Spherical77:
Your region is dry and not productive. Biko do you wanna kill your people if they all move back to that dry red mud land?

Last last your drugs business, prostitution as your lord and saviour COWNU called his people and Ogwu ego will be the last option though

Whatever bad characteristic you ascribe to them is all true. Let them go back to thier unproductive dry region and die. You should be supportive of thier struggle.

Why do you care so much for people you hate this much and wish dead? Is it not better for you if they all go back to thier dry region and die? Let them use ogwu ego and kill themselves and prostitute themselves to oblivion, the question is why won't you let who you hate that much to go and die? Why? Are you normal?

Redcrafton:


May be you were born yesterday...

In 1967, they all returned home.

They had their military, police, Central bank and had their currency.

You killed millions using starvation when you couldn't defeat their soldiers in normal combat...

So why do you want them to go again?

I believe they will all go when they get what they want, once and for all.

Same reply I gave a dude above, you don't put the cart before the horse, they declared their nation and manybof them left for it. The same people complaining now fought a war to drag them back into the union after they left.

Now it's go back to your land and then demand the nation from there while still being under the same nation they are trying to leave? I don't really understand how some folks reason!

allthingsgood:


What is senseless about returning to Biafra biko

it's quite simple, you can't put the cart before the horse, the last time they all went back home, and declared thier country you all fought a war to drag them back to the union.

So saying they should go back home without giving them thier independence while still having military and security control over them is a no brainer.

Hope you get the sequence it should be in? Grant them the freedom first, then chase them out of your lands, close your borders to prevent them from returning. For the ones who refuse to leave your region after that you can do as you wish to them, flay, burn, behead, drown any punishment that suits your fantasy. You will now be free to do as you please. After all they are all subhuman according to you!

derecho:

The crux of the matter is the bolded not the italicized.
The topic was a reaction to comments from a previous thread.
No one would ever say all that is needed in marriage is virginity.
Those who don't value virginity have their reasons. For example, if the virgin is a pretender and is only a virgin because she doesn't have the opportunity to have sex.Of course, guys won't value her.
Howbeit, no guy would say I don't like a virgin please go and get deflowered, then return to me.

We are saying who will those sane guys choose if the girl they desire come as a virgin or a non-virgin.You don't need a prophet to tell you bro.

You just reminded me of a girl many years ago who in a bid to disparage virginity, said the elder brother said if a virgin comes to him that he'll ask her to go and be deflowered first before he'll marry her. I didn't waste time to tell her :Only a fool reasons like that.

Bro I wasn't aware of the former thread, I simply referred to the title of this thread! Which I have specified the answer. And I repeat again not everyone fancies Virginity. Take it to the bank! Some fellows like experienced women and that's fact, weird but true.

Anybody disparaging virginity is an idiot. The bone of contention here is virginity solely a determinant for successful marriage? Not if it's not a good thing or a lofty ideal!

JovialJune:
[s][/s]


All emotions, no substance

I did not eat your biscuit, go sleep.

Understand that most of these monikers are undergrad kids! You can tell from the original post. Silly comparison between Toyota cars and virginity of women, these are university boys talking points! You can spot the comments from men who are already married here and see the difference!

derecho:
The thief analogy is to further explain the place of wisdom over capability or strength. You alluded to weakness and incapability of the OP to handle any lady with plenty body counts is why he needs a virgin.

Like I have always maintained, virginity is not the only thing needed for a successful marriage But it's good Not because of any religious inclination...
It's about wisdom.

It's just like saying you would prefer a fairly used phone to a new one if both are offered at same price.
I honestly don't believe any sane man would opt for a non-virgin if the virgin possesses all the qualities as the non-virgin.

All I'm saying is let's not act as if it doesn't matter.
A man may say it doesn't matter for any reason but deep in his heart, he prefers a virgin.

Now you're coming closer to the crux of the debate. No one says virginity doesn't matter. The topic of discourse was virginity isn't the sole requirement to a successful marriage and the answer is yes!

The other side talks were just rants in response to what some silly boys were attributing the virginity status to, like women who married as virgins don't fall prey to other hypergamous temptations women typically are known to fall for.

