Southgate called up an injured Reece James?

Maybe it is England's water polo team he's going to feature for as he is training in the pool.

Ibime:


Who said ball is near you? If you are a defensive player and play is going on in the opponents half, you should absolutely be marking the opposing attackers still in your half if not one clearance or long ball puts them in. Unless you want to be unfortunate like Barca leaving Torres unmarked for an Ashley Cole bouday to land to him to run unchallenged on Valdes in 2012.

The kain comments man dey read here these days makes me wonder which kain people dey discuss football here.




Which kain talk be the bolded. Is it when ball lands to man's feet that you remember he is a threat? Is Kovacic not also foolish for doing exactly what you recommended in the bolded - waiting for ball to land to Chiesa before remembering that Chiesa is a threat, by which time it's too late

I have blamed Kovacic of being guilty of the same thing, however my focus is not Kovacic. Nobody is hyping Kovacic as the best thing since sliced bread here. Silva has little fault. He is the spare man.[b] Silva will be stupid to commit too early to a one on one with Bernadeschi being the last man. [/b]Last man does not commit to duels early especially in a 3 man defence cos if you lose a duel as last man, it is over. He would be surprised to see a ball dropping to Bernadeschi unchallenged in-between the DM and last man. The last man is insurance, and only duels if absolutely necessary, that's why I said we keep a spare man 5 yards back when playing defence. Everybody else duels and anything that falls from a duel will fall to spare man 90% of the time. If Silva had gone tight to Bernadeschi early in that sequence, Bernadeschi is open to the possibility of one dribble putting him through on goal.

Raumdeuter and his other stooges did you see the part I bolded or make I do am again ?This is the difference between those who actually play the game be it monkey post or full field and know it and those who didnt play it all but want to form professor on it. My egbon from ogbomosho form the later part though

popizaino:


Replace Silva with either maldini,cannavaro,baresi,vidic,john terry,puyol,Ramos and that pass would still not be blocked. Maybe only Boateng who fluked his way up there and lacks the basis requisite of defending would have blocked such a pass. In basic defending you give your opponent the option of passing,what you don't give them is to dribble you with the ball and still gain it at your back. It now require your teammate to always watch your back and anticipate the pass but I don't expect you to understand this because you didn't play ball even if it is monkey post. You only watch ball and think you know it all.

Is it that to you Silva is ultra human that can make no mistake. This is turning to sycophancy.

Ibime:


Who said ball is near you? If you are a defensive player and play is going on in the opponents half, you should absolutely be marking the opposing attackers still in your half if not one clearance or long ball puts them in. Unless you want to be unfortunate like Barca leaving Torres unmarked for an Ashley Cole bouday to land to him to run unchallenged on Valdes in 2012.

The kain comments man dey read here these days makes me wonder which kain people dey discuss football here.




Which kain talk be the bolded. Is it when ball lands to man's feet that you remember he is a threat? Is Kovacic not also foolish for doing exactly what you recommended in the bolded - waiting for ball to land to Chiesa before remembering that Chiesa is a threat, by which time it's too late

I have blamed Kovacic of being guilty of the same thing, however my focus is not Kovacic. Nobody is hyping Kovacic as the best thing since sliced bread here. Silva has little fault. He is the spare man[b]. Silva will be stupid to commit too early to a one on one with Bernadeschi being the last man. [/b]Last man does not commit to duels early especially in a 3 man defence cos if you lose a duel as last man, it is over. He would be surprised to see a ball dropping to Bernadeschi unchallenged in-between the DM and last man. The last man is insurance, and only duels if absolutely necessary, that's why I said we keep a spare man 5 yards back when playing defence. Everybody else duels and anything that falls from a duel will fall to spare man 90% of the time. If Silva had gone tight to Bernadeschi early in that sequence, Bernadeschi is open to the possibility of one dribble putting him through on goal.

Raumdeuter and his other stooges did you see the part I bolded or make I do am again ?This is the difference between those who actually play the game be it monkey post or full field and know it and those who didnt play it all but want to form professor on it. My egbon from ogbomosho form the later part though

Ibime:


Who said ball is near you? If you are a defensive player and play is going on in the opponents half, you should absolutely be marking the opposing attackers still in your half if not one clearance or long ball puts them in. Unless you want to be unfortunate like Barca leaving Torres unmarked for an Ashley Cole bouday to land to him to run unchallenged on Valdes in 2012.

The kain comments man dey read here these days makes me wonder which kain people dey discuss football here.




