owagbeba:
According to the records provided here by chatinent, there a few striking facts to this case. And these facts raise a lot of questions.... I think this case was easy for the investigators to solve

-The rapist had access to the complex, as he was seen on CCTV punching access codes on the door knob

- this access door leads to the laundry in the complex

- the rapist arrived to the complex in a car with a distinct tag

- the rapist had an “African” accent.


————-
How many Africans lived in that complex?
Is it possible that the rapist accessed the laundry to change clothes?
Did the car the defendant (Powerhouse5050) used that night have a distinct tag?
Did the defendant admit to this crime ?
Did the victim identify the defendant as the rapist?

————
@ powerhouse5050
I am afraid your current argument over clothings won’t really sway the jury. The rapist had ample time to change clothing.

Powerhouse5050:


Listen and read this please

There were two videos involved in this case :

1, The video that showed me captured by the surveillance camera

2, The video that showed the unmistaken identity of the man this lady reported

The evidences I am presenting showed the lady reported the man wears khaki short (911record)

Also the police officer that viewed the surveillance video footage and his report that he saw the man in khaki short

This lady also testified at the trial that the man wears khaki short
And again the police officer also testified that he saw the man that was wearing khaki short

That was the man this lady reported, this is the only video evidence that shows the unmistaken identity of the man this lady reported.

Why is the police hiding this video from the public?

Under due process clause of 14the amendment rights, I am entitled to the video in order to perfect my defense

The jury have the right to see all the evidences that showed any kind of identification in this case,in order to be able to determine who actually committed the crime.

As you can see from the photo I attached I wasn't wearing khaki short and it is totally impossible for me to be at 2 desperate locations at the same time wearing 2 different kind of cloth.

Don't forget the prosecutor protested and objected to in-court identification WHY? Isn't that a normal criminal trial procedure in America?

Everybody want justice for this lady but when you convict innocent person,is that the type of justice this lady want?

How can you get justice through injustice?

All these documents I am sharing were part of evidences that was never shared with the public......so your family or whoever you called doesn't really have knowledge of the evidences I am sharing now.........show them this evidences and hear their opinion again.

Thank you

JayEntaur:
Hi OP. In trying to make sense of all your assertions, I have a couple of questions that I would like to ask you, if you don't mind.

You keep buttressing that you wore pants while the attacker wore khaki shorts. Seeing that the attacker wasn't apprehended immediately, do you agree that he would have had ample time to quickly change into something else?
Alternatively, you said there were 2 different footages. Where they of the same timestamp, so as to back up your alibi that you were somewhere else?

And about your call records... Was it established that you were on the phone with a MD at the exact time the incident was happening? Not some minutes before or after, but at that exact time.
If so, was this crucial evidence tendered at your trial - was the MD subpoenaed to testify?
If not, why?

Finally, at least 2 people are saying that after the cctv footage was shown to you, you confirmed it was you and pled guilty. Is this true?

IF you're truly innocent, I can't begin to imagine all you must feel. God help you!

JayEntaur:
Hi OP. In trying to make sense of all your assertions, I have a couple of questions that I would like to ask you, if you don't mind.

You keep buttressing that you wore pants while the attacker wore khaki shorts. Seeing that the attacker wasn't apprehended immediately, do you agree that he would have had ample time to quickly change into something else?
Alternatively, you said there were 2 different footages. Where they of the same timestamp, so as to back up your alibi that you were somewhere else?

And about your call records... Was it established that you were on the phone with a MD at the exact time the incident was happening? Not some minutes before or after, but at that exact time.
If so, was this crucial evidence tendered at your trial - was the MD subpoenaed to testify?
If not, why?

Finally, at least 2 people are saying that after the cctv footage was shown to you, you confirmed it was you and pled guilty. Is this true?

IF you're truly innocent, I can't begin to imagine all you must feel. God help you!

hamjola:


@OP, If you remember my first post to this case.I said you should tell us the story yourself. It saves you from integrity check. You are now giving us the story in bit.You never mention purchasing any car in your initial post.Some of us might put you on the spot by our questions and cross examination, we are only working with the facts available to us.If you have given us your itinerary from Japan to US,till the time of arrest, it would have helped us.

Since you are very sure of your innocence, let a legal person put all your evidences together.
Please remember no black man will be happy to see a fellow black man sentenced for what he didn't do.Nobody hate you here.I don't pray this to happen to my enemy when he is innocent.

Best of luck.

Ola17:


He claims that there exists another cctv footage of him in a different location with a different attire at the time of the crime. He also claimed that there’s a proof that he was on a phone call with his doctor when the crime was going on and that he will forward these evidences to Chatinent.

