which of the two cars above should i go for? which is easier to maintain, fuel economy, cheap parts, etc

camry is better cos de parts r cheaper than babyboy and de availability of de spear for camry is high than babyboy.

get this one for just 1.3m
very clean in and out, camry anyday anytime, no gear issues, no pulling tyres. less fuel consumption, remember fuel subsidy removal, joking
but the car is fresh and just arrived 4days ago

Ȋ̝̊̅§ it that this baby boy Ȋ̝̊̅§ a no go area or a problem car coz in all d site I have seen comparison of this two cars camry always take ‎​†ђξ lead with baby boy painted in form of a death trap.but surprisingly people keep buying and using it on daily basic and some I know of 4rm my friends hardly have a major issue Pls expert in this section help solve my little problem. What Ȋ̝̊̅§ realy ‎​†ђξ problem with baby boy thanks.

babyboy or Honda cars up to 2005 models needs more attention than we give cars in this part of the world, i can drive my camry with sounds from the legs and other parts with no fear for so long without fixing it but you don't try that with a honda. but the gear is prone to mechanical issues mostly

always TOYOTA, but if you want to buy fancy, go for HONDA, but i will advice you to go for TOYOTA.

femmy2010:

You never go wrong with a Toyota.

correct!

the prices of both cars will give you an idea.

while the camry goes for btwn 850k to over a million, you get the baby boy for as cheaply as 700k.

toyota all the way