, which was a powerful empire that spanned from the Black Sea to the Caspian Sea. During the late eighth century, the Khazars were facing a series of military defeats from their neighbors, including the Abbasid Caliphate and the Byzantines. In response to this pressure, Bulan is said to have turned to Judaism for protection and guidance.

Bulan is reported to have sent a delegation of high-ranking Khazars to consult with the leading rabbis of the time, who were located in Jerusalem. The rabbis are said to have impressed the Khazars with their knowledge and piety, and they ultimately decided to convert to Judaism.

It is believed that the conversion process took several years to complete, and it involved a program of educational and cultural reforms that aimed to transform the Khazarian society into a Jewish one. The Khazars reportedly developed a large Jewish population and became known for their devotion to Judaism and their contributions to Jewish scholarship.

In conclusion, while the details of Bulan's role in converting his kingdom to Judaism are still debated, it is clear that he played a significant role in introducing Judaism to the Khazars and ultimately transforming their kingdom into a Jewish state. With his leadership, the Khazars became one of the most important Jewish communities in Europe, and their conversion had a profound impact on the development of Jewish culture and theology.

DNA Research Confirms That Modern Khazarian "Jews" Are Not the Descendants of Ancient Isrealites or The Seed of Abraham



DNA Research Confirms That Modern Khazarian "Jews" Are Not the Descendants of Ancient Isrealites or The Seed of Abraham.



New DNA Science Research Confirms...

“I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the Synagogue of Satan.”


(Revelation 2:9)
“And the Lord appeared unto Abram, and said, Unto thy seed will I give this land.

(Genesis 12:7)
Who should possess the land of Israel? Christian evangelicals say it should be the descendants of Abraham. They point to the Old Testament and claim that God gave this land forever to the descendants of Abraham and that God demands they and they alone own the land.

To the Christian evangelical, this means the Jews. Yes, it is the Jews who own this land, and it is their land forever.


The Khazarian Empire was a war-like people, as evidenced by this statue of a marauding warrior. Note the six-pointed star on the shield. Today's "Jews" came from Khazaria and are not descendants of Abraham.The Jews, then, according to Christian evangelicals, are the descendants of Abraham, his seed.
DNA Science Confounds the Common Wisdom
There is only one problem. And it is a huge one. Science proves those who call themselves “Jews” are not Jews! DNA Science has confounded the Christian evangelicals by proving conclusively that most of the people in the nation of Israel and in World Jewry are not the descendants of Abraham.

Those living today who profess to be “Jews” are not of the ancient Israelites, and they are not the seed of Abraham. In fact, the new DNA research shows that the Palestinians actually have more Israelite blood than do the “Jews!”

The nation of Israel today is populated with seven and half million imposters.

The “Jews” Are Not Jews But Are Khazarians

Dr. Eran Elhaik, geneticist researcher at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, found that today’s “Jews” originated from Khazaria and not Israel. They are not the seed of Abraham.The newest DNA science finding is from Dr. Eran Elhaik (“a Jew”) and associates at the McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. In research accepted December 5, 2012 and published by the Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Molecular Biology and Evolution, it was found that the “Khazarian Hypothesis” is scientifically correct.
What exactly is the “Khazarian Hypothesis?” Simply stated, it holds that the Jewry genome is a mosaic of ancestries which rise primarily out of the Khazars.

Jews are Khazars, not Israelites.

The “Jews” of America, Europe, and Israel are descendants not of Father Abraham but of King Bulan and the people of ancient Khazaria. Khazaria was an amalgam of Turkic clans who once lived in the Caucasus (Southern Russia) in the early centuries CE. These Turkic peoples were pagans who converted to Judaism in the eighth century. As converts, they called themselves “Jews,” but none of their blood comes from Israel.


Geneticists report that less than 2 percent of “Jews” living in Israel are actually Israelites.Later, the “Jews” (Khazars) emigrated, settling in Russia, Hungary, Poland, Germany, and elsewhere in Europe.



