Popizaino let me use few minutes to teach you what "evidence yapa" means.

Calmly go through the posts below. This is Popizaino stand on Pochettino...

popizaino:
See ball.

Well done Pochettino.

popizaino:
Abeg make una allow Pochettino do him work now. He didn't get us playing beautifully like this to be told what to do on nairaland. [/b]Let's be guided.

popizaino:

Cry from now till eternity, [b]Pochettino is a far better tactician than your stupid god forsaken Tuchel that almost ran this club to the ground.

I love this one especially...

popizaino:

You are dreaming if you think i will take back my words on Pochettino as the right man for this job.

Then, few games later,the same Popizaino...

popizaino:
Pochettino isn't ready for the job.

popizaino:


Tbh, this game has just made me lose any iota of hope i have in Pochettino. This is the same thing i lambasted that idiot in bayern Munich for thinking Pochettino is coming to correct it,only to see him doing the same thing with different players. And just like you,i want my ugly football back.

popizaino:


I am very much aware of this, maybe we should just sack Pochettino after two games and call Nagglesman,Ancelotti, Pep guardiola to come and develop this players after two games.

popizaino:
No club in Europe should ever hire Pochettino if he fails here. Idiot.

If you, Popizaino, can change lane on Pochettino this fast, who gave you the "moral right" to question me if I say I don care who replaces Rohr and later, mentioned who I want to replace him? Do you see why I called you a hypocrite earlier?

And for your info, evidence still yapa... I just selected this few for now.

Sportsweb:
I don't get it.

One dude refused to swallow his L and instead spam the thread with one particular screenshot yet other do!ts keeps replying him

When two elephants fight, grass 🌿 suffer, when two E-warriors fight readers suffer.

This is your eternal ally Airmark sef

airmark:


How did we get here?

Popizaino, where do you want your thunder?

airmark:
Popizaino, can you please use the same channel you used to recommend Pochettino, to recommend his sack?

We looking like a senseless club to other clubs.

Popizaino do you want more evidence? E still yapa...

timbros:


If you engage in a football discussion about a team not doing well that you DO NOT support, can't you as a football fan point out what is wrong with that team and make recommendations? Now, if those you recommendations are not follow, will you come out and vehemently criticise them? Or will you be indifferent on what is happening there?

You scolded VVD decision because it had to do with a club you support, Chelsea.

Why must you expect me to vehemently criticise the decision of a team I do not support just because I discussed that team with fellow football fans?

But you knew the solution (Rohr must go) to the problem of a team you don't support?

You didn't criticise because the solution (Rohr must go, to move forward), was executed. But as fate would have it, the team haven't moved forward since.

Rest, Timbros.

popizaino:


Before now,his defence was that he never had any chat with me about Rohr or not when i called him out,today he has seen a perfect straw of did he recommend Jose. .

Such a shameless man .

Timbros is still my guy sha. On this one, he missed big time.

timbros:


What do you mean by press? Choose your words wisely man.

So Diss.troy asking my opinion is now press?

If Disstroy or anybody didn't ask you, nobody would have heard about him. You were all about 'Rohr must go, to move forward'.

popizaino:



Did anyone asked for your opinion when you were all over the pages of nairaland asking Rohr to be sacked? Why should you wait for destroy to ask for your opinion before making your recommendations?

Na Disstroy question brought Renard into the picture. Man was all about Rohr must go. The mantra was loud and clear, as the solution until Disstroy's question breezed in.

airmark:


But you knew the solution (Rohr must go) to the problem of a team you don't support?

You didn't criticise because the solution (Rohr must go, to move forward), was executed. But as fate would have it, the team haven't moved forward since.

Rest, Timbros.

You can't impose on me why I didn't criticise. I have told you why. Whatever way you twist it, is your own cup of tea.

Why are you only concerned about the Rohr must go aspect? What of the "appoint a tested and trusted guy who knows African football to the core"? Isn't that the main solution?

Sportsweb:
I don't get it.

One dude refused to swallow his L and instead spam the thread with one particular screenshot yet other do!ts keeps replying him

Iyalaya e ni do!ts.

airmark:


Timbros is still my guy sha. On this one, he missed big time.

You are the one that missed big time.

Only God knows what would have been happening here if I didn't bring proof that I mentioned a guy I wanted for the job.

But here you have it in black and white and yet you are still forcing what doesn't exist.

airmark:


If Disstroy or anybody didn't ask you, nobody would have heard about him. You were all about 'Rohr must go, to move forward'.

