dammywapes:
imagine comparing scholes role with that of Gerrard n lampard sm pple knw football .... scholesy plays deep than lampard n Gerrard ... both Gerrard n lampard plays offensive

Scholes is a limited midfielder. Gerrard and Lampard gave extras to their CMs roles.

Why did Sven Goran Eriksen pushed Scholes away from the midfield and put Gerrard and Lampard?

Even Scholes will tell you not to defend him this way.

airmark:


Yes Pk experts like Ronaldo, Ramos etc.

So Ramos is rated because of his attacking stats? You're a disgrace

Swissh:

Expert17 another one of your scummy who doesn't know anything. Your Albino started as a supporting striker before pushed further and further into midfield for being useless.

How many goals and assist did he score n create when he was played as a supporting striker? arsenal fan no get mouth where man utd dey yan

airmark:




Scholes is a limited midfielder. Gerrard and Lampard gave extras to their CMs roles.

Why did Sven Goran Eriksen pushed Scholes away from the midfield and put Gerrard and Lampard?

Even Scholes will tell you not to defend him this way.

Same reason why England was failing with the so called Lampard and Gerrard in midfield. No sensible coach will do that.

airmark:




Scholes is a limited midfielder. Gerrard and Lampard gave extras to their CMs roles.

Why did Sven Goran Eriksen pushed Scholes away from the midfield and put Gerrard and Lampard?

Even Scholes will tell you not to defend him this way.

did you say scholesy was a limited midfielder ? it's eriksen choice do you also know Gerrard was pushed to deeper role for lampard to play upfront ? coach decision

Ordinary Henderson and Dier in midfield outperformed all Gerrard and Lampard partnership in England midfield

Mumu England coach was Benching Carrick and Scholes and using PK merchants

eph12:

So Ramos is rated because of his attacking stats? You're a disgrace

Who said this? You need to go and test for Covic 1,9.

eph12:

Same reason why England was failing with the so called Lampard and Gerrard in midfield. No sensible coach will do that.

Benching Owen Hagreeves and Carrick for Gerrard as Defensive midfielder.. stupid coach.....

No wonder Ferdinard and Terry defence was just shipping goals anyhow

dammywapes:
How many goals and assist did he score n create when he was played as a supporting striker? arsenal fan no get mouth where man utd dey yan

Typical Scummy who doesn't know anything . Who is United and what have they produced.

Swissh:

Expert17 another one of your scummy who doesn't know anything. Your Albino started as a supporting striker before pushed further and further into midfield for being useless.

If Scholes decide to join Arsenal today, ..... He will bench all those flops in your midfield

Expert17:


If Scholes decide to join Arsenal today, ..... He will bench all those flops in your midfield

Yes Scholes the England failure

dammywapes:
did you say scholesy was a limited midfielder ? it's eriksen choice do you also know Gerrard was pushed to deeper role for lampard to play upfront ? coach decision

Scholes couldnt assist even himself, so no coach would prefer him to Gerrard or Lampard. These two were so good they mounted Ballon d'or podium, unlike overrated Scholes, who was never even Man utd player of the season for once in 19yrs.

Swissh:

Typical Scummy who doesn't know anything . Who is United and what have they produced.

We don't have to produce...... We just buy your best players Van persie and Sanchez

Swissh:

Yes Scholes the England failure

That's why they want him to come out of retirement

Expert17:


We don't have to produce...... We just buy your best players Van persie and Sanchez

Where is Sanchez

Expert17:



Benching Owen Hagreeves and Carrick for Gerrard as Defensive midfielder.. stupid coach.....

No wonder Ferdinard and Terry defence was just shipping goals anyhow

The thing is England FA never got it right in terms of recruiting the right coaches for the team during that golden era of players they had. They were consistently recruiting idiots that lacked ideas as the national team coaches. Gerrard and lampards penalty padded goal scoring stats in their clubs didn't help those coaches either. They were so fixated on having those two play together , forgetting that they are like for like sub for eachother, thereby the experiment was failing consistently. It was the same problem they had playing Terry and Ferdinand together in defence, when they are both the same styled players thereby shipping in goals anyhow.

Gerrard and Lampard are just a better version of Ross Barkely . they only know how to run and run with the ball in midfield and with little ingenuity. when everywhere is blocked, they can't improvise, they will just result in wayward shooting evrytime. that is why those two usually record a very high number of shots per game.

airmark:


Scholes couldnt assist even himself, so no coach would prefer him to Gerrard or Lampard. These two were so good they mounted Ballon d'or podium, unlike overrated Scholes, who was never even Man utd player of the season for once in 19yrs.

They were nominated for the award fine but never won it.... Gerrard n Lampard were good but won't take them over scholesy... I know what xavi n guardiola said about scholesy

Expert17:



Benching Owen Hagreeves and Carrick for Gerrard as Defensive midfielder.. stupid coach.....

No wonder Ferdinard and Terry defence was just shipping goals anyhow

I'm telling you. benching natural Defensive midfielders like Carrick and scholes that can control a game for pk merchants that mostly only knows how to shoot and play pks and can't control a midfield from deep lying positions.

Swissh:

Typical Scummy who doesn't know anything . Who is United and what have they produced.