The thing is, if such evidences exist how come they weren’t tendered in the court? And until those evidences are posted here I’m afraid your observations is the most likely thing that happened.

Ola17:


He claims that there exists another cctv footage of him in a different location with a different attire at the time of the crime. He also claimed that there’s a proof that he was on a phone call with his doctor when the crime was going on and that he will forward these evidences to Chatinent.

The thing is, if such evidences exist how come they weren’t tendered in the court? And until those evidences are posted here I’m afraid your observations is the most likely thing that happened.

Powerhouse5050:


Answers
Answers : Yes the attacker could have changed into something else however what I am fighting for is the video that showed the attacker in khaki short.

We need to see the identity of the attacker first before we get worried if had changed clot or not

The video that showed men has time on it and that picture was taken from the video

I can prove 2 footage does exist but the prosecutor only released one footage and that was the footage that showed me, so where is the second footage that showed the man in khaki short..... The complex has 4 different cameras at different locations

About phone calls YES

The evidence I will share showed TIME,START TIME,END TIME DURATION,NUMBER DIALED AND SHOWED CALL SUCCESSFUL.

Please wait till I attach this cell phone record .

About people who were say in I pled guilty can they show any record to prove that?

chatinent:


I like the questions you guys are asking.

Relax...you'll get all evidences. You know he is in jail..time factor.

Powerhouse5050:


Answers
Answers : Yes the attacker could have changed into something else however what I am fighting for is the video that showed the attacker in khaki short.

We need to see the identity of the attacker first before we get worried if had changed clot or not

The video that showed men has time on it and that picture was taken from the video

I can prove 2 footage does exist but the prosecutor only released one footage and that was the footage that showed me, so where is the second footage that showed the man in khaki short..... The complex has 4 different cameras at different locations

About phone calls YES

The evidence I will share showed TIME,START TIME,END TIME DURATION,NUMBER DIALED AND SHOWED CALL SUCCESSFUL.

Please wait till I attach this cell phone record .

About people who were say in I pled guilty can they show any record to prove that?

Powerhouse5050:


The evidences does exist, they were part of the discovery released by the prosecutor, my defense attorney had it on the table, I was looking at it,check it until it was time to present it to the court, he had a discreet conversation with the prosecutor right inside court with the jury watching and after that he returned to the defence table without present in it to the court.

I protested but I was shut down

chatinent:

1stGenAmerican, please do you have evidences on this?

1stGenAmerican:


Because I like you, I’ll give you a bit of food for thought.

If you are accused of entering a code on a keypad to enter a laundry, what might provide more proof? Footage taken from a distance or your fresh fingerprints lifted from the keypad via a forensic investigator?

Please, do not respond to me as I am only giving you food for thought.

If you are accused of entering a code on a keypad to enter a laundry

chatinent:


Remember, in law, facts may be wrong or right.

.

1stGenAmerican:


I shall correct you on one important thing: with regards to law, FACTS ARE FACTS.

dollynnn:

Yeah,that is correct

chatinent:


What happens when they are debunked?

1stGenAmerican:


So if I continue to spot lies and realize that you guys are doing more harm than good, you want me to shut the fvck up?

Your wish is my command

chatinent:


I like the questions you guys are asking.

Relax...you'll get all evidences. You know he is in jail..time factor.

1stGenAmerican:


Facts are never debunked, theories are.

Fact: water is wet. Can that be debunked?

chatinent:


What happens when they are debunked?

onlyforchrist:
Please shut it already bitter woman

chatinent:


I don't follow the books. I follow the reality. I would give a case but it isn't important. Facts are based on theories. Evidences build up facts. I can prove fact to what is has been when it becomes what it is at present.

What happens when the family of the ingredients of facts isn't all right or all wrong but is absorbed one-sided?

chatinent:


I don't follow the books. I follow the reality. I would give a case but it isn't important. Facts are based on theories. Evidences build up facts. I can prove fact to what is has been when it becomes what it is at present.

What happens when the family of the ingredients of facts isn't all right or all wrong but is absorbed one-sided?

Arigbabuwo21:
Why attack her ? She is entitled to her opinion! While I don’t agree with some of her points, name-calling and insults are of no good.

dollynnn:

The thing is, in law, facts are not based on theories. You got the second one right_ Evidence builds up facts of a case and strengthens it

Arigbabuwo21:
Why attack her ? She is entitled to her opinion! While I don’t agree with some of her points, name-calling and insults are of no good.

1stGenAmerican:


While you Google answers about the American Justice System I hold a JD and actively practice in the US.

That must happen BEFORE a conviction.[size=8pt][/size]

I’m not going to tell you anything else and I’ll allow you to keep embarrassing yourself. You will be providing a laugh for those with true US legal knowledge who find this forum many years to come.