Oga, stop misleading people, only one of them looks sweet.

Learn to say things as they are without fear like the Ajeku Iya noje master!

elantraceey:
You want to marry someone that insults and shouts at you?


I just wonder what she'll do after marriage .

you sound like you are already falling for the poster.

I guess you want his girl friend to become his ex so you can take over.

There is God ooooooo..

Forgive and marry her ma guy!

You should do this if you truly love her in the first place. That is what love is all about, forgiveness!

Flipping through a guys phone..

I guess they secretly shared the gold plated customised phones this time. #Shame

Surely, pride will not let 95% of Nigerian ladies to do that. Get back to the basis; humble yourselves and be exalted in dues time! #Word

Shameless Post..

Thanks, don't mention.... I just thought about this one. I hope NO nairalander has ever got this response!

No problem..

I don't believe this letter; it is not coming from Iyabo Obasanjo. This is Fake!! Mark my words.....

Run!! and again I say Run!!! Before he will beat life out of you in marriage.. You thought marriage is child's play abi? Don't consciously dig your grave by yourself because or so called "Love" and "Material Things".

Happy Birthday Dude!! This guy get mind sha...

Dahslim: Not in my own case!

Me too!!

Our very own Vicent Eyeama has kept 11 clean sheets for Lille. This is a good sign for 2014 world cup in Brazil...


Enyeama keeps 11th consecutive clean sheet as Lille snatch win over Marseille

The Nigerian goalkeeper has now gone more than 1,000 minutes without conceding in Ligue 1 as Nolan Roux netted an injury-time winner to move his side within a point of PSG

See link below;

http://www.goal.com/en-gb/match/109303/lille-osc-vs-olympique-de-marseille/report

We do not use clean water (distilled water) to bath and moreover there's bacteria in the water! So the towel will have to be dirty coming in contact with our body which isn't properly clean after the bath.. Next topic please! Moderator, this time, bring up something more interesting...

To be honest, non of them wore it better...

He wasn't just patient to wait for the report from the united nations investigators.. Even Obama is not sure as at now if to go ahead or not

LONDON — Invoking the specter of the Iraq war, British lawmakers on Thursday rejected military action in Syria, dealing a stunning blow to Prime Minister David Cameron and effectively ruling Washington’s staunchest military ally out of any U.S.-led strike.

After a marathon eight-hour debate, Cameron lost a vote that was initially seen as a symbolic motion setting up a final vote in the days ahead authorizing force against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime for allegedly using chemical weapons. But the surprise loss of even the weaker piece of legislation — by a vote of 285 to 272, including a group of rebels from Cameron’s Conservative Party in opposition — appeared to cost the United States its centerpiece ally in a still-forming coalition. The rejection additionally signaled what analysts called the biggest rupture in the U.S.-British “special relationship” since the 1982 Falklands war.

Technically, Cameron could still authorize military strikes over the objection of Parliament, but top government officials — including the prime minister himself — indicated that was not an option following Thursday’s defeat.

“It is clear to me that the British Parliament, reflecting the views of the British people, does not want to see British military action,” Cameron said after losing the vote. “I get that, and the government will act accordingly.”

The rejection — which dealt Cameron the most powerful setback of his premiership and came as one lawmaker shouted “resign” as the vote was read out — amounted to an extraordinary turn of events in Britain. Only two days ago, this nation appeared ready to fast-track a plan to join a U.S.-led coalition.

But over the past 24 hours, Cameron, a hawk on Syria who has long argued for a tougher response, has encountered a level of domestic political resistance that caught his government off guard. It suggested the extent of the damage done here from the faulty intelligence and mission creep that steered British troops into Iraq a decade ago.

During the debate in the House of Commons, Cameron confronted an avalanche of skepticism. In his impassioned call for action, the prime minister defended President Obama and U.S. humanitarian motives in Syria, while also acknowledging that Britons — who polls show are overwhelmingly opposed to military intervention — were understandably gun-shy after the mishaps in the run-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

“The well of public opinion has been well and truly poisoned by the Iraq episode,” Cameron said.

