The only thing I learnt on this thread is never argue with someone better than you at English

I like how that one retracted without being told

advanceDNA:


Yawn!
Weak jabs

Haha. Not a fight. You obviously have no idea about women. Just hungry for attention. Lol

Botragelad

I'd like to ask an hypothetical question and I think you and I can have a conversation void of insults ...

If I line up 10 women and I tell them to choose between two men, these two men are identical in ALL regard, except the fact that one is rich and the other has enough to get by, which in all fairness do you think the 10 women (or atleast majority of the females) will choose? ...

Fahvvy:
Botragelad

I'd like to ask an hypothetical question and I think you and I can have a conversation void of insults ...

If I line up 10 women and I tell them to choose between two men, these two men are identical in ALL regard, except the fact that one is rich and the other has enough to get by, which in all fairness do you think the 10 women (or atleast majority of the females) will choose? ...

The eternal mystery of women's preferences. .
Let's play along with your hypothetical scenario, shall we? Assuming these women are devoid of agency and individuality, and their sole criterion is financial security, even then, it's not a foregone conclusion that they'd all choose the wealthy one.

Newsflash: women are not a monolith. They have diverse priorities, and experiences that shape their decisions. Some might prefer the man with a sense of humor, emotional intelligence, or shared values over the one with a fat wallet.

But, for the sake of argument, let's assume all 10 women prioritize financial security above all else. Even then, it's not a guarantee they'd choose the rich one. Perhaps some would prefer the man who is content with his modest means, demonstrating a sense of gratitude or let's say humility.

Your hypothetical scenario is simplistic. It's time to evolve beyond such outdated thinking and recognize women's complexity/individuality.

Botragelad:

The eternal mystery of women's preferences. .
Let's play along with your hypothetical scenario, shall we? Assuming these women are devoid of agency and individuality, and their sole criterion is financial security, even then, it's not a foregone conclusion that they'd all choose the wealthy one.

Newsflash: women are not a monolith. They have diverse priorities, and experiences that shape their decisions. Some might prefer the man with a sense of humor, emotional intelligence, or shared values over the one with a fat wallet.

But, for the sake of argument, let's assume all 10 women prioritize financial security above all else. Even then, it's not a guarantee they'd choose the rich one. Perhaps some would prefer the man who is content with his modest means, demonstrating a sense of gratitude and humility.

Your hypothetical scenario is a simplistic. It's time to evolve beyond such outdated thinking and recognize women's complexity/individuality.

First of...
Nowhere in my earlier write up did I opine that women were a monolith ... Neither did I say anything that hinted that women didn't have a sense of individuality ...

But somehow, you saw all of this in just a simple question? ...

Secondly...
I said both men were the same in ALL regards ... Which means the whole emotional intelligence, sense of gratitude, modesty and sense of humor are present in both men ...

But I guess that flew right past your head ...

Thirdly...
If your definition of "evolving beyond such outdated thinking" (which I hope not) is you making the kind of assumptions you made in your earlier write up, then no thanks, I'm fine being completely sane and not delusional ...

Fourthly...
The question I asked isn't all hypothetical ...
Infact, a documentary was done on this exact same scenario, but it wasn't 10 women that were used, it was a 100 and not surprising, an overwhelming majority of women (97) choose the man with the fat wallet ...

The conclusion of this is simple, whilst it is true that women aren't monolith, an overwhelming majority of women out there will choose a man who is financially stable over a man who isn't ...

This isn't based on assumptions, it is factual! ...

Thank you so much for your time dearly beloved evolved specie ... I remain my most humble self, simplistic fahvvy ...

Fahvvy:


First of...
Nowhere in my earlier write up did I opine that women were a monolith ... Neither did I say anything that hinted that women didn't have a sense of individuality ...

But somehow, you saw all of this in just a simple question? ...

Secondly...
I said both men were the same in ALL regards ... Which means the whole emotional intelligence, sense of gratitude, modesty and sense of humor are present in both men ...

But I guess that flew right past your head ...

Thirdly...
If your definition of "evolving beyond such outdated thinking" (which I hope not) is you making the kind of assumptions you made in your earlier write up, then no thanks, I'm fine being completely sane and not delusional ...

Fourthly...
The question I asked isn't all hypothetical ...
Infact, a documentary was done on this exact same scenario, but it wasn't 10 women that were used, it was a 100 and not surprising, an overwhelming majority of women (97) choose the man with the fat wallet ...

The conclusion of this is simple, whilst it is true that women aren't monolith, an overwhelming majority of women out there will choose a man who is financially stable over a man who isn't ...

This isn't based on assumptions, it is factual! ...