We have tackled both Ashkenazs and Khazar Jews who are of the house of Yapeth not Shem.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 5:51pm On Jan 06
Ashkenazi Jews and Khazar Jews are two distinct groups with different histories and origins.

Ashkenazi Jews are an ethnoreligious group that originated in Central and Eastern Europe in the early Middle Ages. They were formerly called "German Jews" and are the largest Jewish diaspora community in the world. Ashkenazi Jews traditionally speak Yiddish, a language derived from Medieval German and Hebrew, and they have a distinct cultural heritage and traditions that have evolved over many centuries.

On the other hand, Khazars were a nomadic people of Turkic origin who lived in the northern Caucasus and lower Volga regions during the late first millenium CE. In the late eighth century, the Khazar King Bulan converted to Judaism and established a Jewish kingdom that lasted for several centuries. Some scholars have speculated that some modern Ashkenazi Jews might be descended from Khazar converts, but there is no concrete evidence to prove this.

In conclusion, while there are some similarities between Ashkenazi Jews and Khazar Jews, they are distinct groups with different origins and histories. Ashkenazi Jews are an ethnoreligious group that originated in Europe, while the Khazars were a nomadic Turkic people who converted to Judaism in the late eighth century.


Ashkenazs who make up the majority of white Jews and Khazars who make up the rest are both of the house of Yapeth.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 11:07pm On Jan 06
Philippines seem to fit perfectly with the Bible's description of Ophir: 3 year voyage from Israel so you rule out places near to Israel like Africa and Middle East. Has gold, silver, apes, peacocks and algum wood. Group of islands.






The Phillipines contains the Hebrew tribe of Ophir and they are very brown. As I keep proving that Shem and his descendants are always brown in complexion. The Black and white people are not of Shem.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 6:18pm On Jan 07
Tan is ‘In’: Study Finds Light Brown More Attractive than Pale or Dark Skin
Findings Might Impact How Advertisers Use Models
By Katherine Kostiuk
MU News Bureau

Columbia, Mo. (Oct. 2, 2006) — Some African-American stars have been ridiculed for trying to lighten their skin color, but many Caucasians go to tanning salons to darken their skin. A new study by Missouri School of Journalism researcher Cynthia Frisby found that people perceive a light brown skin tone to be more physically attractive than a pale or dark skin tone.


“Does a person’s skin color alone impact whether others perceive her as physically attractive? Advertisers want their models to be perceived as attractive so that consumers will buy their product, and previous studies have found that black models used in advertisements frequently are fair-skinned and have more European features. I wanted to test skin color separately to find out whether it’s important to perceptions of beauty. I found that without regard to physical features, people prefer light brown skin over dark brown skin or pale skin,” said Frisby, associate professor of strategic communication at the School.

For the study, photographs of four female models were adjusted using computer software. Each model was imaged in three different skin tones – light, medium and dark – but all other features remained the same. Frisby asked 79 female participants to evaluate a selection of the photographs, which they believed were for an upcoming advertising campaign. Frisby analyzed the responses and discovered that participants, of whom 45 were Caucasian and 34 were African American, found the light brown skin tone most attractive.

These findings might impact how advertisers use African-American models. Some advertisers have worried that using African-American models for mainstream products might alienate potential Caucasian buyers, Frisby said, but this study shows Caucasians and African Americans react in similar ways to light, medium and dark shades of skin tone.

“Since the mid-1960s, many advertisers have been in a dilemma regarding the use of blacks in advertisements,” Frisby said. “Many considered using blacks in advertisements to appeal to a growing black target audience but were concerned that use of blacks might alienate white consumers. Fortunately for advertisers and advertising agencies, research shows that white consumers react to black models in advertisements in almost exactly the same way as black consumers react. It seems that both groups prefer the light brown skin tone, whether it’s a tan Caucasian or a light-skinned African American.”

