lordfalcao:
Penny wise , pound foolish of osihmen agent.

popizaino:



That defensive philosophy is why the UCL still eludes them.

airmark:


The difference is, we watched Jackson's full season at Chelsea and we all saw how he was abysmal in front of goal. Hence, the call for his upgrade, so that our club won't continue to sink.

But you mocking outputs of strikers that just joined new clubs in their first 3 matches, reeks of desperation that should have come from Lordfalcao, Raumdeuter as their bodies have been riddled with Ls.

No dey fall my hand Egbon.

nateevs:


Idiots altogether. Him and his agent.

Thazard:
I don't understand you guys.

Can you take a paycut to join a popular company?

EmmanuelScott1:


You don't understand how loan works. Sterling is on loan at arsenal, and Chelsea is covering half of his wages. Osimhen agent said "no loan". If Osimhen accepted the loan offer from Chelsea, the salary he's earning in Napoli will still be intact. How it's payed will be Chelsea and Napoli matter.

The paycut was when Chelsea included obligation to buy because his agent rejected the initial dry loan offer.

airmark:


Baba, leave all these fukefuke points you are trying to make, to those with little knowledge of football like Lordfalcao and Raumdeuter.

There was a season Kane didn't score for like 2 months at the beginning, but still won the golden boot.

Also, i hope you weren't one of those that were hurriedly mocking Haaland for scoring just 1 goal in his first 4 Epl matches for Man City.

nateevs:


Idiots altogether. Him and his agent.

Thazard:
I don't understand you guys.

Can you take a paycut to join a popular company?

Thazard:



Would lewandoski in his prime accept a loan deal with an obligation for purchase?

airmark:


There's a reason Havertz is not in our team again. Jackson shouldn't be leading our attack too. They are birds of a feather only that Havertz is not completely useless in 1v1 as Jackson.

Will you give us Havertz and take Jackson?

Thazard:



Would lewandoski in his prime accept a loan deal with an obligation for purchase?

izzou:


The guy is more confused than the agent sef.

He refused to collect paycut. I understand

Oya join the employer that was willing to pay double. He still refused.

nateevs:


Idiots altogether. Him and his agent.

WhoDeyHause:

There were some reports saying Al ahli backed out of the deal because they asked for extra 5m to be added after first agreeing a fee, he hadn't agreed to move yet though, he was probably waiting for us to increase the salary offer while Al ahli 's was the alternative but unfortunately them too wise, I don't know why some of these twitter influencers are acting as if somebody died, most na fake love sha, if he goes to turkey and destroys their league with at least 25 goals he would surely see suitors again by next year.

lordfalcao:
all this gra gra to go on loan.

Why not go to Saudi. If you can’t agree to Chelsea offer

WhoDeyHause:

There were some reports saying Al ahli backed out of the deal because they asked for extra 5m to be added after first agreeing a fee, he hadn't agreed to move yet though, he was probably waiting for us to increase the salary offer while Al ahli 's was the alternative but unfortunately them too wise, I don't know why some of these twitter influencers are acting as if somebody died, most na fake love sha, if he goes to turkey and destroys their league with at least 25 goals he would surely see suitors again by next year.

izzou:


The guy is more confused than the agent sef.

He refused to collect paycut. I understand

Oya join the employer that was willing to pay double. He still refused.

kingBolton:

Deal that Napoli scattered ??

izzou:


Do you know how many forwards are in Gala?

I don't even understand what he wants.

Napoli was never going to play him.

Do you want money? Go to Saudi
Do you want playtime? Go to Chelsea.

What is hard here?

EmmanuelScott1:


I thought we're talking about salary, lol

Chelsea first offered a dry loan, his agent talk shit about it.

Chelsea second offer was a loan and obligation to buy, which he still rejected.

At the end of the day, he's till going on loan. Lmaoo 😂

First, no player is bigger than a loan.

2nd, don't compare lewandoski with Osimhen.

EmmanuelScott1:


You don't understand how loan works. Sterling is on loan at arsenal, and Chelsea is covering half of his wages. Osimhen agent said "no loan". If Osimhen accepted the loan offer from Chelsea, the salary he's earning in Napoli will still be intact. How it's payed will be Chelsea and Napoli matter.

The paycut was when Chelsea included obligation to buy because his agent rejected the initial dry loan offer.

EmmanuelScott1:


Osimhen never gave the green light for the Saudi move. If he did, the Saudis would have offered that unverified €5 million if they really wanted him.

Saudis already agreed the deal with Napoli and was waiting for Osimhen to say go on, but he didn't.

WhoDeyHause:

They should have decided on what they wanted before the deadline day truly, hopefully this will teach them a lesson, na mostly wingers gala get though abi na egbon icardi wan bench Osimhen? E wan tear acl be that.

izzou:


That is why i am asking if football is a side hustle for him.

You want money, you do anything to pursue it.

You want playtime, you do anything to pursue it.

How can a player who is in his prime choose to train alone for the next 6 months, just because he wants the same salary?