basilico:


When people go the UK what makes them they are more intelligent

I never knew he was this naive

benalvino3:


rubbish. so saying man and woman are biologically different is now demonizing people? wow which kind of bullshit from the left you dont support.

The law gives people the right to choose their gender. So far as that is the law, media has no duty to stoke hatred or unhelpful conversations.

15 years ago, the conversation was about gay civil partnerships

40 years ago it was about whether homosexuality should be legal

50 years ago it was whether blacks can go to same school or restaurant

20 years from now it will be another thing.

Countries are a collection of diverse individuals and to stoke hatred on a subsection of the country is to tear yourself apart.

The media has a civic duty. One day you Trumpanzees will realise that media and Government is not talk anyhow, do anyhow. People respect dialogue not hatred. As an example we haven't seen BLM on the street for over a year.

Ibime:


The law gives people the right to choose their gender. So far as that is the law, media has no duty to stoke hatred or unhelpful conversations.

15 years ago, the conversation was about gay civil partnerships

40 years ago it was about whether homosexuality should be legal

50 years ago it was whether blacks can go to same school or restaurant

20 years from now it will be another thing.

Countries are a collection of diverse individuals and to stoke hatred on a subsection of the country is to tear yourself apart.

The media has a civic duty. One day you Trumpanzees will realise that media and Government is not talk anyhow, do anyhow. People respect dialogue not hatred. As an example we haven't seen BLM on the street for over a year.

ibime has officially throway reality and biology.
question is men and women biologically different ? yes or no.

benalvino3:


ibime has officially throway reality and biology.
question is men and women biologically different ? yes or no.

Of course they are, but what is the purpose of the question, to deny men who choose to become women their legal right?

Ibime:


The law gives people the right to choose their gender. So far as that is the law, media has no duty to stoke hatred or unhelpful conversations.

15 years ago, the conversation was about gay civil partnerships

40 years ago it was about whether homosexuality should be legal

50 years ago it was whether blacks can go to same school or restaurant

20 years from now it will be another thing.

Countries are a collection of diverse individuals and to stoke hatred on a subsection of the country is to tear yourself apart.

The media has a civic duty. One day you Trumpanzees will realise that media and Government is not talk anyhow, do anyhow. People respect dialogue not hatred. As an example we haven't seen BLM on the street for over a year.

2000 years ago It was whether a woman in her menses should appear in publc

basilico:


2000 years ago It was whether a woman in her menses should appear in publc

You getti the point naw

Ibime:


Of course they are, but what is the purpose of the question, to deny men who choose to become women their legal right?

the purpose. twitter banned a number of folks saying that men and women are biologically different and trans women are biologically men. the MSM dont give platforms to people who believe in the truth. so what you said people is donkey poop.

Ibime:


I don't believe in self immolation of a country by it's own media. Media has a civic duty.

If you think MSM are deceitful for not allowing every conversation which is not helpful to the country such as Deep State conversations and Biological weapons conversations, then the media you watch is an enemy to the country and Western civilization, to be used by foreign actors to destabilise the country

benalvino3:


the purpose. twitter banned a number of folks saying that men and women are biologically different and trans women are biologically men. the MSM dont give platforms to people who believe in the truth. so what you said people is donkey poop.

donkey poop.

whats wrong with Ibime. He has been emasculated by media or what?

basilico:


donkey poop.

whats wrong with Ibime. He has been emasculated by media or what?

i tire. funny how he wants the right to free speech gone

benalvino3:


the purpose. twitter banned a number of folks saying that men and women are biologically different and trans women are biologically men. the MSM dont give platforms to people who believe in the truth. so what you said people is donkey poop.

Twitter has no duty to give voice to hatred. Those people should learn to communicate properly.

Ibime:


Twitter has no duty to give voice to hatred. Those people should learn to communicate properly.

the biological fact is hatred? you have gone nuts

benalvino3:


the biological fact is hatred? you have gone nuts

If I check your Nairaland posts and some facts you like repeating about Mohammed and Aisha, they are facts, but hatred.

It's a fact that Ijaw people were predominantly fishermen. Repeat "those drunk Ijaw fishermen" in all your blogs and you are giving hate speech.

Hitler or Martin Luther repeat "the Jews always charge usury" and he is giving hate speech. It's a fact though.

Ibime:


If I check your Nairaland posts and some facts you like repeating about Mohammed and Aisha, they are facts, but hatred.

It's a fact that Ijaw people were predominantly fishermen. Repeat "those drunk Ijaw fishermen" in all your blogs and you are giving hate speech.

Hitler or Martin Luther repeat "the Jews always charge usury" and he is giving hate speech. It's a fact though.

