Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,169,906 members, 7,876,445 topics. Date: Sunday, 30 June 2024 at 05:21 PM

Handprint Disproves Evolution - Religion (5) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Handprint Disproves Evolution (11619 Views)

A Graduate Student Disproves Gay Marriage Scientifically. / Part Of Evolution Theory That Got Me Really Confused....can There Be An Answer? / Can Evolution Produce An Eye? Not A Chance! (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) ... (23) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by Maynman: 10:58pm On Dec 18, 2022
OLAADEGBU:
Evolution vs Creation...



Source
What’s the origin of the word “animal”?

Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by OLAADEGBU(m): 11:05pm On Dec 18, 2022

Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by Maynman: 12:12am On Dec 19, 2022
OLAADEGBU:
Give Thanks...

Whether you say “Was the universe always here or did it pop out of nowhere?” or “Was your favorite God always here or did it pop out of nowhere?”, it’s the same question.
Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by OLAADEGBU(m): 2:13am On Dec 19, 2022
Soft Tissue Discovered In "50 Million" Year Old Lizard...

In 2011, soft tissue was recovered from a lizard in the Green River Formation which dates to 50 to 70 million years old on the evolution timescale. Scientists don't even call it a fossil because it's soft tissue.

How could soft tissue exist if this animal lived "50-70 million years ago" according to evolutionists?

The answer is, it couldn't. This sample along with many others, casts serious doubt on the possibility of millions of years of evolution. Not to mention, the lizard appears to be a lizard that we have around today. No evolution seems to have occurred in "50-70 million years"!

https://answersingenesis.org/dinosaurs/bones/more-soft-tissue-in-old-fossils/

Source

1 Like

Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by LordReed(m): 1:06pm On Dec 19, 2022
OLAADEGBU:
Soft Tissue Discovered In "50 Million" Year Old Lizard...

In 2011, soft tissue was recovered from a lizard in the Green River Formation which dates to 50 to 70 million years old on the evolution timescale. Scientists don't even call it a fossil because it's soft tissue.

How could soft tissue exist if this animal lived "50-70 million years ago" according to evolutionists?

The answer is, it couldn't. This sample along with many others, casts serious doubt on the possibility of millions of years of evolution. Not to mention, the lizard appears to be a lizard that we have around today. No evolution seems to have occurred in "50-70 million years"!

https://answersingenesis.org/dinosaurs/bones/more-soft-tissue-in-old-fossils/

Source

They even quoted from the source that resolved the issue
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2011.0135
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41315061

Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by OLAADEGBU(m): 1:24pm On Dec 19, 2022
LordReed:


They even quoted from the source that resolved the issue
https://royalsocietypublishing. org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2011.0135
https://www.jstor.org/stable /41315061

How did they resolve the issue? undecided
Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by Maynman: 1:59pm On Dec 19, 2022
Why believe when you can Know?

1 Like

Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by LordReed(m): 2:26pm On Dec 19, 2022
OLAADEGBU:


How did they resolve the issue? undecided

Really? You can't read it for yourself?
Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by OLAADEGBU(m): 2:34pm On Dec 19, 2022
LordReed:


Really? You can't read it for yourself?

If you can't explain it in your own words then it's not worth it wasting my time chasing shadows down rabbit holes.
Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by LordReed(m): 2:41pm On Dec 19, 2022
OLAADEGBU:


If you can't explain it in your own words then it's not worth it wasting my time chasing shadows down rabbit holes.

LoLz. Oh now you want someone to explain it. Remember how you tell me to not be lazy and read, right back at ya. Bwahahahahaha!
Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by Maynman: 5:45pm On Dec 19, 2022
Lol

Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by OLAADEGBU(m): 11:08am On Dec 20, 2022
Scientists Discover Hidden Code Within Our DNA...

Scientists have discovered a secret second code hiding within DNA which instructs cells on how genes are controlled.

Ever since the genetic code was deciphered over 40 years ago, scientists have believed that it only described how proteins are made. However, research now indicates that genomes use the genetic code to ((write)) two separate languages.

Scientists discovered that the second language ((instructs)) the cells on how genes are controlled

The second language remained hidden for so long because one ((language)) is ((written)) on top of the other, scientists said.

Scientists already knew that the genetic code uses a 64-letter alphabet called codons. The research team discovered that some of the codons can have two meanings – one related to proteins, the other to gene control. Those codons were given the name 'duons

(We are twice as complex as evolutionary scientists once thought! If Darwin had only known this information..)

https://answersingenesis.org/biology/microbiology/dnas-hidden-codes/

Source

1 Like

Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by LordReed(m): 11:16am On Dec 20, 2022
OLAADEGBU:
Scientists Discover Hidden Code Within Our DNA...

Scientists have discovered a secret second code hiding within DNA which instructs cells on how genes are controlled.

