Somebody should clarify me.What has the court relied on to arrive at this verdict?

That the legislature has no constitutional rights to make and unmake laws again?

adanny01:


This not the case, splitting the emirate into 5 is the law that was repealed and the 5 Emirs go with the repeal. That's why the house must not bring allegations or investigate anything.

Ask yourself, why was the one Emirate split into 5, was it because of Sanusi? No. There was no reason, same as there can't be a reason for repealing the law.

If that law stood, why not this one?

Previous government have tried in splitting the One Emirate without success, of course hinging it on financial misappropriation and absolute concentration of power and resources is a valid point.SLS reign was the perfect time to break down such monopoly and of course with tangible reasons, I am certain you aware , he SLS had a court order barring the state from probing the financial activities of the emirates.

Tjra:


Don't mind them

We obidients say NO to reinstatement of Bayero.

Sanusi is our recognized Emir.

States (Rivers & Kano) with chaos is where you will find us

Impostor spotted

ryloy:


https://leadership.ng/breaking-court-reinstates-bayero-as-kano-emir/

Federal High Court has no jurisdiction to hear chieftaincy matters