Military Rule I

Fearing the Muslim Hausa-Fulani would never give up control of the government, Igbo military officers from the heavily Christian southeast staged a military coup (government take-over) in 1966. Nearly 30 members of the government, including Prime Minister Balewa, were murdered.

Almost immediately, Hausa-Fulani soldiers began to attack Igbo soldiers. This led to a second coup that violently replaced Igbo rule with northern Hausa-Fulani military officers. The Igbo southeast region refused to accept control of the federal government by the northerners.

Ethnic hatred kept boiling over as the new military regime’s soldiers began to massacre Igbos. The Igbos retaliated against northerners. The slaughters resulted in the death of about 8,000 soldiers and civilians. More than a million Igbos fled back to their homeland.

In May 1967, the Igbo southeast region seceded from Nigeria and declared itself the Republic of Biafra. The Nigerian military regime invaded Biafra and established a naval blockade to cut off imports of weapons and food.

The Nigerian Civil War lasted more than two years and killed about 1 million people, mostly Biafrans. More of them died from starvation than bullets. Nigeria’s blockade and superior military force finally crushed Biafra by early 1970.

Nigeria had a chance to start all over again in the 1970s. The military regime’s leader, Gen. Jack Gowon, successfully drew the Igbos back into the Nigerian federation. He also created Nigerian states in order to increase the political influence of the minorities and lessen that of the three dominant ethnic groups. Finally, he promised a return to civilian elected government.

In the 1970s, high world oil prices injected huge amounts of cash into Nigeria’s treasury. In fact, Nigeria became one of the richest countries in the world. But the military officers in charge of running the government turned out to be just as greedy for a cut of the oil money as elected politicians had been.

The oil revenue could have modernized Nigeria’s agriculture, developed its manufacturing, built roads and electricity grids, financed schools and colleges, and accomplished many other things for the Nigerian people. Some progress toward these goals did happen in the “golden ’70s.”

But Nigeria soon became what economists call a classic “rentier state.” These states usually depend on the world market price of a single valuable natural resource such as gold, diamonds, or oil. Rentier states often make the mistake of collecting and spending their unearned revenues on expensive imports rather than investing them in economic development and the welfare of their people. Nigeria made this mistake by neglecting manufacturing and food and cash crop agriculture. Thus, Nigeria became vulnerable to economic booms and busts, depending on the price of oil.

By 1975, money from oil leases and exports made up 80 percent of Nigeria’s total national income. Nigeria got used to importing luxuries like expensive cars, most of its other manufactured goods, and even food. The military regime created many government jobs and boosted wages to gain public support.

Many Nigerians abandoned farms for the high-paying government jobs in the cities. Food got more expensive. The country’s traditional export crops like coffee and rubber declined. Nigerians invested little in private enterprises. After all, the oil money kept rolling in without anybody really having to work for it.

In the late 1970s, however, world oil prices crashed. Nigeria suddenly found itself short of cash. It became a nation in debt. Unemployment kept rising.

The First Republic

On October 1, 1960, Great Britain declared Nigeria an independent nation with Abubakar Balewa, a northern Muslim, as head of state. The Nigerians established a federal republic with a parliamentary government modeled on Great Britain’s.

Many Nigerians believed their country would become the “giant of Africa.” Nigeria had a large population, experienced government administrators, and valuable natural resources such as oil. Nigeria looked destined to show other African countries the way to prosperity and democracy.

As the Nigerians took over from the British, however, the three major ethnic political parties competed to win control of the national wealth. Most of this wealth came from selling oil production leases to foreign companies. The Hausa-Fulani, Yoruba, and Igbo political leaders wanted the oil money to enrich themselves, their followers, and their regions. Thus, greed and corruption soon became common in Nigerian politics.

The ethnic party that won control of Nigeria’s parliament controlled the oil leases, the import trade licenses, government construction projects, and jobs. Even more important were the bribes that went along with them.

The first national election under the newly formed federal republic, took place in 1964. Desperate to win to get their hands on Nigeria’s considerable oil wealth, politicians used bribery, vote rigging, and even violence to win.

Election fraud led to months of political party conflict and deal making. In the end, the Northern People’s Congress Party, representing mostly Hausa-Fulani Muslims, held a slight majority of seats in the parliament. The majority chose Abubakar Balewa as prime minister. He appointed government officials mostly from his party.