And please don't presume for all men, I know men that left virgins for non virgins (married), I dated Virgins and dumped them as virgins as well. Virginity means nothing to some men, you really need to discuss with some men around you and figure this out.

It doesn't take away anything from a virgin. For those who value such.

derecho:
Funny but I agree that a virgin can turn a prostitute. Like I always say
Every prostitute was once a virgin...
However, a virgin need not be a prostitute.

It's not about being 5mins or 3secs man, it's what is preferable.
No responsible man would want his wife to be warming another man's bed.
Satisfaction is relative...there are women who are addicted to sex so forget satisfaction for those ones.Sex is a thing of the mind.
But since we are not here for sex education, let's address the issue.

The issue is a reaction to a statement that being a virgin doesn't guarantee a successful marriage.
This seeks to find out one thing amongst others: does virginity before marriage matter? Or how does it affect marriage positively?

Wisdom, I believe is better than strength (since you mentioned weakness).
You don't go all out to hire a thief because you are financially strong. Though, anyone could become a thief, no wise employer would employ a thief when you have someone with a similar qualifications and no bad record of theft.
A wise man sees trouble afar off and hides himself but a fool rages on and is destroyed.

God designed sex to be explored in marriage AND HE IS WISER THAN ANYONE.
Sexual defilement and wrong exposure to sex has its consequences.

Why choose to fetch water with a basket instead of an good bucket?
Even if you are "capable" and can go a hundred times, it's wisdom to conserve your strength and use it for other profitable ventures.

My brother all you said is also true, but remember not everyone shares your religious belief system, that a woman is not a virgin doesn't also make her a prostitute.

Does virginity matter in marriage? The answer is dependent on what people value. If it's what you value for your marriage above all else then yes! Some men don't attach value to it, they will look at compatibility of both virgin and non virgin women in terms of what they have to offer and bring to the table. Only when that criteria evens out between both women will virginity be the deal breaker. If the non virgin woman exceeds the other in all other criteria any sensible man will pick that option and vice versa without recourse to who is a virgin or not.

Unless your trying to say all non virgins who married cheat on thier spouses then I don't know what to tell you. Comparison of a thief and a non virgin woman just doesn't cut it. No married woman will remain a virgin, there's no guarantee that you marry a virgin and she won't cheat tomorrow, women's minds work differently from men.

So if it's about the OPs statement, virginity isn't the sole determinant of a successful marriage. There are marriages where women married as virgin turn olosho.... isn't that a conclusive answer to the question?

40 secs man don drop quote. You want virgin so that she won't compare your weak arse game with better gbola abi? your analogy and comparison doesn't even make sense to begin with.

Virginity is a virtue which is dependent on your moral or religious value. Some men like the olosho you hate why? Cuz she dey knack well and sex is all he cares about, some men love the borehole you dismiss.

Virginity disappears once the hymen is gone. After it leaves what remains is what matters. The Oloshos of today were virgins of yesterday.

Virgin can turn olosho anyday, Nigerians aren't the most disciplined people on the planet after all....we rank highest for porn watching, google exposed us, so that your virgin is probably waiting to use it to mugu you! After all she knows you're likely not a virgin yourself and will use it to make you loose guard....by the time you realise what's happening, your gateman is chopping the kpomo you thought was your sole proprietorship.

Small children wey never marry go dey make noise noise about upandan.

eldoradoxx:
Don't mix up the issues, we know about Fulani herdsmen kilers that Obadiah and Danjuma talked about, we also know that Fulani herdsmen are not the unknown gun men that murder people in the East, they are not the people who threatened everyone with no election in Anambra. Fulani herdsmen are not the same people who declared sit at home in the East and have been killing, burning businesses to force people to sit at home, it is IPOB members and they have to be stopped at all cost. Don't u see how matured the Yoruba people are carrying on with their agitation, in a very civil way, they don't force anybody, they don't kill anybody, they don't force sit at home to protest Igboho's detention, compare with what IPOB qbd their supporters are doing in the East.

Saw your comment and want to correct some assumptions. IPOB are not unknown gun men. They aren't the same. IPOB have not killed or burned any igbos person in the east, take what you read by the media with a grain of salt.