We were having genuine football discussion with no bias or motive of trolling. He wanted to know my opinion which I gave to him. How is that a problem?

Are you saying you cannot air your view on a team which you don't support? Whether that view is applied or not, you are indifferent about the team. You just commented based on a football fan you are.

airmark:


Na Disstroy question brought Renard into the picture. Man was all about Rohr must go. The mantra was loud and clear, as the solution until Disstroy's question breezed in.

Did I or did I not say who I want to replace Rohr? Even if it takes policemen to get it off me, the fact remains that I recommended Renard.

Why then are you insisting on what is being said earlier?

timbros:


You can't impose on me why I didn't criticise. I have told you why. Whatever way you twist it, is your own cup of tea.

Why are you only concerned about the Rohr must go aspect? What of the "appoint a tested and trusted guy who knows African football to the core"? Isn't that the main solution?

Because that's the major solution from your heart, before any subsequent query on your preferred coach. I believe you wouldn't have said without Renard, Eagles wouldn't progress.

timbros:


You are the one that missed big time.

Only God knows what would have been happening here if I didn't bring proof that I mentioned a guy I wanted for the job.

But here you have it in black and white and yet you are still forcing what doesn't exist.

Without Disstroy asking you, you wouldn't have mentioned a name as part of the solution. Don't lie.

Na wa...make una sef rest na, say na by force to chop L?...The dragging nor even sweet again

airmark:


Because that's the major solution from your heart, before any subsequent query on your preferred coach. I believe you wouldn't have said without Renard, Eagles wouldn't progress.

So if you propose sack for a coach, that is your final solution for that team? No other coach will replace the sacked one?

airmark:


Without Disstroy asking you, you wouldn't have mentioned a name as part of the solution. Don't lie.

Are you saying I would have wanted Super Eagles to go coachless because I wanted Rohr sacked?

timbros:


Still confused. Must I quote somebody to air my view?

No.....and why should you always remind us what you said to Diss.troy. show us your recommendation of Rohr's replacement without been pressed.

popizaino:


No.....and why should you always remind us what you said to Diss.troy. show us your recommendation of Rohr's replacement without been pressed.

Was I pressed here?

timbros:
Popizaino let me use few minutes to teach you what "evidence yapa" means.

Calmly go through the posts below. This is Popizaino stand on Pochettino...







I love this one especially...



Then, few games later,the same Popizaino...









If you, Popizaino, can change lane on Pochettino this fast, who gave you the "moral right" to question me if I say I don care who replaces Rohr and later, mentioned who I want to replace him? Do you see why I called you a hypocrite earlier?

And for your info, evidence still yapa... I just selected this few for now.

What an expose . !!! Yimu.

I will not allow you change discussion. Accept your L then we will come back to me and Pochettino.

Brainprobremz should take over because this argument is something else now

Nawa oo since last week

Who be all this ones?

Some people get power Sha..dey drag one matter for almost a week.

iamoyindamola:
Brainprobremz should take over because this argument is something else now

Nawa oo since last week

LMAO
Ballzproblemm sef don do Twale!

Phase one Africa's qualification for the World Cup is determined in 10 rounds, and we are currently in round 2 and we have already begun to use permutation and calculating methods of how to qualify, abeg what methods are we going to use when it gets to round 7?

https://www.nairaland.com/7918725/how-rwandas-victory-over-south

popizaino:





What an expose . !!! Yimu.

I will not allow you change discussion. Accept your L then we will come back to me and Pochettino.

I am not changing any discussion.

Is it okay for you to change your opinion of Pochettino? But I can't say I don't care then later specify a name?

MorataFC:
Phase one Africa's qualification for the World Cup is determined in 10 rounds, and we are currently in round 2 and we have already begun to use permutation and calculating methods of how to qualify, abeg what methods are we going to use when it gets to round 7?

https://www.nairaland.com/7918725/how-rwandas-victory-over-south

Laplace theorem

Ibime:


Laplace theorem

Ibime:


Laplace theorem

MorataFC:
When two elephants fight, grass 🌿 suffer, when two E-warriors fight readers suffer.

hahahahaha, the thing is too much

timbros:


Was I pressed here?

Did you quote anyone here?

timbros:


I am not changing any discussion.

Is it okay for you to change your opinion of Pochettino? But I can't say I don't care then later specify a name?

In my case nobody pressed me before i gave my opinion unlike yours.