I won't talk football with your type calling people names on SM

dammywapes:
I won't talk football with your type calling people names on SM

Scummy

The truth is those england coaches find it hard to drop Gerrard n lampard for the right player to right position. How will you play an attacker in defensive role and expect him to do the job well and it cost england a lot

timay:


The thing is England FA never got it right in terms of recruiting the right coaches for the team during that golden era of players they had. They were consistently recruiting idiots that lacked ideas as the national team coaches. Gerrard and lampards penalty padded goal scoring stats in their clubs didn't help those coaches either. They were so fixated on having those two play together , forgetting that they are like for like sub for eachother, thereby the experiment was failing consistently. It was the same problem they had playing Terry and Ferdinand together in defence, when they are both the same styled players thereby shipping in goals anyhow.

Gerrard and Lampard are just a better version of Ross Barkely . they only know how to run and run with the ball in midfield and with little ingenuity. when everywhere is blocked, they can't improvise, they will just result in wayward shooting evrytime. that is why those two usually record a very high number of shots per game.

Nice one....

Lampard that will just be looking for opportunity to run forward and score

Scholes dictate the tempo of games, ....spraying long and short passes.... Opening defence with thru pass.....also skilful.

Gerrard and Lampard as a midfield duo, is rubbish...

Swissh:

Where is Sanchez

Enjoying his 400k a week

Van persie enjoying his EPL trophy

Expert17:


Nice one....

Lampard that will just be looking for opportunity to run forward and score

Scholes dictate the tempo of games, ....spraying long and short passes.... Opening defence with thru pass.....also skilful.

Gerrard and Lampard as a midfield duo, is rubbish...

Even in their clubs , the coaches knows better than putting them in Defensive midfield, cos they don't have the positional discipline of the likes of Carrick, Scholes , Mikel etc .

timay:


I'm telling you. benching natural Defensive midfielders like Carrick and scholes that can control a game for pk merchants that mostly only knows how to shoot and play pks and can't control a midfield from deep lying positions.

Carrick and Scholes were dominating EPL teams and making UCL finals 3 times out of 4...... But england prefer to use traditional Gerrard and Lampard that can't win low ranked countries

eph12:

Same reason why England was failing with the so called Lampard and Gerrard in midfield. No sensible coach will do that.

Let's blame midfielders and leave attackers and defenders.

dammywapes:
They were nominated for the award fine but never won it.... Gerrard n Lampard were good but won't take them over scholesy... I know what xavi n guardiola said about scholesy

I know what Ronaldinho and Messi said about Lampard. I know what Uefa and Fifa said about Lampard.

You know what?

Expert17:


Carrick and Scholes were dominating EPL teams and making UCL finals 3 times out of 4...... But england prefer to use traditional Gerrard and Lampard that can't win low ranked countries

How English FA consistently manages to recruit idiots as coaches beats me.

dammywapes:
imagine comparing scholes role with that of Gerrard n lampard sm pple knw football .... scholesy plays deep than lampard n Gerrard ... both Gerrard n lampard plays offensive

Lampard was playing box to box at later stage in his career, same with Gerrard for Liverpool so talk another thing.

timay:


The thing is England FA never got it right in terms of recruiting the right coaches for the team during that golden era of players they had. They were consistently recruiting idiots that lacked ideas as the national team coaches. Gerrard and lampards penalty padded goal scoring stats in their clubs didn't help those coaches either. They were so fixated on having those two play together , forgetting that they are like for like sub for eachother, thereby the experiment was failing consistently. It was the same problem they had playing Terry and Ferdinand together in defence, when they are both the same styled players thereby shipping in goals anyhow.

Gerrard and Lampard are just a better version of Ross Barkely . they only know how to run and run with the in midfield and with little ingenuity. when everywhere is blocked, they can't improvise, they will just result in wayward shooting evrytime. that is why those two usually record a very high number of shots per game.

All these are Shalayes. Scholes was the definition of bad for England. He was useless even before Gerrard and lampard became mainstay for England and shamelessly retired in 2004. Ferdinand and Terry only started 15games together for England and they never shipped in goals anyhow. They conceded only 2goals through out the 2006 world cup. You don't ever know what you are talking about. Typical Scummy .

Before you graduate as a Midfielder @ barca academy, you have to learn to play the Scholes way........

His video clips are shown to the upcoming midfielders every time, to understand the midfield game.....

Confirmed by Messi, Xavi, Iniesta, Busquet, Fabregas, Thiago, Guadiola etc

Swissh:

All these are Shalayes. Scholes was the definition of bad for England. He was useless even before Gerrard and lampard became mainstay for England and shamelessly retired in 2004. Ferdinand and Terry only started 15games together for England and they never shipped in goals anyhow. They conceded only 2goals through out the 2006 world cup. You don't ever know what you are talking about. Typical Scummy .

Through out the world cup, ...as if they played, all the way to the final.......

He was useless with 17 goals in 66 games playing from the wing without PK....

Lampard was useful with 29 goals in 100+ games from his position....scoring penalties....

Gerrard was useful with 21 goals in 100+ games from his position......scoring penalties

King of Scummies