Which kain talk be the bolded. Is it when ball lands to man's feet that you remember he is a threat? Is Kovacic not also foolish for doing exactly what you recommended in the bolded - waiting for ball to land to Chiesa before remembering that Chiesa is a threat, by which time it's too late

I have blamed Kovacic of being guilty of the same thing, however my focus is not Kovacic. Nobody is hyping Kovacic as the best thing since sliced bread here. Silva has little fault. He is the spare man. Silva will be stupid to commit too early to a one on one with Bernadeschi being the last man. Last man does not commit to duels early especially in a 3 man defence cos if you lose a duel as last man, it is over. He would be surprised to see a ball dropping to Bernadeschi unchallenged in-between the DM and last man. The last man is insurance, and only duels if absolutely necessary, that's why I said we keep a spare man 5 yards back when playing defence. Everybody else duels and anything that falls from a duel will fall to spare man 90% of the time. If Silva had gone tight to Bernadeschi early in that sequence, Bernadeschi is open to the possibility of one dribble putting him through on goal.

You're giving me joy .

airmark:


You sabi ball.

The likes of Raumdeuter, Lordfalcao should be carrying your folders, while you are delivering a football speech.

That is the same part I bolded I didn't even see yours before I bolded that part.

swiz123:


Is it that to you Silva is ultra human that can make no mistake. This is turning to sycophancy.

What happened to treating the message and leave the messenger ?

If someone who didn't watch the goal was judging by comments here, they would think someone committed an error of the season that led to the goal.

Agenda is making this place stink. What is even more stinking is the stench from the herd of cattle whose leader has lost it.

raumdeuter:
Another outlet pins the goal on Silva yet agenda will not let us mention his name but blame Jorginho for being on the field

Don't mind them, we know the real culprit for that goal.

swiz123:


Is it that to you Silva is ultra human that can make no mistake. This is turning to sycophancy.

amusing part is that silva is a mercenary, only joined Chelsea because psg refused to offer him a new contract

Even worst, he recently revealed that it hurt him when he heard that psg signed Ramos

popizaino:


Replace Silva with either maldini,cannavaro,baresi,vidic,john terry,puyol,Ramos and that pass would still not be blocked. Maybe only Boateng who fluked his way up there and lacks the basis requisite of defending would have blocked such a pass. In basic defending you give your opponent the option of passing,what you don't give them is to dribble you with the ball and still gain it at your back. It now require your teammate to always watch your back and anticipate the pass but I don't expect you to understand this because you didn't play ball even if it is monkey post. You only watch ball and think you know it all.

Silva is the last man giving the opponent the passing option? LMAO No wonder he is always found wanting.
Smart defender wont mind giving a dribble option as long as its to a less dangerous area of the field. Which teammate was behind Silva?

popizaino:


Hope you will sing his praises when this your website rate him higher ?

Why not point his hand in the goal conceded and not wait until another game

The goal vs Juventus Silva is the main culprit simple

popizaino:



Why didn't we score?

You played a top team and they wont give more than half chances to lukaku

raumdeuter:


Silva is the last man giving the opponent the passing option? LMAO No wonder he is always found wanting.
Smart defender wont mind giving a dribble option as long as its to a less dangerous area of the field. Which teammate was behind Silva?

I believe you saw the part of ibi.me comment that o bolded,pls read it again,it has addressed this your particular agenda .

popizaino:


They did not ask you.

They dont need to ask before we all know Hazard is a monumental failure who cannot deliver in the CL

raumdeuter:


Why not point his hand in the goal conceded and not wait until another game

The goal vs Juventus Silva is the main culprit simple

Main culprit ko main criminal ni. Read ibi.me response to jode.ra

popizaino:


I believe you saw the part of ibi.me comment that o bolded,pls read it again,it has addressed this your particular agenda .

We can all see the video of the goal and how Silva was found wanting again as he failed to block the pass that led to the goal

popizaino:



Main culprit ko main criminal ni. Read ibi.me response to jode.ra

Silva was the criminal there

Havertz10:
amusing part is that silva is a mercenary, only joined Chelsea because psg refused to offer him a new contract

Even worst, he recently revealed that it hurt him when he heard that psg signed Ramos

what has someone been a mercenary got to do with what we are saying now,pls you should be more concern about Havertz proving his performance on the pitch rather than coming to tell us what does not in anyway relate to the topic at hand.

raumdeuter:


They dont need to ask before we all know Hazard is a monumental failure who cannot deliver in the CL

Was ballack a failure too ?

Was nisterool a failure too?

popizaino:


Was ballack a failure too ?

Was nisterool a failure too?

Ballack took his Nation to a world cup final
Ballack took lowly Leverkusen to the CL final

Tell us about Hidden hazard and how many finals he has taken his country

raumdeuter:


Silva was the criminal there

Why will I take a site that rates Christensen who was jittery on the ball on night above Thiago Silva in a match that I watched serious? .......egbon if you don't trust your eyes enough to believe what it sees then not me.

raumdeuter:


Ballack took his Nation to a world cup final
Ballack took lowly Leverkusen to the CL final

Tell us about Hidden hazard and how many finals he has taken his country

The same metric that doesn't work for Thiago Silva .