Ever since the genetic code was deciphered over 40 years ago, scientists have believed that it only described how proteins are made. However, research now indicates that genomes use the genetic code to ((write)) two separate languages.

Scientists discovered that the second language ((instructs)) the cells on how genes are controlled

The second language remained hidden for so long because one ((language)) is ((written)) on top of the other, scientists said.

Scientists already knew that the genetic code uses a 64-letter alphabet called codons. The research team discovered that some of the codons can have two meanings – one related to proteins, the other to gene control. Those codons were given the name 'duons

(We are twice as complex as evolutionary scientists once thought! If Darwin had only known this information..)

https://answersingenesis.org/biology/microbiology/dnas-hidden-codes/

Source

So what if we are twice as complex as we first thought? How does that prove your god is real or that evolution didn't happen?

BTW all these findings happened in a lab not in Bible study. LoLz.

2 Likes

Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by OLAADEGBU(m): 11:22am On Dec 21, 2022
Living for 900 years...

According to the genealogy of Genesis 5, the average lifespan of a pre-flood human was about 900 years.

Methuselah was recorded to have lived the longest on that list, at 969.

How was this possible? And why don't we live as long as they do today?

Based on the Biblical record, we have found a number of events and factors that tie in beautifully with the field of genetics to serve as a very likely explanation.

https://creation.com/living-for-900-years
Source

1 Like

Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by OLAADEGBU(m): 1:05pm On Dec 22, 2022
Snowmen–Wintery figures point to design!

"Due to excessive snowfall a few years ago I found myself in that ‘fortunate’ position, unable to get into work, and decided to spend my time wisely exploring design theory by building two snowmen. Just as I had finished lifting the head onto the second snowman, and had added the obligatory items to construct a facial representation, I was joined by the next door neighbour's child. Taking my opportunity to conduct this rather fun piece of research I asked him if he thought that the snowmen could have appeared by chance, all by themselves? He replied, “No, someone had to make them."
.
For this 10 year old boy it was obvious; of course the snowmen could not have appeared all by themselves. The design of the snowmen was glaringly obvious to him. He implicitly recognised that there was a specific way in which the snowmen had been put together and shaped, a specified complexity to it, that there had been a designer and creator..
.
..This then begs the bigger question, why do some people deny that the person creating the snowman is himself/herself designed?
.
The human body is incredibly more complex than a snowman, obviously! To compare the two would be like comparing a toy car to a Ferrari F60, and then some more. Snowmen cannot see, taste, touch, move, digest, excrete, reproduce, talk, think, design, or make things. They do not have incredibly complex cellular machines like ATP Synthase, Kinesin or Ribosomes, or complex codes such as DNA, m-RNA, and yet no-one would dispute that they were made by somebody. As the snowmen speak of design, so the makeup of human beings screams design!
.
The Bible is quite clear on this point in Romans 1:20 where the Apostle Paul speaks of design, declaring that God's eternal power and divine nature can be understood from the things that have been made. This means that the design that we can see in the natural world around us clearly points us to God. And Paul says that because of this, the ungodly are ‘without excuse’ and that such people wilfully reject this clear evidence, as indeed they do. So, "it follows that when men proudly declare that they are atheists and deny that there is any evidence for belief in an almighty and eternal God, they are pitting their wits against clear evidence to the contrary”, as our snowman example amply demonstrates."
.
Read the full article here: http://creation.com/snowmen-point-to-design

Source

1 Like

Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by Maynman: 2:29pm On Dec 22, 2022
OLAADEGBU:
Snowmen–Wintery figures point to design!

"Due to excessive snowfall a few years ago I found myself in that ‘fortunate’ position, unable to get into work, and decided to spend my time wisely exploring design theory by building two snowmen. Just as I had finished lifting the head onto the second snowman, and had added the obligatory items to construct a facial representation, I was joined by the next door neighbour's child. Taking my opportunity to conduct this rather fun piece of research I asked him if he thought that the snowmen could have appeared by chance, all by themselves? He replied, “No, someone had to make them."
.
For this 10 year old boy it was obvious; of course the snowmen could not have appeared all by themselves. The design of the snowmen was glaringly obvious to him. He implicitly recognised that there was a specific way in which the snowmen had been put together and shaped, a specified complexity to it, that there had been a designer and creator..
.
..This then begs the bigger question, why do some people deny that the person creating the snowman is himself/herself designed?
.
The human body is incredibly more complex than a snowman, obviously! To compare the two would be like comparing a toy car to a Ferrari F60, and then some more. Snowmen cannot see, taste, touch, move, digest, excrete, reproduce, talk, think, design, or make things. They do not have incredibly complex cellular machines like ATP Synthase, Kinesin or Ribosomes, or complex codes such as DNA, m-RNA, and yet no-one would dispute that they were made by somebody. As the snowmen speak of design, so the makeup of human beings screams design!
.
The Bible is quite clear on this point in Romans 1:20 where the Apostle Paul speaks of design, declaring that God's eternal power and divine nature can be understood from the things that have been made. This means that the design that we can see in the natural world around us clearly points us to God. And Paul says that because of this, the ungodly are ‘without excuse’ and that such people wilfully reject this clear evidence, as indeed they do. So, "it follows that when men proudly declare that they are atheists and deny that there is any evidence for belief in an almighty and eternal God, they are pitting their wits against clear evidence to the contrary”, as our snowman example amply demonstrates."
.
Read the full article here: http://creation.com/snowmen-point-to-design

