2 days to go

because asking him what he does for a living might make you look like a gold digger

hmm

Tajbol4splend:
Fallacy of hasty generalisation and hasty conclusion

you know what 80% (my stats) of people won't find out what this means and at the end what you say doesn't mean a thing

Tajbol4splend:
Fallacy of hasty generalisation and hasty conclusion

meaning what?

all I'm saying is, try to know the guy firs before asking him what he does for a living

Most men who talk to you, no matter who they are and where it is, have two intentions:

1.They want to have sex with you and are attracted to you physically.

2.They would like to know more about you as a person and might see you as a potential long term partner.

The second happens almost all the time. Many guys are secretly romantic saps waiting on the right girl. However, even if a girl fails that test, we would still like to have sex with you. It’s in our nature. You might not notice the subtle things a guy does to make sure you’re relationship material, but they’re still there. For me, there is one seemingly innocent phrase that alters my perception of you completely. Not in its context, but in its timing, because if you say this at the wrong time, you are completely disqualified from being girlfriend material. What’s this phrase?

AND WHAT DO YOU DO?

Yes, that seemingly innocent phrase has led to more confused women. And it’s not a bad phrase in and of itself, because after all, it’s important to know what your potential partner spends a lot of their time doing. But timing is key here.

And if you say this magic phrase before you find out a guy’s name or immediately after, he will likely think that you’re one of those girls: spoiled, likes gifts, broke and will probably leave him when times are hard. I can go on.

So ladies, if you want to know what a guy does, just wait and he’ll probably tell you. Or at least ask waaaaaay after finding out his name.

diegwu01:
https://www.premiumtimesng.com/regional/nnorth-east/245010-army-chief-commissions-human-rights-office-maiduguri.html?utm_source=&utm_medium=twitter

Channel your grievances to this New Human Rights Office Commissioned by Buratai in Maiduguri

this is in maiduguri.

LifeofAirforce:


Work Hard smart bro

ok

shouts out to hungryboy

go for double chance or goal goal

LifeofAirforce:
Broke boys and girls topics flying everywhere like Aeroplane


Seems the population of broke people on this forum is Much higher than the few who could afford Moet with no stress.

life is not fair.

1. They make up for what they lack.

My personal theory is simply that, "broke" men are better in bed because they feel the need to overcompensate for their lack there-of.
If a man makes a lower income than other men he thinks might pursue her, he is going to want to show her that he has some impressive skills in the bedroom. But I would call that working with what you've got, not overcompensating.They're more likely to be more focused on quality of life than a lifeof luxury — and that quality of life probably includes great, frequent sex."

2. They're Less stressed about Work

men who bring in less money than their wives have "hot" or "very good"sex lives,in comparison to their higher earning counterparts. Why? They have less to stress about when it comes to work. most of them their marriages or relationship is satisfactory, I'm not saying people should quit their jobs to improve their sex lives but this is what happens...

They're Less Likely To Cheat

one of the biggest turn-ons in bed is confidently knowing that your guy only has eyes (and hands and other things) for you.
if your male partner has excess money he's going to cheat on you. you won't be his sweet heart that he always comes back to. So less money means more commitment.

4. They Not Easily Annoying or Annoyed

Yes, we know this one. There's this pride that comes with money that some women hate so much, it's degrading. you can go out and come back home in peace, I don't know what else to add but the broke guys aren't annoying.

conclusion

Don't be so quick to write someone off. even if he isn't buying you the things you need because he doesn't have he's compensating on other things.

konoplyanka:


Yes. But why can't buhari forgive him because they are fellow Muslims and Fulani? Why hasn't northern Fulani Muslim elders prevail on buhari to free him?

he's an old man and his mind is set.

tdarkside Julian assange said it on Twitter

Nnamdi kanu's Lawyer has a case against Federal government.

https://www.nairaland.com/4097956/nigerias-military-crimes-against-south

Nnamdi kanu's Lawyer has a case against Federal government.

https://www.nairaland.com/4097956/nigerias-military-crimes-against-south

Nnamdi kanu's Lawyer has a case against Federal government.

https://www.nairaland.com/4097956/nigerias-military-crimes-against-south

konoplyanka:
The same Nigerians accused obasanjo of witch hunting him. When buhari arrested daskuki, they forgot he is Fulani and Muslim and said it was a vendetta. If Baru is sacked and prosecuted now. Y'all would find another twist to it.

dansuki arrested buhari during the coup.