Abegii show me his winner medals .

raumdeuter:

Less than 10 CL goals in an entire career, more than half from penalties

Neymar in PSG alone 20 CL goals

Now tell us about Hazard CL stats from Lille Chelsea and Madrid

Dont run away o

How did that make Hazard a failure, was scoring his primary assignment with the way chelsea set up their play.

popizaino:


The same metric that doesn't work for Thiago Silva .

Abegii show me his winner medals .

Which world cup final did Silva take his country to?

popizaino:


Why will I take a site that rates Christensen who was jittery on the ball on night above Thiago Silva in a match that I watched serious? .......egbon if you don't trust your eyes enough to believe what it sees then not me.

Did Christensen cause the goal scored? Who caused the goal scored? Show me any site that blamed Christensen or Jorgnho for the goal scored

hensben:
How did that make Hazard a failure, was scoring his primary assignment with the way chelsea set up their play.

H is an attacker, what is the job of an attacker?
Yet he had how many CL goals and assists for Chelsea in his time for Chelsea?

Ibime:


Who said ball is near you? If you are a defensive player and play is going on in the opponents half, you should absolutely be marking the opposing attackers still in your half if not one clearance or long ball puts them in. Unless you want to be unfortunate like Barca leaving Torres unmarked for an Ashley Cole bouday to land to him to run unchallenged on Valdes in 2012.

The kain comments man dey read here these days makes me wonder which kain people dey discuss football here.




Which kain talk be the bolded. Is it when ball lands to man's feet that you remember he is a threat? Is Kovacic not also foolish for doing exactly what you recommended in the bolded - waiting for ball to land to Chiesa before remembering that Chiesa is a threat, by which time it's too late

I have blamed Kovacic of being guilty of the same thing, however my focus is not Kovacic. Nobody is hyping Kovacic as the best thing since sliced bread here. Silva has little fault. He is the spare man. Silva will be stupid to commit too early to a one on one with Bernadeschi being the last man. Last man does not commit to duels early especially in a 3 man defence cos if you lose a duel as last man, it is over. He would be surprised to see a ball dropping to Bernadeschi unchallenged in-between the DM and last man. The last man is insurance, and only duels if absolutely necessary, that's why I said we keep a spare man 5 yards back when playing defence. Everybody else duels and anything that falls from a duel will fall to spare man 90% of the time. If Silva had gone tight to Bernadeschi early in that sequence, Bernadeschi is open to the possibility of one dribble putting him through on goal.

Kovacic case is different from jorginho's case na. Chiesa is clearly kovacic man thus it's wrong for kovacic to allow chiesa to run free, but in Jorginho case the ball was in the air before it landed to bernadeschi. The blame of Jorginho (to me) is not reading that 2nd ball quickly like the way bernadeschi did. When ball is in the air, any DM(or player close to that side) is looking to mop out the 2nd ball and not looking for who to mark, you only look for who to mark when ball is on the floor or if in kovacic's case (far away from you).

The only big culprit is see there is kovacic for sleeping in allowing that chiesa's run. Jorginho's fault is not anticipating better to win the 2nd ball and not looking for bernadeschi to mark cos if Chelsea player had won that header, Jorginho will rightly be criticized here also for hiding behind bernadeschi

If only Kovacic haven't given chiesa free run into the box thus not making chiesa present, that would have been a dead end for bernadeschi cos nobody will be there to bail him out. It's that chiesa option that's causing all these wahala. Not exonerating Jorginho for not winning the 2nd ball tho cos he was slow in covering up his zone.

hensben:
How did that make Hazard a failure, was scoring his primary assignment with the way chelsea set up their play.

Nobody has an agenda on Azpi hence no one will question why he didn't challenge the header.

To me, Silva could have done better. He should have drifted back slowly until Jorginho will close down on Bernadeschi instead of rushing out.

Finally, it's an ordinary mistake which I don't understand why it's been blown out of proportion

Havertz10:
amusing part is that silva is a mercenary, only joined Chelsea because psg refused to offer him a new contract

Even worst, he recently revealed that it hurt him when he heard that psg signed Ramos

All footballers are mercenaries, that's what they collect fat checks for, say something new.

swiz123:
Nobody has an agenda on Azpi hence no one will question why he didn't challenge the header.

To me, Silva could have done better. He should have drifted back slowly until Jorginho will close down on Bernadeschi instead of rushing out.

Finally, it's an ordinary mistake which I don't understand why it's been blown out of proportion

Agenda too much for here.
Ever brought out their tools and targeted them only at their usual suspects.

That goal was as a result of organizational lapse, almost everyone has a hand one way or another, but not enough to paint him as the main culprit.