Wrong address! The responsibility to deport illegals rest solely with ICE, and ICE is under Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and NOT Dept of State. So next time, tell your attorney to get the address right. Only rout through Dept of State.

Juliusmalema:
Failed system but in actual sense Universities are right because they should be autonomous.

Jamb recommends, it is now left for university to admit..

Jamb has no right whatsoever to tell any university who and who not to admit.

You can only see such nonsense in Nigeria not in other civilisation.

On a serious note Jamb should be scrapped.

May God bless you with that your submission. I don't know why Nigerian youth have misplaced priorities: putting cat before the horses. Yes schools make mistakes in the process of admission and some candidate will be admitted via man know man method, but it doesn't equate the damage being done to the system by the centralised system where Abuja dictate everything including who to be admitted and how. That kind of over-centralization in a diverse country where school defers on merit and standard breed such indifference attitude to authority and also stunt growth and innovation.

shadeyinka:

And so you feel that it is correct for a university to deny admission for those who scored above 286 for medical school yet give admission to many who scored 206?

It is done in almost all our public universities

Yes there are such cases and there will always be, but it doesn't invalidate his submission which I agree with in totality. No centralised system can work in an environment full of diversity. Yes the country education system is bastardised but we still have standard differential among the schools. So Abuja cannot be admitting students for all schools using unified yardstick, it won't work! Give schools autonomy, let them admit candidates they want and innovate. Jamb should simply concentrate on testing then hands off. Schools should determine their admission yardstick including cutoff mark and all. That's if we want to grow and develop our educational system anyway.

Like? If you can recommend one with good contents/stations, I would appreciate it.

Hi everyone, I noticed DStv has reshuffled the channels under family bouquet. My favourite channels and the only reason I am still using DStv (Bloomberg TV & CNBC Africa) were removed some days ago, and all movies, sports, and News channels follow suit this morning, even when my subscription is not expiring until early next month. I called the company customer service this afternoon only to be told that I should upgrade to compact plus as (Bloomberg TV & CNBC Africa) have been moved up, but couldn't tell me the reason behind the remaining channels that are vanishing too. So house I just want to confirm whether am the only one experiencing this disruption or it's general. And if it is general, won't it be better to kuku scrap Access, Family and Compact, and restructure to just premium package (DStv) and economy package (Gotv). Thanks.

Hi everyone, I noticed DStv has reshuffled the channels under family bouquet. My favourite channels and the only reason I am still using DStv (Bloomberg TV & CNBC Africa) were removed some days ago, and all movies, sports, and News channels follow suit this morning, even when my subscription is not expiring until early next month. I called the company customer service this afternoon only to be told that I should upgrade to compact plus as (Bloomberg TV & CNBC Africa) have been moved up, but couldn't tell me the reason behind the remaining channels that are vanishing too. So house I just want to confirm whether am the only one experiencing this disruption or it's general. And if it is general, isn't it now a better option to go for Gotv of 2/4k instead of DStv 4/7k with less valuable channels. And won't it be better for Multichoice to kuku scrap Access, Family, and Compact bouquet, so we are left with premium package (DStv) and economy package (Gotv). Thanks.

QuotaSystem:


How did you conclude on the currency to be used for payment?

Besides what price do you think his major competitors are selling their refined oil?

Don't forget that for him to survive and excel as a global player in the industry, he must remain competitive.

Modified:



Let us break this down:

Dangote will not sell to Nigeria in Dollars unlike if we were importing refined fuel. That is KEY. Why?

It is because Nigeria will benefit greatly from eliminating a huge daily demand for USD to import fuel. This fall in demand has a direct effect on the exchange rate which will fall as a result of a fall in demand for $. Additionally Dangote will be forced to repatriate some of his USD income from exports, which will also boost our foreign reserves. More USD in the reserves means more USD available to satisfy our daily forex bill and avoid price spikes because the CBN will be better positioned to intervene accordingly.

Now why can't Dangote just sell to us at a reduced price? It is also simple.

For Dangote to survive in the global oil industry, it means he must then be able to compete favorably with other international refineries. That would be impossible if he is subsidizing prices for specific countries, because the costs of input (crude) and processing (refining) are the same or similar to his other competitors across the world. He must therefore sell at global prices, Nigeria not excluded (do not forget he is exporting the excess refined fuel to other countries) so as to remain profitable to his investors and keep him from shutting down after a few months of operation.