IPOB has called off the sit at home for months but my wife doesn't go out to the shop due to fear. Not fear of IPOB but of the Nigerian military and police, they are the ones who are responsible for most of the killings in imo state. 3 people I personally know off where shot dead by police men in Owerri. One owned 5 sharwarma joints and was killed while going to deliver ingredients for the next day production. His wife told him to just avoid going out and wait till the next day he said nothing was happening, ipob did not kill am the police did.

The second was a pig farmer who was killed barely just a week after the prison break in owerri. He was driving from ideato to supply his pigs to a market In irete and was not aware the Rd lane in front of the prisons was cordorned off. He was shot when he noticed the traffic was being diverted and tried to reverse, his assistant that survived and that was how we got to know after the boy was detained for 2 weeks.

The 3rd person was just an acquaintance who was to travel back to Germany. He had booked his flight to Lagos from owerri and took bolt taxi to the airport. That was on the day ipob gave sit home directive for the Biafran rememberance day. The military checkpoint just before naze junction along the airport road is where this guy was shot by the military personnel there. Their excuse? they thought they were IPOB members.....unarmed civilians, loosing Thier lives everyday due to the terrible work ethic of the Nigerian security forces and you still question why people stay at home?

These are people I know personally, if I recount stories of people who lost loved ones to these animals in uniform you won't be here passing blame on IPOB! There's a reason they are supported by the masses in the SE, the Nigerian security men are terrorist and monsters. Don't even try to justify their actions.

Agboriotejoye:

How many people did Muhammad and Jesus killed?
Did Jesus enslave anybody or keep sex slaves like Muhammad?
How many caravan did Jesus and Muhammad ever robbed?
Did Jesus or Muhammad ever sacked any city by killing the inhabitants?
Who has blood on his hands? Jesus or Muhammad?

Don't bother yourself, he won't answer the question. You should know moslems on the internet by now, they deflect, project and cast aspersions first before giving direct answers.

Watch he will go off topics instead answering the simple question!

Ibkhaleel01:
lol are you not even ashame of your trash?


I really pity you guys... dumbfounded polytheist trinitarian pagans....

Christianity is a dead religion ! Confined in some shit history books...

Christianity is dying out already

The whole xtianity is a joke

Been a Christian is nothing more than advertising that you are a loser!

A religion of gay pope, gay Jesus gay pastors, satanic churches etc

Christians prefer to read the epistles of Paul, the Evangelists who preach the falsehood of Christianity quote Paul and not Jesus


Any sensible person that reads the bible from cover to cover with open mind will dumb chrstianity and lookbfor another religion bor turn to an atheist..

The United States used to be a Christian nation, today it is the HQ of atheism in the world today and even those who still claim to be Christians are those who see nothing wrong in abortion, homosexuality, fornication and adultery among other forbidden practices.

They became what they are when the Christians started belittling the teachings of their religion, watering it down and making it so that everyone is a Christian "just believe in Jesus and you'll go to heaven". This worked for a generation, but didn't for subsequent generations.

We can see it starting to play out here in Nigeria. Chrstianity is the peak of inmorality, deceit, fraud and insults of other faiths

"Somebody ought to tell the truth about the Bible. The preachers dare not, because they would be driven from their pulpits. Professors in colleges dare not, because they would lose their salaries. Politicians dare not. They would be defeated. Editors dare not. They would lose subscribers. Merchants dare not, because they might lose customers. Men of fashion dare not, fearing that they would lose caste. Even clerks dare not, because they might be discharged. And so I thought I would do it myself . . . "

Still going to the internet and posting pictures from websites. You really are a funny Muslim aswear. Like I said earlier focus on your religion first and solve the problems you have within it, deflecting and hounding chirstianity for whatever flaw you perceive is laughable.

Sorry to burst your bubble mister I don't identify as Christain , was born into it but left a while ago. My post was to point out your ignorance and falsehoods on the bible passages you quoted.

For all you accuse the religious adherents of chirstianity of, you are 5 times guilty of the same. Your religion is no better.
Your all in the same boat so feeling Superior to them is foolery on your part.