The study, “‘Shades of Beauty’: Examining the Relationship of Skin Color to Perceptions of Physical Attractiveness,” was published in the August issue of the journal Facial Plastic Surgery.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 5:54pm On Jan 08
Emperor Constantine and his wife Saint Helena were brown skin people not white and not black. So you see the Roman nobility were actually brown skin people of the Mediterranean which includes the Middle East, the Greek Isles, North Africa and the Iberian Peninsula. So she white historians were very envious to write the Romans in history as white. Even some African scholars attempted to write the Romans as Black people but it's not true.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 6:11pm On Jan 08
Italians are considered descendants of the ancient Romans who once ruled over what is now known as Italy. The Romans were known for their expansive empire, which reached its height in the 1st century AD.

Throughout history, the Italian peninsula has been influenced by a variety of cultures and empires, including the Greeks, Carthaginians, and the Byzantine Empire. However, the influence of the Roman Empire remains a defining aspect of modern Italian culture and identity, and many architectural, cultural, and legal traditions of Italy can be traced back to the ancient Roman civilization.

While there have been many changes and shifts in Italian culture and identity over time, there is still a strong connection between Italians and their Roman heritage, and many Italians take pride in the fact that their ancestors were once part of one of the greatest empires in world history.


Italians are brown and their ancestors ancient Romans were brown.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 11:20pm On Jan 08
10 Century Byzantine soldiers

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 7:44pm On Jan 10
There is a widespread belief among scholars that historical Jesus's skin colour was brown or dark. They argue that the vast majority of people living in the ancient Middle East, including the Jewish communities in Nazareth, had brown skin and were not light-skinned like most people living in Northern Europe. Additionally, images of Jesus from the first century CE, such as the Alexandria mural, depict him with a brown complexion, further supporting this interpretation.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 9:17pm On Jan 10
The Alexandria Mural is a 2nd-century CE mosaic discovered in the mid-19th century in Alexandria, Egypt. It is considered to be the earliest known depiction of Jesus, and it shows a bearded, brown-skinned man with piercing blue eyes, dressed in a purple tunic. The figure is not accompanied by any other Christian symbols, such as a cross or halo, but scholars speculate that this may be due to the mural's early date and possible Christian persecution in the early years of the faith.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 9:20pm On Jan 10
The oldest known portrait of Jesus, found in Syria and dated to about 235 CE, is a fresco depicting a beardless young man of authoritative and dignified bearing. This painting is a key example of early Christian art and is considered to be one of the earliest depictions of Jesus. It is believed to be an early example of iconography, a system of religious art and imagery used to represent deities, saints, and other holy figures in Christian tradition. The painting is known for its realistic and naturalistic style, and it is considered to be one of the earliest examples of this type of art in the Christian tradition.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 11:20am On Jan 11
Yes, according to Hebrew tradition, Zipporah was a black Ethiopian and the daughter of Jethro, a Midianite priest. The Bible describes Zipporah as a "Cushite", which was a term used to refer to people from the general region of the Horn of Africa, which includes Ethiopia.



No one was ever deceived until modern times that Hebrews were brown and Cushites, Ethiopians were black.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 4:01pm On Jan 12
Emmanuel Philibert (Italian: Emanuele Filiberto; Piedmontese: Emanuel Filibert; 8 July 1528 – 30 August 1580), known as Testa di ferro (Piedmontese: Testa 'd fer; "Ironhead", because of his military career), was Duke of Savoy and ruler of the Savoyard states from 17 August 1553 until his death in 1580. He is remembered for the recovery of the Savoyard state (invaded and occupied by France when he was a child) following the Battle of St. Quentin (1557), and for moving its capital to Turin.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 6:08pm On Jan 12
Portrait of Charles Emmanuel II (1635 -1675)



Yeah right. They don't want you to know brown skin men ruled Europe and had white women as queens and concubines. There are plenty of portraits of white skin Nobility and they aren't using any brown technique.