Source

But your god popped out of no where? Nobody made it lol

Listen to yourself.

1 Like

Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by LordReed(m): 4:16pm On Dec 22, 2022
OLAADEGBU:
Snowmen–Wintery figures point to design!

"Due to excessive snowfall a few years ago I found myself in that ‘fortunate’ position, unable to get into work, and decided to spend my time wisely exploring design theory by building two snowmen. Just as I had finished lifting the head onto the second snowman, and had added the obligatory items to construct a facial representation, I was joined by the next door neighbour's child. Taking my opportunity to conduct this rather fun piece of research I asked him if he thought that the snowmen could have appeared by chance, all by themselves? He replied, “No, someone had to make them."
.
For this 10 year old boy it was obvious; of course the snowmen could not have appeared all by themselves. The design of the snowmen was glaringly obvious to him. He implicitly recognised that there was a specific way in which the snowmen had been put together and shaped, a specified complexity to it, that there had been a designer and creator..
.
..This then begs the bigger question, why do some people deny that the person creating the snowman is himself/herself designed?
.
The human body is incredibly more complex than a snowman, obviously! To compare the two would be like comparing a toy car to a Ferrari F60, and then some more. Snowmen cannot see, taste, touch, move, digest, excrete, reproduce, talk, think, design, or make things. They do not have incredibly complex cellular machines like ATP Synthase, Kinesin or Ribosomes, or complex codes such as DNA, m-RNA, and yet no-one would dispute that they were made by somebody. As the snowmen speak of design, so the makeup of human beings screams design!
.
The Bible is quite clear on this point in Romans 1:20 where the Apostle Paul speaks of design, declaring that God's eternal power and divine nature can be understood from the things that have been made. This means that the design that we can see in the natural world around us clearly points us to God. And Paul says that because of this, the ungodly are ‘without excuse’ and that such people wilfully reject this clear evidence, as indeed they do. So, "it follows that when men proudly declare that they are atheists and deny that there is any evidence for belief in an almighty and eternal God, they are pitting their wits against clear evidence to the contrary”, as our snowman example amply demonstrates."
.
Read the full article here: http://creation.com/snowmen-point-to-design

Source

Did anyone claim that human beings made themselves or that snowmen appeared from nothing? These strawmen arguments are worse than a child doodling with his own vomit.

1 Like

Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by OLAADEGBU(m): 6:50pm On Dec 22, 2022
LordReed:


Did anyone claim that human beings made themselves or that snowmen appeared from nothing? These strawmen arguments are worse than a child doodling with his own vomit.

Did the snowmen happen by chance? undecided
Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by OLAADEGBU(m): 7:12pm On Dec 22, 2022
Maynman:


But your god popped out of no where? Nobody made it lol

Listen to yourself.

Thank God that you are wrong because God is not an "it." cool

2 Likes 1 Share

Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by OLAADEGBU(m): 7:14pm On Dec 22, 2022
The Genesis 5 and 11 fluidity question!

Many modern scholars believe that the Genesis 5 and 11 genealogies contain gaps due to fluidity, and thus cannot be used to help date creation or the Flood. Their case is threefold.

First, the Genesis 4 and 5 genealogies are so alike they must have come from a single original genealogy that developed into two.

Second, the symmetrical ten-generation form of Genesis 5 and 11 indicates schematization.

Third, science has proven that mankind is older than a no-gap reading of Genesis 5 and 11 will allow.

This paper negates the first two of these arguments by showing that conflation of two original genealogies better accounts for the similarity of the Genesis 4 and 5 names, and by demonstrating that at least three lines of evidence argue against schematization of Genesis 5 and 11.

Thus, as far as the biblical evidence is concerned, the arguments for fluidity lack a firm basis. One might reasonably conclude that the Genesis 5 and 11 genealogies do not contain gaps.

https://creation.com/the-genesis-5-and-11-fluidity-question

Source

1 Like

Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by LordReed(m): 7:39pm On Dec 22, 2022
OLAADEGBU:


Did the snowmen happen by chance? undecided

Is it 100% guaranteed that any particular person will always build a snowman? No. Therefore there is a chance that anybody will build a snowman.
Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by Maynman: 7:43pm On Dec 22, 2022
OLAADEGBU:


Thank God that you are wrong because God is not an "it." cool
Was “god” written in the old and New Testament before English translation?

god is used for masculine, and goddess is used for feminine..

Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by HellVictorinho6(m): 7:52pm On Dec 22, 2022
LordReed:


So what if we are twice as complex as we first thought? How does that prove your god is real or that evolution didn't happen?

BTW all these findings happened in a lab not in Bible study. LoLz.


I wonder why they make it seem like saying it's true or I know it's true makes it true
Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by HellVictorinho6(m): 7:55pm On Dec 22, 2022
OLAADEGBU:
Snowmen–Wintery figures point to design!

"Due to excessive snowfall a few years ago I found myself in that ‘fortunate’ position, unable to get into work, and decided to spend my time wisely exploring design theory by building two snowmen. Just as I had finished lifting the head onto the second snowman, and had added the obligatory items to construct a facial representation, I was joined by the next door neighbour's child. Taking my opportunity to conduct this rather fun piece of research I asked him if he thought that the snowmen could have appeared by chance, all by themselves? He replied, “No, someone had to make them."
.
For this 10 year old boy it was obvious; of course the snowmen could not have appeared all by themselves. The design of the snowmen was glaringly obvious to him. He implicitly recognised that there was a specific way in which the snowmen had been put together and shaped, a specified complexity to it, that there had been a designer and creator..
.
..This then begs the bigger question, why do some people deny that the person creating the snowman is himself/herself designed?
.
The human body is incredibly more complex than a snowman, obviously! To compare the two would be like comparing a toy car to a Ferrari F60, and then some more. Snowmen cannot see, taste, touch, move, digest, excrete, reproduce, talk, think, design, or make things. They do not have incredibly complex cellular machines like ATP Synthase, Kinesin or Ribosomes, or complex codes such as DNA, m-RNA, and yet no-one would dispute that they were made by somebody. As the snowmen speak of design, so the makeup of human beings screams design!
.
The Bible is quite clear on this point in Romans 1:20 where the Apostle Paul speaks of design, declaring that God's eternal power and divine nature can be understood from the things that have been made. This means that the design that we can see in the natural world around us clearly points us to God. And Paul says that because of this, the ungodly are ‘without excuse’ and that such people wilfully reject this clear evidence, as indeed they do. So, "it follows that when men proudly declare that they are atheists and deny that there is any evidence for belief in an almighty and eternal God, they are pitting their wits against clear evidence to the contrary”, as our snowman example amply demonstrates."
.
Read the full article here: http://creation.com/snowmen-point-to-design

Source


How does complexity prove intelligence?
Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by OLAADEGBU(m): 7:59pm On Dec 22, 2022
LordReed:


Is it 100% guaranteed that any particular person will always build a snowman? No. Therefore there is a chance that anybody will build a snowman.

Could the snowman by any chance be built by nobody but happened to form by itself? cheesy

1 Like

Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by LordReed(m): 8:36pm On Dec 22, 2022
OLAADEGBU:


Could the snowman by any chance be built by nobody but happened to form by itself? cheesy

We know that snowmen are built by humans so no, snowmen cannot form themselves.
Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by OLAADEGBU(m): 8:42pm On Dec 22, 2022
LordReed:


We know that snowmen are built by humans so no, snowmen cannot form themselves.

Wow! That's a revelation! shocked
Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by LordReed(m): 8:52pm On Dec 22, 2022
OLAADEGBU:


Wow! That's a revelation! shocked

Really? Good for you.
Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by LordReed(m): 8:55pm On Dec 22, 2022
OLAADEGBU:


Wow! That's a revelation! shocked

You see how question and answer should go? Not the usual dodges you like doing. LoLz.

1 Like

Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by OLAADEGBU(m): 11:21pm On Dec 22, 2022
LordReed:


Really? Good for you.

I thought you had to give it millions or billions of years for the snowman to form by itself, no? undecided
Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by LordReed(m): 11:27pm On Dec 22, 2022
OLAADEGBU:


I thought you had to give it millions or billions of years for the snowman to form by itself, no? undecided
LordReed:


We know that snowmen are built by humans so no, snowmen cannot form themselves.

1 Like

Re: Handprint Disproves Evolution by OLAADEGBU(m): 12:16am On Dec 23, 2022
HellVictorinho6:



How does complexity prove intelligence?

Do you also believe the snowman happened by chance?

1 Like

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) ... (23) (Reply)

The Definition Of Divine Harmony - Understanding Creation & Non-interference / 16 "gods" that share the same story with jesus / Are You A Church Worker Or A Bench Warmer?

Viewing this topic: 1 guest(s)

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 76
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.