Yes we are an oil producing nation, but we are not 'dashing' the crude to Dangote to process for us. He is buying it from us at global prices too, and adding value (refining) at a cost he must recover and make some profit on.

This is rather simplified but hopefully it puts things in clearer perspective.

You are wrong sir. First, there is no global price for petroleum products. Market forces determine the price of products in different countries. That's why there is differential between the price petrol is sold in Germany & U.K., btw Nigeria & S.A. by the time you adjust for Forex. Don't get me wrong, there is global price for crude but not derivates.
Second, I believe Deva was misquoted, because you can't be a Nigerian refiner, based in Nigeria but still sell products at import price (i.e. you would be charging your customers for export of crude & import of products; the task that you did not do), so I agree with the guy you referenced. According to him, landing cost of PMS is #133 which has cost of shipment factored-in, and sold at 145 so profit can accrued for importer. But Dangote isn't importing therefore can't have cost of production up to #133, except global price of crude shoot up to over $100/barrel or he wants to be too greedy. I said too greedy because petrol does not obey demand/supply law, so if he decides to sell at 200 naira/liter people would still but cus they won't have choice as he has the strength (size & volume of his refinery/products) to chase away importer/competitors.
However, I agree with you that the price of his products won't be cheap (though would not be as high as those of importers), because we are not giving him crude for free, and he is buying in dollars (though in Naira equivalent) at global price. So all those would go into his own pricing too. Another point of yours that am agreeing with is the reparation of dollars made by selling it's products internationally. That would be so good for the country Forex reserve, as we would cut off demand for dollar for petroleum products importation. That together with the self sufficiency in rice production and some other products means dollars will come down a bit and Nigerian will be relieved.

Credit on the points above goes to Ope, a research/business analyst with S.T. BROOK LTD.



    

☰

Choosing your own DStv channels – Here is where we stand

Jan Vermeulen 9 hours ago



MultiChoice said it will not be forced to let subscribers choose their own channels, according to ICASA’s draft findings document on its inquiry into the subscription TV market in South Africa.

“This is the process that started in 2016 when ICASA published a notice of its intention to conduct an inquiry into the state of competition in the subscription broadcasting services sector,” the regulator said.

The Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA) published its draft findings on Friday, 12 April.

“The draft findings are published for further comments, subsequent to which ICASA will publish the final findings.”

Depending on the outcome of the final version of its finding document, ICASA said it may consider developing regulations, possibly in the form of additional licence conditions on broadcasters.

“A separate public consultation process would be followed in that case.”

À la carte model

As part of its inquiry into South Africa’s pay TV market, ICASA considered requests from consumers to force broadcasters like MultiChoice to offer an à la carte model for channels.

“The Authority’s consumer survey revealed that consumers are looking for value for money services. There is general dissatisfaction with the service being offered,” ICASA said.

MultiChoice has confirmed this, stating that its Premium subscribers are under financial pressure and dissatisfied with having to contend with re-runs.

With subscription TV prices increasing without there being a corresponding increase in the value subscribers get for their money, consumers are calling for the ability to only pay for the channels they want to watch.

“While it may be an appealing proposition, the Authority notes that it would take technical configuration and re-engineering of business models by current subscription broadcasters,” ICASA said.

Citing India and Canada’s à la carte models, ICASA noted that only a few countries in the world have implemented such models, with inconclusive results in terms of benefits to consumers.

“The Authority will embark on a separate process should it become necessary to introduce an à la carte option for the South African market.”

ICASA said that for now, the remedies it is proposing to increase competition in the subscription broadcasting space should lead to increased access and lower prices.

ICASA’s proposals

As a result of MultiChoice’s dominance in South Africa’s pay TV market, ICASA said it is proposing various license conditions to address the market failure.

ICASA said that most stakeholders support the following remedies:

Reducing contract duration —Maximum of 5 years, without automatic renewal.

Rights splitting — Rights-owners must split their rights and sell them to more than one broadcaster.

Unbundling — Sports rights must be sold on open tender, allowing for more than one buyer, with no “excessive exclusivity” and no automatic contract renewals.

Wholesale must-offer — MultiChoice must offer its sports rights to other broadcasters on a wholesale basis.

Limiting access to the number of Hollywood movie studios — ICASA wants to limit the number of studios a broadcaster may enter into exclusive agreements with.