Nigeria..... USA yada yada yada! Quit the sermons bro......your rants are becoming erratic from religion to politics..stay one place.
Chirstians are the problem of the world just like you moslems, don't exempt yourself! Your religion is no better!

Ibkhaleel01:
Many are skeptical because they have been so brain washed for centuries. In the present time, when one listens to some of the TV Evangelists .......

While this part of your comment seems true about brainwashing and televangelist being cunny and deceptive, you are no better than them with your mixing of half truths and outright twisting of the bible to pass your obvious falsehoods. And I'll expose your animosity clouded as being logical and analytical.

Ibkhaleel01:
The one who said "love your enemies", Luke 6:27 or the one that said "But as for these enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them"bring them here and slaughter them in my presence", Luke 19:27.

You took Luke chapter completely out of context to tell a bold faced lie. Jesus was telling the parable about a master and his servants and his charge to them before he left on his journey. The parable starts from verse 11 up to verse 27 you conveniently edited out. A parable is story used to pass a lesson. Incase you don't know what it means.

Ibkhaleel01:
The one who said "Be merciful just as your father is merciful", Luke 6:36, or the one who said "he did not come to give peace on earth, but rather division", Luke 12:51.

Here again you commit the same falsehood as the first, pick a verse and take it out of context. This passage was clear and meant that a person who choose to follow him and his teachings would become an enemy even to his own people. Which is a simple statement of how people oppose the beliefs of others especially when it exposes thier own inadequacies. Hence it will bring division.

Ibkhaleel01:
The one who said "honor your father and mother", Matthew 15:4, or the one who called his mother "Woman", John 2:4?

If you understand any idea about christianity you should know Jesus birth wasn't a normal one. Many christian denominations have the same problem with Catholics for this same reason on how mary should be honoured. Calling your mother woman doesn't go all the way to show if he honoured her not. Honouring a person is in your actions and deeds not what you say necessarily.

Ibkhaleel01:
The one who said "if someone slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him", Matthew 5:39, or the one who went to the temple and drove people out and overturned the tables, Matthew 21:12?

Again false comparison, he drove the merchants out of the temple to show that the house of God was not a place for business. Infact the bible said it angered him. Turn the other cheek was among the beatitudes of peace making. Chirstians understand it as not actively seeking trouble and avoiding conflict at any cost.

Ibkhaleel01:
The one who said have "peace with one another", Mark 9:50 or the one who said he "did not come to bring peace but a sword", Matthew 10:34?

♦ The one who said "forgive, and you will be forgiven", Luke 6:37, or the one who said "if your hand or foot causes you to sin, cut it off and cast it from you", Matthew 18:8?

As a Muslim, I understand both sides, because Jesus, like Muhammad, was both merciful when mercy was required and powerful when power was required. God himself has both heavens and hellfire. Yet half the truth Evangelists never failed to present only the merciful side of Jesus and only the powerful side of Muhammad.

No you don't understand both sides but just your side. I can go on and on on your falsehoods and frankly it's tiring. Chirstians see chirst as God and moslems see him as a prophet. The two positions are radically different, so don't think you understand the Christain point of view cuz you don't.

You can disagree with it which is fine and within your rights but rather than focus on Christains and thier problems, I suggest you focus on your Muslim faith that commands death for apostates, and defenestration for homosexuality. You have a lot of doctrinal issues to fix within Islam first to make it compatible with modern society before you turn your eyes on the chirstians.

Looking for out of context verses to butress your false stance shows you neither read the verses you quoted not understood them, I'm guessing you copied them from anti Christain web posts on the internet. If you wanna argue better I suggest you read the chapters of the verse you quoted. Hopefully your ignorance will shrink on the matter and you can make your positions more refined!

chukxie:
When OPEC meetings are held, Nigeria is always present. It a misnomer that Nigeria is a member of OPEC! An oil rich country that doesn't refine its own God-given oil! Shame on Nigeria. Shame on our leaders- past and present. Nigeria is a curse to sub Sahara Africa.

