babasolution:


The so called Egyptians were defeated by Assyrians first who were not Muslims,then Greeks who were not Muslims,then Romans who were not Muslims. These are the people who wiped out the indigenous so called black Egyptians, not Arabs,by the time Arabs entered Egypt, the population was no more majority black if indeed they were black before.

Nah. The people in Egypt today, are they Romans or Greeks? No but are Arabs today! So all what you stated is hogwash.

We know how the Europeans always operate na, even as we all saw what they did in Africa. They came to Africa but returned back to their territory. Worse they did was enslaving Africans but they preserved the Africans nonetheless. Point is If the Europeans acted like the callous Arabs did to North Africa, you wouldn't even be here today to begin with. Of course this isn't exonerating the Europeans for enslaving Africans but they weren't as callous as the Arabs who wiped out the North Africans from North Africa. Heck, the Europeans were the ones who stopped the slavery whereas the criminal Arabs hadn't wanted to stop.

Anyways, point is Africans are not Arabs. Africans are simply Africans who predates Arabs btw. And I repeat, no useless idiot has any right to kill anyone over a religion, let alone kill any indigenous people in their ancestral home over a foreign religion! Let everyone sink this into their brain because I know the useless ulterior motives of some useless people murdering others in a bid to steal their ancestral territory.

Dsimmer:


Nah. The people in Egypt today, are they Romans or Greeks? No but are Arabs today! So all what you stated is hogwash.

We know how the Europeans always operate na, even as we all saw what they did in Africa. They came to Africa but returned back to their territory. Worse they did was enslaving Africans but they preserved the Africans nonetheless. Point is If the Europeans acted like the callous Arabs did to North Africa, you wouldn't even be here today to begin with. Of course this isn't exonerating the Europeans for enslaving Africans but they weren't as callous as the Arabs who wiped out the North Africans from North Africa. Heck, the Europeans were the ones who stopped the slavery whereas the criminal Arabs hadn't wanted to stop.

Anyways, point is Africans are not Arabs. Africans are simply Africans who predates Arabs btw. And I repeat, no useless idiot has any right to kill anyone over a religion, let alone kill any indigenous people in their ancestral home over a foreign religion! Let everyone sink this into their brain because I know the useless ulterior motives of some useless people murdering others in a bid to steal their ancestral territory.

Europeans did not enslave Africans ,they bought slaves enslaved by other Africans.

Greeks,Assyrians and Romans had mixed with the population of Egypt by the time Arabs arrived just as whites settled in south Africa etc,no one can wipe out Africans,if they cud they wud have done it,after all,the Europeans wiped out the red Indians of America

babasolution:


Europeans did not enslave Africans ,they bought slaves enslaved by other Africans.

Greeks,Assyrians and Romans had mixed with the population of Egypt by the time Arabs arrived just as whites settled in south Africa etc,no one can wipe out Africans,if they cud they wud have done it,after all,the Europeans wiped out the red Indians of America

Nah. The ethnicity in the North Africa is Arabs. As a matter of fact, the Europeans
who were there were also murdered and castrated as well as the Blacks. The Arabs had even gone further to Spanish territory to continue their madness until the Europeans fought back and dealt with them.

As I stated already, we all knew how the Europeans operated. They came to Africa but returned back to their territory. If they were as callous as the Arabs, Africans wouldn't even exist to begin with. Of course this isn't exonerating the Europeans for enslaving Africans however they were the ones who also stopped slavery whereas the Arabs hadn't wanted to stop

Dsimmer:


Nah. The ethnicity in the North Africa is Arabs. As a matter of fact, the Europeans
who were there were also murdered and castrated as well as the Blacks. The Arabs had even gone further to Spanish territory to continue their madness until the Europeans fought back and dealt with them.