The door, observers said, could be open to indirect military cooperation, including intelligence sharing. But any direct military involvement — such as British missiles being launched into Syria — now appeared largely out of question.

The reluctance to back a possible U.S.-led mission, analysts said, marked a rare and major jolt to U.S.-British relations, the strategic pillar of transatlantic policy for decades that has seen Washington and London forge one of the closest military.

“To not support the U.S. would be very damaging to the U.K., damaging to our relationship with the U.S. and to our global standing,” said Richard Kemp, the former commander of British forces in Afghanistan. “Britain would be diminished if we didn’t fight.”

Cameron repeatedly sought to reassure skeptical lawmakers that he was not contemplating another Iraq. “It is not about taking sides in the Syrian conflict, it is not about invading, it is not about regime change, and it is not even about working more closely with the opposition,” Cameron said. “It is about the large-scale use of chemical weapons and our response to a war crime — nothing else.”

His government sought to back up the argument for action by releasing a brief intelligence assessment of the Aug. 21 incident near Damascus, as well as a document offering legal backing for action. Bowing to earlier demands from the opposition Labor Party, he had pledged Britain would take no action until the United Nations had reviewed a report from weapons inspectors, who are in Syria examining the sites of an alleged chemical attack last week that left hundreds dead.

While Cameron conceded there was no “smoking piece of intelligence,” he argued reasonable assessments indicated that the Assad government was responsible for the deadly attack. The West, he said, had an obligation to deter a possible repeat of “one of the most abhorrent uses of chemical weapons in a century” — an apparent reference to a 1988 incident in Iraq when Saddam Hussein ordered a poison gas attack in the Kurdish town of Halabja that killed thousands of people.

Yet skeptical lawmakers repeatedly cautioned that the strikes could end up aiding al-Qaeda-backed elements within the Syrian opposition and could escalate violence while failing to deter a repeat of chemical weapons use. Many labeled the government’s intelligence inadequate and insisted that despite Cameron’s promises, Britain could be dragged into a protracted military operation.

“Those of us who were here in 2003, at the time of the Iraq war, felt they had their fingers burnt,” said Richard Ottaway, a conservative member of Parliament.

Other lawmakers, meanwhile, had sought to dispel the ghost of Iraq. “This is not Iraq, we are not putting boots on the ground and we are not invading,” longtime lawmaker Paddy Ashdown argued during a separate debate in the House of Lords on Thursday. “And above all, this is not George W. Bush. It’s Obama.”

Cameron was particularly at loggerheads with the opposition Labor Party leader, Edward Miliband, who had deepened his resistance to military strikes during the past 24 hours. In an oddly halting performance in Parliament on Thursday, he did not rule out supporting military action, but he called for “a calm and measured” analysis.

“I do not believe we should be rushed to judgment on this issue based on a political timetable set elsewhere,” he said in a clear reference to Washington.

The government first sensed major trouble after several hours of debate, following an announcement by Miliband that Labor lawmakers would vote against Syria action — marking the first time in nearly five decades that a British opposition party has rejected a government motion for military intervention.

The true depth of his opposition, however, had remained unclear, with some analysts predicting he was merely staking out a political position against a preliminary motion for action that would be reversed after U.N. weapons inspectors produced a report in the coming days. Yet the additional defection of lawmakers from the ruling coalition of Conservatives and Liberal Democrats away from the government motion ultimately doomed Cameron.

On Thursday, Miliband, however, had made one thing clear from the beginning.

“We have got to learn the lessons of Iraq,” he said in Parliament.

Diamond ko, copper ni.... She is simply shameless with no decent manners.

"Daurawa said Christians in the state will now be allowed to participate in the exercise to disengage them from prostitution." This is nonsense!

[url][/url]http://news.sky.com/story/1127962/china-mountain-villa-on-tower-block-must-go

About six years ago Zhang Biqing, said to be an ex-army medic, started his grand project to cover the rooftop of the 26-storey Beijing building with fake rocks, real greenery and even a swimming pool.

But residents have expressed their anger at the penthouse, which has no permission or licence to be there.