Bro you just hit the point everyone else has been missing. We have this crude oil as a natural resource, if we drill out and refine the crude here with majorly local sourced means would we die? If we refine these things ourselves within the country shouldn't it stand to reason that it will cost less to do so here and sell the refined products at cheaper rate for our people then at international rates when we export them and make money from it?

Rather, we export the crude and import one of the refined derivates at international prices, then subsidize it with profits we made from the crude oil sale.....who cursed this nation abeg?

Ive heard of locally refined petroleum products done crudely by our brothers into bunkering that live in the creeks of ND, all it needs it's fine tuning and professional methods to make it feasible for the larger public.

Whenever you talk of this petrol stuff you hear landing cost and all what not....can't we refine it ourselves and enjoy it like an oil producer should?

AutoChick4U:
Single dads? Where's d mother of the kids?

Most times dead, divorced and remarried! Women will hardly abandon thier offsprings, a select few among the generality of the populace will leave the kids with the man, irresponsible men lead in that regard!

So when you see a single dad isn't it logical for them to be with single mom's who can understand thier circumstance better? Just saying!

adanny01:


Good luck.

Just because majority says its the way to go does not mean its the right way.

You're right somewhat but relationships are make or break for people. If you were in a plane and told to jump out with a chute that had a 70 Percent failure rate, would you still Jump with it despite knowing that 30 percent of them are functional?

There's a reason why there are stereotypes.

Toks2008:


I agree most of them are very very confused regarding where they place their baby daddy.

But if you meet a reasonable one you won't regret it especially the one that has a child who is Less dependent on her.

And let me bust your bubbles, even the single ladies are no exception, they usually have strong emotional bonding to their exes so whether you go with single mum or single lady it is still the same story.

Just make sure you know the story behind their breakup so you will have an idea of how strong their bonding is.

Well you're Right, my comparison either way is that between a good single mom and a good single lady I'll pick the single lady, the bad ones are all the same either way!

There's is that potential drama from the baby daddy which is a sure as day which isn't her fault but she already entangled with the while mess! With a single lady that's responsible the odds are 50 50 at worse case scenario.

AutoChick4U:
Now this is where communication is very important. A single mom who still sees, talks to d baby daddy is a suspect. Besides the lady in this your story is a very dumb fvck.

Many single moms are not in contact with their baby fathers and managing alone just like me. Theres minus zero possibility of such happening in my case anyways

Where you say Zero possibility men hear potential possibility! That connection to the child's father is always there whether you choose to use it or not. It's a door and it opens both ways, if you don't use that connection he might decide to use it, and then showing up and causing problems for you and your family when you least expect.

I had no qualms if they were keeping tabs and in communication at first, after all it's his kid and if it was up to me I wouldn't support keeping the kid away from him if he was interested. But she claimed he abandoned the child, and was not in the picture so I thought no communication whatsoever was going on in that regard, I was prepared to deal with that eventuality anyways but still got burned.

Once you have a kid with someone there's always an eternal connection, you might not use it but he might and will eventually, all these complications might not be worth it for a lot of dudes.

I wouldn't call her dumb cuz I have no idea about thier history, all efforts to bring up the matter about their relationship always made her cry and emotional I had to just let it go. Some people are just weak around certain people especially when they share a lot of history and a kid, all sorts of things could go wrong and I wouldn't advice any young man who wants long term peace to go for it.
The potential risk involved isn't worth it....let single dad's and single moms have each other, that's a better deal in my opinion!

AfroKnight:


Do not take it out of context please. I was talking about offending her sensibilities because of the child in question and certainly not in the general sense. She expects inclusion from you on everything except when it’s time to correct children, then she places you under scrutiny. That’s an unnecessary awkwardness I certainly do not want. It is different from just any relationship. It doesn’t make her a bad person, but it is what it is. And I’d rather avoid such situations if I can help it.




Don’t misunderstand me. I do not frown upon them. I just don’t prefer them. I don’t treat them any less than other humans. But my decision not to date them is seen as offensive by women. Why? It should not be so. Plus I particularly dislike the fact that some of them withhold the information that they are single mothers until they feel you are committed to the relationship. They should tell me upfront so I can move on to the next person instead of wasting time.