As I stated already, we all knew how the Europeans operated. They came to Africa but returned back to their territory. If they were as callous as the Arabs, Africans wouldn't even exist to begin with. Of course this isn't exonerating the Europeans for enslaving Africans however they were the ones who also stopped slavery whereas the Arabs hadn't wanted to stop

It's a lie,read the history of Zulus in south Africa,if not for the fighting ability of the Zulus,they would have been wiped out,the Europeans cud not prevail over Africans,Africans were not some sitting ducks that cud just be wiped out like that even with advanced weapons the Europeans suffered heavy casualties that's why they had to concede truce in many instances,if they had their way,they wud have wiped out Africans,Africans are better fighters than Europeans or Arabs,they just lacked advanced weapons like the red Indians who were poor fighters and were wiped out by Europeans.

Even in West Africa, Europeans suffered heavy casualties in many places and most of their wars were fought by blacks themselves, in Nigeria the Hausa fought for the British against other tribes

Read about Zanzibar revolution, Arabs can never wipe out Africans, Arabs had access to better weapons which made them have some gains in the world but it wasn't adequate enough to do much damage.

Again you are wrong and delusional.

Arabs or Europeans can never wipe out Africans even today with all their advanced equipments.

babasolution:


It's a lie,read the history of Zulus in south Africa,if not for the fighting ability of the Zulus,they would have been wiped out,the Europeans cud not prevail over Africans,Africans were not some sitting ducks that cud just be wiped out like that even with advanced weapons the Europeans suffered heavy casualties that's why they had to concede truce in many instances,if they had their way,they wud have wiped out Africans,Africans are better fighters than Europeans or Arabs,they just lacked advanced weapons like the red Indians who were poor fighters and were wiped out by Europeans.

Even in West Africa, Europeans suffered heavy casualties in many places and most of their wars were fought by blacks themselves, in Nigeria the Hausa fought for the British against other tribes

Read about Zanzibar revolution, Arabs can never wipe out Africans, Arabs had access to better weapons which made them have some gains in the world but it wasn't adequate enough to do much damage.

Again you are wrong and delusional.

Arabs or Europeans can never wipe out Africans even today with all their advanced equipments.

No. Most of the Europeans went back to their territory. Of course some Europeans were obnoxious but they weren't as callous as the Arabs.

I will use Nigeria as a case study. The fact that the Northern Nigeria exist while practicing the foreign Islam forced on them by outsiders irrespective of the enslavement of Africans by the European is a testament to the magnanimous act of the Europeans unlike the Arabs who would have wiped them out, let alone let them continue with a religion different from theirs 🤔.. Even the Northern Africans who were practicing the backward Arab religion/culture were still wiped out by the criminal Arabs 🙄

As a matter of fact, after the Europeans fought back against the Arabs and defeated the Arabs, the Europeans were still the ones who allowed the Arabs to settle in Saudi. If it was the callous Arabs in their shoes, that wouldn't have been the case.

That's my answer!

Anyways, my main business is Africans are not Arabs! And I repeat, no useless idiot has any right to kill anyone over any religion, let alone kill any indigenous people in their ancestral home over a foreign religion! Let everyone sink this into their brain because I know the useless ulterior motives of some useless people murdering others in a bid to steal their ancestral territory.

Dsimmer:


Nah. Most of the Europeans went back to their territory. Of course some Europeans were obnoxious but they weren't as callous as the Arabs.

I will use Nigeria as case study. The fact that the Northern Nigeria exist while practicing the foreign Islam forced on them by outsiders despite the European enslavement of Africans is a testament to the magnanimous act of the Europeans unlike the Arabs who would have wiped them out, let alone let them continue with a religion different from theirs 🤔.. Even the Northern Africans who were practicing the backward Arab religion/culture were still wiped out by the criminal Arabs 🙄

As a matter of fact, after the Europeans fought back against the Arabs and defeated the Arabs, they were still the one who allowed Arabs to settle in Saudi. If it was the callous Arabs in their shoe, that wouldn't have been the case.

That's my answer!

Anyways, my main business is Africans are not Arabs! And I repeat, no useless idiot has any right to kill anyone over a religion, let alone kill any indigenous people in their ancestral home over a foreign religion! Let everyone sink this into their brain because I know the useless ulterior motives of some useless people murdering others in a bid to steal their ancestral territory.

