airmark:


Your prediction? You don't want Dayo to disturb us that Juju, except Magun, always fails abi?

Nezzjnr:



You would have just saved your strength instead of writing this Trash.

They should be sent to go and meet their creator.

iamoyindamola:

After killing thousands of innocent people

Ideaball:


Pantami-esque......"most" of you Muslims are sympathetic to Talibans,Isis,isil,bokoharam,bandits, Hezbollah etc cos it is "holy war" or jihad to you guys...

You call releasing book haram members CONFLICT RESOLUTION? WTF!!!!

Havertz10:
it's the same thing the Taliban does, i'm naturally empathetic, I can totally understand the reasoning behind their actions and their leaders actions self

your last paragraph is on the money about monitoring them but I don't think that it's that simple, you can't release a criminal into the streets and expect him to change

You have to find out what led to him committing those crimes and preventing that process from restarting, with employment rates in Nigeria, no matter how hard they try to reorientate these guys they will still fall back into that life, it provided for them, never play with a man's food, his judgment of right from wrong is skewed when his survival is on the line


Personally if I had my way, anybody that commits a crime should die, prisons are a flawed system, the numbers are there, it's an exponential growth system, it will never reduce crime or deter crime, people will forever try to game the system, only the certainty of death can deter humans, I also think that the world is overpopulated, straight forward executions is the only way forward in my book, especially for clear cut criminal cases.

Emmynator:

Your first paragraph is very accurate. What happens when peace is the price you pay for justice?
At this stage of insecurity, FG needs more terrorists surrendering, so its pertinent to create incentives for surrender. While we can all agree that the decision will raise brows, we shouldn't look at it like a totally bad decision.

Look at it this way, our struggles with boko haram means we need more information in order to combat them properly, information defectors can provide. If the government gives full punishment to terrorists who surrender, we will have less of them surrendering and more terrorists to deal with, while having less inside information.
Justice demanded the sanctions placed on Germany after the first world War, but these sanctions played a key role in the start of the second world War.

I will only advise the government to monitor them properly and ensure that they give quality information as part of their plea deal, and perhaps send some of them back as undercover agents.

iamoyindamola:

Do you know the leader of the bandits that kidnapped students to extort the government repented and now he's back in the bush.
Now we have more bandits who go around kidnapping students and extort the government then form repentance.
Then the cycle continue
Tomorrow I can also decide to start killing people then next tomorrow I repent and life goes on

Amoto94:
I know the modus operandi of some of you when you guys lack convincing argument to counter a valid argument you resort to name-calling and bigotry. Keep it coming it's was never unexpected but I won't shy away from presenting my opinion whenever I have something to say.

What valid argument do you even have?

Was the Nigerian government having a conflict with Boko Haram in the first place?

A group of people decided to force a belief in a particular region, kill people against it, repeatedly claimed parts of the country as their colonies, destroyed lives and properties, killed soldiers, displaced tens of thousands of lives, all for their own selfish reasons, have placed the country among the top countries in Terrorism, and to you, this is conflict?

I'm happy you know it's your opinion. My opinion is that you are a terrorism apologist. The only difference between you and those guys carrying cardboards is that you haven't killed.

This is my opinion

Havertz10:
it's the same thing the Taliban does, i'm naturally empathetic, I can totally understand the reasoning behind their actions and their leaders actions self

your last paragraph is on the money about monitoring them but I don't think that it's that simple, you can't release a criminal into the streets and expect him to change

You have to find out what led to him committing those crimes and preventing that process from restarting, with employment rates in Nigeria, no matter how hard they try to reorientate these guys they will still fall back into that life, it provided for them, never play with a man's food, his judgment of right from wrong is skewed when his survival is on the line


Personally if I had my way, anybody that commits a crime should die, prisons are a flawed system, the numbers are there, it's an exponential growth system, it will never reduce crime or deter crime, people will forever try to game the system, only the certainty of death can deter humans, I also think that the world is overpopulated, straight forward executions is the only way forward in my book, especially for clear cut criminal cases.

Amoto94:

You don't know anything and you're also unteachable. Instead of keeping quiet you ended up embarrassing yourself and education.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_war

iamoyindamola:

And the 49 virgins will wait for them

BlueAngel444:
then what is justice to you, concerning those who surrender? Should they be executed or placed under arrest and monitoring? Shouldn't others be encouraged to defect as well?!