In addition, ICASA said that it has identified set-top box interoperability as a potential license condition to impose on MultiChoice. This would allow decoders to work with various pay TV operators, rather than requiring a separate decoder for each.
Source:
https://mybroadband-co-za.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/mybroadband.co.za/news/broadcasting/303148-choosing-your-own-dstv-channels-here-is-where-we-stand.html/amp?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fmybroadband.co.za%2Fnews%2Fbroadcasting%2F303148-choosing-your-own-dstv-channels-here-is-where-we-stand.html

MondayOsunbor:



the federal police we have now is it working that is wrong with this people ? LAPD na state police NYPD na state police for America a governor have at most 8 years term

Na una dey fear loosing UNA FEDERAL MIGHT abi

Point of correction, LAPD & NYPD aren't state police, they are city police. America big cities have their own police different from the states, some states have state police, while small towns have sheriffs (which the local police)

Oshin56:
case close see you you can not defense your argument see you later after receiving sense

Bro in as much as I understand your fear, your mentality is the kind that makes Africa still remain where it is today. You allow fear to restrict you from moving forward. So because airplane has a tendency to crash you would not travel by air again, or cuz automobile vehicle accident you won't move by car again. Yes state police has a tendency to be misused by the governor shouldn't stop us from practicing it, afterall, president can also misuse federal police. What we should do is to put mechanism in place to prevent the hijack and misuse of the department by the governors, then adopt it because it is more effective to nib crime in the bud before it actually happened. If Northeast had state police in place, they would had had better chance at identifying potential book haram members, persuade some and luck up the hardened ones before they grow wing to become monsters they are today. This is because is allows people that knows one another to report potential crime or criminal to another fellow that grew up with them and knows the terrains who is the commissioner of police than bringing someone from another tribe who doesn't know the terrain or the culture of the people he want to superintend in their policing.
In answering your question about which state can effectively adopt and practice state police, I say to you that ALL STATES IN NIGERIA CAN DO IT. Like I said earlier, all they need to do is putting necessary mechanism in place to reduced to greater extent, the intervention, influence or contribution of the state executive in choosing the police commissioner or running the system.
MY POLICY/STRATEGY ON HOW TO ACHIEVE THIS:
There should be police service commission (PSC) to be created by the law of each state with the function of appointing and firing police commissioners. The selected and appointed commissioner name should be forwarded to the state House of assembly for ratification and the name sent to the governor as a mere formality. The sending of the name to governor should trigger the effectiveness of the appointment. The budget of the police should be ratify by the PSC and assembly and be the first thing to be deducted from the source of state coffers before the governor do any other things. The PSC members should be constituted by combination of retired cheif judges of the state, retired police commissioner, professors of sociology or criminology, and representatives of BAR and Civil society, all who would be elected by members of their professional constituencies for 4 years that is renewable at the end of every 4 years, and the election of each members should be staggered. *Note that the JOB will be free, so it's only those that are willing to serve their state and have the integrity that would be there.
If we want to take it a step further, the state House of assembly members that would be ratifying the appointment too should be have their salaries being paid by their constituencies and not the governor to prevent them from being influenced. Each constituency should pay what it can afford (which means there won't be uniform take home for all the honourables, and this is an incentive to make them listen to their constituencies that send them there and prevent gang-up), and the vote on ratification of police commissioner should be done openly so the constituencies would know which of the honourables vote in favour and against the ratification so they can ask them the reaso behind their action.
If the house fail to ratify without an acceptable reason to the people, the nominated police commissioner should stay in active capacity pending when the case would be taken before a court, and once he/she is clear of any wrongdoing or baggages, he (commissioner) should continue and the judgement should be seeing as the ratification.
With this strategy, the believe state police is possible, and can be done effectively with minimal and insignificant interface from the governor.

Jokerman:


That means Modric played better than Messi as well in La liga since he won the best world best... Agree??

Overall Yes he did! If not he wouldn't have won world best ahead of Messi and C. Ronaldo. And CR7 performed better than Messi that season that's why he was ahead of Messi. No sentiment about it. A player natural potential is different from actual performance in a given season. That's why people who knows the game would tell you Ronaldinho is the most naturally gifted of this generation but Messi and CR7 play more purposeful football than him hence their greater achievement. Messi is more gifted but CR7 is the most hardworking football player I even known. In that line of comparison, CR7 and Messi are of better quality naturally, but for last season, Modric topped the 2 in performance EOD!

ernieboy:
oga are u even listening to itself? a team that has been winning the UCL back to back in recent seasons has been in decline? the UCL is arguably the highest silverware any club can win and a team that has dominated it as if it their personal property in the past few seasons was on decline?