Europeans didn't enslave Africans, they simply bought slaves from other Africans,there was never enslavement on African soil,

One thing people do not get is that the fact there was heavy available number of slaves to be bought is evidence that Africans were a notorious warring people and not that they were sitting weaklings.

You people have this misconception of Africans as a kumbaya happy naive people, that's a terrible misconception, Africans were a constantly fighting race,more than the Europeans or Arabs.

I repeat, neither the Europeans or Arabs could wipe out Africans, nor did they enslave Africans.

Northern Africa was never black lands, it was berberlands,who are largely related to the arabs,if it was,it was the desertification of the Sahara that killed off the blacks in northern Africa not the Arabs

More so,why did they not wipe out the Ethiopians etc who records shows were present during the time of Mohammed and even accommodated Mohammed at a time,why could they not even as much Islamise the Ethiopians if Arabs were that strong or is it Europeans that saved them too, are they not blacks too or its only negroid blacks that lack war ability to you or are sacrificial lambs for you right?

OALandAgents:
Where is the evidence that the so called Trans-Saharan slave trade actually occurred and was not just a lie written into the history books ?

Secondly no evidence Islam originated from Arabs, Islam is not the major religion in Africa, in my opinion, no religion is.

Even if for argument sake, Islam originates from Arabs and Islam became the major religion, that is no proof that Arabs ever enslaved Africans.

Why can't you research before displaying your ignorance. So you never had of Trans Saharan slave trading, where Arabs do transport black Africans from west Africa to Egypt ,somalia, Djibouti even crossing Mediterranean sea down to Saudi Arabia which existed up till 1970, before the Europeans attacked and block such trading.
What about Mauritania where the Arab Mauritania enslaves Mauritania black Africans Harantines using Quran to back up it, which is still in existence till today.
Even though Mauritania government outlaws the enslaving of black Harantine by their Arab masters in 2007 but the practice is still prevalent till today.
What made Kano a viable city? Do you know the number of Hausa slaves transported from Kano to Cairo after castrating them?
Why can't you use Google or YouTube, with pictorial and video evidences on how Arabs enslaved black Africans.

Where is the evidence?
All you have regurgitated here are the lies written in history books by Caucasian historians. Show me the undisputable evidence that proves that Arabs ever enslaved Africans.

Klinee:
Why can't you research before displaying your ignorance. So you never had of Trans Saharan slave trading, where Arabs do transport black Africans from west Africa to Egypt ,somalia, Djibouti even crossing Mediterranean sea down to Saudi Arabia which existed up till 1970, before the Europeans attacked and block such trading.
What about Mauritania where the Arab Mauritania enslaves Mauritania black Africans Harantines using Quran to back up it, which is still in existence till today.
Even though Mauritania government outlaws the enslaving of black Harantine by their Arab masters in 2007 but the practice is still prevalent till today.
What made Kano a viable city? Do you know the number of Hausa slaves transported from Kano to Cairo after castrating them?
Why can't you use Google or YouTube, with pictorial and video evidences on how Arabs enslaved black Africans.

babasolution:


Europeans didn't enslave Africans, they simply bought slaves from other Africans,there was never enslavement on African soil,

One thing people do not get is that the fact there was heavy available number of slaves to be bought is evidence that Africans were a notorious warring people and not that they were sitting weaklings.

You people have this misconception of Africans as a kumbaya happy naive people, that's a terrible misconception, Africans were a constantly fighting race,more than the Europeans or Arabs.

I repeat, neither the Europeans or Arabs could wipe out Africans, nor did they enslave Africans.

Northern Africa was never black lands, it was berberlands,who are largely related to the arabs,if it was,it was the desertification of the Sahara that killed off the blacks in northern Africa not the Arabs

More so,why did they not wipe out the Ethiopians etc who records shows were present during the time of Mohammed and even accommodated Mohammed at a time,why could they not even as much Islamise the Ethiopians if Arabs were that strong or is it Europeans that saved them too, are they not blacks too or its only negroid blacks that lack war ability to you or are sacrificial lambs for you right?