Mr Zhang, who became famous after inventing a system of Chinese acupuncture treatment, managed to carry out the building work despite years of constant complaints.

The project has allegedly caused water leaks and structural damage to the flats downstairs.
One family who lives at the opposite building told Sky News that the work was hugely intrusive.

They said it was loud and very bright and it meant they could not open their curtains at night.

"It was not only the construction work that carried on at night but also the camera at the top that seemed to be working and recording all the time - we don't have any privacy," the woman, who did not want to be named, told Sky News.

"I heard the swimming pool has caused floods to downstairs flats a few times; those poor families."

Local shopkeepers and security guards suggested bribes had possibly exchanged hands, claiming there were close connections between Mr Zhang and the compound's management, who turned a blind eye to the project.

Chinese officials have given Mr Zhang 15 days to vacate the residence in the city's west district of Haidian - but they face a major issue.

"The only thing now for us is that we can't find the owner," said the Beijing City Enforcement Bureau's Chen Yu told reporters.

"We have issued a lot of summonses, but he never came to us to be investigated."

But local media managed to find Mr Zhang, who told them he had to keep the villa to accommodate "famous people coming to stay and sing".

"I live here, so I'm not worried about the complaints," Mr Zhang said.

Guys see the above link and pix below

[url][/url]http://news.sky.com/story/1127962/china-mountain-villa-on-tower-block-must-go

About six years ago Zhang Biqing, said to be an ex-army medic, started his grand project to cover the rooftop of the 26-storey Beijing building with fake rocks, real greenery and even a swimming pool.

But residents have expressed their anger at the penthouse, which has no permission or licence to be there.

Mr Zhang, who became famous after inventing a system of Chinese acupuncture treatment, managed to carry out the building work despite years of constant complaints.

The project has allegedly caused water leaks and structural damage to the flats downstairs.
One family who lives at the opposite building told Sky News that the work was hugely intrusive.

They said it was loud and very bright and it meant they could not open their curtains at night.

"It was not only the construction work that carried on at night but also the camera at the top that seemed to be working and recording all the time - we don't have any privacy," the woman, who did not want to be named, told Sky News.

"I heard the swimming pool has caused floods to downstairs flats a few times; those poor families."

Local shopkeepers and security guards suggested bribes had possibly exchanged hands, claiming there were close connections between Mr Zhang and the compound's management, who turned a blind eye to the project.

Chinese officials have given Mr Zhang 15 days to vacate the residence in the city's west district of Haidian - but they face a major issue.

"The only thing now for us is that we can't find the owner," said the Beijing City Enforcement Bureau's Chen Yu told reporters.

"We have issued a lot of summonses, but he never came to us to be investigated."

But local media managed to find Mr Zhang, who told them he had to keep the villa to accommodate "famous people coming to stay and sing".

"I live here, so I'm not worried about the complaints," Mr Zhang said.

Guys see the above link and pix below

One day the bush meat go catch the hunter... Be warned!

Hi All,

I just found this on google this morning; this is the route from Lagos to London for anyone interested in going for the so called "Greener pastures". All the best in your journey....

http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en&tab=il

Naso!

ifeness:

Another christian not happy to see the bible lies being exposed.

Young man watch your statement, else you will incur the wrath of God. You should be ashame of urself in making such comments.

This thread is pointless; it is completely baseless. Mr moderator I'm not sure the essence of this forum is to create topics to give some idiots the opportunity to ridicule people's religion and faith. There is no reason why this thread should make the front page! Please remove ASAP and let us concentrate on more important topics..

Just wondering if i could find out what people opinion are on dating a virgin at 30, especially when you are not 100% sure of getting married. Personally I feel it is not right to start up anything at all, until you have a conviction that the road will lead to the alter, else there is no need wasting her time at this point in her life.

The big question is if you like a virgin at 30, but not sure what the future hold, should you start up a relation hoping it will work out positive or just pull out in the middle of intimacy when things are not as you expect?

This is creativity mixed with a bit of stupidity. I guess there are other materials that can be used for such to make people admire ur work, and not "Ghana must go" hehehehe....

There is no two ways about this, the child is completely possessed.