Havertz10:
I said clear cut cases, besides our legal system is a joke, the premise of defending the guilty because there is a possibility that he can be innocent has made the legal profession a joke, lawyers have become liars, what happens when the innocent has bad lawyers and the guilty has good lawyers, it's a flawed system that we are using

China has started using Ai judges to decide cases, I think that is the way to go, it wouldn't be something harsh like statutory minimums but it will be flexible and very consequentialI wouldn't mind losing 50% of my wealth to the government for a crime, besides it's money that I would have spent on stupid things, government can repurpose that money into welfare progams, but death should always be a possibility particularly if found guilty

I have never been arrested, the probability of me being arrested in my lifetime is very low, if you get arrested even if you are innocent, you are doing something wrong, can be intangible things but the number of innocent people that end up in trouble is very low, less than a percent.

Ideaball:


They should be applauded for surrendering, given virgins so their fellow members can also be encouraged to surrender too while those whose villages has been ransacked,daughters raped and families killed watch on or be shot by police and military if they try to protest the decision

Emmynator:

Psychological studies shows that such system will just lead to implosion and its impossible in any democracy.

Secondly, it could lead to people going to greater lengths to hide their crimes. For example, i go to steal and i am caught by the shop owner, i will most likely kill the shop owner to avoid being killed. Rapists will most likely kill their victims to avoid being found out and killed (perhaps we can agree that being a rape victim is better than being a dead victim).

You are right about finding what led to him joining and blocking it being the best way to ensure rehabilitation.

Emmynator:

Your first paragraph is very accurate. What happens when peace is the price you pay for justice?
At this stage of insecurity, FG needs more terrorists surrendering, so its pertinent to create incentives for surrender. While we can all agree that the decision will raise brows, we shouldn't look at it like a totally bad decision.

Look at it this way, our struggles with boko haram means we need more information in order to combat them properly, information defectors can provide. If the government gives full punishment to terrorists who surrender, we will have less of them surrendering and more terrorists to deal with, while having less inside information.
Justice demanded the sanctions placed on Germany after the first world War, but these sanctions played a key role in the start of the second world War.

I will only advise the government to monitor them properly and ensure that they give quality information as part of their plea deal, and perhaps send some of them back as undercover agents.

izzou:


What valid argument do you even have?

Was the Nigerian government having a conflict with Boko Haram in the first place?

A group of people decided to force a belief in a particular region, kill people against it, repeatedly claimed parts of the country as their colonies, destroyed lives and properties, killed soldiers, displaced tens of thousands of lives, all for their own selfish reasons, have placed the country among the top countries in Terrorism, and to you, this is conflict?

I'm happy you know it's your opinion. My opinion is that you are a terrorism apologist. The only difference between you and those guys carrying cardboards is that you haven't killed.

This is my opinion

Nezzjnr:
I hate it when one is trying to Form Intelligence over cases linking to Terrorism.. You argue without sense, You drop long posts that are against the law to be understood.


Go and narrate all these rubbish to the wives of those slain soldiers, Families of those Humanitarian workers, The locals.

Amoto94 you are seriously mad

Amoto94:

My emotional diatribes isn't shocking to me anymore because i'm more unstable than a radioactive element with half-life of few seconds.

nateevs:



This is extremely naive. The US has officially more homicide incidents per capita than most other developed countries in the world. And they have the death penalty for 1st degree murder.

There is no evidence anywhere to suggest death is a deterrent to crime rates. You think people go and pick up arms and go to war but it never crosses their minds that death could meet them at anytime during it?

BlueAngel444:
lol and an Ai cannot be hacked

BlueAngel444:

Are you trying to crack an unfunny joke, or sound silly or answer the question.

If you have something sensible to contribute, do so, if not just stfu. there's no need for the sarcasm.

Ideaball:


The sarcasm is meant for you and the other clown who think people bold enough to take down a fighter jet,who have rendered children orphans and women widows need to be pardoned and freed to the society

Havertz10:
I don't think you understand what hacking means or how it can be done

nateevs:
How about this for squad depth?

Amoto94:

Read instead of shouting Pantami-esque
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_war

iamoyindamola:

Bros you are a joke
All of a sudden there is law of war
Why can't we use Sharia law for them and see the outcome
What did MURIC or miyetti say to this
My opinion too

Amoto94:

Even in Shari'a you don't kill people who have surrendered, I have been trying to avoid you but each time you appear childish with your snide remarks laced with ignorance.

Amoto94:

Even in Shari'a you don't kill people who have surrendered, I have been trying to avoid you but each time you appear childish with your snide remarks laced with ignorance.