Over the next two years, corruption reigned. With oil money flowing into the pockets of government officials and their friends, the ruling party ignored the needs of the Nigerian people.

Nigeria: After 50 Years, Still Struggling to Be a Democracy

When Nigeria became independent 50 years ago, it expected to lead Africa to prosperity and democracy. But ethnic and religious violence, rigged elections, military takeovers, and a greedy political class have drained the hopes of Nigerians.

Nigeria, Africa’s most populous nation, is composed of more than 250 ethnic groups, speaking many languages. Three ethnic groups, however, dominate this West African country.

Today the Hausa-Fulani, two peoples who merged in the 1800s, is the largest ethnic group, making up nearly 30 percent of Nigeria’s population. The Hausa-Fulani live mainly in the country’s north region. The Yoruba and Igbo with homelands in the southwest and southeast each make up about 20 percent of Nigeria’s people. The remaining 30 percent are members of small ethnic minorities.

People first inhabited the area surrounding the Niger River thousands of years ago. Over the centuries, kingdoms and empires rose and fell, usually as the result of warfare.

In the 1300s, Muslim preachers who followed caravan routes from North Africa began to convert the Hausa, Fulani, and to a lesser extent the Yoruba to Islam. Their kings, however, did not enforce a strict form of it.

Around 1790, a Muslim preacher led a jihad (holy war) to establish a purified form of Islam. The result was the Sokoto Caliphate, an Islamic religious empire ruled by a sultan from the northern city of Sokoto.

In the 1500s, the British, French, and Dutch arrived along the southern coastline of Nigeria to trade guns, manufactured goods, and liquor for slaves. (The slave trade ended in the 1860s.) By the mid-1800s, European and American Christian missionaries were making many converts, especially among the Igbo in the southeast. Christian preachers were not successful in the heavily Muslim north.

In the 1860s, Nigeria expanded its trade with Britain. The British bought Nigerian products such as palm oil (for candles and soap), rubber, coffee, cacao, and tin. Soon, British companies controlled the production and sale of these products. As the demand for them grew, Britain conquered additional areas of Nigeria, including the Muslim Sokoto Caliphate.

In 1885, the European powers divided Africa among themselves and drew boundaries for their colonies, including those for Nigeria that remain to this day. The Europeans drew colony boundaries that often split apart ethnic groups or combined those hostile to one another, as in Nigeria.

In 1914, Britain combined the areas under its control in Nigeria into one colony. The British adopted an indirect form of colonial government. This permitted the Hausa-Fulani Muslim political class in the north to continue to rule, but under British supervision. In this region, the Hausa language and culture along with Islam remained strong.

In the Yoruba and Igbo regions of the south, the British educated a select class of Nigerians (frequently Christian converts) to assist in administering the colony. The Yoruba and Igbo political classes accepted Christianity, adopted European ways, and learned English, which is the official language of Nigeria today.

After World War II, many of Europe’s colonies in Africa demanded independence. To prepare Nigeria for independence, Britain created a Nigerian federal state with a central government and governments for each of the three regions. The Hausa-Fulani, Yoruba, and Igbo each formed a political party in the region they dominated. This tended to emphasize the ethnic differences of the country rather than Nigerian nationhood.

A few years before independence, European companies discovered vast oil deposits in the Niger River Delta. This seemed to assure a bright future for Nigeria. But many things went awfully wrong.

HAUSA/FULANI POLITICIANS AND THE DESTRUCTION OF NIGERIA

Something drastic and urgent has to be done to curtail the activities of some few powerful Hausa/Fulani politicians causing loss of many non-Muslim lives and properties in the Northern region of Nigeria. It has been established beyond any controversy that some few powerful Hausa/Fulani politicians in the northern region of Nigeria are in the habit of inciting, sponsoring, paying and empowering Hausa/Fulani social urchins and miscreants in the northern region of Nigeria to kill non-Hausa/Fulani Christians and non-Muslims and destroy their properties in that region in retaliation for losing any major election.

"NIGERIA - Non-Muslims Targeted After Presidential Election
Violent protests broke out across Nigeria's Muslim northern region on April 18 after the overwhelming election victory of President Goodluck Jonathan, a Christian from the South. Angry crowds burned churches as well as homes and cars belonging to non-Hausa/Fulani (non-Muslim) residents. The homes of traditional Muslim leaders who supported non-Muslim political candidates were also targeted. More than 500 people have been killed and more than 150 churches burned. VOM workers in Nigeria are collecting reports on the destruction and assessing how to help. They are already responding to medical needs - meeting victims in hospitals, helping them get care and paying medical bills. The VOM team is also providing food and other relief to those who were displaced. "The church leaders in Nigeria did not know how to confront this massive destruction of churches and properties," wrote Isaac, a VOM worker. "Please join hands in praying for the church in Nigeria."

