N780k.


Can I get the VIN?

KeenMind:
I see a low scoring tie.

0-1 in favor of Barcelona if Chelsea docks a ship in front of goal or 1-1 if Morata and Hazard get their shooting boots laced today.

By the way, I'm not comfortable with Rudiger at the back. On second thought, he's better than calamitous Cahill so a case of half bread.

And 1-1 it ended.

Really open play from Chelsea. Should've bagged this one.

EazyMoh:

What makes you say that?
Mind you it's not that people don't get married nowadays, it's just the divorce rate that is rampant. Also there are still perks attached to being married that even gays are not content with just being living with their partners, but they want be recognized as being legally married.

Why do you think divorce rate is rising?

What are these perks attached to marriage that single folks are not getting and desire?

I see a low scoring tie.

0-1 in favor of Barcelona if Chelsea docks a ship in front of goal or 1-1 if Morata and Hazard get their shooting boots laced today.

By the way, I'm not comfortable with Rudiger at the back. On second thought, he's better than calamitous Cahill so a case of half bread.

dragon2:



Making society a better place is more important than making either gender happier. Artificial insemination is a danger to marriage and the family life on the whole.Remember,the family is the smallest binding unit of any society. This very case shows an example of a woman's act that suggests marriage is not necessary.
Such acts lead to large scale divorce rates,the unwinding of the family unit ,one of the results happens to be enmity and a battle of the sexes as is occurring in the West where each sex says; 'Thanks to technology we don't need you'.This is one of the first stages in the collapse of human order.

What sort of illogical claptrap is this?

Just a collection of incoherent sentences wound around slippery slope fallacy.

Artificial insemination is making society worse? Why don't you do away with the other inventions of modern medicine too and livebin your "perfect society"?


Of course, marriage is NOT NECESSARY - whether to a man or a woman.


No, the Bible is not a tenable proof that marriage is necessary.


Learn to look further than your nose. The world doesn't revolve around your beliefs.

LMAO. Dunno, but this sounded hilarious to me.

Sexual frustration is something I wouldn't wish on my enemy though. It could stretch one to the point of depression. I can feel her plight because I've dated someone who couldn't get wet no matter what you did. The few months with her was hellish. Imagine this woman having female blue balls for a decade now... Damn!


The situation can still be salvaged though. I bet the guy doesn't have the world's shortest fingers and tongue too. Let him work on the meat with his fingers and then eat her like he's a Muslim about to embark on Ramadan fast for a whole week. There are many ways to kill a pu.s.s.y.


Communication is key here. Let her open up to him. They can experiment and work things out. It's even easier for acwoman to reach orgasm through oral se.x than penetrative se.x


In the end, if nothing works out, be kind enough to walk out of the union before sampling other BBCs. This man has been good to you like you averred. The small dic.k is no fault of his.

Because women are spotless and can do no wrong.


Even if she errs, a man pushed her to.


It is easier to find search for a ship n the high seas with the naked eye than see a woman apportion {deserved} blames to herself.

Then, though I'm not even too keen about the whole marriage ish.




Marriage as an institution has outlived it's usefulness long time ago. It's naturally disintegrating gradually. In the next 400-500 years or so, I can bet the last vestiges of the marriage institution will be tossed into the bins of history.

OP,

There's nothing wrong with you. I was a late-bloomer too. Was a virgin till final year at 22 and my first experience was horrible. Lasted less than 15 strokes before I busted. That was way back then though.


All the reactions you're getting are perfectly natural. Typical "fight or flight" evolutionary instinct. Those discomforts stem from situations that unsettles your body, sex in this instance. Much like the fuzzy feelings you get when your friends are nudging you to go chyke up a 10/10 chick.


Next time, just go ahead and make a move. You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. At worst, she will decline. Women love sex as much as men, if not more, so you will definitely get a yes sooner than later.

Careful though that you don't get addicted. I did slip into that dungeon after graduation, bedding over 40 women in just about 29 months. Learn to put a lid on that libido once you uncage it.

Happy slamming, man.



PS: Your first experience will probably be nothing to write home about. Do get over it. You will get better with time.

Love is a mirage.

It's not rocket science to decipher that GMB is a man aversed to reading.

Junaid is Captain Obvious here, really.

LOL.


The Bible was written by illiterate archaic cavemen who captured their own whims and caprices as God's directives.

Bible is a fraud. Yahweh is a bigger fraud.

Just like Frederich Nietzsche opined, God created man on the sixth day and on the seventh day, man returned the favor.


God is nothing but a contraption forged by ancient con-men and fashioned after mankind. That's why he suffers from the basal vices of mankind - anger, jealousy, pettiness, murderous tendencies, bias, etc.

The way Barcelona go take beat us tomorrow ehn, Young John, Sarz and Masterkraft dem dey learn work.

Anyway, na ship we go dock tomorrow.

8-1-1 formation noni

Very true.


The best woman a man can say 'I do' to is the woman who's madly in love with the man.


Like 70-30 ratio.

It's not a guarantee that things won't go south but your ride will be less bumpy.

Marrying a woman who had to "settle for you" is a sure-way to a lifetime of misery and sorrow.

52.


PS: I consider myself a very cool-headed guy.

Last time I checked, women are mainly the ones objectifying themselves.

The act of accusing men of objectifying women is the classic instance of women "never taking the blame". Typical hamster spin.

It's women who:

- Take eons to beautify and prune up themselves in other to attract men

- Dress up in skimpy and showy apparels and then cry wolf if a man's look lingers on them for a second

- Tend to equate sex with material and other inputs in an affair hence she has figuratively walked bare-footed on thorns for a man by "giving him" sex hence her part of the deal is done, the man should now slave off his ass in appreciation

- Claim to be "used", for an intercourse that was consensual and mutually enjoyed, should things go awry.


Nobody is objectifying women.

The weevil wey dey chop beans dey inside the beans so.

In Nigeria, both Institutions are epitome of unimaginable failure.

More pitiable are the chest-beating graduates of Nigerian Universities who think they're better off than their counterparts in the Polytechnics.

To me, Universities and Polytechnics in Nigeria are like two knives in the house of the unfortunate - the one with a good handle is blunt, the one with sharp edges has a spoilt handle.

Delivar:
Put the population increase in-check! That's the root cause of this issue. The population is rising to dangerous levels

Global population or Nigerian population?

LOL.

What a coincidence.


This was the central thesis of Yuval Harari's postulations in his book "Homo Deus: A History of Tomorrow" which I was reading today.


But I do not agree wholly with him and ipso facto this write up. Whilst technological inventions do come at the expense of job lost, it's not as gloomy as painted.

Capitalism can never embark on such a "suicidal mission". People need money to patronize capitalist outputs, they earn the bulk of that money from emoluments so there's always a tendency and infact, reality, that capitalism finds a point of trade-off between rapid technological inventions and job security.


Nice article once more, OP.