You mean like how the criminal pedophile Mohammed said he flew by moon into the Jewish Jerusalem? Lol.

Pedophile Mohammad went to no Ethiopia apart from the middle east he was constantly plundering with his criminality. It was after his death that his fellow criminal Arabs continued his criminal footsteps in the middle east and then went further into Egypt, the other North Africa and even into Europe until they were dealt with by the Europeans. That of course stopped their madness. It was also the Europeans who stopped slavery whereas the criminal Arabs hadn't wanted to stop.

And yes, the European colonized Africa. However they weren't as callous as the Arabs. The fact that the Northern Nigeria exist while practicing the foreign Islam forced on them by some outsiders irrespective of the colonization by the European is a testament to the magnanimous act of the Europeans unlike the Arabs who would have wiped them out, let alone let them continue with a religion different from theirs.. Even the Northern Africans who were practicing the backward Arab religion/culture were still wiped out by the criminal Arabs 🙄

And yes, the Egyptians were blacks. That's already ascertained by their arts and the ancient Greeks such as Aristotle, Plato etc who affirmed that the Egyptians were blacks!

Dsimmer:



You mean like how the criminal Mohammed said he flew by moon into Jerusalem? Lol.

Mohammad went to no Ethiopia apart from the middle east he was constantly plundering with his criminality. It was after his death that his fellow criminal Arabs continued his criminal footsteps and then went further into Egypt, the other North Africa and even Europe until they were dealt with by the Europeans. That of course stopped their madness. It was also the Europeans who stopped slavery even though the Arabs hadn't wanted to stop.

And yes, the European colonized Africa. However they weren't as callous as the Arabs. The fact that the Northern Nigeria exist while practicing the foreign Islam forced on them by some outsiders irrespective of the enslavement of Africans by the European is a testament to the magnanimous act of the Europeans unlike the Arabs who would have wiped them out, let alone let them continue with a religion different from theirs.. Even the Northern Africans who were practicing the backward Arab religion/culture were still wiped out by the criminal Arabs 🙄

And yes, the Egyptians were blacks. That's already ascertained by their arts and the ancient Greeks such as Aristotle, Plato etc who affirmed the Egyptians were blacks!

Europeans could not wipe anyone out,they only fought to wear their opponents down and gain control, many tribes especially in Nigeria were already bogged down by internal wars when the Europeans came in,that is what gave the Europeans victory, cos Nigerian tribes were already war weary so didn't fight much with the Europeans when they came in.

Nigerian tribes easily submitted and were left to be,if the Europeans had gone ahead to attempt any massacres,they would have been severely resisted and defeated.

You talk about the magniminity of Europeans but forget,the Herero in Namibia who were massacred by the Germans, are Germans not Europeans again? They saw the herero as easy pickings that's why they attempted the massacres and remain in Namibia today,the Rhodesian Afrikaans ( Dutch) also did that in Zimbabwe but we're later booted out,Angola fought a bitter war of independence with Portugal,same as Guinea, the king Leopold of Belgium massacred and amputated Congolese,these were easy pickings for the Europeans and they showed their stuff,they cudnt do such in West Africa and south Africa( the country) because those areas were occupied by WAR experienced tribes.

Again Arabs could never have wiped out Africans, they are simply not capable of doing so,why did the so called Sudanese Arabs not wipe out the south Sudanese,the black south Sudanese gave them the hell they were seeking,just as the antibalaka of the CAR gave the Arab Fulani wannabe the beating of their lives.

Again you are completely wrong and misled.

Arabs never wiped out Africans and Europeans only bought slaves and did not enslave Africans

babasolution:


Europeans could not wipe anyone out,they only fought to wear their opponents down and gain control, many tribes especially in Nigeria were already bogged down by internal wars when the Europeans came in,that is what gave the Europeans victory, cos Nigerian tribes were already war weary so didn't fight much with the Europeans when they came in.

Nigerian tribes easily submitted and were left to be,if the Europeans had gone ahead to attempt any massacres,they would have been severely resisted and defeated.