The assessment of the Nigerian situation following the Presidential election of April 18 by the Voice of Martyrs that "more than 500 people have been killed and more than 150 churches burned" was a very conservative estimate. According to Nigerian newspapers, the people killed were more than 1000. And not just churches were burnt, the homes of the Christians were burnt and they lost their properties worth millions of United States Dollars in the process. As a Christian, I believe in prayers but I do not think that the trend of killing non-Hausa/Fulani Christians living in the northern region by Hausa/Fulani Muslims will stop if we pray alone. I believe that the President of Nigeria has the constitutional responsibility, ability and opportunity to stop the trend in Nigeria. Let me back up for a moment. This is not the first time the lives of Christians and their properties have been destroyed up north by Hausa/Fulani social miscreants and urchins sponsored by very few and powerful Hausa/Fulani politicians to emphasize their relevance in the political process.

Shortly after President Obasanjo was sworn in as the President of Nigeria on May 29, 1999, Ahmed Sani, the Governor of Zamfara state in the Northern region of Nigeria set up the Sharia law system claiming that the Muslims in that state wanted the Sharia law. He also claimed that the Sharia law would apply to only Muslims. Under Sharia law, a person's leg was amputated for committing a petty theft and a person was stoned to death for committing adultery. Later the Sharia law was applied to Christians living in the North against their wishes and many Christians were maimed or killed for slight misconduct. Historically, Sharia law was essentially a body of law developed by Muslim clerics in some Islamic countries to govern the lives of Muslims. However, the Zamfara governor forced the Sharia law to apply to Christians living in that state against their wishes. They were maimed and killed for allegedly violating the Sharia law. The Nigerian Christians protested vehemently. In spite of their protest, other northern governors introduced the Sharia law to their states and apply that law to non-Muslims against their wishes. It was beyond dispute that the imposition of Sharia law on non-Muslims violated the fundamental rights of Nigerians to freedoms of religion, peaceful assembly, association and expression as enshrined in the 1999 constitution. When President Obasanjo pointed out the northern governors were violating the constitutional guarantees of freedoms of religion and assembly by imposing sharia law on non-muslims, the governors did not budge. They were ready to plunge the country into war and render the country ungovernable. Ironically, the northern governors were reported to have violated the Sharia law in their own personal lives without consequence. In order to avoid war and bloodshed, the then President left them alone and Christians continued to be killed for allegedly violating Sharia law. The Sharia law was not uniformly applied to people. Some powerful Muslim politicians who violated the sharia law by committing adultery were not stoned to death and were not even punished at all whereas ordinary people who did the same thing were stoned to death! The fact that the implementation of the Sharia law was a purely political move to control the incumbent southern Christian President Olusegun Obasanjo was brought to light when it suddenly died down when a northern Muslim called Musa Yaradua became the next President of Nigeria in 2007.

Why do male Muslims in the northern region of Nigeria kill Christians living in that region? Many people believe that they have been indoctrinated that they will be automatically admitted into the Muslim paradise called Alujona by Allah if they kill Christians regardless of the extent of their wrongdoings. Additionally, each murderer will be compensated in Alujona with 10 virgins or more virgins depending on who you speak with! It is very hard to reconcile this view with the fact that the Muslims in the southern part of Nigeria are peaceful and are not in the habit of killing Christians. Does it mean that southern Muslims and northern Muslims in Nigeria do not hold the same view about qualification for admission to alujona? I find this reason for killing Christians very untenable.

