Ebukacute:
This is the day we'll teach these scumies how to beat Villarreal.
3:0 correct score ,go bank on it.

BlueAngel444:
then what is justice to you, concerning those who surrender? Should they be executed or placed under arrest and monitoring? Shouldn't others be encouraged to defect as well?!

Amoto94:

This is ad hominem attack. What has my religion got to do with the opinion I just raised which is a common practice in conflict resolution?

timbros:


This is not true.

izzou:


There can never be peace without justice.

I don't want to believe you're typing this because they are Islams. I'm shocked this is coming from you

Emmynator:

Your first paragraph is very accurate. What happens when peace is the price you pay for justice?
At this stage of insecurity, FG needs more terrorists surrendering, so its pertinent to create incentives for surrender. While we can all agree that the decision will raise brows, we shouldn't look at it like a totally bad decision.

Look at it this way, our struggles with boko haram means we need more information in order to combat them properly, information defectors can provide. If the government gives full punishment to terrorists who surrender, we will have less of them surrendering and more terrorists to deal with, while having less inside information.
Justice demanded the sanctions placed on Germany after the first world War, but these sanctions played a key role in the start of the second world War.

I will only advise the government to monitor them properly and ensure that they give quality information as part of their plea deal, and perhaps send some of them back as undercover agents.

Ebukacute:
This is the day we'll teach these scumies how to beat Villarreal.
3:0 correct score ,go bank on it.

Amoto94:

I will respond to this. Sometimes in war you allow for rebels to lay down their arms for greater good. And according to the interview granted by one of them he said that some of them were conscripted forcefully and fear of summarily execution prevented them from defecting, when there was an opportunity for them to surrender due to leadership crises and military bombardment they seized the opportunity and have surrendered.
What we should be demanding is that they should be placed on security watch to ascertain whether they're not infiltrators sent by their leaders.

Havertz10:
it's the same thing the Taliban does, i'm naturally empathetic, I can totally understand the reasoning behind their actions and their leaders actions self

your last paragraph is on the money about monitoring them but I don't think that it's that simple, you can't release a criminal into the streets and expect him to change

You have to find out what led to him committing those crimes and preventing that process from restarting, with employment rates in Nigeria, no matter how hard they try to reorientate these guys they will still fall back into that life, it provided for them, never play with a man's food, his judgment of right from wrong is skewed when his survival is on the line


Personally if I had my way, anybody that commits a crime should die, prisons are a flawed system, the numbers are there, it's an exponential growth system, it will never reduce crime or deter crime, people will forever try to game the system, only the certainty of death can deter humans, I also think that the world is overpopulated, straight forward executions is the only way forward in my book, especially for clear cut criminal cases.

iamoyindamola:

Do you know the leader of the bandits that kidnapped students to extort the government repented and now he's back in the bush.
Now we have more bandits who go around kidnapping students and extort the government then form repentance.
Then the cycle continue
Tomorrow I can also decide to start killing people then next tomorrow I repent and life goes on

iamoyindamola:

Be logical this can't work, what about case of mistaken identity
I should die for what I didn't do right

iamoyindamola:

Do you know the leader of the bandits that kidnapped students to extort the government repented and now he's back in the bush.
Now we have more bandits who go around kidnapping students and extort the government then form repentance.
Then the cycle continue
Tomorrow I can also decide to start killing people then next tomorrow I repent and life goes on

Havertz10:
I said clear cut cases, besides our legal system is a joke, the premise of defending the guilty because there is a possibility that he can be innocent has made the legal profession a joke, lawyers have become liars, what happens when the innocent has bad lawyers and the guilty has good lawyers, it's a flawed system that we are using

China has started using Ai judges to decide cases, I think that is the way to go, it wouldn't be something harsh like statutory minimums but it will be flexible and very consequentialI wouldn't mind losing 50% of my wealth to the government for a crime, besides it's money that I would have spent on stupid things, government can repurpose that money into welfare progams, but death should always be a possibility particularly if found guilty

I have never been arrested, the probability of me being arrested in my lifetime is very low, if you get arrested even if you are innocent, you are doing something wrong, can be intangible things but the number of innocent people that end up in trouble is very low, less than a percent.