Thank you so much for your time dearly beloved evolved specie ... I remain my most humble self, simplistic fahvvy ...

The art of dodging and deflecting. How impressive.
Let's address your points.

1) Your original question did imply a reduction of women's agency to a singular preference, which is a simplistic and outdated view. Don't backtrack now.

2) Your assumption that both men are identical in all regards, including emotional intelligence and sense of humor, is a flawed premise. Emotional connection and shared values are complex aspects that can't be reduced to a simple "both have it" clause.

3) The attempt to label my response as "delusional" and "making assumptions" is a deflection tactic. I'm not the one making sweeping generalizations based on a flawed hypothetical scenario.

In case you aren't aware, citing a documentary with a biased experiment (100 women, really?) doesn't make your conclusion factual. It's still a narrow and sexist perspective. Women's choices are influenced by diverse factors, and your "study" doesn't account for individuality.

Please, do go on. I'm fascinated by your simplistic, fahvvy, cheesy wisdom.
😂

Biggie225:
This is one of the most strict advice my father gave me when I was small.
No matter what ,never drop your standard for a woman . As a married man hustle hard ,born children you can provide and cater for. Always live below your means.
No woman is kind. The moment you can’t provide, that’s where the love ends.
Many men are facing shege in their marriage today due to ignorance.

Word of advice.

yeye advice... just because many of these married women are useless to their husbands (when money issue arise), doesnt mean that all women are. if a wife cant take over the family duty when her husband is down, then this useless woman shouldnt be called your "wife".

wonder233:
But a woman can be fed forever by a man right?
you people think through your anus in this part of the world.
In the world today, wealth and success is no longer by physical strength but by mental and social networking, so both men and woman can both rise to the top. So anyone of them could face a hard time for any length of time. You shallow trado-religious airheads should go and sit your butts down

Are you now trying to imply men and women are the same? Are you a modern man?

Look, it's not a woman's role to provide for a man, we can support. Providing is not our job.

Biggie225:
This is one of the most strict advice my father gave me when I was small.
No matter what ,never drop your standard for a woman . As a married man hustle hard ,born children you can provide and cater for. Always live below your means.
No woman is kind. The moment you can’t provide, that’s where the love ends.
Many men are facing shege in their marriage today due to ignorance.

Word of advice.

It's better to die than allow a woman feed you.

Botragelad:

The eternal mystery of women's preferences. .
Let's play along with your hypothetical scenario, shall we? Assuming these women are devoid of agency and individuality, and their sole criterion is financial security, even then, it's not a foregone conclusion that they'd all choose the wealthy one.

Newsflash: women are not a monolith. They have diverse priorities, and experiences that shape their decisions. Some might prefer the man with a sense of humor, emotional intelligence, or shared values over the one with a fat wallet.

But, for the sake of argument, let's assume all 10 women prioritize financial security above all else. Even then, it's not a guarantee they'd choose the rich one. Perhaps some would prefer the man who is content with his modest means, demonstrating a sense of gratitude or let's say humility.

Your hypothetical scenario is simplistic. It's time to evolve beyond such outdated thinking and recognize women's complexity/individuality.

See as this one dey use big big grammars dey whine everybody.

In this world we live in and in this civilization. Twenty women wouldn't take a flinch in attaching themselves to that one rich man.

Any lady who picks the guy who only but gets by would hypothetically regret and prolly rescind her decision in less than a month.

Women are constantly weighin' their choices. They always think a better man would come for them regardless of who they are with at the moment. Yeah! They always think they deserve a better man.

This is the gospel truth, and it is as crystal clear as the biblical's mene mene tekel urpharsin.

Reality right here, and not some Nollywood inveigled reasoning.

ogashman:
Next yr after marriage... I'm getting some money from my wife to add up and start a biz.

Nothing bad if ur wife feeds u when things get tough for u, just don't let it be prolonged.

Strive to be bringing something to the table... Let her see that u re trying ur best to regain ur position as head of house..


Where the problem lies is that in that situation, some men just relax and become lazy.

Let her see that youre trying . . until you kill ur self. What happens if the man has an accident and can't keep up? Na there you go know the kind woman wey you marry. Sometimes, I advise men to marry when they're broke. E get why

Mikuni:


Let her see that youre trying . . until you kill ur self. What happens if the man has an accident and can't keep up? Na there you go know the kind woman wey you marry. Sometimes, I advise men to marry when they're broke. E get why

It's a different thing if the man is incapacitated due to an illness or accident.

I was talking about cases of job loss

FRANCISTOWN:

See as this one dey use big big grammars dey whine everybody.