A better view is that many young Hausa/Fulani Muslims in the northern part of Nigeria are unemployed because many of them did not have formal education. They depend on the stipends and gifts from few rich Hausa/Fulani politicians for their livelihood. They feel that they have an obligation to render services to their benefactors even if they include committing heinous and horrendous crimes of mayhem, genocide and arson. The few powerful Hausa/Fulani politicians pay them a lot of money and give them ammunitions to kill Christians living in that region in order to become politically relevant. They expect the incumbent Christian President of Nigeria from the South to plead with them to maintain peace in the northern region and be rewarded with juicy political positions in the federal government and big contracts. It is difficult to track down the murderers because many law enforcement personnel in the northern region of Nigeria are Muslims and are also from the Hausa/Fulani tribe and many of the Christians being killed in that region are not from the Hausa/Fulani tribe but from the Southern region of Nigeria. Not a few people in Nigerian believe that majority of the Hausa/Fulani senior law enforcement personnel in northern region are compromised by the caballing Hausa/Fulani oligarchy by putting them on their payroll and offering them other incentives. The Hausa/Fulani oligarchy is not likely to be brought to book in the circumstances.

How do we stop the killing of non-Hausa/Fulani Christians living in the northern region of Nigeria? I must confess, there is no easy solution to the problem. Someone has suggested that Nigeria should break up into two. The northern region should be an independent country and the southern region should also be another. This is not a bad idea given the history of Nigeria and given the number of southern Nigerians who have been killed in the northern region just because they are not Muslims from October 1, 1960 when Nigeria became independent to date. I believe this view should be considered last if every other solution has failed.

Some people also suggest that the top law enforcement positions in the northern part of Nigeria should be headed by southern Nigerians and the top law enforcement positions in the southern part of Nigeria should be headed by northern Nigerians. It is doubtful whether or not the rank and files of the law enforcement who are predominantly from each region will cooperate with foreign top law enforcement officers in suppressing a riot or killing orchestrated by the criminals who are native to the each region.

Another solution that is being preferred is that the non-Muslims living in the northern region of Nigeria should be armed with weapons such as guns, grenades etc. so that they can defend themselves when Muslims social miscreants attack them. The jurisprudence of major legal systems of the world recognize killing in the act of self-defense as a valid defense to murder. But from the Scriptural point of view, is a Christian permitted to kill someone who wants to kill the Christian as an act of self-defense? In the Old Testament, the answer is unequivocally "yes". In the New Testament, the answers of Christians differ. Some think that a Christian cannot kill his/her assailant under any circumstances. They argue that Jesus said Christians should turn the other cheek and this means that we should not defend ourselves. They further said Jesus and the Apostles teach that we should not use evil to repay evil and that if our enemy is hungry we should feed him. Other Christians argue that it is okay for Christians to defend themselves because Jesus asked the 12 disciples at one point if they had swords. And when they said they did not have swords, he told them that they should go buy swords. What did he want them to do with the swords? Obviously swords are not for decoration. One Bible commentator said that Jesus told them to buy swords to warn potential armed robbers in the isolated wilderness roads that the disciples were armed and would defend themselves if necessary because the potential robbers would see the swords held by the disciples' belts. On a serious note, turning-the-other- cheek does not mean that we should do nothing and allow people to kill us or our loved ones without just cause especially when we can stop it. The audience of Jesus Christ then understood the idiomatic expression of Jesus Christ of turning-the-other cheek to mean that they were to take verbal insults without retaliating, not physical injury that could cause their death. Apostle Paul frequently used the instrumentality of the ancient Roman justice system to defend himself. "I appeal to Caesar" he said. I encourage non-Hausa/Fulani Christians and non-Muslims living in the northern region of Nigeria to acquire guns and other weapons legally, take classes on the use of guns and the other weapons and let the potential Hausa/Fulani social miscreants and urchins know that they have weapons and that they will use them to defend themselves, their families and dwelling homes if need be.

I think that the best solution for now is for the Federal Government of Nigeria to gather intelligence on the few powerful Hausa/Fulani politicians responsible for the mass killing of non-Hausa/Fulani Christians in the northern region of Nigeria. Once their identities have been discovered, they should be publicly tried in a court of law and maximum punishment should be imposed on them to serve as deterrent to others. We have to demonstrate to these few bad politicians that Nigeria is greater than any individual or group of individuals no matter how highly placed. A situation where a Nigerian cannot live anywhere he/she wants or practice any religion he/she chooses in Nigeria without fear, intimidation and victimization is totally unacceptable and must be corrected by President Goodluck Jonathan of Nigeria. After all, the President swore to uphold and defend the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Article V of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria guarantees to every Nigeria the right to life, right to dignity of human persons, right to privacy and family life, right to freedom of expression and the press, right to peaceful assembly and association, right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, right to freedom of movement, among others.

http://nigeriaworld.com/articles/2011/may/062.html

Slaves to the Fulani system open your eye size nothing

Violence is only a means to settle a difference that cannot be settled amicably.