Bro you are very on point....take it from someone talking from experience....it's emotionally draining and damn complicated to date them. The majority who have tried have the same story that's evidence enough by itself.

You scenario was exactly my experience, she hid the kids existence from me cuz we were in separate countries. I only got to find out months later after we got serious. When asked of the kids father you can guess the response she gave....same line you
Typed in the original post.....this women never disappoint like clockwork!

I said okay not bad, lemme try getting to know the kid and make it work. I live in the same country with her parents so her mom brought the kid over and I went visiting to get to know the parents and my prospective step child. Everything went well, I loved the kid even discussed a formal adoption for the child after the nuptials since the father in her words abandoned it.

Few months to the engagement and set date for return to naija to conclude the traditional rites, Babe went AWOL. Stopped picking my calls, her parents as well. There was no way I could reach her, plus I couldn't just travel to her location due to I
Being in a different continent and my job demand.

To Cut the long story short, I had a friend who stays I. The same country to help me check up on them, turns out baby daddy showed up, somehow they made up and had a short lived rekindled love affair. I was seriously vexed but what could a brother do. Madam just ghosted me. I had to let it go ultimately.

Now here comes the interesting part, the baby daddy knocked her up with twins and vanishes again. 3 months to her EDD and 4 to my wedding she calls me up out of the blue and starts pontificating. Sounds like a movie but I was living it in real time.

Single moms? Hell no to any young single man. If you don't love drama stay far away.

JovialJune:



You don't sound intelligent, the men were cheating with single ladies, as in side hen, we are talking of marriage here, or didn't you see the rest of my comment?

Lolz! No be only side hen. It's a cycle my dear but look at it this way, the single girls are cheating on thier boyfriend's with married men. Cheating for men requires funds and financial backing so the majority of these men who are randy are within a set percentage of the male population.

The single ladies will obviously get married, one day,some of the boyfriend's they cheated on while single with the married folks also get married and become suga zaddies.

Madam will start vibrating OGa is cheating with small small girls, forgetting she was part of the trend. Marriage is just a situation these days, no more sanctity and respect for the institution any more!

Juliusmomoh:
Just as the subject above.

Have you ever slept hungry just to prove a point to your wife or girlfriend that you are angry ??

Yes, i did it but she later beg me..

Share yours

I'm not mad nah, the food is mine, the wife is mine the sleep is mine. Starving yourself to prove a point? It proves nothing.

I dish my food myself eat it properly, enter the second room lock the doors and sleep peacefully. That's what I do when I'm vexed. My wife won't even see me to provoke further.

neyoohhh:


Who let the dog out?

In case you aren't aware, money correlates with time even in the developed world. The older you get the higher your networth should be, provided you did all the right things.

It's impossible to be wealthy at a young age unless you've created something of value or captured an impossible niche, which requires great talent and oftentimes a starting capital, a preserve of the smart few.

Guy's aren't angry with you because they're broke, that's all in your head as per usual. Could it be that they see a narcissistic irrational being who associate's every dysfunctionality in life to the male gender.

You should be wealthy yourself before having the temerity to broke shame others.

It's your low crass mentality and type's that is actually pushing young folks into criminal activities, because you'll be certain to look down on them if they haven't made it yet.

Say no more brother! These females think nairaland is the entire country, a few guys here comment weird stuff and they assume all Nigerian men are misogynistic while being misandrist themselves.

Only on nairaland you see broke females broke shaming broke men. Stats show that Nigerian males are economically well off than thier female counterparts, yet they seem to think they are all independent, power women. Yet, they overtake men in every dependency index like prostitution, NGO beneficiaries and low income jobs!

Like you said, wealth is built over time. 3rd world countries like Nigeria have a very limited wealth making opportunity especially for younger folks, few obviously make it through but a larger portion he just hover the poverty line. Especially for people who want to make it legitimately....it takes time effort and dedication.

Good thing for us men is that we get better with age, many men get thier financially maturity between 45 to 60 yrs. That's when we turn to sugar daddies and begin to plow through the daughters of our current slay queens....let them keep broke shaming the broke guys, they are the potential sugar pop's of tomorrow lolz!