Havertz10:
it's the same thing the Taliban does, i'm naturally empathetic, I can totally understand the reasoning behind their actions and their leaders actions self

your last paragraph is on the money about monitoring them but I don't think that it's that simple, you can't release a criminal into the streets and expect him to change

You have to find out what led to him committing those crimes and preventing that process from restarting, with employment rates in Nigeria, no matter how hard they try to reorientate these guys they will still fall back into that life, it provided for them, never play with a man's food, his judgment of right from wrong is skewed when his survival is on the line


Personally if I had my way, anybody that commits a crime should die, prisons are a flawed system, the numbers are there, it's an exponential growth system, it will never reduce crime or deter crime, people will forever try to game the system, only the certainty of death can deter humans, I also think that the world is overpopulated, straight forward executions is the only way forward in my book, especially for clear cut criminal cases.

Amoto94:

This is ad hominem attack. What has my religion got to do with the opinion I just raised which is a common practice in conflict resolution?

Amoto94:

I will respond to this. Sometimes in war you allow for rebels to lay down their arms for greater good. And according to the interview granted by one of them he said that some of them were conscripted forcefully and fear of summarily execution prevented them from defecting, when there was an opportunity for them to surrender due to leadership crises and military bombardment they seized the opportunity and have surrendered.
What we should be demanding is that they should be placed on security watch to ascertain whether they're not infiltrators sent by their leaders.

Havertz10:
I said clear cut cases, besides our legal system is a joke, the premise of defending the guilty because there is a possibility that he can be innocent has made the legal profession a joke, lawyers have become liars, what happens when the innocent has bad lawyers and the guilty has good lawyers, it's a flawed system that we are using

China has started using Ai judges to decide cases, I think that is the way to go, it wouldn't be something harsh like statutory minimums but it will be flexible and very consequentialI wouldn't mind losing 50% of my wealth to the government for a crime, besides it's money that I would have spent on stupid things, government can repurpose that money into welfare progams, but death should always be a possibility particularly if found guilty

I have never been arrested, the probability of me being arrested in my lifetime is very low, if you get arrested even if you are innocent, you are doing something wrong, can be intangible things but the number of innocent people that end up in trouble is very low, less than a percent.

iamoyindamola:

It's very to type in the corner of your bedroom

Havertz10:
I have encountered police numerous times but my disposition and countenance doesn't make me appear suspicious, I stop listen to their questions and answer them in a civil manner, very polite and respectable to them and they soon reciprocate it, aesthetics matter


Police only harass hooligans or suspicious looking people, can be your hair or the way you dress or talk but police respect polished people, if you didnt know, now you know

nateevs:
How about this for squad depth?

Emmynator:

At the bolded, really? So the less than 1 percent don't deserve to be vindicated?

You don't throw away the baby with bath water, the legal system has loopholes, heck democracy has loopholes, everything has loopholes. Even AI has loopholes as long as its human creating and programming the AI.

Nezzjnr:



You would have just saved your strength instead of writing this Trash.

They should be sent to go and meet their creator.

Emmynator:


SARS harassment of youths hinged on this same premise.

izzou:


Go and check the meaning of "Conflict resolution", and come back and tell me how it applies to terrorism, especially Boko Haram.

I don't even want to argue with you. I feel disgusted that I quoted what you even typed.

iamoyindamola:

Kindly confirm na Baba give you this so that I can put all my savings

Catfishing:

You should be ashamed of yourself for this trash you put up.

Amoto94:

This is ad hominem attack. What has my religion got to do with the opinion I just raised which is a common practice in conflict resolution?