Bro! Your POV is the problem of Africans. All you see is today, not minding the strength of the mechanism you giving you that today's winning. Yes they won back to back, but careful observation and analysis of the team would tell you the team strength drop season-in season-out. That's the fact, it's now left for you to accept it or not. If the team is as strong as you portray it then why is it down now? Or are you telling me that the exit of CR7 alone is what crash the whole Madrid team, as if he is the only one that plays all the positions. Don't tell me you are part of the people that project that narrative because if you are then that means you can believe anything. A team or company winning today doesn't mean all is good. That's why Facebook, Alphabet, Amazon, Apple Inc are buying up new innovative company to cover their weakness and strengthened themselves for tomorrow, and Mcity, Barcelona and even R.Madrid buy players to shore-up the team against weakness despite them winning ATM.

ernieboy:
no mind that guy a beg., since Rinaldo exited why has Madrid not been shining like they used to?

Your point of argument is faulty! Everybody knows the whole Madrid as a squad has been on a declining for like 2 seasons now. Yes they managed to win champions League last season but the signs of weakness were there. That's why Zidane left, and PART of the reasons CR7 too left. If Modric was not at that midfield, there is high probability that Madrid won't win cuz CR7 won't see quality supplies of ball to score. So, CR7 contribution was significant, but Modric contribution that last season was much more significant than his. Except you want to tell me that all the professionals that voted him were fools or they did that solely on world cup performance where he equally had less goals than CR7. CR7 is naturally a better player but for that season, Modric top him in contribution to Madrid. But I must say that he has also dropped this season.

Jokerman:


All through Ronaldo 's stay in Madrid, can you tell us any player than had more Influence on the team than him per season?? Thanks

Modric contribution to the team was more than his (CR7) last season, hence his being crowned as world best. Yes Ronaldo had more goals than him in country and club yet his (Modric) contribution was more. Yes goals determine the winner of games, but the goal scorer is not always the biggest contributor to the team. That's why Ronaldinho was the world best ahead Eto'o and Henry in their time, Canavaro, a defender won world best, Figo, Zidane etc won world best despite not being the highest goal scorers.

oluwatobi75:
c'mon He is right now.... indomie generation will not know this impeccable striker of all time.... Eto'o indeed made Barcelona win games in his prime not Messi... He was king then but now Messi is King.... simple.

Oga, your claim was wrong. There was never a time Eto'o was a king in Barcelona. A king of a team is that player that's the most feared by opponent, most influential to the team, and he whose absence affected the team most and make opponent happy. The king of Barcelona and indeed the king of world football during Eto'o reign was Ronaldinho. After Dinho reign starts Messis'. Though Eto'o score significant number of goals but that doesn't make him the king. its like saying CR7 was the king of Real Madrid last season because he scored more goals than Modric, or saying Neyma/Suarez were the king when in Barcelona because they were also influential and scoring goals. So Eto'o lied cus he wasn't the king: Messi was and still is.

business05:



Listen my friend. Do you think the North is foolish? To allow a cabal controlled government of Buhari for the next 4 years? Compare to a fresh potential 8 years that Atiku will give them.

Let us be fare and neutral to assume the following scenarios will play out on Feb. 16.

NW - 12 million votes | Atiku - 4.5 million PMB - 7 million
NE - 9 million Votes | Atiku - 5 million PMB - 4 million
NC - 6 million votes | Atiku - 4 million PMB - 2 million
SW- 10 million votes | Atiku - 4 million PMB - 6 million
SE- 6 million votes | Atiku - 5 million PMB - 1 million
SS - 7 million votes | Atiku - 5 million PMB 2 million

Total 50 million votes 27.5 million votes PMB 22 million votes

PMB can no boast of 70% votes in any part of Nigeria even in his home town. But Atiku can easily crush him (PMB) with 80% in both SS and SE.