Is that people don't actually follow the news or what? The fuel scarcity is caused by NUPENG/IPMAN going on strike due to a dispute with the imo state government.

Some years back the former governor Rochas destroyed a filling station owned by one of their members during one of his land grabbing schemes and the matter was dragged to the courts. The case was concluded last month and the court ordered the imo state government to pay up.

The new governor Hope refused and thus the whole drama you're seeing, it's got nothing to do with IPOB, sit at home not the FG.

LegalWolf:


I would only respond to the other half of your argument for reasons best known to me. Please read what I wrote again, this time slowly. I never said Gombe and Bauchi are viable states. At all. Rather, I said they are NOT barren as insinuated by who I was responding to.

I understand all your points bro and you're somewhat correct. Necessity they say is the mother of invention....my personal opinion is that all the current Nigerian states are viable ( although not equally).

Both the north and south have thier share of corrupt leaders and when people refer to the regions they don't necessarily mean the ordinary people there but the political and elite class.

It's not an open secret that the Northern power brokers and the political class are opposed to the restructuring of Nigeria, of course there are a few southern elite idiots that will take the same position and it is well known that they do it to remain in the good books of the federal power and not be seen as opposition.

The North has the land mass for mechanized and modern agriculture than the south and that's fact, just that can place any northern state on the map for fiscal independence, food will never go out of style.

what is needed is the will to actually tow this fiscal federation route, but the current revenue system sharing make a lot of these states (both north and south) to be lazy.

Compared to the north though the south is more in support of it. It's common knowledge!

AlhajiBitcoin:


The ones in Nigeria are mostly black.

The way to kill them is salt.

The black ones that almost look like the creature in the OP's picture aren't slugs but leeches. Very hard to kill almost imposisible via physical force and very rubbery. Salt kills them horribly....

We called them kulukulu in Jos back in the day!

lexy2014:


if i am repeating my questions, how then am i shifting d goal post?

these are ur claims:


this is my question to those claims:

How is act 1 and 2 responsible for Afghanistans predicament and Taliban taking over d country?

Where is d answer? In essense, u dont have any information to tell us how Bidens decisions created d present predicament in Afghanistan.

According to u:



How did and at what point did Biden leave American civilians "behind enemy lines"? How is d Taliban takeover not d d situation? If d "Taliban takeover" isnt d situation, why then are u complaining that Biden didnt "get his people out first"? why dont they just remain in Afghanistan since "Taliban takeover" isnt d situation?

which leads me to d question i asked u earlier which u have failed to answer:



One of your claims goes thus:



my question again which u cant answer is simple:


U also made a claim that



Hence i asked u



If u saying "A large number...", then u should at least be able to give us a percentage. its possible u were there to take a head count of d equipment u are talking about.

i said this



and u said



answered numerous times by who? can u show me d "numerous" u answered d question?

if u say that

"corruption, unwillingness to combat the Taliban" was d reason why d afghan military was not able to hold back d taliban without even putting up a fight, how then is Joe Biden responsible for d present predicament in Afghanistan?

I can't keep going in circles with you, you literally ask a question, quote the answer then say it's not answered......seems to me you want to to hear your own answers sir!

Like I said if you can't see the answers I can't help you!

lexy2014:


Sorry dude, u haven't:

How is act 1 and 2 responsible for Afghanistans predicament and Taliban taking over d country?

if there was no "afghanistan predicament", would "US citizens, Afghan US workers and translators still trapped within the country caused by the shody withdrawal of the military"?

D weapons u mentioned in Act 3, where they left behind by d US military or where they equipment d US supplied d Afghanistan military?

what percentage makes up "A large number of the equipments and hardware there were not just for the Afghan army but we're being used by the American troops in joint defense operations"?

According to u:

It's was clear the Afghan army wouldn't hold back the Taliban in an eventual take over scenario

why was d afghan army not able to hold back d taliban without even putting up a fight?

You still repeating yourself, making up a strawman and shifting the goal post with your question.