Read my thread you will know why.

The Yoruba's the lapdogs of the Fulani's

This is a struggle to free us from the Fulani Feudal system.

APC= Arewa Peoples Congress now you know what you are doing do you want to go back to the dark ages.

Tinubu the Akintola of our time

Are you scared of the truth open your eyes APC= Arewa Peoples Congress

Wily wily nice one

APC= Arewa Peoples Congress how it that progressive when they want to enslave you and your family.

I want to refresh your memory that on the 5th of October 2010, a Fulani Lawal Kaita former governor of old Kaduna State said this, "Anything short of a Northern president is tantamount to stealing our Presidency, Jonathan has to go and he will go (emphasis). Even if he uses the incumbency power to get his nomination on the platform of the PDP, he will be frustrated out (emphasis). The North is determined if that happens to make the country ungovernable for President Goodluck Jonathan or any other Southerner who finds his way to the seat of power of the platform of the PDP against the principles of the party's owning policy". Today, insurgent groups to the furtherance to this clarion call from the feudal Fulani occupiers of our land have wrecked havoc, they are attacking barracks and seizing weapons. Their foot soldiers in the army are planning a Coup (because at the top, they can not plan a Coup), and Goodluck Jonathan is just sitting and watching and we will not sit and watch! For every action, there'll be any equal and opposite reaction, and it'll be disproportionate. And nobody arrested this fellow, this invader from Fouta Djallon, Lawal Kaita, nobody arrested him, he's walking free.

After that, another Fulani who had used our money to over throw a democratically elected government. A corrupt Fulani, General Muhammadu Buhari, very corrupt, highly corrupt, rotten! Made this statement 15th May 2012, "God willing by 2015, something will happen (emphasis). They either conduct a free and fair election or they go a disgraceful way. If what happened in 2011 should happen again in 2015, by the grace of God, the Dog and the Baboon will all be soaked in blood. He was never arrested. This man, in all civilised countries. (digresses) In Chile, General Pinochet is being tried, there is a call for his extradition, former military leaders are being tried in Pakistan (Musharraf). It is only here (Nigeria) that these things are not happening. That a man who overthrows a legitimate government, continues to threaten us with blood and nothing has happened. Who is this criminal who took our guns and our resources to plan and overthrow a legitimate government without any reason what so ever. And introduced retroactive laws that led to the death of citizens, nothing has happened.

To crown it all, another Fulani invader of our home land continued, one Farouk Adamu Aliyu (Jigawa CPC Governorship candidate), "Let me also use this opportunity to say on the behalf of us in the north that nobody has monopoly over violence". We thank God that they don'y have because we are going to give them surplus violence. That "On behalf of the people of Northern Nigeria, there shall be no more Nigeria if a Northerner is not elected President".

I want to refresh your memory that on the 5th of October 2010, a Fulani Lawal Kaita former governor of old Kaduna State said this, "Anything short of a Northern president is tantamount to stealing our Presidency.

Big Word our Presidency.

The hausa fulani has infiltrated our system.

The Nigerian Police,Our military Forces,Government Parastatals,and many more we must get rid of this cancer.

A Bill Sponsored By Fulani you see

A Bill already gazetted by the House of Representatives and exclusively obtained by Sunday Mirror is in the works, to make the procedure for impeaching President and Vice-President less tedious and easier.

The Bill is short-titled “An Act to Alter the Provisions of Section 143 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 to Remove Ambiguities in the Process of Removal of the President and the Vice President from Office on Allegations of Gross Misconduct.”

The Bill is being sponsored by Hon. Yakubu Dogara (PDP-Bauchi) and two others. Dogara, an international lawyer and Chairman of the Committee on House Services, also seeks to make the lower Chamber the impeaching House, while the Senate would after the President or his Deputy’s impeachment, set up a quasi-judicial panel presided over by the Chief Justice of Nigeria and comprising lawmakers acting as prosecutors, before a final verdict either nails or exonerates the President or a V-P.

The Bill states in part: “The President or Vice-President shall be removed from office on allegations of gross misconduct in accordance with the provisions of this section.”

The Bill seeks to amend sub-section 2 of 143 to read that, “Whenever the Committee of the House of Representatives in charge of Judiciary decides on whether or not to proceed with impeachment proceedings against the holder of the office of the President or Vice President on allegations of gross misconduct.