In this world we live in and in this civilization. Twenty women wouldn't take a flinch in attaching themselves to that one rich man.

Any lady who picks the guy who only but gets by would hypothetically regret and prolly rescind her decision in less than a month.

Women are constantly weighin' their choices. They always think a better man would come for them regardless of who they are with at the moment. Yeah! They always think they deserve a better man.

This is the gospel truth, and it is as crystal clear as the biblical's mene mene tekel urpharsin.

Reality right here, and not some Nollywood inveigled reasoning.

Another rant from a self-proclaimed expert on women.
Please, do go on, I'm fascinated by your caveman like understanding of relationships and your impressive collection of stereotypes.

Providing is not your job. What is your job? You're an adult, it is not anybody's responsibility to feed you. It is your primary responsibility to guarantee what you put in your mouth. You think having a vagina shields you from that responsibility? What then is your use?
Sex? An escort cleaner than you can provide that even better. Chores? A maid more diligent can you can provide that even better. Childbirth? A lady with better reproductive system can do that better than you. What do you think will make a man chain himself for life to serving you? Let me tell you what it is: it is if he knows you're in with him 100%. That when he falls into hardtimes, someone has his back, no mater how long it is. Not this "it is not my responsibility, i can only support" bullcrap. Cos merely supporting means you are not an active participant and would withdraw when things go bad.
Yet you want a man that would love you unconditionally, funny delusional lots.

1Sharon:


Are you now trying to imply men and women are the same? Are you a modern man?

Look, it's not a woman's role to provide for a man, we can support. Providing is not our job.

wonder233:
Providing is not your job. What is your job? You're an adult, it is not anybody's responsibility to feed you. It is your primary responsibility to guarantee what you put in your mouth. You think having a vagina shields you from that responsibility? What then is your use?
Sex? An escort cleaner than you can provide that even better. Chores? A maid more diligent can you can provide that even better. Childbirth? A lady with better reproductive system can do that better than you. What do you think will make a man chain himself for life to serving you? Let me tell you what it is: it is if he knows you're in with him 100%. That when he falls into hardtimes, someone has his back, no mater how long it is. Not this "it is not my responsibility, i can only support" bullcrap. Cos merely supporting means you are not an active participant and would withdraw when things go bad.
Yet you want a man that would love you unconditionally, funny delusional lots.

Providing isn't our job too .... Except there are kids involved..

Yes love for men is conditional based on what you have to offer, old tale. Why do you think alot of men are workaholics.

QuinModah:
It is only a shameless and irresponsible man that would allow a woman to feed him for good 6months .

These are some of the Sample(Insults) you will get as a man by the 2nd day of being fed.

What if the man had an accident, and recovery would take up to 2yrs?

advanceDNA:



All Women prefer the parasitic life ......anything slightly or significantly different from it is not ideal to them....even if its 1% they are bringing to the table..they will remind u of how they have been feeding you....

The only time a woman is happy investing in her family is when the man is not longer there.... as long as the man is still in the picture, any money shes spending even for her self or her own child is like u are making her suffer.....

Oga, stop surrounding yourself with leeches and stop generalising ur awful experiences with "ebina" you and ur goons are parading as girlfriends.


Several wives are out there, helping their men financially to succeed

Botragelad:

Another rant from a [b]self-proclaimed expert[/b]on women.
Please, do go on, I'm fascinated by your caveman like understanding of relationships and your impressive collection of stereotypes.

Where and when did I say I am expert at women affairs?
I only know one thing about women, and that one thing I know is : NOTHING GOOD CAN EVER COME OUT OF A 21ST CENTURY WOMAN, EXCEPT KIDS OR SHE'S A RELATIVE.

My peace I leave with you.
Have a good morning.

FRANCISTOWN:


Where and when did I say I am expert at women affairs?
I only know one thing about women, and that one thing I know is : NOTHING GOOD CAN EVER COME OUT OF A 21ST CENTURY WOMAN, EXCEPT KIDS OR SHE'S A RELATIVE.

My peace I leave with you.
Have a good morning.

Yeah, you're a real expert at being wrong about women! Good job, champ! You must be so proud of your amazing ability to stereotype. Keep it up.

Fiscus105:


Several wives are out there, helping their men financially to succeed

Men who allow women (except for relatives) to help them financially are a disgrace to manishnness. They should be publicly executed, because it's better to allow the devil help you financially than take financial help from a woman.

Even if I went broke(which can never be). And there's the Devil who is as bad as what people paint him to be.

Worst case scenario, I'd gladly shake hands with the devil in a brotherly love than receive a dime from women.

Botragelad:

Keep it up.

Advice successfully taken.
Adíos.