Facts are facts. The hatred you have for Donald Trump should not be allowed too. You are all over the place.

You want to silence biological fact. No hatred in saying men are women are biologically different.

benalvino3:


Facts are facts. The hatred you have for Donald Trump should not be allowed too. You are all over the place.

You want to silence biological fact. No hatred in saying men are women are biologically different.

The law is not concerned with biology and allows them to choose their gender. Finito.

We left the legality of this conversation behind in UK since 1970

Ibime:


The law is not concerned with biology and allows them to choose their gender. Finito.

We left the legality of this conversation behind in UK since 1970

Tell me the law that says you cannot say biological facts?

I dont think I am talking to ibime
You are not this dumb or is it the vaccine ?

benalvino3:


Tell me the law that says you cannot say biological facts?

I dont think I am talking to ibime
You are not this dumb or is it the vaccine ?

Next time you you have a coworker who has transitioned, keep referring to them by their previous gender and see what the law would tell you in a discrimination case.

Ibime:


Next time you you have a coworker who has transitioned, keep referring to them by their previous gender and see what the law would tell you in a discrimination case.

You didn't answer my question.
Which law that says no one can say women and men are biologically different. No one is talking about a coworker here.

benalvino3:


You didn't answer my question.
Which law that says no one can say women and men are biologically different. No one is talking about a coworker here.

The law says what you must address them as, that being what they have chosen. If you insist on calling them anything else, it's legally discrimination.

basilico:


Why dont you want to admit that media is just one big asshole. And democrats are the bigger asshol.
Come home we very accommodating

Lol, come which home bro?
Too many jagajaga people are in the GOP of today.

Ibime:


The law says what you must address them as, that being what they have chosen. If you insist on calling them anything else, it's legally discrimination.

If you decide to wear women clothing That doesn't turn you into a woman .I would only call you a woman. if you die and get born again as a woman
The law is an ass

basilico:


If you decide to wear women clothing That doesn't turn you into a woman .I would only call you a woman. if you die and get born again as a woman
The law is an ass

Kikikikikikiki

Ibime:


The law says what you must address them as, that being what they have chosen. If you insist on calling them anything else, it's legally discrimination.

Ya donkey ya slowpoke ye

ya isa expose ye

gambojimeta:

Kikikikikikiki

kikiki ya ass kisser ye

Ibime:


The law says what you must address them as, that being what they have chosen. If you insist on calling them anything else, it's legally discrimination.

Sigh... women and men is not a specific individual. Tell me which law that says one cannot say WOMEN AND MEN are biologically different.

You have completely gone nuts. No reasoning in what you say... Just subconsciously trying to defend any nonsense from the left.

When you hear high inflation too you go try to blame others. No sense again.

benalvino3:

Mumu, women and men is not a specific individual.

Tell me which law that says one cannot say WOMEN AND MEN are biologically different.

Mumu, I'm sure when referring to a person, you use he or she.

So therefore I have told you what the law will say if you want to continue to use he on someone who is now a she.

You can say what you want about biology, that's your business, but you can't speak English without referring to gender

Colleague says, "Benalvino did you get the email from Caitlyn Jenner".

Benalvino choice of response: "I got it from him" or "I got it from her"

Benalvino walks away without answering, sits in front of blank computer and repeats to himself "there is no law that says one cannot say WOMEN AND MEN are biologically different."

Ibime:


Mumu, I'm sure when referring to a person, you use he or she.

So therefore I have told you what the law will say if you want to continue to use he on someone who is now a she.

You can say what you want about biology, that's your business, but you can't speak English without referring to gender

Colleague says, "Benalvino did you get the email from Caitlyn Jenner".

Benalvino choice of response: "I got it from him" or "I got it from her"

Benalvino walks away without answering, sits in front of blank computer and repeats to himself "there is no law that says one cannot say WOMEN AND MEN are biologically different."

Nobody will make a sentence saying he or she are biologically different.

an adult female human being.

You have been typing nonsense since yesterday, you must have had too much booster shots it is getting into your brain.

So oga, I am not referring to a person, I am saying a factual statement that women and men are biologically different.

The ones who identify as women cannot be offended by that or discriminated against when the ones who are women and never transitioned dont have issues with it.

So when I say women who am I referring to?
Biological women or men who thinks they are women?

This guy is taking his dumbness to a special level.

Women are women... I will tell you that biology is biology and if it is reality how is it a problem that you support censoring the truth?
Where is the hate speech in women and men are biologically different?

When will you start calling your spouse birthing person instead of woman or female because they want you to know men can give birth too and you are happily subscribing to this delusion.