Nnamdi kanu's Lawyer has a case against Federal government.

https://www.nairaland.com/4097956/nigerias-military-crimes-against-south

richeeyo:
I THOUGHT IPOB WAS READY FOR WAR
MILITARY JUST PLAY PASS YOUR AREA UNA THEY COMPLAIN

guy answer me

richeeyo:
I THOUGHT IPOB WAS READY FOR WAR
MILITARY JUST PLAY PASS YOUR AREA UNA THEY COMPLAIN

when did IPOB tell you something like that, what news do you listen to?

please be serious.

In international human rights law, a forced disappearance(or enforced disappearance) occurs when a person is secretly abducted or imprisoned by a state or political organization or by a third party with the authorization, support, or acquiescence of a state or political organization, followed by a refusal to acknowledge the person's fate and whereabouts, with the intent of placing the victim outside the protection of the law.

According to theRome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which came into force on 1 July 2002, when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed at any civilian population, a "forced disappearance" qualifies as acrime against humanityand, thus, is not subject to astatute of limitations. On 20 December 2006, theUnited Nations General Assemblyadopted theInternational Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance.

Often, forced disappearance implies murder. The victim in such a case isabducted, illegallydetainedand often tortured during interrogation, and killed, with the body hidden. Typically, a murder will be surreptitious, with the corpse disposed of to escape discovery so that the person apparently vanishes. The party committing the murder hasplausible deniability, as nobody can provide evidence of the victim's death.

"Disappearing" political rivals is also a way for regimes to engender feelings of complicity in populations. The difficulty of publicly fighting a government that murders in secret can result in widespread pretense that everything is normal, as it did in the dirty War in Argentina.

Human rights law

In international human rights law, disappearances at the hands of the state have been codified as "enforced" or"forced disappearances" since the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action. For example, the Rome Statute establishing the international Criminal Court defines enforced disappearance as a crime against humanity, and the practice is specifically addressed by the OAS's inter american Convention on Forced Disappearance of Persons. There is also some authority indicating that enforced disappearances occurring during armed conflict, such as the Third Reich's Night and Fog program, may constitute war crimes.

In February 1980 the United Nations established the working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances, "the first United Nations human rights thematic mechanism to be established with a universal mandate." Its main task "is to assist families in determining the fate or whereabouts of their family members who are reportedly disappeared." In August 2014, the Working Group reported 43,250 unresolved cases of disappearances in 88 different States.

The international Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, adopted by the UN General Assembly on 20 December 2006, also states that the widespread or systematic practice of enforced disappearances constitutes a crime against humanity. It gives victim's families the right to seek reparations, and to demand the truth about the disappearance of their loved ones. The Convention provides for the right not to be subjected to enforced disappearance, as well as the right for the relatives of the disappeared person to know the truth. The Convention contains several provisions concerning prevention, investigation and sanctioning of this crime, as well as the rights of victims and their relatives, and the wrongful removal of children born during their captivity. The Convention further sets forth the obligation of international co-operation, both in the suppression of the practice, and in dealing with humanitarian aspects related to the crime. The Convention establishes a Committee on Enforced Disappearances, which will be charged with important and innovative functions of monitoring and protection at international level. Currently, an international campaign of the international Coalition against Enforced Disappearances is working towards universal ratification of the Convention.

Disappearances work on two levels: not only do they silence opponents and critics who have disappeared, but they also create uncertainty and fear in the wider community, silencing others who would oppose and criticise. Disappearances entail the violation of many fundamental human rights. For the disappeared person, these include the right to liberty, the right to personal security and humane treatment (including freedom from torture), the right to a fair trial, to legal counsel and to equal protection under the law, and the right of presumption of innocence among others. Their families, who often spend the rest of their lives searching for information on the disappeared, are also victims.