If we must face reality, Atiku cannot defeat Buhari in NE & NC. Buhari is wining NW & NE with a wide margin; NC with a slim margin; and SW with with like 60% to 40%; while Atiku will win SE & SS in a landslide. After all is done, Buhari will win. Though I wish it doesn't happen so a fresh and disruptor like Sowore or Kingsley can come in, but that's the reality.

ollah2:



Nope. Apple isn't a private company

What I meant by private is that it isn't own by government. Apple is a private-public liability company. I used that adjective because there is another company that has tasted the Trillion Dollar pride in the past. The first company to cross $1Trillion mark was a Chinese company (PetroChina) to be precise, before its market cap fell back under $1T. The difference between PetroChina and Apple & Amazon is that the former is government owned company while the last two are Privately owned-Public quoted companies.

tigerclaws:
if I'm mark I'll buy all their shares and kick their asses out of my company


Why will a company allow a total stranger to have upto 30% shares on his sweat?

if na me maximum you can have is 15-20%

make someone no come tomorrow start dragging my company with me

Mark Zuckerberg does not have 60% of Facebook as you assumed. The guy has only under 25% share of Facebook. The 60% you were referring to is voting right at board level as a result of class of his share, but not the percentage of his share in the company. 60% of share would mean Mark is worth over $200billion as the market cap of Facebook is $447billion, and not $58billion (Source: Forbes Real-Time Networth) that he is worth as at this morning. So please let us be careful and be sure we are put out genuine info and data anytime we discuss issue online.
Cheers!

ollah2:



Amazon too

Apple Inc is the only private company with atleast $1 Trillion valuation bro! Amazon was there for just a day before he dropped back under. Amazon only worth $863 Billion as of today.

BedLam:
That is what happens when you are not innovative just like most other Nigerian businesses like Dangote and Globalcom. These guys just rake in analogue money with no innovation on their side. After many years, these people can't drill oil. We still use Foreign companies to drill our own oil. Meanwhile China the world's largest importer of oil has one of the biggest Oil companies in the world.

You hear of Gazprom of Russia, Saudi Aramco and you wonder what we are doing in this part of the world.

The future will tell. I'm sure one day, cement won't be tasting this sweet.

Guy pls for your future sake, always listen to those that have better understanding of issue and refrain from talking on subject you know nothing about so that you can gain. You lack knowledge of big business management and the oil industry, yet, you keep disagreeing with people that are out to enlighten you.
First, there is what is called midstream in oil business, and refining and other oil business processes constitute what you have in that segment of the business, and that is what dangote is into.
Second, Downstream majorly petroleum products marketing is the core business of Forte oil, while E&P and power generation are non-core business, just like E&P is Conoil producing (Adenugas' company) core oil business and Conoil Plc (Adenugas' petroleum products marketing company) is allied or non-core oil business.
Selling off Ghana unit is as a result of it not yielding profit which the article attributed to the Cedis devaluation and other business environmental factors in that country. You can't also rule out the fact that Ghana is a foreign environment to Forte to their performance in that country.
In conclusion, the strategy is to leverage their industry knowledge in Nigeria downstream sector, divest their stake in non-core business (upstream) and non yielding Ghana business, grow and expand their marketing business in Nigeria in anticipation for the dangote refinery. By so doing they will be the biggest by leveraging Otedolas' relationship with Aliko to have constant supply and be the biggest marketer of dangote petroleum products (mutual benefit/symbiotic relationship), because dangote would be the biggest producer while Otedola would be the biggest marketer.
I hope you can understand the logic in the Fortes' repositioning/strategy better now. So it's purely business strategy and nothing to do with being lacking in innovation. Fortes' share price that fell then was as a result of fall of crude oil price and it affected ALL, I REPEAT ALL OIL COMPANIES THE WORLD OVER, INCLUDING EXXONMOBIL, SHELL, CHEVRON, BP, CONOCO PHILLIPS, SOUDI ARAMCO, PETROCHINA, PETROBRAS to mention but just a few.
Cc: kjhova, BedLam

aminho:
JAGABAN BORGU ASIWAJU OF SOUTHWEST

Nope! he is ASIWAJU of the UNIVERSE

A PIECE OF YORUBA HISTORY. WILL IT REPEAT ITSELF IN LAGOS?

I’m yet to see a man that will keep quiet when his territory is been invaded with impunity.

