Enzo riding the bench when Andrey Santos returns will be fun

100m garbage losing possession anyhow on the pitch

popizaino:



The error even started from attack as soon as Enzo missed that final third pass from a shooting chance,i knew something was up.

Thank God lavia will be back after international break

popizaino:



The final third pass that he missed was the turnover Crystal Palace scored from.

Painful to watch Enzo yesterday.

drisham:
Goals scored this season
City-9
L'pool-7
Chelsea-7


They are 1 and 2 on the table

We are 11th

same way guys counted goals last year, not looking at the games where we scored and when we didn't score. You cannot be scoring four goals from different players in one game and none in another game because we don't have a consistent goalscorer leading the team

airmark:


This is how some idiots were shouting that Jackson scored 14 non-penalty goals last season, so he was impressive. They didn't consider the number of matches he played, his xG was the highest in the league and that he boosted his tally with easy goals he scored against a 9-man Spurs.

Chelsea failed to score against City and only scored 1 against a Crystal palace team that West Ham scored twice at Crystal Palace ground. This important info didn't reflect in the nonsense list you copied or you drafted. Mumus will be attracted to the post with glee, as they only think with their d*cks.

Data shouldn't be given to fools, they will use them foolishly.

my guy you read my mind

airmark:


This is how some idiots were shouting that Jackson scored 14 non-penalty goals last season, so he was impressive. They didn't consider the number of matches he played, his xG was the highest in the league and that he boosted his tally with easy goals he scored against a 9-man Spurs.

Chelsea failed to score against City and only scored 1 against a Crystal palace team that West Ham scored twice at Crystal Palace ground. This important info didn't reflect in the nonsense list you copied or you drafted. Mumus will be attracted to the post with glee, as they only think with their d*cks.

Data shouldn't be given to fools, they will use them foolishly.

you did not tell us that the havertz who has now become one of your reference point missed this

Omoluabi16:
I'm convinced Todd boehly is running Chelsea not for football reasons, but for other reasons. E fit be money laundering self. Jackson signed till 2033??

I want to believe this.

Gucciboy:
Enzo riding the bench when Andrey Santos returns will be fun

100m garbage losing possession anyhow on the pitch

You people just talk anyhow. Can your andrey play CB?

Gucciboy:


Painful to watch Enzo yesterday.

Enzo played CB. You are ungrateful

airmark:


This season, Chelsea are the only team that didn't score City in Epl. Newcomers, Ipswich, even scored them.

Maresca would slap idiocy from your body if he sees the stupid defence you want to do for your wasteful striker. You think he was jubilating by collapsing on his knees after witnessing that Jackson's miss, right?

Meanwhile, is conceding 2 goals by Chelsea no more a sure banker again?

I saw Jackson and Felix refusing to pass to each other tit for tat on two occasions to score. Nkunku refusing to Palmer. The team is not united

drisham:
Goals scored this season
City-9
L'pool-7
Chelsea-7


They are 1 and 2 on the table

We are 11th

Torture data long enough and it will confess to anything, what this stat doesn't show is that 6 out of those goals came in 1 game and we failed to score in another.

lordfalcao:
you did not tell us that the havertz who has now become one of your reference point missed this

It's so terrible that a goal scored by Havertz, our main striker couldn't score it. Obviously, Jackson may only score a tap in, sometimes he fumbles it.

airmark:


Every angle is tight when the keeper is in front of a striker with no 'goal sense'.

When Harvetz was in your team na daily complaints too until he left you are now using him as example

Shows how confused you are

milann:
I saw Jackson and Felix refusing to pass to each other tit for tat on two occasions to score. Nkunku refusing to Palmer. The team is not united

Madueke as well in the first half, at least twice. Everyone, I think, was trying to recreate the 6-2 thing. But I am not worried. I still consider it a tactical issue that will be resolved with more playing time. IMaresca has got to get everyone thinking on the ball like Palmer, and we'll be a different team for it.

On another day, with right choices, the game ends 4-0, and all these ninjahs foaming in the mouth will move to the back of the class.

raumdeuter:


When Harvetz was in your team na daily complaints too until he left you are now using him as example

Shows how confused you are

It means Jackson is terrible, for Havertz to even be considered better in front of goal.