[b]Where is Nnamdi Kanu?[\b]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_disappearance?_e_pi_=7%2CPAGE_ID10%2C3793223858

Who ever is using these tactics against the IPOB members or people from the south East Is an old man whose committing an international crime and doesn't know it has been outlawed by the UN.

6 Days ago Bruce Fein wrote this

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_59cd2b79e4b0149549227e1e

amnesty international has also reported about the kidnappings and killings of the Nigerian Government

http://saharareporters.com/2017/08/30/nigerian-government-forcibly-kidnap-hundreds-instill-fear-among-populace-says-amnesty

a couple of months back a governor said this about the Nigerian military police

http://dailypost.ng/2017/09/13/police-operatives-responsible-kidnapping-armed-robbery-rivers-wike/

the Nigerian government has killed & buried so many people in the south east but the most prominent is Nnamdi kanu and his family and if they don't provide him on October 17th the world will ask them.

the political frogs are people who jump from one party to another when they know their political dreams can no longer be achieved in the party that they belong to.

These people’s representatives no longer consider themselves as servants of the people as they claimed to be when seeking to be elected but have become a super class having acquired money, power and status by the sheer virtue of being elected. Their motto is power for powers sake and wants the existing system to thrive.

The political system has deteriorated so much today that it is hard to identify to which political party or which polarized group of the party a representative may belong to. So much that we will have to refer to them as leaping frogs. Because some of them have changed camps that even committed political watchers would find it hard to say which side they are on the talk like PDP but act like APC and vice versa.

political stability in such circumstances become impossible because This amphibious habit of leaping from tree to tree and land to water got to be halted. That cannot be done by reformation of the system of elections alone.

I am not against frogging if I may call it so, but I believe that every member of the upper and lower chamber or of every political party position should at least quit their positions before jumping to another party. without that it suggests that you're laughing at the people who voted you there in the first place.

As the Election year comes up, we will begin to see the frogs jumping from one party to another because they don't want to miss the opportunity that 2019 presents to them, but they forget that at the end we the people will have to vote for or against them.

We have seen ministers and Senators in former PDP government telling us to join APC we have seen people who enjoyed PDP coming out to publicly condemn PDP all this so they can join the ruling party APC.
The Truth is that the APC likes that because it makes them look relevant in their irrelevance.

Let us look out for the political frogs and deny them our votes. They don't deserve it.

A list should be made DEFECTION LIST to show who defected from party to party. This people don't deserve to take that sit.

women who work should tell us.


is it all about satisfying your boss at the office by meeting targets or is it all about your family.

kimbraa:
Op, you wrote so much for a woman being morally upright but what about the men?.

for a woman it's a choice but for a man it's hard work, it's a choice for a woman to decide to sleep with any man but for a man it's not a decision he has to put in the work to be accepted by the woman.

IAMSASHY:
Sixth to comment

thanks

yes

fifth to comment

should a lady work 40 hours a week, then come back and do the cleaning and cooking?
and take care of the kids.

won't it be better she stay at home and make sure her kids get DECENT education?

so if the husband is a bread winner the least she can do is to prepare it.

replacing men with women in jobs is going to destroy the family. men will no longer want to marry due to no money and it is on record that a woman will never raise a guy up from poverty like men do to ladies and will be avoided by men in marriage due to her high status.

IAMSASHY:
Op, I understand where u ar heading bt considering d situation of things rite now, it's risky 4 d man alone 2 financially run d family, Wat if he loses his job? Women hate to hear any sentence dat has "I lost my job" in it. Dnt place ur family on such risk. If u dnt wnt her work, instead of staying idle, u cn open a business 4 her, put sales person dere 2,so she wl b able to jst check up on d shop and stl run d family affairs

Women should only work if they "want" to and not because they "have" to. Women were not designed to deal withthe stress of demanding jobs. Women are designed tobe caretakers of the home, the reason why we have unmarried women today is because of "demanding" jobs