I blamed Biden for the sloppy pull out and endangering American lives with his withdrawal tactic. Which could have been avoided if he evacuated civilians first before the military personnel. You keep asking me how it lead to the Afghan situation and Taliban takeover....the answer is right there. Get your people out first not just strand them there. Leaving American civilian behind enemy lines is the Afghan situation and not the Taliban takeover is what his mistake is....you keep lumping the 2.

It's doesn't matter the percentage of military hardware the US troops used 10 percent, 20 percent 50 percent.....none matters, they know the numbers and should have pulled them out especially the heavy ordinance equipment to avoid the Taliban getting them. Intelligence reports showed that corruption was very evident in the Afghan army that could lead to even the equipment being used by them directly falling into Taliban possession.

"Why was the Afghan army not able to....." That's another question that had been answered numerous times.... corruption, unwillingness to combat the Taliban, heck even the US withdrawal.....it could be any or all of these and more. Take your pick!

If you don't find your answer still, I can't help you further sir!

lexy2014:


u havent answered my questions:

How is act 1 and 2 responsible for Afghanistans predicament and Taliban taking over d country?

if there was no "afghanistan predicament", would "US citizens, Afghan US workers and translators still trapped within the country caused by the shody withdrawal of the military"?

D weapons u mentioned in Act 3, where they left behind by d US military or where they equipment d US supplied d Afghanistan military?

what percentage makes up "A large number of the equipments and hardware there were not just for the Afghan army but we're being used by the American troops in joint defense operations"?

According to u:

It's was clear the Afghan army wouldn't hold back the Taliban in an eventual take over scenario

why was d afghan army not able to hold back d taliban without even putting up a fight?

I have answered your questions more than 3 times already. Read my replies again. If you don't see an answer there, then you can hold your peace.

lexy2014:


How is act 1 and 2 responsible for Afghanistans predicament and Taliban taking over d country?

D weapons u mentioned in Act 3, where they left behind by d US military or where they equipment d US supplied d Afghanistan military?

The Afghan predicament isn't the discussion, but the US citizens and Afghan US workers and translators still trapped within the country caused by the shody withdrawal of the military. You normally evacuated civilians first and military last. Actions 1 and 2 led to that.

The Taliban takeover of the country was always sure as night and day, military intelligence briefed that scenario for months. To forestall certain military hardware from falling into the hands of the Taliban on thier eventual take over, a large number of the equipment the US troops used should either be transported back or scuttled.

A large number of the equipments and hardware there were not just for the Afghan army but we're being used by the American troops in joint defense operations. In an eventual pull out the hardware should be pulled out as well, especially the heavy ordinance weapons to avoid the possibility of it falling into Tliban hands by either take-over or simple corrupt practices the Afghan military is known for like handing it over to them.

It's was clear the Afghan army wouldn't hold back the Taliban in an eventual take over scenario, every intelligence agency knew this to be fact.

lexy2014:


I didn't ask u if Biden is to blame or not. I asked u "what mistake did Biden make as an amateur?"

who left billions dollar worth of military hardware and weapons?

Was it d US that abandoned "a ton of military hardware"?

Yes sir! act 1....Biden pulled out the military over night before ensuring US citizens were evacuated.

Act 2...he did not inform the US allies on the exact plan for withdrawal, after the Military pulled out impromptu, Boris Johnson tried to get ahold of him on the phone for 36 hrs to no avail.

Act 3....the US military left behind humvess, attack helicopters, ammunition and drones behind, news sources called it effectively giving the Taliban an airforce. Usual MO of the military Is to evacuate major hardware and scuttle the ones they can't transport!

If you are following the events I did not need to type out all this for you!

lexy2014:


Since u are following d news, answering d questions shouldn't be a challenge for u. what mistake did Biden make as an amateur? who left billions dollar worth of military hardware and weapons?

I've answered the question bro, Biden is to blame firstly for the messy situation, his poor handling of the withdrawal plan caused the US military to abandon a ton of military hardware, abi do you me to post a news link to for you?

LordReed:


Then why didn't the Taliban attack US Forces?

Such a move will definitely prolong the American occupation,

lexy2014:


what mistake did Biden make as an amateur? who left billions dollar worth of military hardware and weapons?

short answer Biden! Or are you not following the news?