Meanwhile today on Dovbyk and Guirassy watch.

These are the strikers that were recommended to us to be bought about 200 times

Only a blind football analyst, won't see where our major problem lies.


Frank Lampard: "In terms of where Chelsea are at, Maresca mentioned that, he's right that they're not the same team that won the Champions League.

I was there 18 months ago, and at that point it was at a really low point from my point of view because it didn't feel like the club that had been very successful for 20 years and a lot of that was sort of environment, and getting things right.

So I feel like they're on the curve on the way up. But there will be good days and bad days, I think, because of the squad, but I think there is a lot of talent and if they can keep improving, especially at the top end of the pitch, they can give teams a lot of problems."

airmark:


It means Jackson is terrible, for Havertz to even be considered better in front of goal.

How many goals did Kai Harvetz score this season and last season in the league and how many did Nicholas Jackson score

nateevs:
Meanwhile today on Dovbyk and Guirassy watch.

These are the strikers that were recommended to us to be bought about 200 times

This is not possible

Ah ah

Can you help us check for Sesko and Belotti

So we can compute

Nicholas Jackson goals on one side and Sesko+Dovbyk + Belotti + Scamacca + Guirassy one the other side

raumdeuter:


How many goals did Kai Harvetz score this season and last season in the league and how many did Nicholas Jackson score

How many big chances were given to both and how many did they miss?

Will Arsenal swap Jackson with Havertz? Will you advise your team to exchange that old Kane for your great Jackson?

airmark:


How many big chances were given to both and how many did they miss?

Will Arsenal swap Jackson with Havertz? Will you advise your team to exchange that old Kane for Jackson?

Arsenal a free scoring side but somehow their top striker is not given chances

We have Kane and don't need another striker

nateevs:
Meanwhile today on Dovbyk and Guirassy watch.

These are the strikers that were recommended to us to be bought about 200 times

Baba, leave all these fukefuke points you are trying to make, to those with little knowledge of football like Lordfalcao and Raumdeuter.

There was a season Kane didn't score for like 2 months at the beginning, but still won the golden boot.

Also, i hope you weren't one of those that were hurriedly mocking Haaland for scoring just 1 goal in his first 4 Epl matches for Man City.

Fofana injured for 2 months.

Never mind; unreliable source.

NinjaMetahuman:
Fofana injured for 2 months.

Disaster in.

When i asked this some weeks back some people say na hate

raumdeuter:
Is Fofana already injured or he's waiting for season to start

raumdeuter:


When i asked this some weeks back some people say na hate

lol hater.

My source is not reliable yet.

timbros:


Airmark is terrible.

In a bid to discredit Jackson, this is the Havertz goal he is comparing to Jackson.

Is there any way in this world that the two sequence is remotely similar? Look at the distance to goal the keeper came out that made it possible for Havertz to lob him. Look at the angle. Havertz came in centrally so he can pick a spot to lob. How can Jackson do the same from that tight angle? Havertz had no one marking him, literally. Look at the defender breathing down Jackson's neck, making life difficult for him.

But no, Airmark must come and disgrace himself because it's Jackson matter.

Worst part is that in that same match, Havertz have same or even better chance than Jackson to put us 2-1 ahead but he missed it. Come to our thread and see how most of us were complaining about that missed chance in our thread

But Airmark won't see that one. It doesn't fit his agenda

airmark:


Baba, leave all these fukefuke points you are trying to make, to those with little knowledge of football like Lordfalcao and Raumdeuter.

There was a season Kane didn't score for like 2 months at the beginning, but still won the golden boot.

Also, i hope you weren't one of those that was hurriedly mocking Haaland for scoring just 1 goal in his first 4 Epl matches for Man City.

Sir, on a good day, you won't find me with fukefuke points. And certainly will not catch me referencing Halaand at all times, as nothing else but generational talent, regardless of the season he's having.

The central point I am making is that, if we want to go silly analysis on a striker that plays for us because they missed chances, then all those who have been recommended previously as better output strikers be subject to the same fukefuke analysis.