You talk about the magniminity of Europeans but forget,the Herero in Namibia who were massacred by the Germans, are Germans not Europeans again? They saw the herero as easy pickings that's why they attempted the massacres and remain in Namibia today,the Rhodesian Afrikaans ( Dutch) also did that in Zimbabwe but we're later booted out,Angola fought a bitter war of independence with Portugal,same as Guinea, the king Leopold of Belgium massacred and amputated Congolese,these were easy pickings for the Europeans and they showed their stuff,they cudnt do such in West Africa and south Africa( the country) because those areas were occupied by WAR experienced tribes.

Again Arabs could never have wiped out Africans, they are simply not capable of doing so,why did the so called Sudanese Arabs not wipe out the south Sudanese,the black south Sudanese gave them the hell they were seeking,just as the antibalaka of the CAR gave the Arab Fulani wannabe the beating of their lives.

Again you are completely wrong and misled.

Arabs never wiped out Africans and Europeans only bought slaves and did not enslave Africans

The Europeans didn't wipe out Africans and others from their ancestral home because they weren't as wicked as the criminal Arabs! Simple as ABC. Heck, the Europeans were the ones who stopped slavery.

As for those Africans who got wiped out by the criminal Arabs were those who refused to use the intelligence in their Ori thus replaced their superior culture with the backward unintelligent foreign Arab culture while killing themselves over the foreign Arab allah stone worshipping until Arabs finished them all in the end.

Dsimmer:


The Europeans didn't wipe out Africans and others from their ancestral home because they weren't as wicked as the criminal Arabs! Simple as ABC. Heck, the Europeans were the ones who stopped slavery.

As for those Africans who got wiped out by the criminal Arabs were those who refused to use the intelligence in their Ori thus replaced their superior culture with the backward unintelligent foreign Arab culture while killing themselves over the foreign Arab allah stone worshipping until Arabs finished them all in the end.

It's a lie,Europeans are gods to you,
Europeans were simply not capable of wiping out Africans if they could they would have,this is evident by the fact that werever they could they did,like in the Americas against the red Indians,like against the Herero,like against the black aborigines of australia and new zealand,etc,werever they found they were capable of wiping out the population they did.

The French would have wiped out the Haitians during the revolution if the could but they cudnt.

Arabs have not had war against Africans except the almoravids invasion of Mali

Again neither Europeans nor Arabs cud or can wipe out africans

babasolution:


It's a lie,Europeans are gods to you,
Europeans were simply not capable of wiping out Africans if they could they would have,this is evident by the fact that werever they could they did,like in the Americas against the red Indians,like against the Herero,like against the black aborigines of australia and new zealand,etc,werever they found they were capable of wiping out the population they did.

The French would have wiped out the Haitians during the revolution if the could but they cudnt.

Arabs have not had war against Africans except the almoravids invasion of Mali

Again neither Europeans nor Arabs cud or can wipe out africans

No, You're the one projecting the criminal Arab as your god. Something which the stupid Egyptians did until they were wiped out.

Meanwhile, I haven't exonerated the Europeans for what they did to Africa. However I acknowledged the fact that they weren't as wicked as the criminal Arabs. Heck, the Europeans could have wiped out all the Arabs after they fought back and defeated the Arabs during the crusades yet they didn't wipe out all the Arabs and even allowed the Arabs to stay in Saudi.

Dsimmer:


No, You're the one projecting the criminal Arab as your god. Something which the stupid Egyptians did until they were wiped out.

Meanwhile, I haven't exonerated the Europeans for what they did to Africa. However I acknowledged the fact that they weren't as wicked as the criminal Arabs. Heck, the Europeans could have wiped out all the Arabs after they fought back and defeated the Arabs during the crusades yet they didn't wipe out all the Arabs and even allowed the Arabs to stay in Saudi.

The Arabs had minimal war against africans and only bought slaves,infact Arabs captured more of white SLAVES.

But white slavery is hardly talked about, everyone including Africans like you keep emphasising black slavery, that project blacks as dumb and weak.

babasolution:



The Arabs had minimal war against africans and only bought slaves,infact Arabs captured more of white SLAVES.