According to the Bill, “the Chairman of the Committee on Judiciary of the House of Representatives shall propose a motion to begin an inquiry into such allegations of gross misconduct, and if the motion is passed by a simple majority of the House, the Committee shall be mandated to carry out an inquiry into the allegations.”

The Bill further proposes that “The committee on Judiciary upon conclusion of such an inquiry shall present its findings to the whole House, stating that impeachment is warranted encompassed in Articles of Impeachment, or that impeachment is not called for”.

The House also seeks to see the process through, in line with rules drawn by its Committee on Business and Rules and to sack the President and his Vice by a simple majority. “If any Article of Impeachment so considered by the House of Representatives is approved or passed by a simple majority vote of members been present and voting, the President or Vice-President shall be impeached”.

The Bill adds that “Upon the impeachment of the holder of the office by the House of Representatives, the Speaker shall within 7 days transmit the House Resolution to the Senate for Trial”, and also “The Shall within fourteen days of the receipt of the House Resolution conduct a trial to be presided over by the Chief Justice of Nigeria, with a select Committee of the House of the House members serving as prosecutors.

The Bill in part, however proposes that the impeached Executive “shall have the right to defend himself in person and be represented before the Senate by Legal Practitioners of his choice”.

The Senate, on its part would vote after the trial process is exhausted by a 2/3 to oust the President or his vice. One of the drafters of the piece of legislation who spoke with Sunday Mirror at the weekend, said the Bill was made in line with the procedure for impeachment of the Executive in the United States of America. He said “The idea is to make impeaching the President easier and more democratic.”

He added, “The Bill though is not targetted at any particular person, the present times call for an easier process of impeachment”.

Free yourself from this mentality that it is only a fulani man that can lead this country you all have been brainwashed.Ask yourselves which people have been fighting this government and which people have been more vocal and who are they using.

Tinubu the Akintola of our time

APC = Arewa Peoples Congress

Free yourself from this mentality that it is only a fulani man that can lead this country you all have been brainwashed.Ask yourselves which people have been fighting this government and which people have been more vocal and who are they using.

Tinubu the Akintola of our time

APC = Arewa Peoples Congress

Now you know go read my thread it will blow your mind.

The problem of this country is the Fulani they believe it is there right and this country nigeria is there father's property and we are visitors.

It would be recalled that the Fulani embarked on ethnic cleansing of the Jukun ethnic nationality in Taraba State in the 1990s. The Fulani are vociferously claiming the ownership of Idi-Araba and yelled “barao, barao, barao” meaning “thief, thief, thief” on the then Governor of Lagos State, Bola Tinubu in his own State. The Fulani started war on traditionalists in Shagamu in Ogun State over the celebration of Oro Festival. The Fulani have tried to reduce the Tiv’s population by extermination during the First Republic. The Fulani have tried to emasculate the Katafs in Kaduna before. The Fulani tried to cleanse Zakibiam of non-Fulani blood. The Fulani have been killing owners of the land in Iseyin and Shaki in Oyo State. Media reports noted that scores of owners of the lands in Oyo were left “dead, maimed or Molested.” The Fulani are determined to wipe out the Birom people of Plateau from their ancestral lands. The Fulani has just recently killed a policeman in Ekiti State after wounding the owners of the land. The Fulani has an Emir of Ilorin, a Yoruba town. The Fulani is determined to have an Emir of Jos and possibly Enugu too, very soon

Share this page let the world know and let them know we know them.

The real (APC) Arewa Peoples Congress now you know your new political party.You have been freed but you want to go back to bondage.

Tinubu the new Akintola selling the Yoruba race for a bowl of porridge.

The real (APC) Arewa Peoples Congress now you know your new political party.You have been freed but you want to go back to bondage.

Tinubu the new Akintola selling the yoruba race for a bowl of porridge.

The real (APC) Arewa Peoples Congress now you know your new political party.You have been freed but you want to go back to prison.

Tinubu the new Akintola selling the yoruba race for a bowl of porridge.

APC Arewa Peoples Congress now you know your new political party.

APC Arewa Peoples Congress now you know

APC Arewa Peoples Congress now you know

You all have been told read and understand what is happening.

The true meaning of APC (Arewa People's Congress) (APC)

He will smile and say that is my boy.

The truth shall set you free.

The true meaning of APC (Arewa People's Congress) (APC)

The true meaning of APC (Arewa People's Congress) (APC)