We have devolved into a cult where Jackson's every touch is scrutinised for days, even when he's got 3 G/A already in the season. Meanwhile the others that were recommended to be better have not scored a goal in 4 games but it's okay to make excuses for them, yet call others names for supporting our own?

This is analysis?

Jodera:

Worst part is that in that same match, Havertz have same or even better chance than Jackson to put us 2-1 ahead but he missed it. Come to our thread and see how most of us were complaining about that missed chance in our thread

But Airmark won't see that one. It doesn't fit his agenda

There's a reason Havertz is not in our team again. Jackson shouldn't be leading our attack too. They are birds of a feather only that Havertz is not completely useless in 1v1 as Jackson.

Will you give us Havertz and take Jackson?

. Things learnt from the weekend.
1. Fofana and colwill's partnership.
Improvement from both of them, colwill is no longer shying away from going close and physical on strikers, saw good examples of it when he was sticking to mateta in the first half. His passing out from the back also helped in breaking presses by palace.
Fofana is gradually getting back to his level, his defending of the right channels and carrying is improving almost every match. He is still not at his best physically but that is expected for someone that was out for a year.

2. Selfishness of players
If the rest of Chelsea's attackers could be as selfless as Palmer in the attacking third, we would have scored at least 2 more goals yesterday. Jackson, Madueke Felix and Nkunku were all guilty of going for glory when passing the ball would have resulted in an easier opportunity to score. I hope Maresca will sort that out soon as you don't have to be on the score sheet to have a good game.

3. Defensive issues
Defensive issues continue but interestingly they are not as a result of the defenders.
Tracking back and pressing from the front, space in the middle and tactical fouls are things that should be improved on. There were many situations yesterday that defenders had to make last ditch tackles as a result of these three things mentioned above.

4. Striker
Adding a striker with a different profile to Jackson should have been one of the priorities for the season. Chasing the game yesterday and I just had this feeling that we need a box 18 striker.

nateevs:


Sir, on a good day, you won't find me with fukefuke points. And certainly will not catch me referencing Halaand at all times, as nothing else but generational talent, regardless of the season he's having.

The central point I am making is that, if we want to go silly analysis on a striker that plays for us because they missed chances, then all those who have been recommended previously as better output strikers be subject to the same fukefuke analysis.

We have devolved into a cult where Jackson's every touch is scrutinised for days, even when he's got 3 G/A already in the season. Meanwhile the others that were recommended to be better have not scored a goal in 4 days but we can make excuses for them, yet call others names for supporting our own?

This is analysis?

The difference is, we watched Jackson's full season at Chelsea and we all saw how he was abysmal in front of goal. Hence, the call for his upgrade, so that our club won't continue to sink.

But you mocking outputs of strikers that just joined new clubs in their first 3 matches, reeks of desperation that should have come from Lordfalcao, Raumdeuter as their bodies have been riddled with Ls.

No dey fall my hand Egbon.

airmark:


The difference is, we watched Jackson's full season at Chelsea and we all saw how he was abysmal in front of goal. Hence, the call for his upgrade, so that our club won't continue to sink.

But you mocking outputs of strikers that just joined new clubs in their first 3 matches, reeks of desperation that should have come from Lordfalcao, Raumdeuter as their bodies have been riddled with Ls.

No dey fall my hand Egbon.

If Chelsea had bought them won't Chelsea be a new club to them too?

And what new club did Sesko join

airmark:


There's a reason Havertz is not in our team again. Jackson shouldn't be leading our attack too. They are birds of a feather only that Havertz is not completely useless in 1v1 as Jackson.

Will you give us Havertz and take Jackson?

Boss, as for the bolded, I can't say.

When Havertz was playing at Chelsea, he was one of the players I normally troll here— from his style of play to his finishing— it was so worst cos I knew how many chances this guy misses on per basis. The only thing I knew he was good at was heading balls.
I knew how I wailed endless when we bought him. He's someone I wouldn't touch with a 6 foot pole normally even if given for free

I'm shocked he started giving returns in terms of goalscoring (for us). If Havertz can do it for us and I can calm down a bit, I don't think I would really say no to Jackson.

Tbh, with a straight swap between Havertz and Jackson, I won't outrightly say no