But white slavery is hardly talked about, everyone including Africans like you keep emphasising black slavery, that project blacks as dumb and weak.

Another gibberish.

Africans exist today both in their African homeland and even in Europe despite the colonization by the Europeans whereas same can't be said for the North Africans who were wiped out by the criminal wicked Arabs.

As a matter of fact, the Arabs captured both Africans and the Europeans. The Arabs enslaved, castrated and murdered them. That was Until the Europeans fought back and dealt with the useless criminal Arabs thus stopping the madness of the criminal Arabs.

Dsimmer:


Another gibberish.

Africans exist today both in their African homeland and even in Europe despite the colonization by the Europeans whereas same can't be said for the North Africans who were wiped out by the criminal wicked Arabs.

As a matter of fact, the Arabs captured both Africans and the Europeans. The Arabs enslaved, castrated and murdered them. That was Until the Europeans fought back and dealt with the useless criminal Arabs thus stopping the madness of the criminal Arabs.

Arabs were also enslaved and murdered by other people,including Africans,read about the Zanzibar revolution

babasolution:


Arabs were also enslaved and murdered by other people,including Africans,read about the Zanzibar revolution

It seems you're stupid though. Zanzibar revolution is about Tanzanian who sent out the criminal Arabs who were enslaving and murdering them in their own territory. It's Tanzanians who were the victims in the first place.

Dsimmer:


It seems you're stupid though. Zanzibar revolution is about Tanzanian who sent out the criminal Arabs who were enslaving and murdering them in their own territory. It's Tanzanians who were the victims to begin with.

You are irritating, the typical irritating African,my point is if Zanzibar revolution could occur,why do you think your so called north Africans could not send out the Arabs who you say were murdering them and enslaving them.

There was nothing like Arabs enslaving Africans, they simply purchased SLAVES.

You don't even realise that there were also many blacks from Senegal particularly who were hired mercenaries working for the Arab armies that invaded Spain.

There were many blacks among those ranks.

Arabs only acquired slaves they cudnt enslave Africans ,infact they were only able to enslave whites.

Arab perception of blacks was good up until they started purchasing black slaves from irritating Africans who sold their neighbours to SLAVERY

babasolution:


You are irritating, the typical irritating African,my point is if Zanzibar revolution could occur,why do you think your so called north Africans could not send out the Arabs who you say were murdering them and enslaving them.

There was nothing like Arabs enslaving Africans, they simply purchased SLAVES.

You don't even realise that there were also many blacks from Senegal particularly who were hired mercenaries working for the Arab armies that invaded Spain.

There were many blacks among those ranks.

Arabs only acquired slaves they cudnt enslave Africans ,infact they were only able to enslave whites.

Arab perception of blacks was good up until they started purchasing black slaves from irritating Africans who sold their neighbours to SLAVERY

You're quite stupid. The North Africans simply acted like you and that was why they were wiped out. They acted stupidly by replacing their superior culture with the backward retrogressive foreign Arab culture while killing themselves over foreign Arab allah stone hence the reason why they were wiped out by the criminal Arabs. Simple as ABC.

My main business is Africans are not Arabs! And I repeat, no useless idiot has any right to kill anyone over any religion, let alone kill the indigenous people in their ancestral home over a foreign religion! Let everyone sink this into their brain because I know the useless ulterior motives of some useless people murdering others in a bid to steal their ancestral territory.

Dsimmer:


You're quite stupid. The North Africans simply acted like you and that was why they were wiped out. They acted stupidly by replacing their superior culture with the backward retrogressive foreign Arab culture while killing themselves over foreign Arab allah stone hence the reason why they were wiped out by the criminal Arabs. Simple as ABC.

My main business is Africans are not Arabs! And I repeat, no useless idiot has any right to kill anyone over any religion, let alone kill the indigenous people in their ancestral home over a foreign religion! Let everyone sink this into their brain because I know the useless ulterior motives of some useless people murdering others in a bid to steal their ancestral territory.

You are a dull man,u are not an African,easy to tell by the way u talk,u don't know anything about Africa