If anyone have a doubt that liberalism is a mental disorder... Take a look at ibime ans doubt no more

Ibime, if you want me to call you monkey I will, but do I think you are a monkey? Nope. Transgender women or men are called he or she but nobody will tell you they are biologically women. They cant see their period, no uterus. Only deluded brainwash fools will think they are biologically women.

benalvino3:


Nobody will make a sentence saying he or she are biologically different.



You have been typing nonsense since yesterday, you must have had too much booster shots it is getting into your brain.

So oga, I am not referring to a person, I am saying a factual statement that women and men are biologically different.

The ones who identify as women cannot be offended by that or discriminated against when the ones who are women and never transitioned dont have issues with it.

So when I say women who am I referring to?
Biological women or men who thinks they are women?

This guy is taking his dumbness to a special level.

Women are women... I will tell you that biology is biology and if it is reality how is it beneficial to otherwise.

Ibime, if you want me to call you monkey I will, but do I think you are a monkey? Nope. Transgender women or men are called he or she but nobody will tell you they are biologically women. They cant see their period, no uterus. Only deluded brainwash fools will think they are biologically women.

As per the bolded, when you see Caitlyn Jenner at work, you would still refer to her. Good.

Now you've got that men and women are biologically different off your chest, perform 100 repititions, 5 times a day for the rest of your life.

Ibime:


As per the bolded, when you see Caitlyn Jenner at work, you would still refer to her. Good.

Now you've got that men and women are biologically different off your chest, perform 100 repititions, 5 times a day for the rest of your life.

You think passing stupid laws are good and must be followed but cry about slavery and segregation.

No sane person thinks because something is pass of as a law its good. Keep the same energy when segregation was a law.

benalvino3:

You think passing stupid laws are good and must be followed but cry about slavery and segregation.

No sane person thinks because something is pass of as a law its good. Keep the same energy when segregation was a law.

Look at it through another lens. I support legal recognition for all humans (gay, trans, black, women) because when all are legally recognised, no one can come and roll back my rights as a black man back to segregation era. It's a conservative black position and a survivalist one. I don't have to agree with it morally, but I know it's in my best interest and secures my rights further. Same argument made against denying one section of humans their rights can be applied to any section of humanity using same logic, if the powers that be are wicked enough.

Ibime:


Look at it through another lens. I support legal recognition for all humans (gay, trans, black, women) because when all are legally recognised, no one can come and roll back my rights as a black man back to segregation era. It's a conservative black position and a survivalist one. I don't have to agree with it morally, but I know it's in my best interest and secures my rights further. Same argument made against denying one section of humans their rights can be applied to any section of humanity using same logic, if the powers that be are wicked enough.

I hold the same argument too before somebody will want to roll back my rights as a woman because they will say that we have deviated from God's given mandate blah, blah, blah and take us back to the pre-protofeminist era when it comes to my personal space I am a bit conservative(not too much) but I have a liberal world view of things and nobody's lifestyle is hurting me so why should I force my view on others?

Ibime:


Look at it through another lens. I support legal recognition for all humans (gay, trans, black, women) because when all are legally recognised, no one can come and roll back my rights as a black man back to segregation era. It's a conservative black position and a survivalist one. I don't have to agree with it morally, but I know it's in my best interest and secures my rights further. Same argument made against denying one section of humans their rights can be applied to any section of humanity using same logic, if the powers that be are wicked enough.

hmmm. Now you know where I am coming from.
my point is, just because law for something is passed does not mean it makes sense or it is morally good or it furthers humanity or for the betterment of humanity.

we have Genders and madness appearing at will, if anything that appears that Goes against reality is supported and passed as law, when will they support a situation where I identify or feel like your king and you must accept that I am your king?

I don't have a problem with gays, transgender, etc. I once had a lecturer who was a guy who then transitioned to a woman. I once had a friend in UST, we played PS together, he went to Aberdeen for master's, Got married to a Scottish woman, had 2 kids then divorced her because he had a boyfriend and he is gay. he is still my friend, nothing change.

but when they start to say you cannot say Women and Men are biologically different... then there is a problem. they have started robbing women of their entitlement by allowing MEN to compete as women. that does not further society or solve any problems... it creates problems.

benalvino3:


hmmm. Now you know where I am coming from.
my point is, just because law for something is passed does not mean it makes sense or it is morally good or it furthers humanity or for the betterment of humanity.

Law and morality have never been the same thing since the seperation of church and state, and that's where we differ. You want to codify moral ethics, I'm happy keeping them seperate. Some other persons perception of morality could land me in jail if that was not the case, for example if I drink alcohol in Saudi Arabia.