Some European royal paintings of the 17th and 18th centuries may appear to have a brownish cast to the faces, which is due to the use of certain techniques and materials in the painting process.

One technique that may contribute to this effect is the use of layers of glazes, or thin layers of paint applied over a more opaque base layer, to create a sense of depth and transparency. The glazes used in these paintings often contained metallic pigments, such as cadmium and titanium, which can give a yellowish or brownish tint to the paint. Over time, these pigments can yellow and become more visible, creating a brownish cast to the faces in the paintings.

Another factor that may contribute to this effect is the use of certain painting materials, such as linseed oil and egg tempera. These materials can create a natural patina over time, which can cause the faces in the paintings to take on a yellowish or brownish hue.

Overall, the appearance of brownish cast in European royal portraits is a combination of artistic technique, paint materials, and the natural aging of the painting over time. While this effect may not be desirable in some cases, it can contribute to the historical value and interest of the paintings, as it provides a glimpse into the materials and techniques used by artists in a particular time and place.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 6:17pm On Jan 12
Francis Hyacinth (Italian: Francesco Giacinto; 14 September 1632 – 4 October 1638) was Duke of Savoy and ruler of the Savoyard states from 7 October 1637 to his premature death the following year, under the regency of his mother Christine Marie

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 11:21pm On Jan 13
Gaspard III de Coligny, duc de Châtillon, (1584 to 1646) was a French Huguenot, who served under Louis XIII, and was appointed Marshal of France in 1622. He was described as "a mediocre general, but absolutely loyal"

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 11:28pm On Jan 13
Louis IX (25 April 1214 – 25 August 1270), commonly revered as Saint Louis, was King of France from 1226 until his death in 1270. He is widely recognized as the most distinguished of the Direct Capetians. Following the death of his father, Louis VIII, he was crowned in Reims at the age of 12. His mother, Blanche of Castile, effectively ruled the kingdom as regent until he came of age and continued to serve as his trusted adviser until her death. During his formative years, Blanche successfully confronted rebellious vassals and championed the Capetian cause in the Albigensian Crusade, which had been ongoing for the past two decades.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 8:43pm On Jan 14
During the Moors occupation of Portugal, a small number of blacks converted to Judaism. The Moors were Muslims who ruled parts of Spain and Portugal from the 8th century to the 15th century. They allowed Jews and Christians to practice their religion under their rule, which led to a small minority of blacks converting to Judaism. The exact number of blacks who converted to Judaism during the Moors occupation of Portugal is not known, as records from that time period are limited and fragmented.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 4:04pm On Jan 16
Racism and discrimination based on skin tone can manifest in many ways, including the exclusion of browner skin tones from mainstream culture and society. This can take many forms, including racism, colorism, and other forms of discrimination. It's important to acknowledge and oppose these forms of racism and discrimination in all their forms and to work towards creating more inclusive and equitable communities.


The debate is always between the very darkest blacks and very palest whites who are the true Jews when in fact neither were Semitic and Indigenous to the Middle East.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 6:06pm On Jan 16
Although Middle Eastern people are historically brown the brown-skinned people, as well as other ethnic and racial groups, have often been excluded from certain discussions and debates, which can perpetuate biases and discrimination. It's important to work towards creating more inclusive and diverse spaces where all voices can be heard, and where all perspectives are considered. This often requires intentional efforts to promote diversity and equity, and to dismantle systems and structures that perpetuate exclusion and discrimination.




Although Middle Eastern people are historically brown the brown skinned people have been excluded for sake of black versus white Jews.

Re: Identity Fraud by GodisStriking: 7:35pm On Jan 16
Portrait of the Catholic King Ferdinand II of Aragon (1479-1516), 1587-88

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) ... (12) (Reply)

Her Labia Minora Got Swollen After Her Bf Sucked Her Pvssy / Advice To The opposite gender / Dont Open In Public...lady Shares Hot Backside Photos That Will Rise Konji

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 115
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.