AFONJA was a Yoruba man, and a General in the Oyo Army. He was made the Commanding Officer of Ilorin Outpost. He was an over ambitious man who wanted to be King at all cost and he knew there was no way he could defeat Alaafin of Oyo Army, and so he colluded with and gathered Fulani settlers under Mallam Alimi together to help him fight Alaafin of Oyo.

Yes the Fulanis helped him to defeat the Alafin’s Army but he was killed by the same Fulanis and never made king, thus the Yorubas never recovered their llorin from the Fulanis as they lost the prominent Yoruba town to Fulani Emirate, probably forever, through this senseless and treacherous act of a man who sold his birthright for a plate of porridge.

TODAY, LAGOS IS THE NEW ILORIN . JIMI AGBAJE IS THE NEW AFONJA, WHILE THE IGBOS ARE THE NEW FULANI. Now that Jimi Agbaje promises to make eze ndigbo equal in status with oba of Lagos, in exchange for their support for him to become governor, just as it happened to Afonja, what makes him think he can not be eliminated by conspiracy during his tenure for the lbo man to become the governor in Lagos?

i dont always comment on issues on nl but the level of discussion a times to drop some few lines. seeing people comment on the statement
made by fashola and claimingg generating both quantitative and qualitative power for Lagos is not possible really shows the level of thinking or should i say information at the disposal of our people. cus if we understand the law regulating power in Nigeria
most people here will say smtin different. the truth is dat power gencos nd discos are sold bt government is holdin on to d third critical component of the value chain which is transmission. in oda words if u like generate 100,000mw of power nd av capacity to distribute, without gud transmission u ar goin nowhere. nd if u generate as a state or coy beyond 10mw u av to send d excess to d national grid dat d transmission is nt ok thereby resultin to loss of power nd money to d generatin party instead of allowing d party dat generate to sell to people in her locality dat want ti buy d excess nd get money to generate more so dat d process ll continue till power gets better nd better. so dis is wat fashola is sayin, amend d law to allow people to generate nd sell so dat state nd company dat has capacity can do dat, get more power into d system .d recoup there money in d process. ask dangote y he is nt buildin more power plant in all his factories nd he ll tell u better on his experience in obajana. so my dear nairalanda, fashola is not sayin he WILL bt he CAN if d law allow Lagos to generate more nd sell directly to Lagosia.s without first snd to d grid which will transmit it ti where its less needed e.g. bukuru, umudi and ikole ekiti. ask me nd i belie he can with help of diff willin coys in lagos if d law allow nd stop protectin the present discos and gencos by wantin dem to first mk more dan enough at d expense of nigerians dat urgently nid power.

HAH:
We have entered the beginning of the end of democracy in Nigeria, courtesy of PDP

They are now singing consensus candidate everywhere next they will attempt to change constitution to remove term limit.

David Mark want to be senate president for the 3rd term too.

Indeed there was a country.

HAH:
We have entered the beginning of the end of democracy in Nigeria, courtesy of PDP

They are now singing consensus candidate everywhere next they will attempt to change constitution to remove term limit.

David Mark want to be senate president for the 3rd term too.

Indeed there was a country.

HAH:
We have entered the beginning of the end of democracy in Nigeria, courtesy of PDP

They are now singing consensus candidate everywhere next they will attempt to change constitution to remove term limit.

David Mark want to be senate president for the 3rd term too.

Indeed there was a country.

for ur information, david mark has constitutional right to be senate president for as may tym as he want cus Nigeria constitution place no term limit on legislatures.

Until Nigerian shun mediocrity nd vote meritocrity am sorry we ll just kip the motion without a movement thing. one step forward bt three steps backward. i wonder how we kip a lot of tins under d jurisdiction of presidency nd allow the individual product of such agency to b neutral as if they are chemical bt nt human that knws loyalty. human will always b human nd dats d rational behind gud structures to check human excesses bt without dat notin will hapn. we all shout about fighting corruption bt still concentrate power at d center, dsame tin dat intitutionalize corruptn in d first place. we want evry state to b viable nd look inward for sustainability still we dol out money to dem evry month wich is just a similitude of father givin his son assess to his multimillion company account bt still want such guy to b self sustaining. d earlier we followers change d better for nigeria cus as dey say pple deserve d kind of leader dey get nd its only a fool dat will kip doin tin dsame way bt ll b xpectin diff result. may GOD help us bt after we decided to first help our self.