FRANCISTOWN:

Men who allow women (except for relatives) to help them financially are a disgrace to manishnness. They should be publicly executed, because it's better to allow the devil help you financially than take financial help from a woman.

Even if I went broke(which can never be). And there's the Devil who is as bad as what people paint him to be.

Worst case scenario, I'd gladly shake hands with the devil in a brotherly love than receive a dime from women.

Abi ooo, comming from a single guy who is leaving in dream.

It's early morning of Monday morning.

Bye

Botragelad:

The timeless classic - the "all women are parasites" trope.

Let's start with the obvious: women are not a monolith. They have different preferences. To imply that all women prefer a "parasitic life" is to ignore the diversity of human experience. It's like saying all men are identical robots, which is clearly not the case. Does your mom prefer a parasitic life?

But, for the sake of argument, let's assume that women do prefer a "parasitic life." Wouldn't that mean that they're, you know, actually contributing to society in meaningful ways? Like, say, raising children, managing households, and working outside the home? Oh wait, those things are actually valuable and important.

And then you went with the 1% argument. Ah yes, because clearly, women's contributions are only worth acknowledging if they're above some arbitrary threshold. Tell that to the single mothers working multiple jobs to feed their families or the women who are the sole breadwinners in their households.

How about women who fought for girls' education and became a Nobel laureate? The ones run their own businesses, raise their own children, and contribute to their communities, how about that?

The next time you try to make a point, please leave the sexism and misogyny at the door. Makes you sound ignorant!

Are you really a bot tho? Because you take is really sound like when a prof writes. Lol

wonder233:
Providing is not your job. What is your job? You're an adult, it is not anybody's responsibility to feed you. It is your primary responsibility to guarantee what you put in your mouth. You think having a vagina shields you from that responsibility? What then is your use?
Sex? An escort cleaner than you can provide that even better. Chores? A maid more diligent can you can provide that even better. Childbirth? A lady with better reproductive system can do that better than you. What do you think will make a man chain himself for life to serving you? Let me tell you what it is: it is if he knows you're in with him 100%. That when he falls into hardtimes, someone has his back, no mater how long it is. Not this "it is not my responsibility, i can only support" bullcrap. Cos merely supporting means you are not an active participant and would withdraw when things go bad.
Yet you want a man that would love you unconditionally, funny delusional lots.

You sound bitter, frustrated and broke. If you had the capacity to provide , you won't be
making statements and excuses like this. Remember what your loving Bible says about men that don't provide. If you believe that an escort and cleaner, can do all those things better than a wife, Alaye don't marry!

Go and get a maid, escort and cleaner
No be by force.

Fiscus105:



Oga, stop surrounding yourself with leeches and stop generalising ur awful experiences with "ebina" you and ur goons are parading as girlfriends.


Several wives are out there, helping their men financially to succeed

Yawn

Fiscus105:



Abi ooo, comming from a single guy who is leaving in dream.

Coming from a married man who looks up to his wife financially.
I hope you've washed you wife's underpants or else there will be no food for you this night.

You dey vex say men don wise up? Sorry o, aunty, this broke shaming tactics don cast, e no dey work again. Go and get a job. No free food for lazy woman

1Sharon:


You sound bitter, frustrated and broke. If you had the capacity to provide , you won't be
making statements and excuses like this. Remember what your loving Bible says about men that don't provide. If you believe that an escort and cleaner, can do all those things better than a wife, Alaye don't marry!

Go and get a maid, escort and cleaner
No be by force.

wonder233:
You dey vex say men don wise up? Sorry o, aunty, this broke shaming tactics don cast, e no dey work again. Go and get a job. No free food for lazy woman

I hear ya.

wonder233:
I'm not kidding. My wife that we dated for four years, went and spent night with another guy just four months into the marriage.

1Sharonpost=130398317:


You sound bitter, frustrated and broke. If you had the capacity to provide , you won't be
making statements and excuses like this. Remember what your loving Bible says about men that don't provide. If you believe that an escort and cleaner, can do all those things better than a wife, Alaye don't marry!

Go and get a maid, escort and cleaner
No be by force.

Can u help me with 3k pls?

Proserpina:
The only thing I learnt on this thread is never argue with someone better than you at English

I like how that one retracted without being told

So na English dey pay your bills?

Fishlips!!!😡

Go and hustle and bring money jare!!!

Exactly my point. and she was reasoning like you. She was angry that she had to work same as me, so she decided to sleep with a guy out of spite. So I parted ways with her.
Now I'm with someone who shares same values as me. So, this screenshot actually makes my point contrary to what you thought it would do.

1Sharon:


I hear ya.